A Fuzzy Multi-objective Optimization Model in Sustainable Supply Chain Network Design Considering Financial Flow
محورهای موضوعی : Fuzzy Optimization and Modeling JournalSeyed Hesamoddin Motevalli 1 , Adel Pourghader Chobar 2 , Maryam Ebrahimi 3 , Raheleh Alamiparvin 4
1 - Department of Future Studies, Eyvanekey University, Semnan, Iran
2 - Department of industrial engineering, Qazvin branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
3 - Department of Information Technology Management, Islamic Azad University, Electronic Branch, Tehran, Iran
4 - Department of Industrial Engineering, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran
کلید واژه: Fuzzy Rule-based, Master Planning, Financial Flow, Goal Pprogramming, Fuzzy Multi-objective Solution Methods,
چکیده مقاله :
Integrated and coordinated planning of the main functions of the supply chain (procurement, production and distribution) often leads to economic efficiency and, as a result, more profit for the entire supply chain. On the other hand, the financial flow and the flow of goods and information are crucial and influential flows in any supply chain. In this paper, the main contribution is to integrated planning of procurement, production and distribution for a multi-product supply chain in order to maximize the producer's profit and also minimize the deviations of the producer's financial indicators by considering both the physical and financial flow. In this regard, the studded supply chain includes several suppliers, one producer and several customers. One of the prominent features of the proposed model is the use of mathematical programming to model the financial flow and achieve the producer's financial goals. Since the presented model is a bi-objective one, two fuzzy multi-objective interactive methods, Selim and Ozkarahan (SO) and Torabi and Hassini (TH) can adjust the degree of satisfaction of the objective functions have been applied. Next, the model is optimized using the goal programming method. Finally, the numerical results in optimizing the proposed fuzzy model show the proposed model's efficiency and the high quality of performance and applicability of the proposed model. The core achievement in the numerical results is that the total value of the distribution in the two models is equal. However, the SO method obtains more unbalanced solutions when the decision maker pays more attention to the first objective function.
Integrated and coordinated planning of the main functions of the supply chain (procurement, production and distribution) often leads to economic efficiency and, as a result, more profit for the entire supply chain. On the other hand, the financial flow and the flow of goods and information are crucial and influential flows in any supply chain. In this paper, the main contribution is to integrated planning of procurement, production and distribution for a multi-product supply chain in order to maximize the producer's profit and also minimize the deviations of the producer's financial indicators by considering both the physical and financial flow. In this regard, the studded supply chain includes several suppliers, one producer and several customers. One of the prominent features of the proposed model is the use of mathematical programming to model the financial flow and achieve the producer's financial goals. Since the presented model is a bi-objective one, two fuzzy multi-objective interactive methods, Selim and Ozkarahan (SO) and Torabi and Hassini (TH) can adjust the degree of satisfaction of the objective functions have been applied. Next, the model is optimized using the goal programming method. Finally, the numerical results in optimizing the proposed fuzzy model show the proposed model's efficiency and the high quality of performance and applicability of the proposed model. The core achievement in the numerical results is that the total value of the distribution in the two models is equal. However, the SO method obtains more unbalanced solutions when the decision maker pays more attention to the first objective function.
1. Alinaghian, M., & Goli, A. (2017). Location, allocation and routing of temporary health centers in rural areas in crisis, solved by improved harmony search algorithm. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 10(1), 894-913.
2. Amini Khouzani, M., Sadeghi, A., Daneshvar, A., & Pourghader Chobar, A. (2023). Fuzzy modeling of allocation of financial resources of sustainable projects and Solving with GSSA algorithm. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 19(1), 82-92.
3. Babaeinesami, A., Ghasemi, P., Chobar, A. P., Sasouli, M. R., & Lajevardi, M. (2022). A New Wooden Supply Chain Model for Inventory Management Considering Environmental Pollution: A Genetic algorithm. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 47(4), 383-408.
4. Badell, M., Romero, J., Huertas, R., & Puigjaner, L. (2004). Planning, schedulingand budgeting value-addedchains. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28(1–2), 45–61.
5. Bayanati, M., Peivandizadeh, A., Heidari, M. R., Foroutan Mofrad, S., Sasouli, M. R., & Pourghader Chobar, A. (2022). Prioritize Strategies to Address the Sustainable Supply Chain Innovation Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods. Complexity, 2022.
6. Burke, H., Zhang, A., & Wang, J. X. (2021). Integrating product design and supply chain management for a circular economy. Production Planning & Control, 1-17.
7. Chandra, P., & Fisher, M. (1994). Coordination of Production and distribution planning. European Journal of Operation Research, 72, 503-517.
8. Cohen, A. M., & Sangwon, M. (1991). An integrated plant loading model with economic of scale and scope. European Journal of Operation Research, 50, 266-276.
9. Daneshvar, A., Radfar, R., Ghasemi, P., Bayanati, M., & Pourghader Chobar, A. (2023). Design of an optimal robust possibilistic model in the distribution chain network of agricultural products with high perishability under uncertainty. Sustainability, 15(15), 11669.
10. Ge, H., Goetz, S. J., Cleary, R., Yi, J., & Gómez, M. I. (2022). Facility locations in the fresh produce supply chain: An integration of optimization and empirical methods. International Journal of Production Economics, 249, 108534.
11. Ghasemi, P., Hemmaty, H., Pourghader Chobar, A., Heidari, M. R., & Keramati, M. (2023). A multi-objective and multi-level model for location-routing problem in the supply chain based on the customer’s time window. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 10(3), 412-426.
12. Ghasemi, P., Hemmaty, H., Pourghader Chobar, A., Heidari, M. R., & Keramati, M. (2023). A multi-objective and multi-level model for location-routing problem in the supply chain based on the customer’s time window. Journal of Applied Research on Industrial Engineering, 10(3), 412-426.
13. Goli, A., Zare, H. K., Tavakkoli‐Moghaddam, R., & Sadegheih, A. (2020). Multiobjective fuzzy mathematical model for a financially constrained closed‐loop supply chain with labor employment. Computational Intelligence, 36(1), 4-34.
14. Hahn, G.J., & Kuhn, H. (2012). designing decision support systems for value-based management: A survey and an architecture. Decision Support Systems, 53, 591-598.
15. Hammami, R., Frein, Y., & Hadj-Alouane, A.B. (2009). Astrategic-tactical model for the supply chain design in the delocalization context: mathematical formulation and acasestudy. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 351-365.
16. Horrigan, J. (1966). the determinants of long-term credit standing with financial ratios. Journal of Accounting Research, 4 (Suppl.), 44–62.
17. Huang, C., Chan, F. T., & Chung, S. H. (2022). Recent contributions to supply chain finance: towards a theoretical and practical research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 60(2), 493-516.
18. Jahangiri, M.H., & Cecelja, F. (2014). Modelling Financial Flow of the Supply Chain. Proceedings of the IEEM, 1071-1076.
19. Lai, Y.J., & Hwang, C.L. (1993). Possibilistic linear programming for managing interest rate risk, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 54, 135–146.
20. Longinidis, P., & Georgiadis, M. C. (2011). Integration of financial statement analysis in the optimal design of supply chain networks under demand uncertainty. International journal of production economics, 129(2), 262-276.
21. Mehrani, K., Mirshahvalad, A., & Abbasi, E. (2019). Comparison of the Accuracy of Black Hole Algorithms and Gravitational Research and the Hybrid Method in Portfolio Optimization. International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting, 4(14), 111-126.
22. Mehrani, K., Mirshahvalad, A., & Abbasi, E. (2020). Portfolio optimization using black hole meta heuristic algorithm. Specialty Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5.
23. Melo, M.T., Nickel, S., & Saldanha-da-Gama, F. (2009). Facility location and supply chain management—a review. European Journal of Operational Research, 196(2), 401–412.
24. Najafi-Tavani, S., Sharifi, H., Naudé, P., & Parvizi-Omran, E. (2022). The impact of alternative financial supply chain management practices on supply risk: A relationship quality and buyer relative power perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 100, 112-126.
25. Park, Y.B. (2005). An integrated approach for production and distribution planning in supply chain management, Internat. J. Prod. Res, 43(6), 1205–1224.
26. Patterson, L.J., & Kim, M. (2000). Strategic sourcing: a systematic approach valuation, selection and development. Caps Research, 4, 112-125.
27. Peng, X., Ji, S., Thompson, R. G., & Zhang, L. (2021). Resilience planning for Physical Internet enabled hyperconnected production-inventory-distribution systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 158, 107413.
28. Pirkul, H., & Jayaraman, V. (1998). A multi- commodity, multi plant, capacitated facility location problem: formulation and efficieient heuristic solution. Journal of operation research, 25, 10, 869-878.
29. Romero, J., Badell, M., Bagajewicz, M., & Puigjaner,L. (2003). Integrating budgeting models in to scheduling and planning models for the chemical batch industry. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 42(24), 6125–6134.
30. Rushinek, A., & Rushinek, S.F. (1987). Using financial ratios to predict in solvency. Journal of Business Research, 15(1), 93–100.
31. Sabri, H., & Benita, M. (2000). A moulti objective approach to simultaneous sterategic and operational planning in supply chain design. Omega, 28, 581-598.
32. Sakawa, M., Yano H., & Yumine, T. (1987). An interactive fuzzy satisfying method for multi objective linear-programming problems and its application. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Manand Cybernetics SMC, 17, 654–661.
33. Thevenin, S., Adulyasak, Y., & Cordeau, J. F. (2021). Material requirements planning under demand uncertainty using stochastic optimization. Production and Operations Management, 30(2), 475-493.
34. Torabi, S.A., & Hassini, E. (2008). An interactive possibilistic programming approach for multiple objective supply chain master planning. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 159, 193–214.
35. Vafadar, A., Guzzomi, F., Rassau, A., & Hayward, K. (2021). Advances in metal additive manufacturing: a review of common processes, industrial applications, and current challenges. Applied Sciences, 11(3), 1213.
36. Zhao, L., & Huchzermeier, A. (2015). Operations-finance interface models: A literature review and Framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 10, 1016-1044.
37. Zimmermann, H.J. (1978). Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 45–55.
