Comparisons of Egg Quality Traits, Egg Weight Loss and Hatching Results between Chinese and Mamut Geese Eggs Reared under the Countryside Conditions
محورهای موضوعی : Camel
Y. Akın
1
,
M.F. Çelen
2
1 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Usak University, Usak, Turkey
2 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Usak University, Usak, Turkey
کلید واژه: egg quality, Chinese goose, egg weight loss, hatching results, Mamut goose,
چکیده مقاله :
This study was carried out in order to comparisons of egg quality traits, egg weight loss and hatching results between Chinese and Mamut geese eggs reared under the countryside conditions in Kütahya province. For use in the experiments, eggs have taken from both Mamut and Chinese geese 38-44 weeks old. Animals reared extensive conditions (free-range production system) and were been not any special care or feeding has been applied in addition to the care and feeding in the rearing conditions. Male-female ratio was usually respectively 1/2-4, 1/3-5 in mamut and chinese geese. Laying period of both genotypies is early January, the eggs used in the research were obtained after 4 weeks from the first spawning time. The average egg yield of the flock were 35-40 eggs for each genotypes. Eggs were stored 12-16 ˚C temperature, 70-75% humidity under environment conditions 5-7 days until are put into the incubator. At the end of the research, Mamut geese egg quality criteria of egg weight (g), yolk color value, albumen index (%), eggshell thickness (mm), eggshell weight (g), haugh unit (%), eggshell ratio (%) (P<0,01), shape index (%), yolk index (%) (P<0.01) compare to Chinese geese eggs were found significant as statistical. Same way, Mamut geese egg weight loss (P<0.01) and hatching results of fertility (%), hatching chick weight. (g) (P<0.01), hatching performance (%) (P<0.05) compare to Chinese geese eggs were determined statistical values important. Taken together these results; Mamut geese eggs' can be said egg quality traits, egg weight loss, and hatching results statistically significant compare to Chinese geese eggs.
Akın Y. and Çelen M.F. (2020a). Goose breeding in Aegean region and importance of geese in region culinary culture. Uşak Univ. J. Sci. Natl. Sci. 1, 28-39.
Akın Y. and Çelen M.F. (2020b). Determination of first yield period hatching results of linda geese. Pp. 272-279 in Proc. 2nd Int. Congr. Med. Sci. Biotechnol., Uşak, Turkey.
Akın Y., Çelen M.F. and Karagöz A. (2020c). General Characteristics of Mamut Geese and Assesment of Yield Performance. Beykent University Archives of Healty Science Book, Istanbul, Turkey.
Akın Y. and Çelen M.F. (2020d). The posibilities using of bee pollen powder on breeding Japanese quail rations: I. Effect on performance and hatching egg quality characteristics. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 6(13), 24-34.
Akman M.K. and Yıldırım Z. (1995). Storage of hatching eggs and its effect on hatching results. Pp. 13-15 in Proc. 4th Livest. Nutr. Symp., Konya, Turkey.
Aral Y. and Aydın E. (2007). The economic importance of goose breeding assesment possibility of goose. J. Turkish Vet. Med. Soc. 78(3), 31-38.
Arroyo C.L. (1990). Specific gravity, weight and the percentage of shell, albumen and yolk in goose eggs. Agron. Costarric. 14(1), 99-102.
Arslan C. and Saatci M. (2003). Egg yield and hatchability characteristics of native geese in the Kars region. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 27, 1361-1365.
Bednarczyk M. and Rosinski A. (1999). Comparison of egg hatchability and ın vitro survival of goose embryosof various origins. Poult. Sci. 78, 579-585.
Boz M.A. (2015). Determining the growth, slaughter and carcass traits of natural and artificial incubated geese in intensive conditions. Ph D Thesis. Ondokuz Mayıs Univ., Samsun, Turkey.
Boz M.A., Sarıca M. and Yamak U.S. (2017a). Production traits of artificially and naturally hatched geese in intensive and free‐range systems I. Growth traits. British Poult. Sci. 58(2), 132-138.
Boz M.A., Sarıca M. and Yamak U.S. (2017b). Production traits of artificially and naturally hatched geese in ıntensive and free‐range systems II. Slaughter, carcass and meat‐quality traits. British Poult. Sci. 58(2), 166-176.
Buckland R. and Guy G. (2002). Goose Production. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper, Roma, Italy.
Elibol O. (2009). Embryo development and incubation. Pp. 170-172 in Poultry Science: Breeding, Nutrition, Diseases. Ed., M. Türkoğlu and M. Sarıca, Eds. Bey Ofset Matbaacılık, Ankara. Turkey.
Erişir Z., Akıncı Z. and Poyraz Ö. (1999). Some external and internal quality traits of Turkey eggs. J. Poult. Res. 1(1), 35-39.
FAO. (2020). Live Animals Data. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy.
Faruga A., Jamroz E., Lepek G. and Wojcik A. (1999). The Influence of various factors on the biological value and hatchability of Bilgoraj goose eggs. Pp. 115-119 in Proc. 12th European Symp. Waterfowl, Adana, Turkey.
Golze M. (1991). Four years of use and the right time of hatching result in more hatching eggs and goslings for laying geese. Tierzucht. 45, 524-526.
Gürbüz Y., Yaşar S. and Karaman M. (2003). Effects of addition of the red pepper from 4th harverst to corn or wheat based diets on egg-yolk colour and egg prodution in laying hens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2(2), 107-111.
Haugh R.R. (19370). The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg Poult. Mag. 43, 522-555.
Heiman V. and Carver J.S. (1936). Albumen index as a physical measurement of observed egg quality. Poult. Sci. 15, 141-148.
Karabulut O. (2021). Estimation of external quality characteristics of goose eggs of known breadth and length. Vet. Med. Czech. 66, 440-447.
Karabulut O., Ün H., Çamkerten İ., Garip M. and Bulut G. (2017). The investigations on hatchability in geese in Aksaray region. J. Bahri Dagdas Anim. Res. 6(1), 13-22.
Kırmızıbayrak T., Kuru B.B. and Yazıcı K. (2016). Yield and traits of goose eggs and hatcability traits. Turkiye Klinikleri J. Reprod. Art. Insemin Special Topics. 2(1), 42-47.
Mazanowski A. and Bernacki Z. (2006). Characteristics of reproductive traits and egg traits in graylag goose (Anser anser) crossbreds. Arch. Geflügelk. 70(2), 56-63.
Önk K. (2009). The egg production, growth, slaughter, and carcass characteristics of native geese (Anser anser) raised under local breeding conditions in Kars. Ph D. Thesis. Kafkas Univ., Kars, Turkey.
Peşmen G. and Yönetken A. (2020). Incubation properties of native geese in Turkey. Eskişehir Tech. Univ. J. Sci. Technol. 9(1), 64-68.
Pingel H. (2011). Waterfowl production for food security. Lohmann Inform. 46(2), 32-42.
Poyraz Ö. (1989). The phenotypic correlations among the egg characteristics related with shell quality. Lalahan Livest. Stud. 29(1), 66-79.
Puchajda H., Faruga A. and Siekiera J. (1989). Using bilgoraj geese for two the cycles. Acta Acad. Agric. Olsten. Zootech. 32, 187-193.
Puchajda H., Faruga A., Pudyszak K. and Hrouz J. (1998). Changes in performance of bilgorajskie geese from a closed flock in three consecutive years of laying. Zivocisna Vyroba. 43, 197-201.
Rahn H. and Paganelli C.V. (1989). Shell mass, thickness and density of avian eggs derived from the tables Schönwetter. J. Ornithol. 130, 59-68.
Ramos M., Gonzales O., Avila A., Perez Z., Guash S., Diz M., Puente D. and Toledo E. (1989). Effect of of wiping or washing on the hatching results of goose eggs. Rev. Avic. 33, 163-172.
Reddy P.M., Reddy V.R., Reddy C.V. and Rap P.S.P. (1979). Egg weight, hape index and hatch ability in Khaki Campbell duck egg. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 14, 26-31.
Rosinski A. (2002). Goose production in Poland and Eastern Europe. Pp. 125-37 in Goose production. R. Buckland and G. Guy, Eds. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper, Roma, Italy.
Saatci M., Kırmızıbayrak T., Aksoy A.R. and Tilki M. (2005). Egg weight, shape ındex and hatching weight and ınterrelationships among these traits in Native Turkish geese with different coloured feathers. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 29, 353-357.
Saatçi M., Tilki M., Sarı M. and Şahan Yapıcıer Ö. (2021). Her Yönüyle kaz Yetiştiriciliği. Antalya Kutlu and Avcı Ofset Ltd., Antalya, Turkey.
Saatçi M., Yardımcı M., Kaya İ. and Poyraz Ö. (2002). Some egg properties of geese in Kars city. Lalahan Livest. Stud. 42(2), 37-45.
Selçuk E., Aykurt İ. and Geliyi C. (1983). Goose Breeding. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, General Directorate of Agricultural Affairs,; Ankara, Turkey.
Şenköylü N. (2001). Modern Tavuk Uretimi. Trakya Üniversitesi Basımevi, Tekirdağ, Turkey.
Sharp P.F. and Powell C.K. (1930). Decrease in internal quality of hen’s eggs during storage as by the yolk. Indian Eng. Chem. Res. 22, 909-910.
Soliman F.N.K., Rizk R.E. and Brake J. (1994). Relationship between shell porosity, shell thickness, egg weight loss, and embryonic development in Japanese quail eggs. Poult. Sci. 73, 1607-1611.
SPSS Inc. (2011). Statistical Package for Social Sciences Study. SPSS for Windows, Version 20. Chicago SPSS Inc., USA.
TAGEM. (2018). Poultry Industry Policy Document. WebMD. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr. Accessed Oct. 2020.
Tilki M. and İnal Ş. (2004). Yield traits of geese of different origins reared in turkey I. Hatching traits. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 28, 149-155.
Toth S. (1991). Development of goose for fat liver production part III. Efforts in establishing a synthetic population from Landaise and Hungarian breeds. MS Thesisi. Bulletin of the Univ., Godollo, Hungary.
