In-Between Space, Dialectic of Inside and Outside in Architecture
محورهای موضوعی : Urban DesignAlireza Shahlaei 1 , Marzieh Mohajeri 2
1 - Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Art and Architecture, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran,
Iran.
2 - M.S in Architecture, Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Science and Technology University of Iran, Tehran,
Iran.
کلید واژه: Architectural Space, Outside, Inside, In-Between Space,
چکیده مقاله :
Defining space by dividing it to inside and outside is one of human’s ways to recognize his positionin environment. Architecture is created to response to this need for inside/outside spaces. Design of inside and outsideSpaces and relation between them always has been one of necessities for definition and limitation of human livingspaces, but little attention to relation of this two spatial realms and poor design of transitional spaces between themhas caused to lack of quality in current Iranian architecture. This study aims to explore relation of inside and outside inarchitecture and focus on condition of transition, boundary and connection of those. For achieving this purpose conceptof inside, outside and in-between has been investigated and by exploring cases of this kind of connection (especially inpast and recent Iranian architecture), the aims, approaches, functions and physical forms of in-between spaces has beenpresented. This results and findings can enhance design considerations of in-between spaces especially in architectureof Iran’s big cities. Literature reviewed has shown importance of in-between space design as another kind of space:either inside and outside, neither one of them.
Arnheim, R. (1977). The Dynamics of Architectural Form. Berkley: United States of america: University of California.
Arnheim, R., Zucker W.M, & Watterson J. (1966). Inside and Outside in Architecture: A Symposium. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 25 (1), 3-15
Asadi M.,Tahir M.M., Shabani M.M., & Arjmandi H. (2015). INTRODUCTION TO TRANSITION SPACE IN CONTEMPORARY IRANIAN HOUSING TYPOLOGY. jouranl of social science and humanities, 10(1), 184 - 194.
Bloom, J. (2005). The Spectrum Of Arts: Time And Space In Human Experience Of Art. retrived 27 April 2015, from http://ajourneythroughthearts.com.
Brookes, T. R. (2012). INSIDE / OUTSIDE and the [ inbetween ]. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, School of Architecture.
Collins. (2003). Collins English Dictionary. Great Britain: HaperCollins Publishers.
Ismail, W. H. (2012). Cultural Determinants in the Design of Bugis Houses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,50, 771–780.
Lo, R. (1986). Between Two Worlds: The window and the relationship of inside to outside. Wellington,New Zealand: Victoria University of Wellington.
Maliki, N.Z, Abdullah, A., & Bahauddin, A. (2015). Recalling the Transitional Space: City home and Kampung. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (ISI),170, 605 – 612.
Maragno, G.M., & Roura, H.C. (2010). IMPACTS OF FORM-DESIGN IN SHADING TRANSITIONAL SPACES: THE BRAZILIAN VERANDA. The Prague CESB10 – Central Europe towards Sustainable building conference. prague: Czech Sustainable Building Society.
Mofidi Shemirani, S.M. (2011). The Environmental and Social Manifestation of Islamic-Iranian Urban and Architectural Configuration. International Journal Of Architecture and Urban Development, 1(2) 35-38.
Moore, C. (1974). The Place of Houses. New York: Holt Rhinehart and Winston.
Parsaee, M., Parva, M., & Karimi, B. (2014). Space and place concepts analysis based on semiology approach in residential architecture. HBRC Journal. doi:10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.07.001
Pitts, A. (2013). Thermal Comfort in Transition Spaces. Buildings, 3, 122-142.
Skinner, P. (2013). Reflections on Inside-Outside Space. Design + Research; Project based research in architecture, 2nd International Conference. Melbourne: University of Queensland.
Soleymani, S., Nahanje Y.K., & Sadeghian E. (2011). Recognizing the concept and performance of Iwan in Iranian architecture with a focus on influence on contemporary architecture of Hamedan. International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences. 1(1), 1-3
Tabaeian, S.M., & Einifar, A. (2011). A Study of the Perspectives of Architecturale and Environmental Psychology. International Journal Of Architecture and Urban Development, 1(1), 27-32.
Taleghani, M., Tenpierik, M.,& Van Den Dobbelsteen, A. (2012). The Effect of Different Transitional Spaces on Thermal Comfort and Energy Consumption of Residential Buildings. 7th Windsor Conference: The changing context of comfort in an unpredictable world. London: Network for Comfort and Energy Use in Buildings.
Venturi, R. (1977). Complexity and Contradiction in Architecture. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
