Estimating Pragmatic Competence of EFL Learners' Listening Comprehension via Gricean Cooperative Principles

محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Mohammad Reza Afshar ¹ (Department of Linguistics, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran)
Bahman Gorjian ² (Department of Linguistics, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran)
Elkhas Veysi ³ (Department of Linguistics, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Iran)
Sasan Sharafi ⁴ (Department of Linguistics, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran)
Mansoureh Shekaramiz ⁵ (Department of Linguistics, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran)

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/09/11 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/10/14 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/06/10

کلید واژه: Pragmatic Meaning, Gricean Maxims, Listening comprehension,

چکیده مقاله :

Understanding the pragmatic meanings of the utterances in exchanges is a serious challenge among English language learners. This study aimed to estimate the pragmatic competence of EFL learners’ listening comprehension concerned with cooperative principles (CPs) of TOEFL candidates taking the listening modules. The maxims of quantity, quality, relation, and manner helped test takers uncover the indirect or figurative meanings of the speakers' intended meaning of utterances. The design of the study was exploratory-quantitative and interpretative. The participants were 150 high and low achievers of MA students majoring in TEFL. The research instrument was a 50-item listening test that was randomly selected from the Educational Testing Service (ETS). The participants took the listening test in the fall semester of 2022. Data from the listening test were collected and analyzed via t-test and ANOVA. Findings showed understanding CPs was effective in the learners’ listening performance. Furthermore, results indicated high and low achievers' recognition of quantity and manner principles was significantly different. However, there was no such difference in learners’ comprehension regarding the maxims of quality and relevance. Implications of the study suggest that EFL learners must focus more on the pragmatic meanings of quantity and manner rather than quality and relevance maxims.

منابع و مأخذ:

Ahmed, E.A.M. (2022) The Effects of pragmatics competence in EFL university learners. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 12, 1618-1631. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojapps.2022.1210110

Allami, H., & Aghajari, J. (2014). Pragmatic knowledge assessment in listening sections of IELTS test. Theory and practice in language studies, 4(2), 332-340. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.2.3320-340

Babajani Azizi, D., Ahmadian, M., & Miri, F. (2020). Pragmatic and grammatical awareness in IELTS speaking part 3. International Journal of Research in English Education, 5(2), 82-102. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.5.2.82

Bach, K. (2006). The top 10 misconceptions about implicature. In B. Birner & G. Ward (Eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, 21-30. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.80

Çiftlikli, S., & Demirel, Ö. (2022) The relationships between students’ comprehension of conversational implicatures and their achievement in reading comprehension. Frontier Psychology, 13: 977129, 1-18. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977129

Chiluwa, I. & Ofulu, C. (2014). Pragmatics [Course Guide- ENG432]. The National Open University of Nigeria, School of Arts and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.3.2415

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. R. B. (2017). Research methods in education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2

Darakhshan, A., & Eslami Rasekh, Z. (2016). The effect of metapragmatic awareness, interactive translation, and discussion through video-enhanced input on EFL learners' comprehension of implicature. Applied Research in English, 9(1), 637-664. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v1n1p118

Fraser, B. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6, 167-190. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.6.2.03fra

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation, in P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and semantics, Vol. III: Speech Acts (pp. 133-145). Academic Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700005296

Grice, P. H. (1989). In the way of words. Harward University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031819100064330

Hashemian, M., & Farhang-Ju, M. (2018). Effects of metalinguistic feedback on the grammatical accuracy of Iranian field (in)dependent L2 learners’ writing ability. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2019.62533

Haugh, M. (2002). The intuitive basis of implicature: Relevance theoretic implicitness versus Gricean implying. Pragmatics, 12(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.12.2.01hau

Khalili Sabet, M. & Babaei, H. R. (2017). On the relationship between the IELTS listening and listening in academic English programs. Advances in language and literary studies, 8(2), 170-179. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.2p.170

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008413100023744

Loghmani, Z., Ghonsooly, B. & Ghazanfari, M. (2019). Textual engagement of native English speakers in doctoral dissertation discussion sections.  Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 78-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100851

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2016). Second language research: Methodology and design. (2th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003188414

Matsuoka, Y. (2009). Possible strategies for listening comprehension: Applying the concepts of conversational implicature and adjacency pairs to understand speaker intention in the TOEFL listening section. Accents Asia, 3 (2), 27-56. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1162-1167

Mirzaei, A., Hashemian, M., & Khoramshekouh, A. (2016). L2 learners’ enhanced pragmatic comprehension of implicatures via computer-mediated communication and social media networks. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 19(1), 141-180. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijal.19.1.141

Mulyadi, D., Aimah, S., Arifani, Y., & Singh, C.K. S. (2022). Boosting EFL learners’ listening comprehension through a developed mobile learning application: Effectiveness and practicality. Applied Research on the English Language, 11(3), 37-56. DOI:10.22108/are.2022.130726.1782

Rizaoglu, F. & Yvuz, M.A. (2017). English language learners’ comprehension and production of implicatures. H.U. Journal of Education, 32(4), 817-837. https://doi.org/10.16986/huje.2017027932

Sadock, J. M. (1978). On testing for conversational implicature. In Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantic: Pragmatics (pp. 281–298). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368873_011

Sahraee, R.M. & Mamghani, H.(2012). Validity and reliability assessment of the English language department of science, research, and technology. Quarterly Journal of Educational Measurement, 3(10), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2012.649592

Saul, J. (2002). Speaker meaning, what is said, what is implicated. Nous, 36(2), 228-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0068.00369

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL, 10, 209-231. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209

Spring, C. L., Moses, R., Flynn, M., Steele, S., Joseph, B. D. & Webb, C. (2000). The successful introductory course: Bridging the gap for the non-major. Language, 76(1), 110-122.  https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2000.0124

Taguchi, N. (2002b). An application of relevance theory to the analysis of L2 interpretation processes: The comprehension of indirect replies. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 40, 151-176. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2002.006

Taguchi, N. (2005a). Comprehension of implied meaning in English as a second language. Modern Language Journal, 89, 543-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2005.00329.x

Taguchi, N. (2007c). Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic comprehension in English as a foreign language. TESOL Quarterly, 42, 313-338.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00061.x

Taguchi, N. (2011). Teaching pragmatics: Trends and issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 289-310. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190511000018

Taguchi, N. (2013). Comprehension of conversational implicature. In Taguchi, N., & Sykes, J. M. (2013) (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. (pp. 19-41). John Benjamin Publishing Company.     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.36.03tag    

Verschueren, J. (2016). Contrastive pragmatics. In J. Ostman & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics. (pp. 1-34). John Benjamins.   https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.20.con18

Wang, H. (2011). Conversational implicature in English listening comprehension. Journal of Language teaching and research, 2(5), 1162-1167.   https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1162-1167

Wee, Lian-Hee & Winnie H.Y. Cheung. (2009). An animated and narrated glossary of terms used in Linguistics. Hong Kong Baptist University.   https://doi.org/10.1075/ircl.1.1.24che

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263198224053