Modeling the Limitative Factors of Forage Production Suitability Using GIS (Case Study: Aliabad Rangelands, Lorestan, Iran)

الموضوعات :

Elahe Karami ¹ , Ali Ariapour ² , Hamid Reza Mehrabi ³

1 - M.Sc Student, Department of Rangeland Management, Young Researchers Club, Boroujerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Boroujerd
2 - Assistant Prof., Islamic Azad University, Boroujerd Branch, Boroujerd, Lorestan
3 - Assistant Prof., Islamic Azad University, Boroujerd Branch, Boroujerd, Lorestan

تاريخ الإرسال : 11 الأربعاء , ذو الحجة, 1434 تاريخ التأكيد : 05 الإثنين , ربيع الأول, 1435 تاريخ الإصدار : 05 الإثنين , ربيع الأول, 1435

الکلمات المفتاحية: production, GIS, Available forage, Proper use factor, Palatability, Aliabad,

ملخص المقالة :

This research was conducted to identify the limitative factors of forage productionsuitability in order to achieve the sustainable exploitation of natural ecosystems in AliabadWatershed in Lorestan in 2013. The field measurements have been done through cutting andweighing method to estimate the forage amount, four-factor method to determine the rangecondition, trend scale to specify the orientation and appearance, the plant cover percentmeasurement to categorize the types and desert scroll to separate the land units followed bythe classification. At last, all the digital maps of type, orientation, condition and forageproduction by the help of integration were changed into the final forage production suitabilitymap using specific software ArcGIS 9.3. Results indicate that 6 separated vegetation typeshave been put in the suitability classes of S1, S2 and S3 for the areas of 972 ha (20.02%),3478 ha (71.62%) and 406 ha (8.36%), respectively and no part of the given rangelands wasplaced in non-suitability class (N). Considering the results obtained from final suitabilitymodel of range production in this study, it has been found that high slope was the mostrestricting factor of range suitability. In addition, there were other decreasing factors such aslow percentage of vegetation, overgrazing, early grazing, nonconformity of livestock andrangeland balance and changes of ranges into low-yielding dry lands’ farming as well asforage production. It was concluded that the accuracy, simplicity and quickness can beconsidered as fundamental elements to determine the range suitability using GeographicalInformation System (GIS) which has been addressed in this study.

المصادر:

Ariapour, A., Hadidi. M, Karami, K., and Amiri, F.,
2013. Water Resources Suitability Model by
Using GIS (Case Study: Boroujerd Rangeland,
Sarab Sefid). Jour. Rangeland Science. 3(2): 177-
188. (In Persian).
Arzani, H., 2006. Some aspect of forage quality
assessment. Eight International Conference on
Development of Drylands (8 th ICDD, 25-28,
FEB, 2006, Beijing, China).
Arzani, H., Jangjo, M., Mohtasham Nia, S., Agha
Mohseni Fashami, M., Ahmadi, H., Jafari, M.,
Darvish Sefat, A., and Shahriari, V., 2006. Range
suitability classification for grazing sheep in
central Alborz region, Ardestan, Iran.
Agricultural Techniques and Sciences and
Natural Resources Jour. 1: 273-289. (In Persian).
Amiri, F., Rashid, A., and Shariff, M., 2011. An
Approach for Analysis of Integrated Components
on Available Forage in Semi-Arid Rangelands of
Iran. World Applied Sci. Jour, 12(7): 951-961.
Anonymous, 2011. Effects of service: an
introduction to Forest Organization, Range
Management and Watershed Organization’s
performance, Fourth development plan, Pooneh
Press. (In Persian).
Butler, L. D., Cropper, J. B., Johnson, R. H.,
Norman, A. J., and Shaver, P. L., 1997. The
National Range and Pasture Handbook (NRPH),
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).
Simpo PDF Merge and Split Unregistered Version - http://www.simpopdf.com
Journal of Rangeland Science, 2013, Vol. 3, No. 4 Karami et al. /341
FAO, 1991. Guidelines: Land evaluation for
extensive grazing. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 58.
FAO, Rome, Italy. 170 pp.
FAO, 1993. Guidelines for land use planning. FAO
Development Series, No: 1, FAO, Rome, 96 pp.
Ilanloo, M., 2012. Estimation of soil erosion rates
using MPSIAC models (Case Study Gamasiab
basin). Inter. Jour. Agri. Crop Sci. 4(16): 1154-
1158.
Gholinejad, B., PourBabaei. H., Farajollahi. A., and
Parvane. E., 2012. Assessment and Comparison
of Different Methods for Estimating Forage
Production (Case Study: Rangeland of Kurdistan
Province). Jour. Rangeland Sci. 2(2): 483-489.
(In Persian).
Johnson, C. W., and Gembhart. A. C., 1982.
Predicting sediment yields from sagebrush
rangelands. In proceedings of workshop on
estimating erosion and sediment yield on
rangelands, Tucson, Arizona, March 1981 US
Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Reviews
and Manuals, Western Series, 26: 145-156 pp.
Jung, H.G., 2006. Analysis of forage fiber and cell
walls in ruminant nutrition, Jour. Nutrition, 127:
8105-8135.1987.
Kakolarimi, A., Tamartash. R., Soleymani. K., and
Amini. S. 2009. Range suitability determination
of Lasem rangeland in Haraz for grazing sheep,
Rangeland Jour. 2: 77-288. (In Persian).
Makhdom, M., 2001. Environment evaluation and
planning using GIS, Tehran University Press, 298
Pp. (In Persian).
Mehrabi, H. R., Zeinivand. H., Hadidi. M., 2012.
Site Selection for Groundwater Artificial
Recharge in Silakhor Rangelands Using GIS
Technique. Jour. Rangeland Sci. 2(4): 687-696
(In Persian).
Minor, T., 2002. Range Land Evaluation in Freson
Conty, California, based on livestock carring
capacity modeling using GIS, Proje : County of
freson, California and Agricast, Inc.
Moghadam, M., 1998. Range and range
management, Tehran University. (In Persian).
Mohtasham Nia. S., 2000. Range suitability
determination of semi-steppe rangeland of Fars
province using GIS. Range management thesis,
Natural Resources and Marine Science College,
Tarbiat Modares University. (In Persian).
Wallace. O. C., Qi. J., Heilma. P. and Robin. C. M.,
2003. Remote Sensing and GIS for Cover Change
Assessment in Southeast Arizona. Jour. Range
Management. 56: 402-409.
Paul, T., and Nevada, R., 2001. Remote Sensing of
Range Production and Utilization. Jour. Range
Manage, 54: A77-A89.
PSIAC (Modified Pacific South West International
Agency Committee), 1968. Report of the Water
Management Subcommittee on Factors Affecting
Sediment Yield in the Pacific Southwest Area and
Selection and Evaluation of Measures for
Reduction of Erosion and Sediment Yield. ASCE,
98, Report No. HY12.
SRM (Society for Range Management), 1991. A
Glossary of Terms Used in Range Management,
Third edition, Compiled and edited by the
Glossary Revision Special Committee,
Publications Committee, 1839 York Street,
Denver, CO 80206.
Sour, A., Arzani, H., Feizizadeh, B., Tavili, A., and
Alizadeh, E., 2013. GIS Multi-Criteria Evolution
for Determination of Rangelands Suitability for
Goat Grazing in the Middle Taleghan
Rangelands. International Jour. Agronomy and
Plant Production. 4(7): 1499-1510.
Tueller, P. T., 1982. Remote Sensing Technique for
Range Management, Chapter 12, pp125-140, IN:
Johnson and Sanders (eds.), Remote Sensing
Technique for Resources Management, Soil
Conservation Society of America.
Young, A., 1987. Distinctive Features of Land use
planning for Agroforestry. Soil Survey and land
evolution, 7: 133-140 pp.
Zander, P., and Kachele, H., 1999. Modeling
objectives of land use for sustainable
development. Agricultural Systems, 59: 311-325
pp