Quantitative and Qualitative Responses of Corn 704 Singel-Cross to Different Planting Patterns and Nitrogen Fertilizer Levels

الموضوعات :

Jaber Khordadi Varamin ¹ (Department of Agronomy, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran)
Seyed Mohammad Reza Haj Seyed Hadi ² (Department of Agriculture, Rodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Mohammad Taghi Darzi ³ (Department of Agriculture, Rodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Arash Rozbahaei ⁴ (Department of Agriculture, Rodehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)

تاريخ الإرسال : 27 الأربعاء , رمضان, 1441 تاريخ التأكيد : 26 السبت , ربيع الأول, 1444 تاريخ الإصدار : 12 الخميس , ذو القعدة, 1444

الکلمات المفتاحية: Forage quality, Grain yield, Urea, leaf area index, Regression Analysis, Double row cultivation,

ملخص المقالة :

In this study, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of planting pattern and different amounts of nitrogen on the quantitative and qualitative yield of maize based on split plot design with randomized complete block design in Salmanabad area, Pishva city, Tehran. The factors included planting pattern as the main factor in single-row and double-row cultivation, and the sub-factors were different amounts of urea fertilizer at four levels (zero), 120, 240, and 360 kg urea per ha. First, the highest plant height, ear height from ground level, leaf area index, grain yield, nitrogen percentage of shoot, seed, and soil after harvest, crude protein percentage were obtained by consuming 360 kg urea per ha. Maximum stem diameter, ear diameter, number of rows per ear, number of seeds per row, ear weight per plant, and shoot nitrogen percentage were observed in the single row cultivation method, while maximum plant height, ear height above ground, leaf area index, and crude fiber percentage was reported in the double-row cultivation. In addition, the single row cultivation under the application of 360 kg urea per ha led to the highest number of grain per row and grain yield (34.6 and 13784.6 kg ha-1, respectively) compared to the control treatment increased by 13.5 and 37.4%, respectively. The increasing levels of urea fertilizer indicated a significant increase in nitrogen percentage of seed, shoot, and soil after harvest. Further, the highest mean percentage of shoot nitrogen (1.89%), seed (2.05%), and post-harvest soil (0.13%) was observed under 360 kg urea per ha treatment. Additionally, maximum digestible dry matter (DMD) was obtained in double row cultivation and the use of 360 kg urea per ha with an average of 53.05%, which was 8.55% more than the control treatment. Furthermore, thee highest amount of crude protein was observed in single row culture (19.27%) and the use of 360 kg urea per ha (20.20%). Based on the results, the regression model was significant and 78.54% of the grain yield variations were justified by stem diameter, leaf area index, ear length, and 1000-seed weight. In general, using the methods of single row for grain production and double row for age production cultivation under 360 kg urea per ha yielded the most favorable results.

المصادر:

1. Ahmadi F., Pasari B., Javanheri M., 2020. Study the corn (Zea mays L.) response to the application of various chemical, nano, nano-biological fertilizers and organic extract of seaweed. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 41, 188-203.


2. Dastbandannezhad S., Alavifazel M., Mojadam M., Shokoohfar A. 2020. Response of single-cross 704 maize to application of chemical and biological nitrogen fertilizers and different cultivation patterns under drought stress. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 41, 1-17.


3. Lak Sh., Dashti H., Ebaddoz G., 2016. Assessment water consumption and planting pattern on edaphic soil properties and grain yields of corn in Khuzestan province. Journal of Plant Ecophysiology. 27, 114-126.


4. Bazrafshan F., Fathi G., Siadat A., Ayneband A., Saeid K., 2005. Investigating the effects of planting pattern and plant density on yield and yield components of sweet corn. Agriculture Journal. 28(2), 117-128.


5. Sorensen R.B., Lamb M.C., Butts C.L., 2006. Row pattern, plant density, and nitrogen rate effects on corn yield in the southeastern US. Plant Management Network, Doi: 10.1094/cm. 2006.1211. 01. Rs


6. Behera B.C., Singdevsachan S.K., Mishra R., Dutta S.K., Thatoi H.N., 2014. Diversity, mechanism and biotechnology of phosphate solubilizing microorganism in mangrove-A review. Bio and Agri Bio. 3, 97–110.


7. Haj Seyed Hadi M.R., Abarghooei Fallah M., Darzi M.T., 2015. Influence of nitrogen fertilizer and vermicompost application on flower yield and essential oil of chamomile (Matricaria chamomile L.). Journal of Chemical Health Risks. 5(3), 235-244.


8. Sedghi M., Nemati A., Seyedsharifi R., Gholamhosseini M., 2016. The effect of different levels of nitrogen fertilizer on yield and fertilizer use efficiency of grain corn for different planting dates in Ardabil climate condition. Journal of Crop Production. 9(3), 45-65.


9. Ghobadi R., Shirkhani A., Jalilian A., 2015. Effects of water stress and nitrogen fertilizer on yield, its components, water and nitrogen use efficiency of corn (Zea mays L.) cv. SC. 704. Applied Field Crops Research. 106(28), 79-87.

10.Eivazi A., Habibi F., 2013. Evaluation of nitrogen use efficiency in corn (Zea mayz L.) Varieties. World App Sci J. 21, 63-68.

11. Fazili I.S., Jamal A., Ahmad S., Masoodi J.S., Abdin M.Z., 2008. Interactive effect of sulfur and nitrogen on nitrogen accumulation and harvest in oilseed crops differing in nitrogen assimilation potential. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 31(7), 1203–1220.


12. Molodui A., Ebadi A., Jahanbakhsh S., 2015. Effect of nitrogen application on some characteristics of drought tolerance in spring barley. Journal of Crop Production. 8(3), 95-114.


13. Kazemeini S.A., Naderi R., Karimi Aliabadi H., 2013. Effects of different densities of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) and nitrogen rates on oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) yield. Journal of Ecology and Environment. 36(3), 167-172.


14. Mohammadi V., Rahimi Moghaddam S., 2017. Influence of weed densities and different nitrogen levels on growth indices of corn, red root pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus L.) and Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Agroecology. 9(4), 1084-1098.


15. Niknam N., Faraji H., 2014. Effect of plant density and nitrogen on yield and yield components of maize var. 704. Applied Field Crops Research. 102(27), 54-60.

14.Iqbal S., Khan H.Z., Ehsanullah E., Zamir M.S.I., Marral M.W.R., Javeed H.M.R., 2014. The effects of nitrogen fertilization strategies on the productivity of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 101(3), 249-256.

15. Sharifi M., Mizakhani M., Sajedi A.A., 2012. Effect of nitroxin, nitrogen and manure application on yield, nitrogen use efficiency and some crop characteristics in sweet corn. New Finding in Agriculture. 6(2), 139-149.


16. Wolton W., 2005. Leaf area index and radiation as related to corn yield. Agron J. 65, 459– 461.


17. Kumar P., Pandey S.K., Psingh B., Sinyh S.V., Dineshkumar D., 2007. Effect of nitrogen rate on growth, yield, economics and crisp quality of Indian potato processing cultivars. Potato Research. 50, 143-155.


18. Soleymanifard A., Pourdad S.S., Naseri R., Mirzaei A., 2011. Effect of planting pattern on phonological characteristics and growth indices of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) in rainfed conditions. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences. 13(2), 282-298.


19. Puryousef Zavaydy A., 2013. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus bio chemical and phosphorous fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative yield of sunflower. J Agric Sci. 1, 95-112.


20. Hemmati A., Vazan S., Sadeghi M., Sadeghishoa M., 2012. Effect of pre-planting irrigation, maize planting pattern and nitrogen on grain yield and yield components of maize cv.sc704. Journal of Agronomy and Plant Breeding. 8(2), 21-31.


21. Singh M.D., Chirag G., Prakash P.O., Mohan M.H., Prakasha G., Wajith V., 2017. Nano fertilizers is a new way to increase nutrients use efficiency in crop production. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences. 9(7), 3831-3833.


22. Shakarami G.H., Rafiee M., 2009. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) to planting pattern and density in Iran. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 5(1), 69-73.


23. Falah S., Tadayyon A., 2010. Effects of plant density and nitrogen rates on yield, nitrate and protein of silage maize. Journal of Crop Production. 2(1), 105-121.


24. Bruns H.A., Abbas H.K., 2005. Ultra high plant population and nitrogen fertility effects on corn I the Mississippi Valley. Agron J. 97, 1136-1140.


25. Seyed Sharifi R., Hasani S., Sedghi M., Seyed Sharif R., 2014. Study of effects of integrated biological and chemical fertilizers on fertilizer use efficiency, grain yield and related traits to grain growth of barley (Hordeum vulgaris L.). J Dry Farm. 1, 61- 77.


26. Jafari N., Esfahani M., Fallh A., 2013. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) application, nitrogen and zinc sulphate fertilizer on yield and nitrogen uptake in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Agroecology. 5(4), 492-501.


27. Baghdadi A.S., Balazadeh M., Kashani A., Gilzardi F., 2016. The effect of progesterone treatments and nitrogen levels on the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of silage corn cross silage corn cross 704. Journal of Crop Production. 9(4),103-120.


28. Al-Modares A., Jafarinia M., Hadi M.R., 2009. The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on chemical compositions in corn and sweet sorghum. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 6, 441-446.


29. Saber S., Ghasimihagh Z., Mostafavi Sh., 2013. The effect of nano-titanium mechanism on the physiological processes of spinach plant. Second National Conference and Sustainable Development of Agriculture and Healthy Environment. 1-16.


30. Dolatmandshahri N., Tahmasebi I. 2016. Effect of nitrogen and plant density on silage yield and quality of Maize c.v MV500 as second crop. Journal of Crop Improvement. 18(1), 173-182.


31. Ramazani M., Rezaei Sokht-Abandani R., 2011. The effects of planting density and arrangement on the qualitative indicators Silage maize in the second culture region in Mazandaran. Journal of Crop Physiology. 10, 49-67.


32. Hail Y., Daci M., Tan M., 2009. Evaluation of annual legumes and barley as sole crops and intercrop in spring frost conditions for animal feeding, yield and quality. J Anim Vet Adv. 8(7), 1337-1342.


33. Aslam M., Iqbal A., IbniZamir M.S., Mubeen M., Amin M., 2011. Effect of different nitrogen levels and seed rates on yield and quality of maize fodder. Crop and Environment. 2(2), 47-51.


34. Ayub M., Nadeem M.A., Sharar M.S., Mahmood N., 2002. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) fodder to different levels of nitrogen and phosphorus. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 1(4), 352-354.


35. Budakli Carpici E., Celik N., Bayram G., 2010. Yield and quality of forage maize as influenced by plant density and nitrogen rate. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 15(2), 128-132.


36. Kheirabadi H., Shahsavani S., Basafa M., Gharanjik S., 2012. The amount and timing of foliar urea application effect on maize and forage sorghum proteins. Journal of Chemical Health Risks. 2(3), 9-11.


37. Abayomi Y.A, Adedoyin G.A., 2004. Effects of planting dates and nitrogen fertilizer application on growth and yield of contrasting genotypes of maize (Zea mays L.) I: Leaf growth and its relationship with grain yield. J Agric Res Develop. 3, 83-97.