بررسی رابطه ویژگی‌ها و تخصص هیئت‌مدیره و عملکرد پایداری در شرکت‌های پذیرفته‌شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران

الموضوعات :

سعید پاکدلان ¹ , علیرضا آذربراهمان ² , صالح رفیعی ³

1 - گروه حسابداری، مؤسسه آموزش عالی شاندیز، مشهد، ایران.
2 - گروه حسابداری، مؤسسه آموزش عالی شاندیز، مشهد، ایران.
3 - گروه حسابداری، مؤسسه آموزش عالی شاندیز، مشهد، ایران.

تاريخ الإرسال : 13 الإثنين , ربيع الثاني, 1444 تاريخ التأكيد : 22 الثلاثاء , شعبان, 1444 تاريخ الإصدار : 29 الثلاثاء , شعبان, 1444

الکلمات المفتاحية: مالکیت مدیریتی, استقلال هیئت‌مدیره, عملکرد پایداری, دوگانگی نقش مدیرعامل,

ملخص المقالة :

هدف: گفتمان عملکرد پایداری شرکتی انگیزه فزاینده‌ای را برای شرکت‌ها برای بهبود مزیت رقابتی خود ایجاد کرده است. پژوهش حاضر به دنبال بررسی و آزمون رابطه تخصص و ویژگی‌های هیئت‌مدیره با عملکرد پایداری در شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران است.روش‌شناسی پژوهش: از بین ویژگی‌های هیئت‌مدیره ویژگی‌های دوگانگی نقش مدیرعامل، مالکیت مدیریتی و استقلال هیئت‌مدیره مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل 63 شرکت پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران طی بازه زمانی 1392 الی 1399 می‌باشد. برای آزمون فرضیه‌های پژوهش از روش رگرسیون خطی چندگانه و با استفاده از نرم‌افزارهای ایویوز 10 و اکسل به تحلیل داده‌ها پرداخته شد.یافته‌ها: نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که بین مالکیت مدیریتی، دوگانگی نقش مدیرعامل و استقلال هیئت‌مدیره با عملکرد پایداری رابطه مثبت و معناداری وجود دارد. در حقیقت، در شرکت‌هایی که دارای مالکیت مدیریتی و دوگانگی مدیرعامل، هیئت‌مدیره مستقل هستند، سطح عملکرد پایداری بیشتر است.اصالت / ارزش‌افزوده علمی: به استناد یافته های پژوهش حاضر، فعالان بازارهای مالی باید فعالیت های پایداری و افشای کامل آن در صورت های مالی را موردتوجه جدی تر قرار دهند، سرمایه گذاران نیز در تجزیه‌وتحلیل‌های خود باید ویژگی های هیئت مدیره و کمیته حسابرسی را جهت سرمایه گذاری مدنظر داشته باشند.

المصادر:

Abuzeinab, A., Arif, M., Qadri, Mohd. A., & Kulonda, D. (2018). Green business models in the construction sector: an analysis of outcomes and benefits. Construction Innovation, 18(1), 20–42.

Aksoy, M., Yilmaz, M. K., Tatoglu, E., & Basar, M. (2020). Antecedents of corporate sustainability performance in Turkey: The effects of ownership structure and board attributes on non-financial companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276, 124284.

Bashirimanesh, N., & Vagfi, S. H. (2021). The effect of women's presence on the board of directors on the quality characteristics of financial information of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. Woman in Development & Politics, 19(3), 477-500. [In Persian]

Behnam, S., Cagliano, R., & Grijalvo, M. (2018). How should firms reconcile their open innovation capabilities for incorporating external actors in innovations aimed at sustainable development? Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 950–965.

Bicen, P., Hunt, S. D., & Madhavaram, S. (2021). Coopetitive innovation alliance performance: Alliance competence, alliance’s market orientation, and relational governance. Journal of Business Research, 123, 23–31.

Brick, I. E., & Chidambaran, N. K. (2010). Board meetings, committee structure, and firm value. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16(4), 533–553.

Brockhaus, S., Petersen, M., & Knemeyer, A. M. (2019). The fallacy of “trickle-down” product sustainability. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(9/10), 1166–1190.

Cabral, C., & Sasidharan, A. (2021). Do regulatory mechanisms affect corporate social performance? Evidence from emerging economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 326, 129383.

Ch’ng, P.-C., Cheah, J., & Amran, A. (2021). Eco-innovation practices and sustainable business performance: The moderating effect of market turbulence in the Malaysian technology industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283, 124556.

Chen, H.-L. (2014). Board Capital, CEO Power and R&D Investment in Electronics Firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 22(5), 422–436.

Cuomo, F., Mallin, C., & Zattoni, A. (2015). Corporate Governance Codes: A Review and Research Agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 222–241.

del Río, P., Peñasco, C., & Romero-Jordán, D. (2016). What drives eco-innovators? A critical review of the empirical literature based on econometric methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2158–2170.

Fakoya, M. B., & Nakeng, M. V. (2019). Board characteristics and sustainable energy performance of selected companies in South Africa. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 18, 190–199.

Fang, E. (Er). (2011). The Effect of Strategic Alliance Knowledge Complementarity on New Product Innovativeness in China. Organization Science, 22(1), 158–172.

García-Ramos, R., & García-Olalla, M. (2011). Board characteristics and firm performance in public founder- and nonfounder-led family businesses. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2(4), 220–231.

García-Ramos, R., Díaz-Díaz, B., & García-Olalla, M. (2015). Independent directors, large shareholders and firm performance: the generational stage of family businesses and the socioemotional wealth approach. Review of Managerial Science, 11(1), 119–156.

Garza, F. A. (2013). A Framework for Strategic Sustainability in Organizations: A Three Pronged Approach. Journal of Comparative International Management.

Ghisetti, C., & Rennings, K. (2014). Environmental innovations and profitability: how does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 75, 106–117.

Gupta, S., & Kumar, V. (2013). Sustainability as corporate culture of a brand for superior performance. Journal of World Business, 48(3), 311–320.

Hamid, N., & Purbawangsa, I. B. A. (2022). Impact of the board of directors on financial performance and company capital: Risk management as an intervening variable. Journal of Co-Operative Organization and Management, 10(2), 100164.

Haynes, K. T., & Hillman, A. (2010). The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 31(11), 1145–1163.

Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2006). A Framework for Assessing Corporate Governance Reform. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Ho, J., Huang, C. J., & Karuna, C. (2020). Large shareholder ownership types and board governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 65, 101715.

Hutchins, M. J., Richter, J. S., Henry, M. L., & Sutherland, J. W. (2019). Development of indicators for the social dimension of sustainability in a U.S. business context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 212, 687–697.

Imani, F., & Farhadtoski, O. (2021). The Moderating Role of Family Ownership in the Relationship between Board Characteristics and Risk Disclosure of the Company. 7th International Conference on Management, Accounting and Economic Development. [In Persian]

Jalalianlarki, R., Bavarsad, B., & Alizadeh, S. (2021). Investigating the relationship between green management and economic performance, environmental performance and social performance (a study of companies active in the petrochemical industry). Advances in Finance and Investment, 2(4), 1-32. [In Persian]

Kibert, C. J. (2007). The next generation of sustainable construction. Building Research & Information, 35(6), 595–601.

Klarner, P., Probst, G., & Useem, M. (2019). Opening the black box: Unpacking board involvement in innovation. Strategic Organization, 147612701983932.

Loh, L., & Tan, S. (2020). Impact of Sustainability Reporting on Brand Value: An Examination of 100 Leading Brands in Singapore. Sustainability, 12(18), 7392.

McNulty, T., Zattoni, A., & Douglas, T. (2012). Developing Corporate Governance Research through Qualitative Methods: A Review of Previous Studies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2), 183–198.

Nofsinger, J. R., Sulaeman, J., & Varma, A. (2019). Institutional investors and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 700–725.

Paniagua, J., Rivelles, R., & Sapena, J. (2018). Corporate governance and financial performance: The role of ownership and board structure. Journal of Business Research, 89, 229–234.

Przychodzen, J., & Przychodzen, W. (2015). Relationships between eco-innovation and financial performance – evidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and Hungary. Journal of Cleaner Production, 90, 253–263.

Rashid, A. (2018). Board independence and firm performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Future Business Journal, 4(1), 34–49.

Sadegh Pour, F., Hosseini Masoom, M. R., & Saeidi, H. (2022). The moderating effect of research and development costs on the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance Tehran Stock Exchange companies. Advances in Finance and Investment, 3(7), 1-22. [In Persian]

Shad, M. K., Lai, F.-W., Fatt, C. L., Klemeš, J. J., & Bokhari, A. (2019). Integrating sustainability reporting into enterprise risk management and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208(1), 415–425.

Shariatnia, A., Taherpour Kalantary, H., Jahangiri, A., & Rasouli Ghahroudi, M. (2019). The Effect of Board Characteristics on Quality of Board Processes in State-Owned Companies. Journal of Iranian Public Administration Studies, 2(4), 1-40. [In Persian]

Skripak, S. J., Cortes, A., Walz, A. R., Parsons, R., & Walton, G. (2018). Fundamentals of Business, Second Edition. VT Publishing.

Uribe-Bohorquez, M.-V., Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I.-M. (2018). Board independence and firm performance: The moderating effect of institutional context. Journal of Business Research, 88, 28–43.

Watz, M., & Hallstedt, S. I. (2020). Profile model for management of sustainability integration in engineering design requirements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119155.

Zameer, H., Wang, Y., & Yasmeen, H. (2020). Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: Implications for cleaner production in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119119.

Zhang, M., Zeng, W., Tse, Y. K., Wang, Y., & Smart, P. (2020). Examining the antecedents and consequences of green product innovation. Industrial Marketing Management.