Realization of the ecocity concept considering the effects of urban interchange (overpasses and underpasses): Qazvin city
الموضوعات : Space Ontology International JournalPouria Seyed Mosallaei 1 , Manoucheher Tabibian 2 , Seyed Mohammadreza Khatibi 3
1 - Department of Urban Planning, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
2 - Department of Urban Planning and Design, Fine Arts Faculty, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Urban Planning, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: Ecocity, Interchange, Overpasses, Underpasses, Qazvin,
ملخص المقالة :
All cities, especially megacities in developing economies, are facing undesirable conditions in terms of environmental health and people's quality of life. In this regard, one of the solutions that was considered to solve these challenges is the concept of Ecocity. Creating and developing residential patterns suitable for sustainable cities, emphasizing the positive effects of an environmentally friendly transportation system, is one of the main goals of Ecocity. On the other hand, the construction of interchange, like any urban project, has many effects on different aspects of the city and the lives of citizens. The main purpose of this research is to investigate the effects of constructing interchange in relation to ecocity goals. In this research, five main dimensions of environment and resources, transport, economic, socio-cultural and perceptual-visual were considered for an ecocity. Nine interchange in Qazvin city were investigated in relation to the fulfillment of the mentioned 5 dimensions and their sub-indices. The research method is field research, survey and indirect documentary. At first, the criteria were weighted by 15 professors of transportation and environment therefore, a coefficient was considered for each criterion. In the next step, the opinions of 20 experts (informed about the status of the examined intersections) and then 384 citizens were collected and ranked using AHP. All data were evaluated with Friedman's test and finally multiplied by the coefficient obtained in the previous step. Results showed that Shahid Rajaei Intersection scored the highest in terms of achieving the goals of the Ecocity. Regarding the scores, overpasses have scored better than underpasses in achieving ecocity goals. Furthermore, highest level of realization of an Ecocity goals in relation to the construction of interchange in Qazvin city, has been in the perceptual-visual aspects and the lowest level of realizability belongs to the dimension of environment and resources. In general, the construction of interchange in Qazvin city is not in line with the realization of an Ecocity and is far from it.
An, Sarkar, (2016). Eco-Innovations in Designing Ecocity, Ecotown and Aerotropolis, Journal of Architectural Engineering Technology, 5: 1- 5.
Atkinson, A. (2007). “Cities after oil – 1: ‘sustainable development’ and energy futures”, City, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 201-213.
Boone Christopher G. (2006). City and Environment, US: Temple University Press, translated by Manouchehr Tabibian, 2010, University of Tehran. (In Persian)
Datta, A. (2012). India’s Ecocity? Environment, Urbanization and Mobility in the Making of Lavasa. Environment and Policy: Government and Policy, 30, 982–996.
Deng, W., Cheshmehzangi, A., Ma, Y. and Peng, Z. (2021). Promoting sustainability through governance of eco-city indicators: a multi-spatial perspective, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 16, 61- 72.
Ecocity Builders (2013). The Ecocity Framework. Oakland, Ecocitybuilders Publication.
European Commission (2011). Cities of Tomorrow. Challenges, Visions, Ways Forward, Publications Office of the European Union, Brussels.
Fei, J., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Chen, S., & Zhi, Q. (2016). Towards eco-city: the role of green innovation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.029
Energy Procedia, 104, 165-170
Gaffron, Ph., Huismans, G., Skala, F. (2005) Ecocity: A better place to live, Vienna: Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels AG
Gunawansa, A. (2011). Contractual and Policy Challenges to Developing Ecocities. Sustainable Development, 19, 382–390.
Hoai Nguyen, T. & Huong Thi Vu, G. (2023) Eco-city Paradigm: Urban Planning Towards Sustainable Development Goals, E3S Web of Conferences 403, 01002 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202340301002
Jomehpour, Mahmoud, Ettehad, Seyyede Shabnaz and Nourian, Farshad. (2019). Ecological City of Bojnourd Based on Scenario-based Future Studies, 3(7): 1- 30. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.24765864.1397.3.7.1.5
Jomehpour, Mahmoud, Ettehad, Seyyede Shabnaz and Nourian, Farshad. (2020). Explaining the principles, dimensions and components of the ecological city approach (case study of Bojnourd city), 8(2): 391- 413.
Mersal, A. (2016). Sustainable urban futures: Environmental planning for sustainable urban development. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 34, 49-61.
Mersal, A. (2017). Challenge and Opportunities in transferring a city in to green city. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 37, 22- 33.
Mohammadi Ghafari, Parisa, Al-Madrsi, Seyed Ali & Moradi Abbas, (2022). Measuring and Prioritizing Ecological City Indicators in Urban Development with Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) (Study Case: Bandar Abbas city), Urban Planning Knowledge, 6(1): 58- 70. https://dx.doi.org/%C2%A010.22124/UPK.2022.19232.1668
National Science Foundation, Workshop on Urban sustainability (2000), Towards a Comprehensive Geographical Perspective on Urban Sustainability, Rutgers - The State University of New Jersey.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). OECD Environmental Outlook to 2050: The Consequences of Inaction, available at: www.oecd.org/env/indicators-modellingoutlooks/oecd-environmental-outlook- 1999155x.htm.
Register. Richard, and others, (2008) Eco-City Summit Report, San Francisco.
Roseland, Mark (1997). Eco-City Dimensions: Healthy Communities, Healthy Planet, New Society Publishers.
Roseland, Mark (1997). Dimensions of the eco-city, Cities, 14(4): 197- 202.
Sandoval Hamón, L. A., Bayas Aldaz, C. E., Rodríguez Pomeda, J., Sánchez Fernández, F., Casani F., & De Navarrete, F. (2017). From Ecocity to Ecocampus: Sustainability Policies in University Campuses. Urban Regeneration & Sustainability. Edited by Brebbia, C.A. & Galiano-Garrigos, A., 185–195.
Seyed Mosallaie, P. (2016). Investigating the economic and social effects of constructing Non-level Intersections (underpasses and overpasses) on neighborhoods (Case: Comparison of Shahid Rajaei and Sardaran overpasses with Shahid Motahari and Nasr underpasses), Thesis for M.A. in Urban planning, Qazvin Islamic Azad University, Iran.
Seyed Mosallaie, P., Khastou, M. (2017). Investigating the Social, Economic and Environmental Impacts of Constructing Urban Interchanges (Comparison of the Main Interchanges in the city of Qazvin), Space Ontology International Journal, 6 (3): 37- 57.
Sharifian Barforoush, Seyedeh Shafagh, Mofidi Shemirani, Seyed Majid, (2015). The morphological criteria of Ecocity from the perspective of theorists, Bagh-E Nazar, 11(31): 99- 108.
Tabibian, Manouchehr, (2004). City, sustainability; imagination or inevitable reality, Cultural Research Letter, 8(10): 111- 124. https://ensani.ir/file/download/article/20120514072955-1179-151.pdf
United Nations (2015) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, New York, NY, available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld).
Vasilyeva, E. (2018) Eco-city or “steady city” as the way of improvement of living conditions for urban population, MATEC Web of Conferences 193, 01025, ESCI 2018.
Wang, T., Yuen, B. (2011) Eco-city Planning, Policies, Practices and Design. Singapore: Springer.
Websites:
https://ecocitybuilders.org/
