A Comparative Analysis of Discussion Sections in PhD Dissertations across Cultures, Emphasizing Rhetorical Moves
Nesa Nabifar
1
(
Nesa Nabifar, Ph. D
Islamic Azad University, Tabriz branch
Nesanabifar12@yahoo.com
)
Vida Fathi Bonabi
2
(
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
)
Saeideh Ahangari
3
(
Department of English Language and Literature, Azad University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Key terms: Culture , Cross-cultural Study , Rhetorical Move Analysis, Discussion Sections,
ملخص المقالة :
Abstract
There is a growing recognition of the importance of understanding and addressing the unique linguistic and cultural challenges faced by doctoral students from diverse backgrounds, particularly in the realm of academic writing. By considering this fact, this study delved into the discussion sections of Ph.D. dissertations across diverse linguistic and cultural contexts, focusing on the utilization of rhetorical moves. With an extensive analysis encompassing EFL, ESL, and native English –speaking environments in Iran, India, and English-speaking countries (UK &USA) and based on purposive sampling, a total 0f 300 dissertations were scrutinized. The research adopted a descriptive design to uncover patterns and variations in the discourse structures across the examined contexts. To answer the research questions, Yang and Allison’s (2003) framework was employed. By using SPSS version 21 the whole data was evaluated and Chi-Square data analysis were used to compare the results. The findings showed that although proportionally more rhetorical moves were used by native speakers in comparison to the other two groups, the differences were not found to be statistically different. The results of the present study could help textbook designers, educational planners, material developers, foreign language institutes, teachers, and learners to provide a better context for foreign language learning and improve reading comprehension.
REFERENCES
Alharbi, S. H. (2021). A Comparative Genre-Based Analysis of Move-Step Structure of RAIs in
Two Different Publication Contexts. English Language Teaching. 14(3),
ISSN 1916-4742 E-ISSN 1916-4750, Published by Canadian Center of Science and
Education.
Alvi, U. F., Mehmood, M. A. & Rasool, Sh. (2017). Identification of Moves Structure in the
Discussion Section of Social Sciences Doctoral Research Thesis. Journal DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29145/llr, Issue DOI: https://doi.org/10.29145/llr/31, 3(1).
Amnuai, W. & Wannaruk, A. (2013). Investigating move structure of English Applied Linguistics research discussions published in international and Thai journals. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-13.
Ariarad, Z. & Esfandiari, R. (2021). A Genre-Based Analysis of the Moves and Steps in the
Discussion Section of Psychology Research Articles between English Writers and Iranian
Writers. Journal of Language and Translation. 11(3), 109-130.
Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters’ dissertations in language teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(4), 241-251.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in
Dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 134-144
Bian, Y. (2023). Language Features of Construction Contracts from the Lens of Genre
Analysis. Conference: International Conference of Research on Language Education.
DOI:10.15405/epes.23097.19
Bonsu, E. M. & Afful, J. B. A. (2022). Genre Analysis of Abstracts of Research Articles Published
In Biostatistics. International Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics, 5(1): 17-38
Dervin, F. (2016). Interculturality in education: A theoretical and methodological toolbox.
London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre Analysis: An approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written text analysis (pp. 219-228). Routledge, London.
Evans, C. (2003). The relationship between the cognitive style(s) and preferred teacher style(s)
Of PGCE students. Unpublished Ed.D thesis, University of Durham.
Gries, S. T., & Deshors, S. C. (2015). EFL and/vs. ESL?: A multi-level regression modeling
perspective on bridging the paradigm gap. International Journal of Learner Corpus
Research, 1(1), 130-159.
Helm, S. & Guth, S. (2010). The multifarious goals of tele collaboration 2.0: Theoretical and
practical implications. In S. Guth & F. Helm (Eds.), Tele collaboration 2.0 for language and intercultural learning (pp. 69–106). Bern: Peter Lang.
Herman, Ch. & Sehoole, Ch. (2017). Research and PhD capacities in sub-Saharan Africa: South
Africa Report. British Council, DAAD.
Hidayat, Y. & Herniawati, A. (2023). The Realization of Genre Analysis on Students’ Essay: A
Classroom Discourse Perspective. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics and Literature. 3(1).
Hoff, H. E. (2020). The Evolution of Intercultural Communicative Competence:
Conceptualizations, Critiques and Consequences for 21st Century Classroom Practice. Intercultural Communication Education, 3 (2), 55-74 (2020), https://doi.org/10.29140/ice.v3n2.264
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal
Of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133-151
Illman, R. & Nynäs, P. (2017). Kultur, människa, möte: ett humanistiskt perspektiv. Lund:
Studentlitteratur AB.
Jalilifar, A. R. (2009). Research articles in applied linguistics: A genre-based writing guide.
Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran University.
Jalilifar, A. R., Hayati, A. M., & Namdari, N. (2012). A comparative study of research article
discussion sections of local and international applied linguistic journals. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 9(1), 1-29.
Johns, A. M. (2013). Rhetorical genre studies (RGS) and the teaching of EFL reading and writing–
or genre is much more than text structure. In X. Deng. & R. Seow (Eds.), Alternative
pedagogies in the English language & communication classroom (pp. 1-8). Singapore:
CELC.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in
research articles across three engineering sub-discipline corpora. English for Specific Purposes, 37(1), 74–86.
Kovacs, G. (2017). Culture in Language Teaching: A course design for teacher trainees. ACTA
UNIV. SAPIENTIAE, PHILOLOGICA, 9(3): 73–8. DOI: 10.1515/ausp-2017-0030
Liu, Y., & Buckingham, L. (2018). The schematic structure of discussion sections in applied linguistics and the distribution of meta-discourse markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 34(July), 97-109.
Loan, N. T. T. & Pramoolsook, I. (2015). Move Analysis of Results-Discussion Chapters in
TESOL Master’s Theses Written by Vietnamese Students. 3L: The Southeast Asian
Journal of English Language Studies. 21(2), 1 – 15.
Massoum, Y. & Yazdanmehr, E. (2019). A Genre-analysis of the Discussion Section of Iranian
and English ELT Theses: A Comparative Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies,
9(12), 1611-1623, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0912.19
McCarthy, P. & Wient, M. (2019). Who are the top PhD employers? Advancing Australia’s knowledge economy. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
McIntyre, D. (2015). Towards an integrated corpus stylistics. Topics in Linguistics 16(1), 59-68
Namvar, F. & Ibrahim, N. (2014). Construction of Collocations in the Writing of Postgraduate
Students. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 7(02), 487–497.
Namvar, F., Mohd Nor, N.F., Ibrahim, N. & Mustafa, J. (2017). Analysis of collocations in the
Iranian postgraduate students’ writings. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English
Language Studies. 18(1), 11 – 22.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles.
Department of English and Communication, City University of Hong Kong, Elsevier Science Ltd.
Porto, M. (2013). A model for describing, analyzing and investigating cultural understanding in
EFL reading settings. The Language Learning Journal, 41(3), 284–296.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.836346.
Rahimpour, S. & Faghih, E. (2009). Contrastive rhetoric of English and Persian written texts:
Metadiscourse in applied linguistics research articles. Rice Working Papers in Linguistics. 1, February 2009.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied
linguistics. Routledge.
Risager, K. (2018). Representations of the world in language textbooks. Bristol: Channel View
Publications.
Ros i Solé, C. (2013). Cosmopolitan speakers and their cultural cartographies. The Language
Learning Journal, 41(3), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.836349.
Said Husin, M. & Nurbayani, E. (2017). The Ability of Indonesian EFL Learners in Writing
Academic Papers. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(2). Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/di.v17i2.725
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. & Khakbaz, N. (2011). Theses ‘Discussion’ sections: A structural
move analysis. International Journal of Language Studies (IJLS), 5(3), 111-132.
Shirani, Sh. & Chalak, A. (2016). Genre Analysis of Iranian TEFL Students’ Master Theses.
Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(2), 31-37
Soodmand Afshar, H., Doosti, M. & Movassagh, H. (2018). A Genre Analysis of the Introduction
Section of Applied Linguistics and Chemistry Research Articles. Iranian Journal of
Applied Linguistics (IJAL), 21(1), 163-214.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Maele, J., & Messelink, A. (2019). Mobilizing essentialist frameworks in non-essentialist
intercultural training. In P. Romanowski & E. Bandura (Eds.), Intercultural foreign
language teaching and learning in higher education contexts, (pp. 141–161). Hershey, PA:
IGI Global.
Yang, R. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385.
