A Pedagogical Move Analysis of Literature Reviews in ELT Research Articles and Ph.D. Dissertations
الموضوعات : Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies
Azadeh Karam Pourchangi
1
,
Hossein Saadabadi Motlagh
2
,
سیدفواد ابراهیمی
3
1 - Department of English Language, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
2 - Department of English, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
3 - English Department, Shadegan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shadegan, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: Academic writing, Genre analysis, Schematic structure ,
ملخص المقالة :
This study scrutinizes the rhetorical moves and sub-moves in corpora of literature review sections of 20 research articles published in prestigious journals and 20 literature review chapters of Iranian Ph.D. dissertations from English language teaching (ELT) discipline aiming to compare expert and novice writers’ practices and products. The move analysis approach was applied to fulfill the aims of this corpus-based discourse study. To this end, Kwan’s (2006) literature review move model was employed for the move analysis. The results indicate discrepancies in the length and frequency of use in several rhetorical sub-moves. Yet, both novice and expert writers almost followed a holistic schematic structure, including a novel strategy identified in both sets of corpora. In addition, the findings shed light on the significance of the disciplinary realization of the schematic structure and explicit writing practices for student writers. The pedagogical implications of the findings are also discussed for designers and instructors to produce more appropriate academic materials for inexperienced and novice writers in terms of communicative purposes.
Ahn, C. Y., & Oh, S. Y. (2024). Citation practices in applied linguistics: A comparative study of Korean master's theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 69, 101369.
Akbaş, E., & Farnia, M. (2021). Exploring rhetorical moves in a digital academic genre: A cross-disciplinary study of the highlights section. Ibérica, (42), 85-114.
Alek, A., Marzuki, A. G., Hidayat, D. N., & Fauzji, F. (2022). The discourse structure and linguistic features of research articles and thesis abstracts in English by Indonesian academics. JELITA: Journal of Education, Language Innovation, and Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 37-44.
Amnuai, W., Wimuttisuksuntorn, W., & Wuttikanokkarn, T. (2023). Rhetorical Moves and Metadiscourse in English Abstracts of Research Articles and Masters’ Theses. JEL Vol. 4 No. 2 ((July-December) 2023, 4(2), 29.
Bastola, M. N., & Ho, V. (2023). Rhetorical structure of literature review chapters in Nepalese PhD dissertations: Students’ engagement with previous scholarship. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 101271.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 134-144.
Basturkmen, H., & Von Randow, J. (2014). Guiding the reader (or not) to re-create coherence: Observations on postgraduate student writing in an academic argumentative writing task. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 14-22.
Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. Educational Researcher, 34(6), 3-15.
Bunton, D. (2005). The structure of Ph.D. conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.03.004
Bunton, D. (2014). Generic moves in Ph.D. thesis introductions. In Academic discourse (pp. 67-85). Routledge.
Calle-Arango, L., & Ávila Reyes, N. (2023). Obstacles, facilitators, and needs in doctoral writing: A systematic review. Studies in
Continuing Education, 45(2), 133-151.).
Can, T., & Cangır, H. (2019). A corpus-assisted comparative analysis of self-mention markers in doctoral dissertations of literary studies written in Turkey and the UK. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, 100796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100796
Casal, J. E., Lu, X., Qiu, X., Wang, Y., & Zhang, G. (2021). Syntactic complexity across academic research article part-genres: A cross-disciplinary perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 100996.
Cho, S. (2004). Challenges of entering discourse communities through publishing in English: Perspectives of nonnative-speaking doctoral students in the United States of America. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 3(1), 47-72.
Cotos, E. (2012). Move analysis. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1-8). Retrieved from Wiley Online Library database.
Deng, L., Cheng, Y., & Gao, X. (2024). Engagement patterns in research article introductions: A cross-disciplinary study. System, 120, 103204.
Dong, J., & Lu, X. (2020). Promoting discipline-specific genre competence with corpus-based genre analysis activities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 138-154.
Dudley-Evans, T. (1999). The dissertation: A case of neglect. Issues in EAP writing research and instruction, 28-36.
Ferguson, G., Pérez‐Llantada, C., & Plo, R. (2011). English as an international language of scientific publication: A study of attitudes. World Englishes, 30(1), 41-59.
El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2018). Why are abstracts in PhD theses and research articles different? A genre-specific perspective. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 48-60.
Fryer, D. L. (2012). Analysis of the generic discourse features of the English-language medical research article: A systemic-functional approach. Functions of Language, 19(1), 5-37.
Gosden, H. (1992). Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 11(3), 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80010-9
Hao, J. (2024). Titles in research articles and doctoral dissertations: cross-disciplinary and cross-generic perspectives. Scientometrics, 129(4), 2285-2307.
Hopkins, A., & Dudley-Evans, T. (1988). A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. English for Specific Purposes, 7(2), 113-121.
Hsiao, C. H., & Yu, H. Y. (2012). Knowledge Presentation in Thesis Writing—Examining Move Use in Reviewing Literature. English Teaching & Learning, 36(3).
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of second language writing, 12(1), 17-29.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses, Michigan classics ed.: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2005). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education, 16(4), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.05.002
Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy, and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 148-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005
Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. A&C Black.
Hyland, K. (2009). Corpus Informed Discourse Analysis: The Case of Academic Engagement. In M. Charles, D. Pecorari, & S.
Hunston (Eds.), Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse (pp. 110–128). Bloomsbury.
Işık Taş, E. E. (2008). A corpus-based analysis of genre-specific discourse of research: the Ph.D. thesis and the research article in elt [Ph.D. - Doctoral Program]. Middle East Technical University.
Jian, H. (2010). The schematic structure of literature review in research articles of applied linguistics. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press), 33(5).
Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2020). Prescription and reality in advanced academic writing. Ibérica, (39), 14-42. Retrieved from http://www.revistaiberica.org/index.php/iberica/article/view/74
Johns, A. M. (2008). Genre awareness for the novice academic student: An ongoing quest. Language Teaching, 41(2), 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004892
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.08.003
Kawase, T. (2015). Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 114-124.
Kawase, T. (2018). Rhetorical structure of the introductions of applied linguistics Ph.D. theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 18-27.
Kwan, B. S. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 30-55.
Kwan, B.S.C. (2010). An investigation of instruction in research publishing in doctoral programs: the Hong Kong case. Higher Education, 59, 55-68. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9233-x
Langum, V., & Sullivan, K. P. (2017). Writing academic English as a doctoral student in Sweden: Narrative perspectives. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 20-25.
Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Ali, F. (2022). Advancing knowledge through literature reviews:‘what’,‘why’, and ‘how to contribute’. The Service Industries Journal, 42(7-8), 481-513.
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2020). The rhetorical functions of syntactically complex sentences in social science research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 44, 100832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100832
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., & Liu, Y. (2021). Towards the synergy of genre-and corpus-based approaches to academic writing research and pedagogy. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching (IJCALLT), 11(1), 59-71.
McAlpine, L. (2012). Shining a light on doctoral reading: Implications for doctoral identities and pedagogies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(4), 351-361.
Morgan, E. M. (2022). An investigation into genre-based content and collaborative pedagogy in a Japanese tertiary teaching context (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania).
Mousavi, H. S., & Kashefian-Naeeini, S. (2011). An investigation into the role of EFL learners’ attitudes, motivation, and proficiency in learning among Iranian students of National University in Malaysia. European Journal of Social Sciences, 23(4), 593-603.
Negretti, R. (2021). Searching for metacognitive generalities: Areas of convergence in learning to write for publication across doctoral students in science and engineering. Written Communication, 38(2), 167-207.
Nwogu, K. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
Oj, S., & Siyyari, M. (2024). A Comparison of Moves in Discussion Sections of PhD Dissertations and MA Theses in TEFL and their Relevant Journal Articles.
Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. University of Michigan Press.
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21(2), 125-143.
Pecorari, D. (2006). Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes, 25(1), 4-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445607087010
Rajagopalan, U. M., Griffin, L., & Trimarco, P. (2021). Action Research for Exploring Genre Approaches to Writing in Real-World ESP Classrooms. International Journal of Education, 13(2).
Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and Master's foreign-language theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162-166.
Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 22(4), 365-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00026-1
Sadeghi, K., & Shirzad Khajepasha, A. (2015). Thesis writing challenges for non-native M.A. students. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 20(3), 357-373.
Salager-Meyer, F. (1992). A text-type and move analysis study of verb tense and modality distribution in medical English abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 11(2), 93-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(05)80002-X
Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55-67.
Samraj, B. (2013). Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master's theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 299-310.
Seliger, H. W., & Shohamy, E. (2013). Second language research methods. Oxford Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press.
Shahsavar, Z., & Kourepaz, H. (2020). Postgraduate students’ difficulties in writing their theses literature review. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1784620.
Singh, A. A., & Lukkarila, L. (2017). Successful academic writing: A complete guide for social and behavioral scientists. Guilford Publications.
Skelton, J. (1994). Analysis of the structure of original research papers: an aid to writing original papers for publication. British Journal of General Practice, 44(387), 455-459.
Swales, J. (1984). Research into the structure of introductions to journal articles and its application to the teaching of academic writing. Common Ground: Shared Interests in ESP and Communication Studies, 77-86.
Swales, J., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written communication, 4(2), 175-191.
Swales, J. M., & Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge university press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Thongchalerm, S., & Jarunthawatchai, W. (2020). The Impact of Genre Based Instruction on EFL Learners' Writing Development. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 1-16.
Walter, L., & Stouck, J. (2020). Writing the literature review: Graduate student experiences. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(1).
Wang, G., & Hu, G. (2022). Citations and the nature of cited sources: a cross-disciplinary and cross-linguistic study. Sage Open, 12(2), 21582440221093350.
Xie, J., Xie, J., & Bui, G. (2024). A diachronic study of authorial stance in the discussion of Chinese MA theses and published research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 67, 101320.
Yongyan, L. I. (2002). Writing for international publication: The perception of Chinese doctoral researchers. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 179-193.
Yoon, J., & Casal, J. E. (2020). Rhetorical structure, sequence, and variation: A step‐driven move analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 462-478.
You, Y. L., & Li, M. C. (2021). Move analysis of the literature review chapters in Taiwanese graduate students’ TESOL theses and dissertations. English teaching and learning, 45(2), 119-143.
Zhou, H., & Jiang, F. K. (2023). ‘The study has clear limitations’: Presentation of limitations in conclusion sections of PhD dissertations and research articles in applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 71, 34-47.
