Pragmastylistic Features in English and Arabic Religious Texts: A Comparative Analysis of Rewarding
الموضوعات :Narmin Abbas Lutfi Baqqal 1 , Atefesadat Mirsaeedi 2 , Ahmad Kareem Salem Al-Wuhaili 3 , Fatinaz Karimi 4
1 - Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Department of Translation, Iraqia University, Baghdad, Iraq
4 - Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: Pragmastylistics, rewarding, religious texts, Biblical sayings, Prophetic Hadiths, comparative analysis,
ملخص المقالة :
This study investigates the pragmastylistic features employed in English and Arabic religious texts, with a specific focus on the concept of rewarding. Drawing on Narmin Abbas Lutfi Baqqal's PhD dissertation, the research examines the pragmatic and stylistic characteristics of rewarding in Biblical and Prophetic Hadith texts. The study addresses two primary research questions: (1) What are the pragmastylistic features used in English and Arabic religious texts to convey rewarding? (2) Which pragmatic and stylistic features are more prevalent in these texts? By analyzing 20 Biblical verses and 20 Prophetic Hadiths, the paper identifies the linguistic and rhetorical devices used to express rewarding, highlighting both similarities and differences between the two languages. The findings reveal that both texts employ declarative and imperative speech acts, deixis, and figurative language, but with distinct stylistic preferences. This study contributes to the fields of pragmatics, stylistics, and religious discourse analysis, offering insights into how language shapes religious messages across different cultural and linguistic contexts.
Al-Ameedi, R. T., & Al-A'ssam, S. H. (2018). The role of oral tradition in Arabic religious discourse. Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 45(2), 123-145.
Al-Bahadily, H. (2022). Pragmastylistic features of gender-based violence in English and Arabic advocacy campaigns. Journal of Pragmatics, 56(3), 234-250.
Al-Baqqal, N. A. L. (2023). Pragmastylistic analysis of rewarding in English and Arabic religious texts (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Baghdad, Iraq.
Alston, W. P. (2005). Religious language. In E. Craig (Ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Baker, M. (2000). In other words: A coursebook on translation. Routledge.
BibleRef. (2024a). Matthew 5:12 commentary. Retrieved from https://www.bibleref.com
BibleRef. (2024f). Isaiah 1:19-20 commentary. Retrieved from https://www.bibleref.com
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Crystal, D. (1965). Linguistics, language, and religion. Journal of Linguistics, 1(1), 85-102.
Crystal, D. (1997). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English style. Longman.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Fillmore, C. J. (1997). Lectures on deixis. CSLI Publications.
Hashem, M. (2021). Pragmastylistic characteristics of English and Arabic proverbs of love. Journal of Pragmatics, 53(4), 567-582.
Hickey, L. (1989). The pragmatics of style. Routledge.
Khalil, A., & Waheeb, S. (2017). Stylistic effects of speech acts in dramatic texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 48(2), 189-205.
Leech, G., & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (2004). Deixis and pragmatics. In L. R. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 97-121). Blackwell.
McArthur, T., & McArthur, F. (2005). Concise Oxford companion to the English language. Oxford University Press.
Metzger, B. M., & Coogan, M. D. (1993). The Oxford companion to the Bible. Oxford University Press.
Mohammed, A. (2020). The image of women in the Bible and Nahjulbalaaghah: A comparative study. Journal of Religious Studies, 45(1), 78-95.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Samarin, W. J. (1987). The linguist and the religious use of language. Language in Society, 16(2), 205-216.
Sayakhan, N. (2016). The role of rhetoric in Arabic religious discourse. Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 42(3), 89-107.
Schultz, R. (2006). The concept of divine reward in the Bible. Journal of Biblical Literature, 125(2), 231-250.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Siddiqi, M. Z. (2006). Hadith literature: Its origin, development, and special features. Islamic Texts Society.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Ugwueye, L. E., & Ezenwa-Ohaeto, N. (2011). Language and religion: A sociolinguistic perspective. Journal of Language and Culture, 2(1), 1-10.
Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and speech acts: Volume 1, Principles of language use. Cambridge University Press.
Warner, R. (2017). Pragmatics and stylistics: A new synthesis. Journal of Pragmatics, 112, 1-15.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
