شارک

عنوان URL للمقالة


رقم المقالة : HOVIATSHAHR-1608-10718 (R10) زيارة : 211 الصفحة: 5 - 16

نوع المخطوط: ابحاث

تحلیل آموزش شهرسازی در ایران و رابطه آن با نقش متخصص شهرسازی

الموضوعات :

سید حسین بحرینی 1 , الهام فلاح منشادی 2

1 - استاد گروه شهرسازی، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران
2 - دکترى شهرسازى دانشگاه تهران، دانشکده شهرسازى دانشگاه تهران.

تاريخ الإرسال : 03 السبت , ذو القعدة, 1437 تاريخ التأكيد : 27 السبت , جمادى الأولى, 1440 تاريخ الإصدار : 25 الأحد , ربيع الثاني, 1441

الکلمات المفتاحية: محتوای آموزش شهرسازی, کشورهای درحال‌توسعه, نقش متخصص شهرسازی,

ملخص المقالة :

محتوای آموزشی هر حرفه از نقش و جایگاه آن حرفه در جامعه ناشی می‌شود و آموزش شهرسازی نیز از این قاعده مستثنا نیست. درواقع آموزش شهرسازی باید در عمل پاسخگوی نیازهای متخصصان شهرسازی باشد. در همین راستا، این مقاله ابتدا به بررسی نقش متخصص شهرسازی در ایران پرداخته و سپس با تعیین مهم‌ترین دانش و مهارت‌های متخصص شهرسازی، به ارزیابی میزان انطباق این نقش با محتوای آموزش شهرسازی می‌پردازد. نقش متخصص شهرسازی با مصاحبه با 12 فرد حرفه‌ای و مهم‌ترین دانش، مهارت و اهمیت ارزش‌ها در آموزش شهرسازی با تکمیل 341 پرسشنامه مشخص گردیده است. بررسی نقش متخصص شهرسازی در ایران مبین غلبه دیدگاه تکنسین و یا مشاور در فرایند تصمیم‌گیری بوده و تأکید اصلی بر تهیه طرح‌های توسعه در مقیاس‌های مختلف است. نمود نقش متخصص شهرسازی در محتوای آموزش شهرسازی غلبه دانش رویه‌ای/کاربردی، مهارت‌های تکنیکی و تحلیلی بوده و ارزش‌ها بی‌اهمیت است که نشان‌دهنده انطباق نقش متخصص شهرسازی با محتوای آموزشی در ایران است.

المصادر:


  1. Afshar, F. (2001). Preparing Planners for a Globalizing World: The Planning School at the University of Guelph. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20 (3), 339-352.
    2.
  2. Agyeman, J., & Erickson, J. S. (2012). Culture, Recognition, and Negotiation of Difference: Some Thoughts on Cultural Competence in Planning Education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32 (3), 358-366.
    3.
  3. Alexander, E. R. (2007). What Do Planners Need To Know? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20 (3), 376-380.
    4.
  4. Banerjee, T. (1990). Third World City Design: Values, Models and Education. In T. Banerjee, Breaking The Boundries (pp. 173-189). New York: Springer.
    5.
  5. Bayer, M. Frank, N., & Valerius, J. (2010). Becoming an Urban Planner: A Guid to Careers in Planning and Urban Design. U.S.A. Wiley.
    6.
  6. Budge, T. (2009). Educating Planners, Educating for Planning or Planning Education: the Never-Ending Story. Australian Planner,46(1), 8-13.
    7.
  7. Burayidi, M. A. (1993). Dualism and Universalism: Competing Paradigms in Planning Education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 12(3), 223-229.
    8.
  8. Carter, E. J. (1993). Toward a Core of Body of Knowledge: A New Curriculum for City and Regional Planner. Planning Education and Research, 12(2), 160-163.
    9.
  9. Chettiparamp, A. (2006). Bottom-Up Planning and the Future of Planning Education in India. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(2),185-194.
    10.
  10. Cook, A. (1999). Undercurrents of Change in Planning Education in Hung Kong. Planning Practice and Research, 14(2), 247-249.
    11.
  11. Davidoff, P., & Boyd, L. (1983). Peace and Justice in Planning Education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 3(1), 54.
    12.
  12. Diaw, k., Nnkya, T., & Watson, V. (2002). Planning Education in Sub-Saharan Africa: Responding to the Demands of a Changing context. Planning Practice and Research,17(3), 337-348.
    13.
  13. Edwards, M. M., & Bates, L. K. (2011). Planning's Core Curriculum: Knowledge, Practice, and Implementation. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(2), 172-183.
    14.
  14. Ellis, G., Morison, S., & Purdy, J. (2008). A New Concept of Interprofessional Education in Planning Programs: Reflections on Health Urban Planning Project. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 3(2), 75-93.
    15.
  15. Fainstein, S. (2000). New Direction in Planning Theory. Urban Affairs Review, 35(4), 451-478.
    16.
  16. Faludi, A. (1987). Dutch Planning Education in Its International Context. Journal of Housing and Environment Research., 2(4), 285-298.
    17.
  17. Frank, A. I. (2006). Three Decades of Thought on Planning Education. Journal of Planning Literature, 21(1), 15-44.
    18.
  18. Freeston, R., Williams, P., Tomapson, S., & Thrimbath, K. (2007). A Quantitative Approach to Assessment of Work-based Learning Out-comes: An Urban Planning Application. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(4), 347-361.
    19.
  19. Friedmann, J. (1966). Planning As A Vocation (part 1).Plan Canada, 6, 99-124.
    20.
  20. Friedmann, J. (1996). The Core Curriculum in Planning Revisited. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15(2), 89-104.
    21.
  21. Galloway, T. D., & Mahayani, R. G. (1977). Planning Theory in Retrospect: The Process of Paradigm Change. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 43(1), 62-71.
    22.
  22. Gospodini, A., & Skayannis, P. (2005). Toward an Integration Model of Planning Education Programs in a European and International Context: The Contribution of Recent Greek Experience. Planning Theory &Practice,6 (3), 355-382.
    23.
  23. Gunder, M. (2004). Shaping the Planner's Ego-Ideal, A Lacanian Interpretation of Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(3), 299-311.
    24.
  24. Guzzetta, J. D., & Bollens, S. A. (2003). Urban Planners Skills and Competencies: Are We Different from Other Professions? Does Context Matter? Do We Evolve? Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(1), 96-106.
    25.
  25. Holliday, S. (2011). The Challenges of Being a Planner Today. Sydney: Planning Institute Australia (PIA).
    26.
  26. Horen, B. V., Michael, L., & Pinnawala, S. (2004). Localizing a Global Discipline, Designing New Planning Programs in Sri Lanka. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 23(3), 255-268.
    27.
  27. Innes, J. (1997). The Planner's Century. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(3),227-228.
    28.
  28. Kaufman, S., & Simons, R. (1995). Quantitative and Research Methods in Planning: Are Schools Teaching What Practitioners Practice?. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 15(1), 17-33.
    29.
  29. Klosterman, R. E. (1992). Planning Theory Education in 1980s: Results of a Second Course Survey. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 11(2), 130-140.
    30.
  30. Kuehl, P. G. (1992). Job Analysis Survey: American Institute of Certifies Planners. Rockville MD: Westat, Inc.
    31.
  31. Kunzman, K. R. (1997). The Future of Planning Education in Europe. AESOP News.
    32.
  32. LeGates, R. T. (2009). Competency-based UK Urban Spatial Planning Education. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 4(2), 55-73.
    33.
  33. Mc.Cledon, B. (2003). A Bold Vision and a Brand Identify for Planning Profession. Journal of American Planning Association, 69(3), 221-232.
    34.
  34. McIntyre, S., McNaney, K., Morgan, K., Rucci, C., & Sexsmith, L. (1997). Planning curriculums for the 21st century: What do Canadian and American schools say they do? Master’s student project, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Available from http://www.interchange.ubc.ca/dorcey/: Master's Student Project, University of British Columbia.
    35.
  35. Nutt, T. E., Susskind, L. E., & Retsinas, N. P. (1970). Prospects For Urban Planning Education. Journal of American Institute of Planners, 36(4), 229-241.
    36.
  36. Ozawa, P., & Seltez, E. (1999). Taking Our Bearing: Mapping Among Planning Practice, Theory and Education. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(3), 257-266.
    37.
  37. Pezzoli, K., & Howe, D. (2001). Planning Pedagogy and Globalization, A Content Analysis of Syllabi. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 20(3), 365-375.
    38.
  38. Pinson, D. (2004). Urban Planning: an Undisciplined Discipline? Future,36 (4), 503-513.
    39.
  39. Pivo, G. (1989). Specializations, Faculty Interest, and Courses in Physical Planning Subjects at Graduate Planning Schools. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 9(1), 19-27.
    40.
  40. Poxon, J. (2001). Shaping the planning profession of the future: the role of planning education. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(4), 563-579.
    41.
  41. Sandercock, L. (1999). Expanding the Language of Planning: A Mediation on Planning Education for Twenty-First Century. European Planning Studies, 7(5), 533-544.
    42.
  42. Schuster, J. (1986). Quantitative Reasoning in Planning Curriculum. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 6(1), 30-36.
    43.
  43. Seltzer, E., & Ozawa, C. P. (2002). Clear Signals: Moving on to Planning's Promise. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22(1), 77-86.
    44.
  44. Swearing white, s., & Mayo, J. M. (2005). Environmental Education in Graduate Professional Degrees: The Case of Urban Planning. Report and Research, 36, 31-38.
    45.
  45. Sweet, E. L., & Etienee, H. F. (2011). Commentary: Diversity in Urban Planning Education and Practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(3), 332-339.
    46.
  46. Talor, N. (1999). Urban Planning Theory Since 1945. London: Sage.
    47.
_||_

سند

Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications

الروابط

المراكز ذات الصلة

دعامة

الصفحات الرسمية

حقوق هذا الموقع الإلكتروني مملوكة لنظام SANAD Press Management. © 1442-1446

الصفحة الرئيسية| دخول| معلومات عنا| اتصل بنا|
[English] [فارسی] [en] [fa]