شارک

عنوان URL للمقالة


رقم المقالة : JEST-2104-5351 (R1) زيارة : 192 الصفحة: 93 - 106

10.30495/jest.2022.60003.5351

نوع المخطوط: ابحاث

اعطای شخصیت حقوقی به عناصر طبیعت در پرتو توسعه پایدار

الموضوعات :

زهرا سادات شارق 1 , حسین رضازاده 2

1 - مرکز پژوهشی حوضه اقلیمی خزر- دانشگاه مازندارن- بابلسر- ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه حقوق، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر-ایران. *(مسئول مکاتبات)

تاريخ الإرسال : 28 السبت , شعبان, 1442 تاريخ التأكيد : 24 الأربعاء , محرم, 1443 تاريخ الإصدار : 19 الأحد , رجب, 1443

الکلمات المفتاحية: محیط‌زیست, توسعه پایدار, شخصیت حقوقی عناصر طبیعت, حقوق بین‌الملل, پایداری زیست‌محیطی,

ملخص المقالة :

بعد از جنگ جهانی دوم مفهوم توسعه پایدار به منظور ایجاد تعادل میان حفاظت از محیط زیست و بهره مندی از حقوق بنیادین بشری از جمله حق بر توسعه مطرح شد؛ تا استیفای حق های بشری بهانه ای برای تخریب محیط زیست محسوب نگردد. در واقع بشر دریافت که هرگونه خسارت به محیط زیست در نهایت انسان و کرامت وی را دچار مخاطره می نماید و لذا در کنار عناصر اقتصادی و اجتماعی، پایداری زیست محیطی به عنوان یکی از عناصر توسعه پایدار مطرح و مورد شناسایی قرار گرفت. تحقیق حاضر به دنبال بررسی این مسئله است که چگونه برخی دولت ها با شناسایی شخصیت حقوقی برای عناصر طبیعت، در راستای پایداری زیست محیطی و در نهایت تحقق توسعه پایدار گام برداشته اند. نوع پژوهش بنیادی است که به روش توصیفی- تحلیلی و با استفاده از منابع کتابخانه ای و همچنین بهره گیری از منابع الکترونیک اعم از کتاب، مقاله، پایان نامه، کنفرانس های رسمی مرتبط با موضوع(منطقه ای و بین المللی) به زبان های فارسی و انگلیسی موجود صورت گرفته و پس از طرح مسئله و تبیین فرضیات، داده های مدنظر متناسب با سوال های پژوهش در اسناد و رویه های قضائی ملی و بین الملل (اعم از فارسی و لاتین) جستجو، جمع آوری، جمع بندی و مورد تحلیل قرارگرفته است. در سال های اخیر یکی از اقداماتی که به منظور پایداری زیست محیطی اتخاذ شد شناسایی شخصیت حقوقی برای عناصر طبیعت بوده است. رویه برخی کشورها به خصوص از سال 2008 به بعد نشان می دهد که در راستای تحقق پایداری زیست محیطی، در سطح قانونگذاری یا رویه محاکم، عناصر طبیعت را صاحب حق دانسته و نمایندگانی برای پیگیری حقوق آن ها تعیین نموده اند. در مجموع تحولات حقوق محیط زیست نشان می دهد شناسایی شخصیت حقوقی برای عناصر طبیعت تحول جدیدی در حوزه حقوق محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار بوجود آورده که به سرعت در جامعه بین المللی در حال گسترش می باشد. به طوری که بسیاری از دولت ها می توانند با بهره گیری از تجربه یادشده در این مسیر گام نهاده تا بسترهای لازم برای حمایت های بیشتر از محیط زیست در سرتاسر جهان فراهم گردد.

المصادر:


  1. Drzewicki, Krzysztof. 1984. The Rights of Solidarity- the Third Revolution of Human Rights, Nordic Journal of International Law, vol. 53(1), 26-46.
    2.
  2. Vasak, Karel. 1977. A 30-Year Struggle: The Sustained Effort to Give Force of Law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UNESCO Courier, vol. 30(11), 1-36.
    3.
  3. Shah Mohammadi, Niloufar. The position of the third generation of human rights in international documents, Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Faculty of Law and Political Science, 2011, pp.25-26.
    4.
  4. UN. Doc. A/42/427, 1987.
    5.
  5. Brochure of the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2012.
    6.
  6. UN document, A/RES/66/288, 2012.
    7.
  7. Helen Clark, What does Rio+20 mean for sustainable development?, Lecture at Lincoln University, New Zealand, 20 August 2012. Available at:https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourperspective/ourperspectivearticles/2012/08/21/what-does-rio-20-mean-for-sustainable-development-helen-clark.html
    8.
  8. Velásquez Serna, Johanna. “Operationalization of sustainable development in the international legal instruments”, LL.M in Natural Resources Law and International Environmental Law, University of Iceland, 2015, p.18.
    9.
  9. W. Kates, Robert. 2005. Thomas M. Parris, and Anthony A. Leiserowitz, What Is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, vol. 47(3), 8-21.
    10.
  10. Ross, Andrea. 2009. Modern Interpretations of Sustainable Development, journal of law and society, vol. 36(1), 32-54.
    11.
  11. A.Avilés, Luis. 2014. Sustainable development and environmental legal protection in the European Union: a model for mexican courts to follow?, Mexican law review, vol. 6(2), 251-272.
    12.
  12. Bosselmann, Klaus. 2008. “the Principle of Sustainability Transforming Law and Governance”, 1st ed , Routledge, p.52.
    13.
  13. National Research Council, Policy Division, Board on Sustainable Development, Our Common Journey
    14.
  14. William E.Rees, Defining sustainable Development, CHS Research Bulletin, May 1989. Available at:https://scarp.ubc.ca/sites/scarp.ubc.ca/files/1989%20May_Defining%20Sustainable%20Devt_Rees.pdf
    15.
  15. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for global action
    16.
  16. Gillroy, John Martin. 2006. Adjudication Norms, Dispute Settlement Regimes and International Tribunals: The Status of “Environmental Sustainability” in International Jurisprudence, Stanford journal of international law, vol. 42(1), 1-52.
    17.
  17. Shahbazi, Aramesh. "Sustainable Development" or the "Sustainability of Development" in International Law, International Law Review, 2010, Volume 27(42), 125-139.(In Persian)
    18.
  18. Vaughan Lowe, “Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments”, in Boyle, A.,  and D. Freestone. 2012. “International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges”, Oxford Scholarship Published in print September 1999, Published online March 2012.
    19.
  19. Vardi, Noah, and Zeno-Zencovich, Vincenzo. 2004. From Rome to Nice: A Historical Profile of the Evolution of European Environmental Law, the penn state environmental law review, vol. 12(1).
    20.
  20. Azizi, Sattar,  Seyyed Mahdi Mousavi. Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project Case: The Role of the International Court of Justice in Highlighting the Concept of Sustainable Development, International Law Review, 2017, Volume 33(55), 109-134. (In Persian)
    21.
  21. Mirmohammadi, Mostafa, Mohammadreza Jahanipour. Principles of Sustainable Development in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Comparative Law Review, 2018, Volume 8(2), 799-819. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. ICJ report, Separate opinion of vice-president Weeramantry, Case concerning the gabcikovo-nagymaros project, Hungary v. Slovakia, 1997.
    23.
  23. ICJ report, Separate opinion of judge Cançado trindade, Pulp mills on the river Uruguay, Argentina v. Uruguay, 2010.
    24.
  24. ECJ, Commission v. Denmark, Case no. 302/86, 1988.
    25.
  25. ECJ, Polimeri Europa SpA and Syndial SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico and Others, Case C‑378/08, 9 March 2010.
    26.
  26. Reports of international arbitral awards, Arbitration regarding the Iron Rhine (“Ijzeren Rijn”) Railway, the kingdom of Belgium v. The kingdom of the Netherlands, 2005.
    27.
  27. Mahmoudi, Zahra, The Nature of the General Principles of Law and Their Functions in International Law, International Law Review, 2018, Volume 35(58), 329-364. (In Persian)
    28.
  28. Mir Abbasi, Seyed Baqer, Rozi Mir Abbasi, “The place of the principle of sustainable development in the realization of human rights from the perspective of international law”, 1st Edition, Tehran: Jangal Publications, Javadaneh, 2016, p.35. (In Persian)
    29.
  29. Stern, Nicholas. 2006. “The Economics of Climate Change (The Stern Review)”, Cambridge University Press, summary of Conclusions.
    30.
  30. Clugston, Rick. 2010. Earth Charter Education for Sustainable Ways of Living, Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, vol. 4(2), 157-166.
    31.
  31. UNEP, Embedding the Environment in Sustainable Development Goals, Post-2015 Discussion Paper 1, Version 2, 19 July 2013
    32.
  32. Shelton, Dinah, .2015. Nature as a legal person, VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement [En ligne], iss. 22, 1-19.
    33.
  33. Colwell, Renata, Savannah Carr-Wilson, (2017), Legal Personality of Natural Features: Recent International Developments and Applicability in Canada, Environmental law center. 1-31. Available at: http://www.elc.uvic.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2017-02-03-      LegalPersonalityNatural-Features_web-version.pdf
    34.
  34. J. Iorns Magallanes, Catherine. 2015. Nature as an Ancestor: Two Examples of Legal Personality for Nature in New Zealand, VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement [En ligne], iss. 22, 1-19.
    35.
  35. Colombia Constitutional Court, Ruling T-622, 2016, Expediente T-5.016.242, 2018.
    36.
  36.  ABColombia, Colombian Constitutional Court sets a Global Precedent, 2017, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at: https://www.abcolombia.org.uk/constitutional-court-sets-global-precedent/
    37.
  37. Trivedi and Jagati, Uttarakhand HC declares Ganga, Yamuna living entities, gives them legal rights, 2017, last seen at 22 September 2019, available at: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/uttarakhand-hc-says-ganga-is-india-s-first-living-entity-grants-it-rights-equal-to-humans/storyVoI6DOG71fyMDihg5BuGCL.html 
    38.
  38. moloney, Anastasia, Colombia’s top court orders government to protect amazon forest in landmark, 2018, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-colombia-deforestation-amazon/colombias-top-court-orders-government-to-protect-amazon-forest-in-landmark-case-idUSKCN1HD21Y
    39.
  39. Schmidt, Stephen, Colombian high court grants personhood to Amazon rainforest in case against country’s government, 2018, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at: https://www.pri.org/stories/2018-05-06/colombian-high-court-grants-personhood-amazon-rainforest-case-against-country-s
    40.
  40. Eckstein,Gabriel, Ariella D'Andrea, Virginia Marshall, Erin O'Donnell, Julia Talbot-Jones. 2019. “Conferring legal personality on the world's rivers: A brief intellectual assessment”, Water International, vol.1, p.16.
    41.
  41. O'Donnell, Talbot-Jones, Three rivers are now legally people – but that’s just the start of looking after them, 2017, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at:  https://theconversation.com/three-rivers-are-now-legally-people-but-thats-just-the-start-of-looking-after-them-74983
    42.
  42. Nékam, Alexander. 1938. the Personality Conception of the Legal Entity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p.33.
    43.
  43. Supreme Court of India, Yogendra Nath Naskar v. Commission of Income-Tax. 1969 AIR 1089, SCR (3)742, 1969. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1874024/
    44.
  44. ECtHR, Case of kyrtatos v. Greece, application no.41666/98, 2003.
    45.
  45. Davies, Green, Environment: The Concept of Legal Personality – From Companies to Natural Entities?, 2017, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at: https://www.latham.london/2017/04/environment-the-concept-of-legal-personality-from-companies-to-natural-entities/
    46.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_||_

  1. Drzewicki, Krzysztof. 1984. The Rights of Solidarity- the Third Revolution of Human Rights, Nordic Journal of International Law, vol. 53(1), 26-46.
    2.
  2. Vasak, Karel. 1977. A 30-Year Struggle: The Sustained Effort to Give Force of Law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, UNESCO Courier, vol. 30(11), 1-36.
    3.
  3. Shah Mohammadi, Niloufar. The position of the third generation of human rights in international documents, Master Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Faculty of Law and Political Science, 2011, pp.25-26.
    4.
  4. UN. Doc. A/42/427, 1987.
    5.
  5. Brochure of the Rio+20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2012.
    6.
  6. UN document, A/RES/66/288, 2012.
    7.
  7. Helen Clark, What does Rio+20 mean for sustainable development?, Lecture at Lincoln University, New Zealand, 20 August 2012. Available at:https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/ourperspective/ourperspectivearticles/2012/08/21/what-does-rio-20-mean-for-sustainable-development-helen-clark.html
    8.
  8. Velásquez Serna, Johanna. “Operationalization of sustainable development in the international legal instruments”, LL.M in Natural Resources Law and International Environmental Law, University of Iceland, 2015, p.18.
    9.
  9. W. Kates, Robert. 2005. Thomas M. Parris, and Anthony A. Leiserowitz, What Is Sustainable Development? Goals, Indicators, Values, and Practice, Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, vol. 47(3), 8-21.
    10.
  10. Ross, Andrea. 2009. Modern Interpretations of Sustainable Development, journal of law and society, vol. 36(1), 32-54.
    11.
  11. A.Avilés, Luis. 2014. Sustainable development and environmental legal protection in the European Union: a model for mexican courts to follow?, Mexican law review, vol. 6(2), 251-272.
    12.
  12. Bosselmann, Klaus. 2008. “the Principle of Sustainability Transforming Law and Governance”, 1st ed , Routledge, p.52.
    13.
  13. National Research Council, Policy Division, Board on Sustainable Development, Our Common Journey
    14.
  14. William E.Rees, Defining sustainable Development, CHS Research Bulletin, May 1989. Available at:https://scarp.ubc.ca/sites/scarp.ubc.ca/files/1989%20May_Defining%20Sustainable%20Devt_Rees.pdf
    15.
  15. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for global action
    16.
  16. Gillroy, John Martin. 2006. Adjudication Norms, Dispute Settlement Regimes and International Tribunals: The Status of “Environmental Sustainability” in International Jurisprudence, Stanford journal of international law, vol. 42(1), 1-52.
    17.
  17. Shahbazi, Aramesh. "Sustainable Development" or the "Sustainability of Development" in International Law, International Law Review, 2010, Volume 27(42), 125-139.(In Persian)
    18.
  18. Vaughan Lowe, “Sustainable Development and Unsustainable Arguments”, in Boyle, A.,  and D. Freestone. 2012. “International Law and Sustainable Development: Past Achievements and Future Challenges”, Oxford Scholarship Published in print September 1999, Published online March 2012.
    19.
  19. Vardi, Noah, and Zeno-Zencovich, Vincenzo. 2004. From Rome to Nice: A Historical Profile of the Evolution of European Environmental Law, the penn state environmental law review, vol. 12(1).
    20.
  20. Azizi, Sattar,  Seyyed Mahdi Mousavi. Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project Case: The Role of the International Court of Justice in Highlighting the Concept of Sustainable Development, International Law Review, 2017, Volume 33(55), 109-134. (In Persian)
    21.
  21. Mirmohammadi, Mostafa, Mohammadreza Jahanipour. Principles of Sustainable Development in the Jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice and the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, Comparative Law Review, 2018, Volume 8(2), 799-819. (In Persian)
    22.
  22. ICJ report, Separate opinion of vice-president Weeramantry, Case concerning the gabcikovo-nagymaros project, Hungary v. Slovakia, 1997.
    23.
  23. ICJ report, Separate opinion of judge Cançado trindade, Pulp mills on the river Uruguay, Argentina v. Uruguay, 2010.
    24.
  24. ECJ, Commission v. Denmark, Case no. 302/86, 1988.
    25.
  25. ECJ, Polimeri Europa SpA and Syndial SpA v Ministero dello Sviluppo economico and Others, Case C‑378/08, 9 March 2010.
    26.
  26. Reports of international arbitral awards, Arbitration regarding the Iron Rhine (“Ijzeren Rijn”) Railway, the kingdom of Belgium v. The kingdom of the Netherlands, 2005.
    27.
  27. Mahmoudi, Zahra, The Nature of the General Principles of Law and Their Functions in International Law, International Law Review, 2018, Volume 35(58), 329-364. (In Persian)
    28.
  28. Mir Abbasi, Seyed Baqer, Rozi Mir Abbasi, “The place of the principle of sustainable development in the realization of human rights from the perspective of international law”, 1st Edition, Tehran: Jangal Publications, Javadaneh, 2016, p.35. (In Persian)
    29.
  29. Stern, Nicholas. 2006. “The Economics of Climate Change (The Stern Review)”, Cambridge University Press, summary of Conclusions.
    30.
  30. Clugston, Rick. 2010. Earth Charter Education for Sustainable Ways of Living, Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, vol. 4(2), 157-166.
    31.
  31. UNEP, Embedding the Environment in Sustainable Development Goals, Post-2015 Discussion Paper 1, Version 2, 19 July 2013
    32.
  32. Shelton, Dinah, .2015. Nature as a legal person, VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement [En ligne], iss. 22, 1-19.
    33.
  33. Colwell, Renata, Savannah Carr-Wilson, (2017), Legal Personality of Natural Features: Recent International Developments and Applicability in Canada, Environmental law center. 1-31. Available at: http://www.elc.uvic.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2017-02-03-      LegalPersonalityNatural-Features_web-version.pdf
    34.
  34. J. Iorns Magallanes, Catherine. 2015. Nature as an Ancestor: Two Examples of Legal Personality for Nature in New Zealand, VertigO - la revue électronique en sciences de l'environnement [En ligne], iss. 22, 1-19.
    35.
  35. Colombia Constitutional Court, Ruling T-622, 2016, Expediente T-5.016.242, 2018.
    36.
  36.  ABColombia, Colombian Constitutional Court sets a Global Precedent, 2017, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at: https://www.abcolombia.org.uk/constitutional-court-sets-global-precedent/
    37.
  37. Trivedi and Jagati, Uttarakhand HC declares Ganga, Yamuna living entities, gives them legal rights, 2017, last seen at 22 September 2019, available at: https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/uttarakhand-hc-says-ganga-is-india-s-first-living-entity-grants-it-rights-equal-to-humans/storyVoI6DOG71fyMDihg5BuGCL.html 
    38.
  38. moloney, Anastasia, Colombia’s top court orders government to protect amazon forest in landmark, 2018, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-colombia-deforestation-amazon/colombias-top-court-orders-government-to-protect-amazon-forest-in-landmark-case-idUSKCN1HD21Y
    39.
  39. Schmidt, Stephen, Colombian high court grants personhood to Amazon rainforest in case against country’s government, 2018, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at: https://www.pri.org/stories/2018-05-06/colombian-high-court-grants-personhood-amazon-rainforest-case-against-country-s
    40.
  40. Eckstein,Gabriel, Ariella D'Andrea, Virginia Marshall, Erin O'Donnell, Julia Talbot-Jones. 2019. “Conferring legal personality on the world's rivers: A brief intellectual assessment”, Water International, vol.1, p.16.
    41.
  41. O'Donnell, Talbot-Jones, Three rivers are now legally people – but that’s just the start of looking after them, 2017, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at:  https://theconversation.com/three-rivers-are-now-legally-people-but-thats-just-the-start-of-looking-after-them-74983
    42.
  42. Nékam, Alexander. 1938. the Personality Conception of the Legal Entity, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, p.33.
    43.
  43. Supreme Court of India, Yogendra Nath Naskar v. Commission of Income-Tax. 1969 AIR 1089, SCR (3)742, 1969. Available at: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1874024/
    44.
  44. ECtHR, Case of kyrtatos v. Greece, application no.41666/98, 2003.
    45.
  45. Davies, Green, Environment: The Concept of Legal Personality – From Companies to Natural Entities?, 2017, last seen at 10 November 2020, available at: https://www.latham.london/2017/04/environment-the-concept-of-legal-personality-from-companies-to-natural-entities/
    46.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

سند

Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications

الروابط

المراكز ذات الصلة

دعامة

الصفحات الرسمية

حقوق هذا الموقع الإلكتروني مملوكة لنظام SANAD Press Management. © 1442-1446

الصفحة الرئيسية| دخول| معلومات عنا| اتصل بنا|
[English] [فارسی] [en] [fa]