پیامدهای ژئوپلیتیکی اختلافات سرزمینی ژاپن با چین و چشم‌انداز تحولات منطقه ژئوپلیتیکی شرق آسیا
الموضوعات :دلشاد خضری 1 , زهرا پیشگاهی‌فرد 2 , عزت‌الله عزتی 3
1 - دانشجوی دکترای جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
2 - استاد گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
3 - دانشیار گروه جغرافیای سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية:
ملخص المقالة :
چکیده اختلافات ارضی نسبت به تعدادی از جزایر غیر مسکونی در دریای چین شرقی به مسئله مهمی در روابط دو کشور ژاپن و چین در سال‌های اخیر تبدیل شده است. جزایر مورد اختلاف در ژاپن به سنکاکو و در چین به دیائویو شناخته می‌شوند. این جزایر که در قلمرو دریایی، انحصاری اقتصادی دو کشور ژاپن و چین واقع شده‌اند، مورد ادعای مالکیت هر دو کشور می‌باشند. هدف این نوشتار واکاوی علل مناقشه ژاپن و چین بر سر جزایر سنکاکو یا دیائویو و تبیین ریشه‌ها و پیامدهای ژئوپلیتیکی و چشم‌انداز تحولات این مناقشه در سطح منطقه‌ای و فرامنطقه‌ای با روش توصیفی-تحلیلی می‌باشد. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که پیامدهای ژئوپلیتیکی در سطح منطقه‌ای: تشدید تعارضات ژئوپلیتیکی و رشد ملی‌گرایی، تغییر در توازن ژئوپلیتیکی و برهم زدن امنیت منطقه، تداوم بحران ژئوپلیتیکی و اخلال در همکاری‌های اقتصادی کشورهای منطقه را بدنبال دارد؛ در سطح فرامنطقه‌ای نیز ایالات متحده به عنوان بازیگر اصلی از یک سو حامی ژاپن و از سوی دیگر خواهان ثبات در منطقه با سیاست چرخش به آسیا برای پیشبرد اهداف راهبردی خود در شرق آسیا می‌باشد، که فرصت‌هایی را نیز برای نقش‌آفرینی بیشتر ایران در خاورمیانه فراهم می‌کند.
References
Austin, G. (1998). China’s Ocean Frontier: International Law, Military Force and National Development, Canberra: Allen and Unwin.
BBC. (2013). American bombers over disputed islands with China and Japan flew, available at: http://www.bbc.com/persian/world/2013/11/131126_an_china_us_fighter_japan
Beukel, Erik. (2011). Popular Nationalism In China And The Sino Japanese Relationship The Conflict In The East China Sea an Introductory Study, Danish Institute for International Studies, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Blanchard, Jean-Marc. (2006). “China’s Peaceful Rise and Sino-Japanese Territorial and Maritime Tensions”, Guo (ed.), op. cit., pp. 211–36.
Brzezinski, Zbigniew. (2007a). the Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, Translated By Amirhossein Tavakoli, Sabzan Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Brzezinski, Zibigniew. (2007b). the Choice Global Domination or Global Leadership, Translated By Amirhossein Nowrouzi, Ney Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Cohen S. B. (2008). Geopolitics of the World System, Translated By A. Kardan, Tehran International Studies & Research Institute Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Drifte, Reinhard (2008a), “Japanese–Chinese territorial dispute in the East China Sea –between military confrontation and economic cooperation”, Working Paper 24 Asia Research Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Drifte, Reinhard. (2008). “Japanese-Chinese Territorial Disputes in the East China Sea – Between Military Confrontation and Economic Cooperation”, in LSE Asia Research Centre, Working Paper no. 24, available at: http://www.lse.ac.uk/collections/asiaResearchCentre/pdf/WorkingPaper/ARCWorking Paper 24 Drifte 2008.pdf, 28 February 2011.
Drifte, Reinhard. (2008b). “From “Sea of Confrontation” to “Sea of Peace, Cooperation and Friendship” Japan Facing China in the East Asia Sea”, Japan aktuell, 3/2008, pp. 27–51.
Drysdale. A & Blake, G. (1995). The Middle East and North Africa: a Political Geography, Translated by Dorreh, Mirheydar, Institute for Political and International Studies of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Tehran [In Persian].
Downs, Erica Strecker and Phillip C. Saunders. (1998/99). “Legitimacy and the Limits of Nationalism”, International Security, Vol. 23, No. 3, Winter 1998/99, pp. 114–46.
Dzurek, Daniel. (1996). “The Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Dispute”, 18 October 1996, available at: http://www-ibru.dur.ac.uk/resources/docs/senkaku.html.
Ezzati, Ezzatollah. (2005). Geostrategy, Samt Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Ezzati, Ezzatollah. (2007a). Geopolitics, Samt Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Ezzati, Ezzatollah. (2007b). New theory of Political Geography, Ghoomes Publication. Tehran [In Persian].
Ezzati, Ezzatollah. (2009a). 21st century geopolitics, Samt Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Ezzati, Ezzatollah. (2009b). Iran's Strategic Geography, Vol I, National Geographical Organization Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Flint, Colin. (2011). Introduction to Geopolitics, Translated by M.B Ghalibaf & M.H. Pouyandeh, Ghoomes Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Fravel, M. T. (2010). “Explaining Stability in the Senkaku (Diaoyu) Dispute”, in Curtis, Gerald et al. (eds) Getting the Triangle Straight: Managing China-Japan-US Relations, Washington DC: The Brookings Institution Press, available at: http://www.jcie.org/researchpdfs/Triangle/7_fravel.pdf,9 June 2011.
Fridman, George. (2012). the Next 100 Years (A Forecast for the 21 Century), Translated by M.Z. Goharpour & M.D. Azad. Zeytunesabz Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Goldstein, Avery. (2005). Rising to the Challenge. China’s Grand Strategy and International Security, Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza. (2006). Principles and Concepts of Geopolitics, Amirkabir Publication. Mashhad [In Persian].
Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza. (2008). National Power and Interests (Sources, Concepts & Measurement Methods), Entekhab Publication. Tehran [In Persian].
Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza. (2009). Persian Gulf and Strategic Role of Strait of Hormuz, Samt Publication. Tehran [In Persian].
Hafeznia, Mohammad Reza & Kavianirad Morad. (2009). the New Approaches in Political Geography, Samt Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Heflin, William B. (2000). “Diayou/Senkaku Islands Dispute: Japan and China Oceans Apart”, Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, available at: http://blog.hawaii.edu/aplpj/files/2011/11/APLPJ_01.2_heflin.pdf
Iran-Eurica. (2016). America; Pivot policy to East Asia and its impact on the Middle East, Iranian Institute For European & American Studies. available at: http://eurica.ir/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=344 [In Persian].
Jamejam. (2012). Between China and Japan over disputed islands, available at: http://www1.jamejamonline.ir/printable.aspx?newsnum=100828962267 [In Persian].
Jamnews. (2013). The independence of the country is advanced / advanced country should be looked into America army?, available at: http://www.jamnews.ir/TextVersionDetail/215179
Japanese Communist Party. (2010). “Senkaku Islands Question”, Japan Press Weekly, Special Issue - October 2010, Tokyo, Japan. available at:http://www.japan-press.co.jp/modules/common/download.php?path=/home/jpspress/japan-press.co.jp/public_html/modules/special_issues/data/1353926607.pdf&name=2010_10%20Senkaku%20Islands%20Question.pdf
Delhey, Jan and Graf, Timo. (2011). “Chinese Trust in Europeans: Research Findings and Policy Implications”, August 2011, available at: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cpi/documents/funded-projects/fp7-chinese-viewsofeu-delhey-graf.pdf
Jin, Qiu. (2006). “The Politics of History and Historical Memory in China–Japan Relations”, Journal of Chinese Political Science, vol. 11, no. 1, spring 2006, pp. 25–53.
Keohane, Robert O, and Joseph S, Nye. (2001). Power and Interdependence, New York: Longman, Third Edition.
Krauss, Ellis. (2013). “Crisis Management, LDP, and DPJ Style”, Japanese Journal of Political Science / Volume 14 / Special Issue 02 / June 2013, pp 177 – 199, DOI: 10.1017/S1468109913000029, Published online: 10 May 2013
Manicom, James and Andrew, O’Neil. (2009). “Sino-Japanese strategic relations: will rivalry lead to confrontation?’, Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 63, No. 2, June 2009, pp. 213–32.
Mirheydar, dorreh. (2006). the Foundations of Political Geography, Samt Publication, Tehran [In Persian].
Moteki, Hiromichi. (2010). “The Senkaku Islands Constitute an Intrinsic Part of Japan”, Society for the Dissemination of Historical Fact, Tokyo Japan. http://www.sdh-fact.com
Monfared, Qasem. (2015). South East Asia, China and America competitive future. Strategic Council on Foreign Relations. available at: http://www.scfr.ir/fa [In Persian].
Murase, Shinya. (2013). “Japan Chair Platform: The Senkaku Islands and International Law”, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Tokyo, Japan, May 22, 2013, available at: http://csis.org/files/publication/220509_Japan_Chair_Platform_Senkaku_International_Law.pdf
Nishihara, Masashi. (2012). “Japan Should Stand Firm on the Senkaku Islands Dispute”, The Association of Japanese Institutes of Strategic Studies, 6 November 2012, available at: http://www2.jiia.or.jp/en_commentary/pdf/AJISS-Commentary164.pdf
O’shea, Paul. (2012). “Sovereignty and The Senkaku/Diaoyu Territorial Dispute”, available at: Http://Www.Hhs.Se/Eijs/Research/Documents/240.Pdf
Osti, Donatello. (2013). “The Historical Background to the Territorial Dispute over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands”, Analysis No.183, June 2013, available at: http://www.ispionline.it/sites/default/files/pubblicazioni/analysis_183_2013.pdf
Parwaz, Reza. (2015). Relief and recovery geopolitical North East Asia, Iranian Diplomacy. available at: http://www.irdiplomacy.ir/fa/page/1944909 [In Persian].
Pan, Zhongqi. (2007). “Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands: The Pending Controversy from the Chinese Perspective”, Journal of Chinese Political Science, vol. 12, no. 1, spring 2007, pp. 71–92
Pishgahifard, Zahra. (2005). An Introduction to Political Geography of Seas whit Emphasis on Iran's Seas, University of Tehran press. Tehran [In Persian].
Rashnoo, Nabiallah. (2013). Look at the position of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the new geopolitical conditions, Iranian National Center for Golobalization Studies, Tehran [In Persian].
Rashnoo, Nabiallah. Hamidi farahani, Hooman. (2013). Geopolitical and economic diplomacy of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Iranian National Center for Golobalization Studies, Tehran [In Persian].
Rashnoo, Nabiallah. (2015). Foreign policy, Iran's road map for sustainable development, available at: http://www.rashnoo.ir/2015/11 [In Persian].
Rudakowska, Anna. (2013). “Lessons for the EU from the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands Crisis”, Policy
