تحليل مفهوم شايستگي ديجيتال در نظام تربيت عمومي
الموضوعات : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی
حسن حذرخانی
1
(عضو هیات علمی، گروه شیمی، سازمان پژوهش و برنامه ریزی آموزشی)
فاطمه زهرا احمدی
2
(عضو هیئت علمی سازمان پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی)
مینو آیت اللهی
3
(رئیس گروه هنر،سازمان پژوهش و برنامه ریزی آموزشی)
الکلمات المفتاحية: تحلیل مفهوم, نظام تربیت عمومی, رویکرد کیفی, شایستگی دیجیتال,
ملخص المقالة :
دانش‌آموزان برای بهره‌مندی از فرصت‌های موجود در دنياي دیجیتال و به حداقل رساندن تهدیدهای آن، باید به شايستگي تازه‌اي به نام شایستگی دیجیتال مجهز شوند. چیستی مفهوم شایستگی دیجیتال در ميان صاحب‌نظران مورد مناقشه است و استفاده از مفاهيم نادرست در حوزه تعليم و تربيت سبب می‌شود كاربست آن با اشكال روبرو شود. از این رو، این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی ابعاد و خرده‌ابعاد مفهوم شايستگي ديجيتال در دانش‌آموزان انجام شده است. پژوهش با رویکرد کیفی و به روش مطالعۀ چند موردي صورت گرفت. شش چارچوب شناخته شده جهانی در زمینه شایستگی‌هایی که دانش‌آموزان در حوزه فناوری باید از آن برخوردار باشند انتخاب و تحلیل شدند. یافته‌ها نشان داد دانش‌آموز برخوردار از شایستگی دیجیتال، پنج بُعد برجسته شامل مديريت دسترسي به دانش، اطلاعات و محتواي ديجيتال؛ استفاده تعاملی از دانش، اطلاعات و فناوری؛ توليد محتواي ديجيتال؛ ارتقا سلامت و امنيت خود و ديگران در فضاي ديجيتال و نگاه انتقادي به آن را در رفتار خود نشان می‌دهد.
Adeyemon, E. (2009). Integrating digital literacies into outreach services for underserved youth populations. Reference Librarian, 50(1), 85-98
Ala-Mutka, K. (2008). Social Computing: Study on the Use and Impacts of Collaborative Content IPTS Exploratory Research on the Socio-economic Impact of Social Computing: Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission
Battelle for Kids (2009). P21 Framework Definitions. The Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved August 11, 2022 from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org
Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, 17-66.
Botes, A. (2002). Concept analysis: Some limitations and possible solutions. Curationis, 25(3), 23-27.
Braun V, Clarke V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology.; 3(2):77-101.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11, 589-597.
Calvani, A., Cartelli, A., Fini, A., & Ranieri, M. (2008). Models and instruments for assessing digital competence at school. Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society, 4(3), 183-193.
Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., & Picci, P. (2012). Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagers. Computers & Education, 58(2), 797-807.
Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment (2019). Thinking Skills and Personal Capabilities for key stage 3. Belfast: Council for the Curriculum, Examinations & Assessment. Retrieved. from https://ccea.org.uk/learning-resources/ thinking-skills-personal-capabilities/ planning-infusion
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Boston: Pearson Education.
Department for Education (2013) The national curriculum in England: key stages 1 and 2 framework document. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-primary-curriculum (Accessed: 16 May 2022).
Dey, Ian (1993). Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientist, New York: Routledge.
European Union (2019). Key competences for lifelong learning. Retrieved. from https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/297a33c8-a1f3-11e9-9d01-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
Ferrari, A. (2012). Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. Sevilla: Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission
Ferrari, A., Punie, Y., & Redecker, C. (2012). Understanding digital competence in the 21st century: An analysis of current frameworks. In 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills: 7th European Conference of Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2012, Saarbrücken, Germany, September 18-21, 2012. Proceedings 7 (pp. 79-92). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Finnish national board of education (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. Helsinki: Finnish national board of education
Foley A. S., Davis A. H. (2017). A guide to concept analysis. Clinical Nurse Specialist: The Journal for Advanced Nursing Practice, 31(2), 70–73
Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and information technologies, 21, 655-679.
International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2021).ISTE Standards, Retrieved Mrach 2021 from https://www.iste.org/iste-standards.
Klein, M. F. (Ed.). (1991). The politics of curriculum decision-making: Issues in centralizing the curriculum. Suny Press.
Mahapatra. A., Sharma, P. (2021) Education in times of COVID-19 pandemic: Academic stress and its psychosocial impact on children and adolescents in India. International Journal of social psychiatry; 67(4).
Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (2010). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Naseri E., Sarrafzadeh M; Noruzi A (2021). Investigation of digital native information behavior: A case of students between 15 and 18 years at the Faezun high school in Tehran. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science, 13 (3).
OECD (2005). Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies-Executive
Palfrey, J., Sacco, D. T., boyd, d., DeBonis, L., & Tatlock, J. (2008). Enhancing Child safety & Online Technologies. Final report of the Internet Safety Technical Task Force. Cambridge (MA), The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University: Internet Safety Technical Task Force to the MultiState Working Group on Social Networking of State Attorneys General of the United States
Patton, M.Q. (1980). Qualitative Evaluation Methods. )10th Ed(.. London: SAGE
Penrod J., Hupcey J. E. (2005). Enhancing methodological clarity: principle-based concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(4), 403–409.
Perifanou, M. A., Economides, A. A., (2019). An instrument for the digital competence actions framework, In: ICERI2019 Proceedings, 12th annual International Conference of Education. Research and Innovation, 11139-11145.
Prensky, M. 2012. From Digital Natives to Digital Wisdom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publication.
Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution (2012). Fundamental Reform Document of Education. Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution: Tehran. Available from https://sccr.ir/Files/6609.pdf June 2021
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2, 17-37.
UNESCO (2020). COVID-19 Education Response Webinar: The COVID-19 Pandemic of Disinformation and Hate Speech: How can Education and Digital Citizenship help? Paris: UNESCO Available at: https://en.unesco.org/events/covid-19-pandemic-disinformation-and-hate-speech-how-can-education-and-digital-citizenship
