A Hybrid Entropy-TOPSIS Method to Investigate the Effect of Auditing Team Norms and Peer Personality Components on the Objectivity of Financial Auditors

الموضوعات :

Azam Beygi Harchegani ¹ , Houshang Amiri ² , Mohammad Khodamoradi ³

1 - Department of Accounting, Khorramshahr-Persian Gulf International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramshahr, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran.
3 - Department of Mathematics, Izeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Izeh, Iran

تاريخ الإرسال : 12 الأحد , رجب, 1443 تاريخ التأكيد : 12 الأربعاء , رمضان, 1443 تاريخ الإصدار : 16 الجمعة , صفر, 1445

الکلمات المفتاحية: Entropy, TOPSIS, Objectivity of Financial Auditors,

ملخص المقالة :

Auditors' personality traits have a significant effect on the motivation of their financial behavior. In fact, the personal and personality traits of auditors that can be influenced by the environment play an important role in motivating individuals to engage in financially professional behaviors. Audit team norms are one of the factors in the audit firm environment that affect the auditor's behavior. In this study, the effect of auditing team norms and auditors' personality types on auditor objectivity was investigated. The Entropy technique is used to examine the importance of the norms of the audit team and the personality components of the peers, and based on the results and using the TOPSIS method, these factors affecting the objectivity of financial auditors are ranked. The statistical population of this study includes all professional auditors working in the auditing organization and private auditing institutions, members of the Iranian Society of Certified Public Accountants in 2020, including 242 members. The results showed that extroverted and responsible personality types have a positive and significant effect on auditors' objectivity. The results also showed that the norms of the audit team have a positive and significant effect on the objectivity of auditors.

المصادر:

• Adili, M., Khodamipour, A., Pourheidari, O., Investigation the Effect of Audit Firm’s Ethical Culture and Auditors Personality Types on Auditor Objectivity, Accounting and Auditing Research, 2020, 12(46), P. 5-20.

 Doi: 10.22034/iaar.2020.112777

 

• Akrseli, E. R., A basic quantification of the competitive implications of the demise of Arthur Andersen, Review of Industrial Organization, 2012, 29 (3), P. 193–212. Doi: 10.1007/s11151-006-9117-5

 

• Akhar, G., and Konha, W., Heuristic decision making, Annual Review of Psychology, 2017, 62, P. 451-482. Doi: 1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346


• Azadi, M., Izadikhah, M., Ramezani, F., Hussain, F.K., A mixed ideal and anti-ideal DEA model: an application to evaluate cloud service providers, IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 2020, 31(2), P.233-256, Doi: 1093/imaman/dpz012


• Aleni, B.M., de Jonge, J., Smit, D., Depla, M.F., Pot, A.M., The moderating role of decision authority and coworker-and supervisor support on the impact of job demands in nursing homes: a cross-sectional study, Int J Nurs Stud, 2015, 49(7), P. 822–33. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.02.003

 

• Arnesoun, C. , Brazel, J. F., Hatfield, R. C., Jackson, S. B., How do audit work paper reviewers cope with the conflicting pressures of detecting misstatements and balancing client workloads? Auditing: J. Practice Theory, 2015, 29 (2), P. 27–43. Doi: 10.2308/aud.2010.29.2.27

 

• Aberou, E, P. L., Occupational stress among health care workers: a test of the job demand-control model, J. Org. Behav, 2019, 9(3), P. 217–239. Doi: 10.1002/job.4030090303

 

• Barg Land, M., Kong, S., The Structure of the Belgian Audit Market: The Effects of Clients’ Concentration and Capital Market Activity, Internal Journal of Auditing, 2018, 1(2), P. 151- 162. Doi: 10.1111/1099-1123.00019

 

• Bzerman-Ponte, E., Escobar-Rodriguez, T., Borrero-Dominguez, C., Empirical analysis of delays in the signing of audit reports in Spain, International Journal of Auditing, 2016, 12(2), P. 129-140. Doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008. 00375.x


• Badpa, B., Pourheidari, O., khodamipour, A., Investigating the Effect of Transformational Client Leadership on Auditor’s Judgment and the Mediating Role of Client Identification, The Journal of Accounting Advances, 2019, 11(1), P. 29-67. Doi: 10.22099/jaa.2019.32501.1827


• Cenap, S., Akhtar, S., Arshad, M. A., Mahmood, A., Ahmed, A., Spiritual quotient
  towards organizational sustainability: the Islamic perspective, World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 2018, 13(2), P. 163-170. Doi: 10.1108/WJEMSD-01-2017-0002.

 

• Chen, A., Pina e Cunha, M., Workplace spirituality and organizational commitment:
  an empirical study. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2017, 21(1), P. 53-75.
  Doi: 10.1108/09534810810847039

 

• Calger-Ponte, E., Escobar-Rodriguez, T., Borrero-Dominguez, C. Empirical analysis of delays in the signing of audit reports in Spain, International Journal of Auditing, 2008, 12(2), P. 129-140. Doi: 10.1111/j.1099-1123.2008.00375.x

 

• Doling C.T., Analysis of the influence of emotional intelligence (EQ) and spiritual
  intelligence (SQ) on employee performance, Journal of Business and Management, 2018, 15(1), P. 1-16. Doi: 10.24818/mer/2020.06-05

 

• Hafman, D. W., Spirituality and management, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2015, 9(6), P. 5-8.

   Doi: 10.1108/02683949410070142.

• Jokar, H., Shamsaddini, K., Daneshi, V., Investigating the Effect of Investors' Behavior and Management on the Stock Returns: Evidence from Iran, Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2018, 3(3), P. 41-52. Doi: 10.22034/amfa.2018.544948


• Feransic, K., Jensen K. L., and Payne. J. L., The effect of a bidding restriction on the audit services market. Journal of Accounting Research, 2020, 38(2), P.355–374. Doi: 10.2307/2672937

 

• Gholamrezaee, M., Hassani, M., The Effects of Personality Disorder on Auditors' Professional Skepticism, Journal of Accounting Knowledge, 2019, 10(2), P. 43-76. Doi: 10.22103/jak.2019.13195.2866


• Khajavi, S., Kermani, E., Personality Traits Affecting Knowledge Sharing in Audit Firms with Structural Equation Approach, the financial Accounting and Auditing Researches, 1400, 13(50), P. 1-32. (in Persian)


• Makirimk, A., Nakamura, T., Basic Study on Prevention of Human Error—How Cognitive Biases Distort Decision Making and Lead to Crucial Accidents, In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Krakow, Poland, 1994, 19–23, P. 136–141.

 

• Mitrouf, D., Netan, A., Choices, Values, and Frames. Am. Psychol., 1999, 34, P. 341–350.

 

• Bazerman, M.H., Moore, D.A., Judgment in Managerial Decision Making; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2001.

 

• Namazi, M., Zeraatgari, R., Interesting Accounting Information for Tehran Stock Exchange Investors with Different Personalities,Empirical Research in Accounting, 2020, 10(4), P. 26-50. Doi: 10.22051/jera.2018.18970.1925

 

• Negrmantou, E. R., A basic quantification of the competitive implications of the demise of Arthur Andersen. Review of Industrial Organization 2010, 29 (3), P. 193–212. Doi: 10.1007/s11151-006-9117-5

 

• Pochita Martizou, D., Demaria, S., Magnan, M., Beyond earnings: Do EBITDA reporting andgovernance matter for market participants? Manageral Finance, 2021, 43(2), P. 193–211. Doi: 10.1108/MF-07-2016-0205.


• Poordavoodi, A., Moazami Goudarzi, M.R., Haj Seyyed Javadi, H., Rahmani, A.M., Izadikhah, M., Toward a More Accurate Web Service Selection Using Modified Interval DEA Models with Undesirable Outputs, Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2020, 123(2), P. 525-570, Doi: 32604/cmes.2020.08854


• Parsa, B., Sarraf, F., Financial Statement Comparability and the Expected Crash Risk of Stock Prices, Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2018, 3(3), P. 77-93.

 Doi: 10.22034/amfa.2018.544951

• Regou, A., Kahneman, D., Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases, Science, 1974, 185(4157), P. 1124-1131. Doi: 1126/science.185.4157.1124


• Salehi, A., Mohammadi, S., Afshari, M., Impact of Institutional Ownership and Board Independence on the Relationship Between Excess Free Cash Flow and Earnings Management, Advances in Mathematical Finance and Applications, 2017, 2(3), P. 91-105. Doi: 10.22034/amfa.2017.533104


• Soukidi, E., Psychological Testing at Work, The McGraw-Hill Companies. New York, 2002.

 

• Seven, S., Baumbach, E., Woodside, A. G., Applying configurational theory to build a typology of ethnocentric consumers, International Marketing Review, 2020, 33(3), P. 351–375. Doi: 10.1108/IMR-03-2014-0075.

 

• Sepehri, P., Azadi, K., Vatanparast, M., Akbari, B. Auditor's Personality Types and Their Adherence to Code of Professional Ethics, Management Accounting, 2020, 13(44), P. 205-215. (in Persian)

 

• Safari Gerayli, M., Valyan, H., Designing a Model and Assessing the Capabilities of Audit Institutions in Promoting Social Trust, journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting, 2019, 3(6), P.65-104
  
  


• Terihanedina, R., Spirituality, Progress, Meaning, and Values, Paper Presented 3rd
  Annual Conference on Spirituality, Leadership, and Management, Ballarat, 4 December, 2015.

 

• Teslangou S., Sankaraguruswamy, S., and Y. Zang. Audit Market Concentration and Audit Quality. Working paper, Indian School of Business, National University of Singapore, and Singapore Management University, 2019.

 

• Yang, H., Xie, Sh., How does auditors’ work stress affect audit quality? Empirical evidence from the Chinese stock market, China Journal of Accounting Research, 2014, 9, P. 305–319. Doi: 10.1016/j.cjar.2016.09.001

 

• Zare, R., Izadikhah, M., Multi-criteria decision making methods for comparing three models of aluminum ingot production through life cycle assessment, Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2017, 15(3), P. 1697-1715, Doi: 10.15666/aeer/1503_16971715

 

• Zahr, A., Nakamura, T., Marshal, W., Influence of Cognitive Biases in Distorting Decision Making and Leading to Critical Unfavorable Incidents, Safety, 2013, 1, P. 44-58; Doi:10.3390/safety1010044.

 

• Chen, S.J., Hwang, C.L., Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992.

 

• Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 1981.

 

• Shannon, C. E., A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System Technical Journal, 1948, 27(3), P.379-423, Doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x.