Response of Phenological, Morphological Traits and Crop Production to Apply Different Level of Azospirillum and Azotobacter of Maize Genotypes
الموضوعات :
Abbas soleymanifard
1
(Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University, P.O. Box 19395-3697, Tehran, Iran.)
الکلمات المفتاحية: Grain yield, Nutrition, dry weight, corn, Biofertilizer,
ملخص المقالة :
BACKGROUND: Organic farming has emerged as an important priority area globally in view of the growing demand for safe and healthy food and long term sustainability and concerns on environmental pollution associated with indiscriminate use of agrochemicals.OBJECTIVES: This study was done to determine effect of different level of biofertilizer on phenological, morphological and seed yield characteristics of corn genotypes.METHODS: Current research was conducted as split plot in randomized complete bock design with three replications in Payamnoor university of Ilam in 2009-2010. Treatments were cultivar (SC604, SC704 and SC807) as main plots and rhizobacteria (non- inoculation, inoculation with Azetobacter, Azospirillum and dual inoculation of Azotobacter and Azospirillum) as subplots.RESULT: The effect of cultivar on day to maturity, plant height, stem diameter, dry to matter and grain yield was significant. SC 704 had the highest, day to maturity, plant height, dry to matter and grain yield. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on all traits was significant. Dual inoculation of Azotobacter and Azospirillum had the highest ear initiation day to ear, day to maturity, plant height, stem diameter, dry to matter and grain yield. Obtained results show that double- inoculation was the most effective treatment in all cultivars. Other effective treatment were Azotobacter and Azospirillum inoculation, separately This is indicated that using growth prompting fertilizers as double- inoculation caused to increasing maize yield through synergistic effects by improving growth prompting hormones, controlling pathogenesis and growth reducing agents due to producing fungicide antibiotics and compounds (antagonistic effect) and also air molecular nitrogen fixing and also producing growth prompting hormones such as oxine, cytokenine and giberlines and solving mineral compound.CONCLUSION: The highest and lowest grain yield obtains from SC 704 with dual inoculation of Azotobacter and Azospirillum and SC 604 with non-inoculation treatment, respectively. Also studied cultivars showed different responded to most parameters.
Azimi, S. M., A. Farnia, M. Shaban. and M. Lak. 2013. Effect of different biofertilizers on Seed yield of barley (Hurdeom vulgar L.), Bahman cultivar. Intl. J. Adv. Biol. Biomedical Res. 1(5): 538-546.
Bahamin, S., M. Sohrab, A. B. Mohammad, K. T. Behroz. and A. Qorbanali. 2014. Effect of bio-fertilizer, manure and chemical fertilizer on yield and reproductive characteristics of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Intl. J. Res. Agric. Environ. Sci. 3(1): 36-43.
Gholami, A., S. Shahsavani. and S. Nezarat, 2009. The Effect of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria on Germination, Seedling Growth and Yield of Maize. World Academy Sci. Engineering Technology. 49: 19-24.
Hafeez, F. Y., M. E. Safdar, A. U. Chaudry. and K. A. Malik. 2004. Rhizobial inoculation improves seedling emergence, nutrient uptake and growth of cotton. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 44: 617-622.
Hassanpour, R., H. Pyrdshty, M. Ismaili. and A. Abbasids. 2011. Effects of biological fertilizer on yield, its components of sesame varieties. Proc. 11th Cong. Agron. Plant Breed. 4th Aug. pp: 4217-4220. (Abstract in English)
Kemal, Y. O. and M. Abera. 2015. Contribution of integrated nutrient management practice for sustainable crop productivity, nutrient uptake and soil nutrient status in Maize based cropping systems. J. Nutr. 2(1): 1-10.
Jorfi, A. 2014. Response of corn hybrids to biological and chemical nitrogen fertilizers under Shoushtar Region. Master's thesis. Islamic Azad University, Khuzestan. Science and Research Branch. 150 pp. (Abstract in English)
Nieto, K. F. and W. T. Frankenberger. 1991. Influence of adenine, isopenthyle alchole and Azotobacter chroococcum on vegetative growth of Zea mays. Plant and Soil. 135: 213-221.
Nouraki, F., M. AlaviFazel, A. Naderi, E. Panahpoor. and Sh. Lack. 2016. Effects of integrated management of bio and chemical fertilizers on yield of maize hybrids. J. Exp. Biol. Agri. Sci. 4(4): 421-426.
Rai, S. N. and A. C. Caur. 1998. Characterization of Azotobacter Spp. And effect of Azospirilum lipoferum on the yield and N-Uptake of wheat crop, Plant and Soil. 109: 131-134.
Singh. R., R. K. Behl, K. P. Singh, P. Jain. and N. Narula. 2004. Performance and gene effects for wheat yield under inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi and Azotobacter chroococcum. Haryana Agricultural University. Hisar, India. Plant Soil Environ. 50(9): 409-415.
Soleimanzadeh, H. and F. Ghooshchi. 2013. Response of growth and yield of maize to bio-fertilizers in organic and conventional cropping systems. Intl. J. Agri. Crop Sci. 5 (7): 797-801.
Szulc, P. 2013. Effects of soil supplementation with urea and magnesium on N uptake, and utilization by two different forms of maize in senescence rates. Polish J. Environ. Studies. 22: 239-248.
Tilak, K. V. B. R. 1992. Azospirillum brasilense and Azotobacter chrooccocum inoculum effect of maize and sorghum. Soil Bio. Biochem. 14: 417-418.
Turan M., N. Ataoglu. and F. Sahin. 2006. Evaluation of capacity of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and fungi on different forms of phosphorus in liquid culture. Sust. Agri. 28: 99–108.
Wu, S. C., Z. H. Caob, Z. G. Lib, K. C. Cheunga. and M. H. Wong. 2005. Effects of bio-fertilizer containing N-fixer, P and K solubilizers and AM fungi on maize growth: a greenhouse trial. Geoderma. 125: 155–166.
Zahir, A. Z., M. Arshad. and W. F. Frankenberger. 2004. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: applications and perspectives in agriculture. Adv. Agron. 81: 97-168.
Zaied, K. A., A. H. Abd-El-Hady, A. H. Afify. and M. A. Nassef. 2003. Yield and nitrogen assimilation of winter wheat inoculated with new recombinant inoculants of rhizobacteria. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 6: 344-358.
Zhang, Ji., Sh. Bei, B. Li, Ju. Zhang, P. Christie. and X. Li. 2019. Organic fertilizer, but not heavy liming, enhances banana biomass, increases soil organic carbon and modifies soil microbiota. J. Appl. Soil Ecol. 136: 67-79.
