The appropriate pattern of distribution of construction credits in the provinces of Iran With the method of ideal planning and the goal of economic justice

الموضوعات :

Fateme Sadeghi Pour ¹ , saeid karim zade daei ² , Hosein Sharifi Ranani ³

1 - Department of International Economics, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Islamic Azad University, Isfahan,
2 - Department of Economics, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Iran
3 - Department of Economics, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Iran

تاريخ الإرسال : 05 الثلاثاء , جمادى الأولى, 1444 تاريخ التأكيد : 12 الثلاثاء , شوال, 1444 تاريخ الإصدار : 12 الخميس , ذو القعدة, 1444

الکلمات المفتاحية: construction budget, budgeting, Economic Justice, Provinces of the country, ideal planning,

ملخص المقالة :

The aim of the research is to determine the share of the construction budget of each province in the direction of achieving the goal of economic justice. For this purpose, the ideal planning technique, which is a multi-criteria decision model in the field of linear algebra, was used for 31 provinces of the country during the years 2014-2018. Economic justice based on the variables of the Gini coefficient, unemployment rate, percentage of gross production, percentage of literate, household dimension, economic participation rate, relative population density, investment ratio, the share of Tehran Stock Exchange transactions, roads, water, internet penetration coefficient, coefficient The penetration of social security insurance and the price index has been calculated.The results of the model optimization show that there is a difference between the distribution of the real construction budget and the ideal construction budget. Gilan was the only province where there was no difference between the calculated ideal construction budget and the actual construction budget allocated there. The provinces of West Azarbaijan, Khorasan Razavi, Khuzestan, Sistan, Baluchistan, Fars, Kerman, Kermanshah, Lorestan, Mazandaran, and Hormozgan have a positive deviation, which means that the allocation is more than the ideal amount, and the rest of the provinces have a negative deviation, which means that the allocation is less than the amount. It is ideal.Based on the obtained results, it is suggested to use new and more efficient budgeting methods, especially the methods that measure, observe and track the targeted indicators of the system. It is also suggested that the share of Ardabil, Alborz, Ilam, Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari, North Khorasan, Zanjan, Semnan, Qazvin, Qom, Markazi, Hamedan, and Yazd provinces in the allocation of construction credits and in order to increase economic justice in the country's provinces, which is deviating More than negative one have to be increased.

المصادر:

• Ankh Bayar, Ch., B. Lkhagvajav, N. Tungalag, R. Enkhbat (2019) Application of Markowitz Model to Mongolian Government Budget, Business School, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, iBusiness Vol.11 No.3.


• Azar, A. Sadeghi Shabhani, M. Rezabiki, R. M. (2019) Mapping the model of factors affecting the distortions of the country's public budget, Scientific Journal (Quarterly) Researches and Economic Policies No. 94, Year 28, Pages 426-397.


• Dindar Rostami, M. Shamsullah Sh. Bakhsh M. Afshari, Z. (2019) Investigating factors affecting cyclical and structural budget deficits in Iran, Scientific Quarterly of Applied Economic Studies of Iran, ninth year, number, 33, pages 225-199.


• Ghafari Fard, M. & Shojaei M.R. (2018) Investigating the performance of budget distribution between different provinces of Iran based on their capacity and needs during the first and last years of the 11th and 12th governments, Financial and Economic Policy Quarterly, 7th year, number 28.


• Brusca, I. & Labrador, M. (2016). Budgeting in the Public Sector. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, DOI 10.1007.978-3-319-31816-5_2361-1.


• Jafari Samimi, A. Zarin Iqbal, H. Zibai, M. R. Derakhshani Darabi, K. (2016) Comparative study of public sector economy in the economic model of the Islamic Republic of Iran Constitution and welfare states, Economic Research Quarterly (Sustainable Growth and Development) Year 16, number one, pages 41-75.


• Kanbur, R. (2021) Sustainable Development Goals and the Study of Economic Inequality, the Journal of Economic Inequality, 19:3–11.


• Kerola, E. & Mojon, B. (2021) What 31 provinces reveal about growth in China, Monetary and Economic Department, NO 925, 3- 31.


• Masumzadeh, S. Shirafken, M. and Mohammadinejad, M. (2016) Examining the Convergence of Income Distribution in Iran's Provinces, Economic Modeling Quarterly, Year 12, Number 1, Number 41, Spring 2017, Pages 178-161.


• Rubin, I.S. (2016). The Politics of Public Budgeting: Getting and Spending, Borrowing and Balancing, sage Publication.


• Rahmani Fazli, C. Arab-Mazar, A. (2015). Optimal distribution of provincial budget resources based on an optimal control model. Quarterly Journal of Economic Researches and Policies. Year 24. Number 79. pp: 7-28.


• Rajabi, A. (2013) An effective approach in budgeting and optimal allocation of financial resources-case study: budget allocation of the Ministry of Health and Treatment to the provinces of the country. Health Accounting Quarterly. 1 (2 and 3). pp. 1-16.


• Seyed Rezaei, M. Y. Pourezat, A.A. and Saadabadi, A.A. (2016) Considerations of the budgeting system in order to achieve regional justice, Public Management Perspective, No. 29, 73-91.


• Shakri, A. Momeni, F. Alizadeh, A. Kh. And Mousavi, S.H.M. (2017) An Introduction to the Composite Index of Economic Justice with an Islamic Approach, Scientific-Research Quarterly of Islamic Economy, Year 19, Number 74, Pages 33-5.


• Shakri, A. Momeni, F. Alizadeh, A. Kh. And Mousavi, S.H.M. (2018) Measuring the composite index of economic justice with an Islamic approach in Iran (2016-2018), two scientific quarterly journals of Iran's economic essays, year 16, number 31, pages 9_ 40.


• Tavaklian, H. Mohammadi, T. and Siami Iraqi, E. (2019) Determining the financial rule of the budget balance for Iran's economy using the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) approach, Economic Research and Policy Quarterly, number 95, pages 10-1.


• Tedin, F. Ranjbar, H. Rajabi, M. Samati, M. (2019) Simultaneous control of budget deficit and trade deficit in Iran's economy with the aim of economic growth, Scientific Quarterly, Economic Growth and Development Research, Year 11, Number 41. (83-96).


• Zampelli, E. M & Yen, S.T. (2021) Individual Attitudes toward Government’s Role in Redistributing Income in the United States: Analysis by Ideological Subgroups, The Journal of Economic Inequality volume 19, pages 115–137.