کیفیت تخم‌ها و صفات جوجه‌درآوری در دو لاین مرغ دو منظوره با رشد آهسته پرورش یافته به ‌طور سنتی یا روی مرتع

Subject Areas : Camel

ای. پتکوو ¹ , م. ایگناتووا ² , ت. پپووا ³ , اس. ایوانووا ⁴

1 - Institute of Animal Science Kostinbrod, Kostinbrod, Bulgaria
2 - Institute of Animal Science Kostinbrod, Kostinbrod, Bulgaria
3 - Institute of Animal Science Kostinbrod, Kostinbrod, Bulgaria
4 - Agricultural Institute-Shumen, Shumen, Bulgaria

Received: 2019-02-26 Accepted : 2019-04-15 Published : 2020-03-01

Keywords: مرتع, کیفیت تخم‌ها, صفات جوجه‌درآوری, لاین آهسته رشد,

Abstract :

کیفیت تخم‌ها و صفات جوجه‌درآوری دو لاین آهسته رشد – La Belle (LB) و Bresse Gauloise (BB) پرورش یافته تحت سیستم ستنی یا جایگزین با دسترسی مرتع مقایسه شدند. پرندگان هر دو لاین در مطالعه در سن 37-27 هفته بودند. آنالیز ANOVA دو مسیره برای ارزیابی اثر سیستم پرورشی و همچنین لاین روی ویژگی‌های کیفی تخم‌ها و صفات جوجه‌درآوری لاین‌های LB و BB استفاده شد. هر دو عامل تا حدی متفاوت صفات مورد بررسی را تحت تأثیر قرار دادند. اثر سیستم پرورشی بسیار قوی‌تر از لاین در ارتباط با کیفیت تخم‌ها بود. پرندگان پرورش یافته روی مرتع وزن تخم (0.001>P) و محتوی زرده، سفیده و پوسته (0.001>P) بیشتری داشتند، اگرچه سیستم جایگزین به طور معنی‌داری رنگ زرده را کاهش داد (0.001>P). اثر لاین از نظر صفات جوجه‌درآوری برجسته‌تر بود، اگرچه اغلب با سیستم پرورش برهمکنش داشت. به ‌طور کلی، باروری تخم‌های لاین BB زمانی‌که پرورش سنتی بود به‌ طور چشمگیری کاهش داشت (0.001>P) ، همان‌طور جوجه‌‌درآوری آنها زمانی‌که به عنوان درصد کل تعداد تخم‌ها بیان می‌شود (0.001>P). از طرف دیگر، جوجه‌درآوری تخم‌های بارور به ‌طور مثبت توسط سیستم جایگزین تحت تأثیر قرار گرفت (0.001>P) و در لاین BB بالاتر بود که نشان دهنده سازگاری بالاتر آنها در مقایسه با لاین LB بود.

References:

Ayala F.J. and Kiger J.A. (1984). Modern Genetics. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California.

Bar A., Vax E. and Striem S. (1999) Relationships among age, eggshell thickness and vitamin D metabolism and its expression in the laying hen. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 123, 147-154.

Belorechkov D. (2010). Welfare in Rearing of Broilers. Enyovche, Sofia, Bulgaria.

Belorechkov D. (2015). The relationship between the egg shell formation and the strength of bones in layer hens. Poult. Breed. 4, 4-11.

Belorechkov D. (2016a). Quality of the shell and its cuticle in the eggs. Poult. Breed. 1, 17-25. 

Belorechkov D. (2016b). Sexual behavior in cocks and hens. Poult. Breed. 5, 4-12.

Casagrande P.P., Passamonti F. and Asdrubali G. (2001). La gallina ovaiola allevata a terra e in gabbia. Riv. Avicolt. 3(5), 12-15.

Chang S.C., Lin M.J., Fan Y.K. and Lee T.T. (2016). Effects of lighting intensity on growth and reproductive performance of breeder geese. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 25, 315-321.

Council Directive 1999/74/EC.(1999).Laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens.https://euralex.europa.eu/legalacontent/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A31999L0074 Accessed Feb. 2019.

Council Regulation (EC) No. 1804/1999. (1999). Supplementing Regulation (EEC) No. 2092/91 on organic production of agricultural products and indications referring thereto on agricultural products and foodstuffs to include livestock production. http://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/en/c/LEXAFAOC018524 Accessed Feb. 2019.

Fitze P.S., Tschirren B., Gasparini J. and Richner H. (2007). Carotenoid-basedplumage colors and immune function: is there a trade-off for rare carotenoids? Am.Nat. 169, 137-144.

Haq A., Bailey C.A. and Chinnah A. (1996). Effects of β-carotene, canthaxanthin, lutein, and vitamin e on neonatal immunity of chicks when supplemented in the broiler breeder diets. Poult. Sci. 75, 1092-1097.

Haugh R.R. (1939). Unit for measuring egg storage conditions. Pp. 525-528 in Proc. 7^th World Poult. Cong., Cleveland, Ohio.

Kingóri A.M. (2010). Review of the factors that influence egg fertility and hatchabilty in poultry. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 10, 483-492.

Kouba M. (2003). Quality of organic animal products. Livest. Prod. Sci. 80, 33-40.

Kralik Z., Radišić Ž., Grčević M. and Kralik G. (2014). Comparison of table eggs quality originating from hens kept in different housing systems. Pp. 1-5 in Proc. 15^th European Symp. Quality of Eggs and Egg Prod., Bergamo, Italy.

Küçükyılmaz K., Bozkurt M., Herken E.N., Çınar M., Çatlı A.U., Bintaş E. and Çöven F. (2012). Effects of rearing systems on performance, egg characteristics and immune response in two layer hen genotype. Asian-Australasian J. Anim. Sci. 25, 559-568.

Lordelo M., Fernandes E., Bessa R.J.B. and Alves S.P. (2017). Quality of eggs from different laying hen production systems, from indigenous breeds and specialty eggs. Poult. Sci. 96, 1485-1491.

Md Rakibul H., Md Ataul Goni R., Shabiha S. and Nathu Ram S. (2018). Effects of strains and temperature on production performance, egg qualities and physiological response of laying hens. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 13, 253-262.

Mertens K., Bamelis F., Kemps B., Kamers B., Verhoelst E., De Ketelaere B., Bain M., Decuypere E. and De Baerdemaeker J. (2006). Monitoring of eggshell breakage and eggshell strength in different production chains of consumption eggs. Poult. Sci. 85, 1670-1677.

Minelli G., Sirri F., Folegatti E., Meluzzi A. and Franchini A. (2007). Egg quality traits of laying hens reared in organic and conventional systems. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 6(1), 728-730.

Moller A.P., Biard C., Blount J.D., Houston D.C., Ninni P., Saino N. and Surai P.F. (2000). Carotenoid-dependent-signals: Indicator of foraging efficiency, immunocompetence or detoxification ability?. Avian Poult. Biol. Rev. 11, 137-159.

Mugnai C., Dal Bosco A. and Castellini C. (2009). Effect of rearing system and season on the performance and egg characteristics of Ancona laying hens. Italian J. Anim. Sci. 8(2), 175-188.

Mugnai C., Sossidou E.N., Dal Bosco A., Ruggeri S., Mattioli S. and Castellini C. (2014). The effects of husbandry system on the grass intake and egg nutritive characteristics of laying hens. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94(3), 459-467.

Oke O.E., Ladokun A.O. and Onagbesan O.M. (2014). Quality parameters of eggs from chickens reared in deep litter system with or without access to grass or legume pasture. Livest. Res. Rural Dev. Available at: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/11/oke26201.htm.

Rossi M. (2007). Influence of the laying hen housing systems on table egg characteristics. Pp. 33-41 in Proc. 18^th European Symp. Quality Poult. Meat., Prague, Czech.

Roush W.B. (1981). T 159 calculator program for Haugh unit calculation. Poult. Sci. 60, 1086-1088.

Samiullah S., Roberts J.R. and Chousalkar K.K. (2014). Effect of production system and flock age on egg quality and total bacterial load in commercial laying hens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 23, 59-70.

Sauveur B. (1991). Mode élevage des poules et qualité de l’œuf de consommation. Prod. Anim. 4, 123-130.

Senapati P.K., Dask Madal K.G. and Chatterjee A.K. (1996). Relationship between egg weight, shape index, fertility, and hatchability of Japanese quail eggs. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 14, 574-577.

Soltanmoradi M.G., Seidavi A., Dadashbeiki M., Delgado F. and Gamboa S. (2013). Effect of time, amount and frequency of feeding on total egg production, fertility and hatchability in broiler breeders. Arch. Anim. Breed. 56, 1014-1022.

Sundrum A. (2001). Organic livestock farming: A critical review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 67, 207-215.

Surai P.F., Noble R.C. and Speake B.K. (1996). Tissue-specific differences in antioxidant distribution and susceptibility to lipid peroxidation during development of chick embryo. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 1304, 1-10.

Tengerdy R.P., Lacetera N.G. and Nockels C.F. (1990). Effects of β-carotene on disease protection and humoral immunity in chickens. Avian Dis. 34, 848-854.

Yilmaz Dikmen B., Ipek A., Şahan Ü., Sözcü A. and Baycan S.C. (2017). Impact of different housing systems and age of layers on egg quality characteristics. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 41, 77-84.