EStructural Equation Modeling of Factors Affecting the Realization of an Elderly-Friendly City (Case Study of Ahvaz)
Subject Areas : Urban and Regional Planning StudiesMajid Goodarzi 1 , Saeed Maleki 2 , Dariush Khodabakhshi 3
1 - Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 - Full Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
3 - Masters student of Geography and Urban Planning, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Keywords: the elderly, SEM, Ahvaz city, elderly-friendly city,
Abstract :
Introduction: According to the approach of the World Health Organization, elderly-friendly cities include those urban spaces in which the distribution of public services is such that it is most appropriate to the needs and limitations of the elderly. According to the statistics, the city of Ahvaz, like the whole country, is moving towards the aging of the population and old age. It should be designed and implemented so that the city is on the path of an elderly-friendly city.Research Aim: The purpose of this research is to Structural Equation Modeling of Factors Affecting the Realization of an Elderly-Friendly city in Ahvaz city. Methodology: The present research is applied-theoretical in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in nature and method with a survey approach. Friedman's test and structural equation modeling have been used to analyze the research data.Studied Areas: The geographical area of this research is Ahvaz city.Results: As a result, there is a difference between the indicators of the elderly-friendly city at the level of 95% confidence. In other words, the indicators of the elderly-friendly city from the participants’ perspective did not have the same priority. Accordingly, the social status index with an average rank of 1.81 has the highest score, and the health services index with a score of 1.06 has the lowest score. The regional results also show that the significance level obtained from the Friedman test is less than 0.05. There is a difference between the elderly-friendly city indicators in the eight districts of Ahvaz at the confidence level of 95%. In other words, the elderly-friendly city indicators have not had the same priority from the point of view of the respondents living in the regions. So, Zones 1 and 8, with the average rank of 2.88 and 2.79, have the highest rank, and Zone 6, with the score of 2.21, has the lowest. Analysis of structural equation model to investigate the effect of indicators of the elderly-friendly city of Ahvaz according to the coefficients of determination (R2) showed that the changes in the variable are significantly dependent on changes in independent variables of the research. Due to being positive Subscription index and redundancy index and three values of 0.01, 0.25, 0.36, which are introduced as low, intermediate, and high GOF values and obtaining 0.50 for GOF, the appropriate fit of the model was confirmed.Conclusion: The model explained to investigate the factors affecting the realization of the elderly-friendly city of Ahvaz also showed that the changes of the dependent variable depend to a considerable extent on the changes of the independent variables of the research. In other words, independent research variables can explain up to 50% of the dependent variable, indicating the proposed model’s desirability.
استبصاری، فاطمه؛ رحیمی خلیفه کندی، زهرا؛ استبصاری، کیمیا و مصطفایی، داود. (1398). مفاهیم و شاخصها شهر دوستدار سالمند. فصلنامه آموزش بهداشت و ارتقا ء سلامت، 8(1)، 9-5.
افتخاری اسکویی، آیسان و محمودی نژاد، هادی. (1395). تبیین مولفههای طراحی سالمند آسایشگاهی با رویکرد روان سلامت و نظریه فعالیت گاست و نظریه میدانی کورت لوین. دومین کنفرانس بین المللی انسان، معماری، عمران و شهر، تبریز.
اسداللهی، عبدالرحیم؛ اسمیلی، علی و صابری، لاله. (1394). بررسی شاخص سلامت، سرمایه اجتماعی و کنش مشارکتجویانِ سالمندان در شهر اهواز. مطالعات جامعهشناسی، 6(23)، 64-45.
ایرانشاهی، ایوب و قلعهنویی، محمود. (1395). ارزیابی میزان مطابقت فضاهای شهری با شاخصهای شهر دوستدار سالمند (مطالعه موردی خیابان چهارباغ اصفهان). مجله هویت شهر، 11(30)، 83-69.
تبریزی، نازنین؛ نوذر اصل، سهند، نقوی، مریم و اسماعیلی، مجید. (1397). سنجش نگرش گردشگران سالمند به شهر مشهد ازنظر شاخصهای شهر دوستدار سالمند. مجله گردشگری شهری، 5(3)، 89-83.
خزائی، مصطفی؛ امائی، مجتبی و داورپناه، مسعود. (1397). تحلیلی بر شهر دوستدار سالمند در ایران. جغرافیا و روابط انسانی. 1(3)، 890-887.
شرقی، علی؛ ضرغامی، اسماعیل، الفت، میلاد و صالحی کوسالاری، فرزانه. (1395). سنجش وضعیت شاخصهای جهانی شهر دوستدار سالمند در کلانشهر تهران. مطالعات و پژوهشهای شهری و منطقهای، 8(28)، 22-1.
شرقی، علی؛ قنبران، عبدالحمید و صالحی کوسالاری، فرزانه. (1399). مروری بر نظریههای سالمندی و بازتاب آن در ویژگیهای معماری منظر اقامتگاههای سالمندان. انسان و محیط زیست، 18(4)، 70- 55.
شیری، محمد و رستمی، الهام. (1395). ویژگیهای اقتصادی، اجتماعی و جمعیتی سالخوردگلن بر اساس سرشماری نفوس و مسکن سال 1395، پژوهشکده آمار مر کز آمار ایران.
صحاف رباب؛ خانکه حمیدرضا؛ ابوالفتحی ممتاز یدالله و همدان چی آریا. (1397). تحلیل محتوای عناوین پایاننامههای مرتبط به سالمندی در دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی. سالمند: مجله سالمندی ایران، ۱۳(۳)، 311- 300.
کریمی فرد، لیلا و فروغمند اعرابی، هوشنگ. (1394). شهر دوستدار سالمند و معیارهای طراحی مراکز تعاملات اجتماعی سالمندی با رویکرد سلامت روان. فصلنامه مدیریت شهری، 14(39)، 34-8.
کریمی، محبوبه و الهی، نسرین. (1394). سالمند آزاری در شهر اهواز و ارتباط آن با برخی مشخصات فردی و اجتماعی. مجله سالمندی ایران، 3(7)، 47-42.
کیانی، مژگان؛ مطلبی، سیده آمنه؛ میرزاده، منیر السادات و محمدی، فاطمه. (1398). ارزیابی شاخصهای شهر دوستدار سالمند شهر قزوین: فضاهای باز شهری. ساختمانها و مکانهای عمومی. مجله علمی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی قزوین، 5(106)، 439-430.
نصیری هنده خاله، اسماعیل و رضا علی، منصور. (1397). تأثیر مؤلفههای کالبدی و اجتماعی بر تحققپذیری شهر دوستدار سالمند مطالعه موردی شهر رشت. فصلنامه شهر پایدار، 1(4)، 87-73.
نعمتی، داریوش و آقا بخشی، حبیب. (1391). تهران شهر دوستدار سالمند، گامهای آغازین تحقق نخستین پایتخت سالمندی جهان (به مناسبت سال سالمندی). فصلنامه پژوهش اجتماعی، 6(18)، 44-15.
Andrew, S. (2011). Creating Aging-Friendly Communities in the United States. Published Onlin Springer Science Business Media, No 37, pp: 25-38.
Geoff, J., Gianna, Z., Geoff, G., & Manfred, H. (2015). Is a healthy city also an age-friendly city? Health Promotion International, 30, 108-117.
Guida, C., & Gerardo, C. (2021). Quality of life in the urban environment and primary health services for the elderly during the Covid-19 pandemic: An application to the city of Milan (Italy). Cities, Vol 110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103038.
Hoof, V., & Jan, K. (2012). The Challenges of Urban Ageing: Making Cities Age-Friendly in Europe. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8, 1-17.
Kelly, G., & Francis, J.C. (2014). an overview of Ago-friendly cities and communities Around the World. Journal of Aging &Social Policy, 13, 1-18.
Louise, P., & Alexander, K. (2010). Towards Global Age-Friendly Cities: Determining Urban Features that Promote Active Aging. Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine (2013) The New York Academy of Medicine, 5, 733-739.
Manley, E., Orr, S., & Cheng, T. (2015). A heuristic model of bounded route choice in urban areas. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 56, 195–209
Marshall, S., Gil, J., Kropf, K., Tomko, M., & Figueiredo, L. (2018). Street network studies: From networks to models and their representations, Networks and Spatial Economics, 18(3), 735–749.
Martin, T., & winter, S. (2013). Describing the functional spatial structure of urban environments, Computers. Environment and Urban Systems, 41, 177–187.
Nadel, L. (2013). Cognitive maps. In D. Waller, & L. Nadel (Eds.), Handbook of spatial cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 155-171.
Omer, I., & Kaplan, N. (2017). Using space syntax and agent-based approaches for modeling pedestrian volume at the urban scale, Computers. Environment and Urban Systems, 64, 57–67.
Omer, I., & Kaplan, N. (2019). Structural properties of the angular and metric street network’s centralities and their implications for movement flows. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(6), 1182–1200
Raquel, F., Antonio, C., & Ana, A. (2019). Evaluation of an Age-Friendly City and Its Effect on Life Satisfaction: A Two-Stage Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16, 117. 121.
Rodríguez, D. A., Merlin, L., Prato, C. G., Conway, T. L., Cohen, D., Elder, J. P., &Veblen-Mortenson, S. (2015). Influence of the built environment on pedestrian route choices of adolescent.
Sedini, C., & Zurlo, F. (2019). Building an Age-friendly City for Elderly Citizens through Co-designing an Urban Walkable Scenario. Academy for Design Innovation Management Conference, No14, 69-80.
Tine, B., Chris, P., & Thomas, S. (2012). Ageing in urban environments: Developing ago-friendly cities, Environ-Res, Public Health, 4, 597-617.
Torrens, P. M. (2014). High-fidelity behaviours for model people on model streetscapes. Annals of GIS, 20(3), 139 -157.
Transport for London. (2018). Walking action plan, London: Mayor of London. http://cont ent.tfl.gov.uk/mts-walking-action-plan.pdf?intcmp=54543. (Accessed 1 February (2020).
World Health Organization. (2020). our cities, our health, our future: acting on social determinants for health equity in urban settings. Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health from the Knowledge Network on Urban Settings. Retrieved at.
_||_