Identifying Social Sustainability Key Factors in Urban Neighborhoods (Case Study: Ardabil)

Subject Areas : Architecture and urbanization

maryam hafezifar ¹ , farah habib ² , hossein zabihi ³

1 - Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Civil, Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Civil, Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Urban Planning, Faculty of Civil, Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2018-12-31 Accepted : 2020-03-16 Published : 2021-01-20

Keywords: Sustainable Development, Social sustainability, Structural Interpretative Analysis, MicMac Software, Ardabil Urban Neighborhoods,

Abstract :

Regardless of Over Three Decades in Emerging the Concept of Sustainable Development, Social Sustainability Compared to Two Other Dimensions of Sustainability: Economic and Environmental, Has Been Neglected, However in Recent Years Related Literature to This Dimension Has Also Expanded. According to The Studies, The Best Scale for Assessing and Measuring the Social Sustainability is Urban Neighborhoods. But the Point Is Multiplicity and Variety of Indicators at Different Levels and Scales with Causal Relationships. Therefore, the Purpose of This Research Is to Analyze the Causal Relationships and Recognize the Key Factors of Social Sustainability in the Scale of Urban Neighborhoods in Ardabil. For this Purpose, Structural Interpretation Analysis Has Been Used in Mic‌Mac Software. In Order to Provide the Basic Data of Model Corresponded 47 Indicators, a 47*47 Matrix Was Provided to Experts in Urban Affairs of Ardabil. Sampling Method in This Section, Has been Targeted and Sequential Sampling in a Two- Step Delphi Format. Research Results Show that Social Sustainability Indicators Can Be Divided into four Categories of "Linked", "Effective", "Independent" and "Dependent" Variables. According to the Indirect Relationships Matrix, "Existence of Democratic Institutions", "Political and Institutional Responsibility", "Democracy Level" as "Management and Institutional" Indicators, Have the Most Indirect Influence in the Network of Relationship between Variables and Are Key Variables for Social Sustainability.

References:

Alberti, M.  & Lowrence, S. (1996). Managing urban Sustainability: An Introduction to Social Issue. Newyork: Elsevier.

Ali akbari, E. & Akbari, M. (2017). Interpretative-Structural Modeling of Factors that Affect the Viability of Tehran Metropolis. Space planning and design. 21 (1): 1-28 (In Persian)

Ancell, S. & Thompson-Fawcett, M. (2008). The Social Sustainability Of Medium Density Housing:A Conceptual Model and Christchurch Case Study. Housing Studies.23 (3): 423-442.

Assefa, G. & Frostell, B. (2007). Social Sustainability and Social Acceptance in Technology Assessment: A Case Study of Energy Technologies. Technology in Society. 29(1): 63-78

Azar, A. & Bayat, K. (2009). Designing a Model for "Business Process- Orientation" Using Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach (ISM). Journal of Information Technology Management. 1(1). 3-18 (In Persian)

Bagherinejad, Z., Kazem Zadeh, R. & Asadi, R. (2012). Identifying and Ranking of the Success Factors in Automotive Reverse Logistics through Interpretive Structural Modeling(ISM). Management Studies in Iran. 17(1). 21-40. (In Persian)

Barton, H., Grant, M. & Guise, R. (2003). Shaping Neighborhoods: A Guide for Health, Sustainability and Vitality. Spon Press. London.

Bramley, G., Dempsey, N., Power, S. & Brown, S. (2006). What is Social Sustainability and how do our Existing Urban Forms Perform in Nurturing It? Paper Presented at the "Sustainable Communities and Green Future" Conference. Bartlett School of Planning. University College London. London.

Bramley, G. & Power, S. (2009). Urban form and social sustainability: the role of density and housing type. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(1), 30-48.

Colantonio, A. (2008). Urban Social Sustainability: North–South Perspectives. PP: 1-11, presentation to UN-Habitat 4th World Urban Forum. 3–6 November 2008, Nanjing,China,www.brookes.ac.uk/schools/be/oisd/news/resources/UN_Habitat_seminar_2008.pdf, accessed 1 July 2009.

Colantonio, A. & Dixon, T. (2011). Urban Regeneration & Social Sustainability: Best Practice from European Cities. Wiley- Blackwell, New York and Oxford.

Colantonio. A. & Dixon, T. (2013). Social Sustainability: a Review and Critique of Traditional Versus Emerging Themes and Assessment Methods. Retrieved 2018, Dec. 27, from https://www.sue-mot.org/conference-files/2009/restricted/papers/papers/Colantonio.pdf

Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2009). The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19 (5), 289-300

Dempsey, N.C, Brown, B. & Bramley, G. (2012). The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability.  Progress in Planning, 77(3), 89-141.

Firuzjaeyan, A., Firuzjaeyan, F., Hashemi Petroodi, S.H. & Golamrezazadeh, F. (2013). Applying Techniques of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) in Tourism Studies (A Pathological Approach). Tourism Planning and Development. 2(6). 129-159 . (In Persian)

Forrest R. & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighborhood. Urban Studies 38(12), 2125–2143.

Huang J., Tzeng G., Ong Ch., (2115), Multidimensional data in multidimensional scaling using the analytic network process. Pattern Recognition Letters , Vol.21.

Karuppannan, S. & Sivam, A. (2011). Social Sustainability and Neighbourhood Design: An Investigation of Resident's Satisfaction in Dehli. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justic and Sustainability, 16(9), 849-870.

Koning, J. (2001). Social Sustainability in a Globalizing World: Context, Theory and Methodology Explored. Paper Presented in: UNESCO/ MOST Meeting. Hague. Netherlands.

Littig, B. & Griebler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: a catchword between political pragmatism and social theory International. Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 65-79.

Manzi, T., Lucas, K., Jones, T.L. & Allen, J. (2010). Social Sustainability in Urban Areas: Communities, Connectivity and the Urban Fabric. London and Washington DC, Earthscan.

McKenzie, S. (2004). Social Sustainability: Towards Some Definitions. Hawke Research Institute, Working Paper Series No. 27, University of South Australia, Magill. South Australia.

Mak, M.Y. & Peacock, C.J., (2011). Social Sustainability: A Comparison of Case Studies in UK, USA and Australia. Paper presented at 17^th Pacific Rim Real Estate Society Conference, Gold Coast 16-19 Jan 2011.

Moughtin, C. (1966). Urban Design: Green Dimension. Oxford: Butterworth Architecture.

Munier, N. (2005). Introduction to the Sustainability. London.

Murphy, K. (2012). The Social Pillar of Sustainable Development: A literature review and framework for policy analysis, Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 15-29.

Vallance, S., Perkins, H.C. & Dixon, J.E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum 42(3), 342-348.

Warfield J.N., (1974), Toward interpretation of complex structural modeling, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet, Vol.4, No.5.

Woodcraft, S. (2012). Social Sustainability and New Communities: Moving from Concept to Practice in the UK. ASIA Pacific International Conference on Environment-Behavior Studies. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Science, 68, 29-42.