Spatial analysis of healthy city indicators in Ilam’s townships centers
Subject Areas : Urban and Regional Planning Studiesfatemeh piri 1 , saeed aman pour 2 , maryam abaspour 3
1 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
2 - دانشیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
3 - دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، اهواز، ایران
Keywords: Spatial analysis, indicators of healthy city, urban areas, Ilam province,
Abstract :
City is the symbol of social culture, the main consumer of natural resources and producer of the largest amount of pollution and wastes that affect human life, nature and environment structure. The increasing trend of urbanization followed by development of environmental, social and demographic impacts has caused extensive responses from advocates of a healthy life away from pollution, health governance, human society and environment health. In the mid-1980s, the healthy city approach was raised as a way to achieve personal and social desirability. Healthy city creates facilities to foster healthy and productive organs that can promote healthy environment and community health and provide the basis for the development of relationships, human interactions and improve the ecological situation in the city. This study analyzes the status of some of the indicators of a healthy environment in the cities of Ilam province. The research method was descriptive analytic and based on secondary official data in which Topsis model was used for ranking the urban areas of the province. The results show that there is a significant discrepancy between Ilam urban areas in terms of indicators of a healthy city. In this regard, the situation is more robust in the city center of Ilam and has been ranked first and the last place is the city center of Abdanan. After Ilam city center, the city centers of Malekshahi and Eivan were ranked second and third And at the End of the table, the city centers of Darre shahr and Shirvan, respectively, were rated next before Abdanan.
21. Athens, J. 2004, Healthy housing in Nicaragua, Wisconsin coordinating council on Nicaragua, working paper series no.2.
22. Dooris, M. 1999. “Healthy cities and local agenda21: the uk experience challenges for the new millenium”. health promotion international.
23. Thompson, Stewart. 2007. Health planning Forum, premier’s council, UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) Institute for statistics, 144-156.
24. Ashton, Jan., 2009,From Healthy Towns 1843 to Healthy City 2008, Public Health, 1: 11-13
25. Randall, C., and Amrita D., 1996, measuring access to basic services in global cities: -Descriptive and Behavioral Approaches, Chicago Journal of the American Planning Association Vol. 62, No. 2, pp. 203-222.
26. J.Lawrence, R., & Fudge, C., 2009, Healthy cities in global and regional context, health promotion international .15
27. Leeuw, E., 2009, Evidence for healthy cities: reflection on practice,method and heory, health promotion international. p1.
28. M. Boonekamp, G., & others.,1999, Healthy cities evaluation: the co-ordinators perspective, Health promotion internaional. P104.
29. Northridge, M., D. Sclar, E., & Biswas, P., 2003, sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: a conceptual framework for vavigating pathway and planning healthy cities, Urban health.p 556.
30. Thompson, S., 2007, Health planning forum.
31. World Health Organization, 1998, Determinants of health: the solid facts, Geneva, switzerland.
32. World Health Organization, 1998, Determinants of health: the solid facts, Geneva, switzerland.
31. More, T. 2003, »Translate by Paul Turner« Published by Penguin Group Utopia World Health Organization,2004,WHO Technical Meeting on Housing –Health Indicators, Regional office Europe,Rome,Italy,15-16 January p11
_||_