Analyzing the situation and the level of development of cities of the Guilan province in 1996 and 2011

Subject Areas : Urban and Regional Planning Studies

nahid fallahian ¹ , seyed mosa pourmosavi ² , reza vaisi ³ , hassan rezapour ⁴

1 - عضو هیأت علمی سازمان پژوهش و برنامه‌ریزی آموزشی، تهران ایران
2 - استادیار گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه امام حسین (ع)، تهران ایران
3 - دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
4 - دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، گروه جغرافیا، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

Received: 2014-07-12 Accepted : 2015-09-16 Published : 2015-08-23

Keywords: Guilan Province, urban areas, Inequality, Development Indicators,

Abstract :

Guilan province, inequality and lack of balance in the optimal distribution of resources and focus on facilities and services at the First City area (Rasht), imbalance and gaps in development between regions has caused. In this regard, the development target areas and identify the distribution of economic justice - social areas reduce regional disparities is essential. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the rank of metropolitan areas having the province in terms of development indicators and trend of development levels in the years 1375 to 1390 has done. The research method used in this study cross - the dominant approach, it is applied. To check the status of Guilan province gain and development of 40 indicators of economic, cultural, educational, health, housing and infrastructure, recreation and entertainment combined index is applied. Using factor analysis and Mauritius, the degree of development of each province is calculated and ranked. Then, using cluster analysis, urban areas in the province developed, semi-developed and is classified as disadvantaged. Another noteworthy Guilan province in 1996 due compare with 2011, an increase of inequality between the urban areas of the province. And finally calculated based on the regression model, the priority order of the indices to predict degrees of Guilan province in housing and infrastructure, recreational and entertainment services, economic factors, cultural services, education and health indicators are. 

References:

1. جمالی، فیروز، پورمحمدی، محمدرضا و قنبری، ابوالفضل، 1388، تحلیلی بر روند تغییرهای سطوح توسعه و نابرابری­های ناحیه­ای در نقاط شهری استان آذربایجان شرقی در سال­های 1365، 1375 و 1385، مجله جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی محیطی، ص 25.


2. حسین زاده دلیر، کریم،1383، برنامه ریزی ناحیه­ای، چاپ اول، انتشارات سمت، تهران.


3. رضوانی، محمدرضا، 1383، سنجش و تحلیل سطوح توسعه یافتگی نواحی روستایی در شهرستان سنندج، مجله جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیه­ای، شماره سوم، مشهد، صص 164- 149.


4. رئیس دانا، فریبرز، 1384، اندازه گیری شاخص و پیوش فقر در ایران، فصلنامه رفاه اجتماعی، دوره 4، شماره 17، ص 1.


5. زیاری،کرامت­اله و جلالیان، اسحاق، 1387، مقایسه شهرستان­های استان فارس براساس شاخص­های توسعه 75 – 1355، مجله جغرافیا و توسعه، شماره 11، ص 17.


6. کلانتری، خلیل،1380، برنامه­ریزی و توسعه منطقه­ای، انتشارات خوشبین، تهران.


7. مؤمنی، مهدی، 1377، درآمدی به اصول و روش­های برنامه ریزی ناحیه­ای، انتشارات گویا، تهران.
   
   
   1. Bono, Fillipa and et al.,2007, Regional Inequalities in Consumption Patterns: A Multilevel Approach to the Case of Italy, International Statistical Review, Vol. 75, No. 1 (April).
   
   
   2. Dawson, J. I., 2001, Latvia’s Russian Minority: Balancing the Imperatives of Regional Development and Environmental Justice, Political Geography, No. 20, PP. 787-815.
   
   

10. Dupont, V., 2007, Do Geographical Agglomeration, Growth and Equity Conflict? Regional Science, Vol. 86, No. 2 (June).

11. Jadidi Miandashti, M., 2004, Balanced Distribution of Financial Resources by Regional Development Level, Economical Research Quarterly, No. 11, PP. 17-41.

12. Martic´ M. and Savic´ G., 2001, An application of DEA for Comparative Analysis and Ranking of Regions in Serbia with Regards to Social-economic Development, European Journal of Operational Research, No. 132, PP. 343-356.

13. Matsumoto, M., 2008, Redistribution and Regional Development under Tax Competition, Journal of Urban Economics, No. 64, PP. 480-487.

14. Noorbakhsh, F., 2000, Human Development and Regional Disparities in India .Center for Development Studies Department of Economics University Glasgow.

15. Purohit, B.C., 2008, Health and Human Development at Sub-state Level in India, the Journal of Socio-Economics, No. 37, PP. 2248-2260.

16. Rondinelli, D.A.,1985, applied method of regional analysis, boulder and London,west view press.

17. Shankar, Raja and Anwar Shah ,2003, Bridging the Economic Divide Within Countries: A Scorecard on the Performance of Regional Policies in Reducing Regional Income Perception of Regional Development in less Development Countries: Toward Bridging the Gap, In: Breaking the Boundaries: A One – World Approach to Planning Education, Bishwapria Sanyal (eds), New York: Pilenum Press, PP: 211-230.

18. Wang, X. and Triantaphyllou, E.,2008,Ranking Irregularities when Evaluating Alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods, Omega, No. 36, PP. 45- 63.

19. Wang, Y.M., Liu, J., and Elhag, T.M.S., 2008, An Integrated AHP–DEA Methodology for Bridge Risk Assessment, Computers & Industrial Engineering, No. 54, PP. 513-525.

20. Yasouri, M., 2010, A Survey of Regional Inequality Status in Khorasan Razavi Province, International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, Vol. 1, No. 1, PP. 60-66.

21. Yu, Danlin and Yehua Dennis Wei., 2003, Analyzing Regional Inequality in Post– Mao China in GIS Environment”, Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 44, No. 7, PP.

22. Yu, L., Hou, X., Gao, M. and Shi, P., 2010, Assessment of Coastal Zone Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Yantai, China, Ecological Indicators, No. 10, PP. 1218-1225.

23. Ziari, K., Zanjirchi, S.M. and Sorkhkamal, K., 2010, A Study and Measurement of the Development Degree of the Counties of Khorasan Razavy Province Using TOPSIS Technique, Human Geography Research Quarterly, No. 72, PP. 17-30.