Effect of under Irrigation Management on Potato Performance Components

Subject Areas : Environmental policy and management

Fakhrodin Ghasemi Sahebi ¹ (M.Sc., Irrigation and Drainage, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran)
Masoud Hekmat ² (Department of Agricultural Management, Shoushtar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shoushtar, Iran)
Eman Pourkhiz ³ (Young Researchers Club, Ghaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran)

Received: 2015-08-29 Accepted : 2015-08-29 Published : 2012-06-01

Keywords: Potato, Tape Drip Irrigation, Furrow Irrigation, dry matter,

Abstract :

To evaluate the effect of water, tape drip and furrow irrigation methods on the performance components and features of Agria cultivar potato, an experiment was carried out in the agriculture faculty of Kermanshah. Repeated three times, this study was carried out in the form of full random blocks with the main factor of different amounts of irrigation water in three levels (50, 75, and100 percent of cumulative evaporation from an A- class evaporation pan) and the secondary factor of irrigation method (including drip and furrow irrigations). At 3 repetitions, results showed that the minimum performance (19.168 tons per hectare) was related to the drip irrigation method with 50 percent evaporation from the A-class pan and the maximum one (34.455 tons per hectare) was related to the drip irrigation method with 100 percent evaporation from the A-class pan. The rate of irrigation and effectiveness of method on the number of the main stem per square meter and number of the main stem in the bush were not significant. The minimum percent (number of tubers) of tubers smaller than 35mm (26.47percent) and the maximum tuber production (37.17 percent) in the size of food and market-friendly (tuber bigger than 55mm) were attained by drip irrigation method with 100 percent evaporation from the A-class pan. The impact of Irrigation method on and the specific gravity of tubers and starch (dry matter) were and was not significant, respectively.

References:

1- Allen, E. J. (1992). The Effect of Row width onthe Yield of Three Potato Varieties, J. Agric. Sci.camb. 79: 315-321.

2- Almekinfers, C.J.M. (1991). Flowering and tTrueSeed Production in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.):Effect of Stem Density and Pruning at Lateral Stems,J. Potato Res. 34: 379-388. [DOI via Crossref]

3- Dokhani, Sh., & Rabeae Motmaen, L. (2001).Evaluation of the Variation Rate of Glucose and OrganicAcids of Potato Varieties (Moren, Mafona, andAgria) in Esfahan Province Dduring Storage withHigh Efficiency Chromatographic Method, journalof agriculture and natural resources sciences andtechnologies, 5th edition, 1:161-171.

4- Elizabet, G.C. (1992). Structure and Developmentof Potato Plant, PP. 65-146. In: Harris, P.M. (Ed), thepotato crop: Scientific basis for improvement, Chapmanand Hall, London.

5- Haverkort, A.J., DeWart, M.V., & Bodlaender,K.B.A. (1990). Inter-relationship of the Number ofInitial Sprouts, Stems, Stolons and Tubers per PotatoPlant, Potato Res. 33: 269-274. [DOI via Crossref]

6- Mohammadi, A., & Faeznia, F. (2001). Effect ofMoisture Stress on the Growth and Performance ofTwo Potato Varieties, Experimental Report of SemnanAgriculture Research Center (Shahroud)

7- Mosavi Fazl, H., & Faeznia, F. (2003). Effect ofWater and Azot Fertilizer Different Quantituies onthe Qualitative and Quantitative Characteristics ofPotato, Papers of the 11th Conger of the Iran NationalCommittee of the Irrigation and Drainage.

8- Nadler, A., & Heuer, B. (1995). Effect of SalineIrrigation and Water Deficit on Tuber Quality, PotatoRes. 38: 119-123. [DOI via Crossref]

9- Shock, C.C., Holmes, Z.A., Strieber, T.D., Eldredge,E.P., & Zhang, P. (1993). The Effect ofTimed Water Stress on Quality, Total Solids and ReducingSugar Content of Potatoes, Am. Potato J.70(3): 227-241. [DOI via Crossref]

11- Van Heemst, H.D.J. (1996). The Distribution ofDry Matter During Growth of a Potato Crop, J. PotatoRes. 28(1): 55-66.

12- Wurr, D.C.E. (1994). Effect of Seed Size andSpacing on the Yield and Grading of Two Main CropPotato Varieties, J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 82: 37-52.

13- Wurr, D.C.E. & Allen, E.J. (1974). Some Effectof Planting Density and Variety on the RelationshipBetween Tuber Size and Tuber Dry-Matter Percentagein Potatoes, J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 82: 227-252.

14- Yuan, B.Z., Nishiyama, S., & Kang, Y. (2003).Effect of Different Irrigation Regimes on the Growthand Yield of Drip-Irrigated Potato, Agric WaterManage. 63: 153-167. [DOI via Crossref]