Comparing the formats of MA produced abstracts with other disciplines matching with ISO 214 at the University of Science and Research Branch of Khuzestan: From 2007 to 2011
Subject Areas : Journal of Knowledge StudiesFariba Nazari 1 , mohsen hamidi 2
1 - Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch
2 - Department of Knowledge and Information Science, Islamic Azad University, Boroujerd Branch
Keywords: Islamic Azad University, Abstracting, ISO 214, Academic dissertations, Social and Humanities College, Khuzestan Science and Research Branch (of Islamic Azad University),
Abstract :
Purpose: The present research aimed at comparing the formats of abstracts among social sciences students at the MA level with other fields of studies regarding their appraisal based on the standards of ISO 214 between 2007 and 2011. Methodology: The study design was based on ex-post facto research and the data was collected through library search. Data included 3469 abstracts collection among the MA theses of the graduated students of Social Sciences, Politics, Knowledge and Information Science, Counseling, English language teaching, and Irrigation. The research instrument was a checklist developed by ISO 214 to check the criteria used to evaluate the appropriate formats of the abstracts at the MA level. This checklist was used to compare the MA abstract formats with those of standard abstracts written based on ISO 214.Analysis of the data was conducted through SPSS 17. Findings: The Chi-square analysis indicated that 50% of the abstracts carried out ISO 214 standards and the rest prepared inappropriately concerned with their styles of writing, spelling, meaning and coherence. In terms of ranking the abstracts concerning their appropriateness, Knowledge and Information Science, Counseling and English language teaching MA abstracts were better than those of Social Sciences, Politics, and Irrigation majors. Conclusion: The research may be useful for MA students and the supervisors since they need to follow ISO 214 to write their abstracts with clarity and effectiveness.
استیری، ع. (1371). اصول چکیدهنویسی و کاربرد آن در اطلاعرسانی. فصلنامه مصباح، 2(1)،102-113.
استاندارد ایزو چیست؟ (1379). پردازشگر، 50، 42 – 60.
شعبانی، عسگری، همایی و سعادت (1390). بررسی میزان انطباق چکیدهی فارسی پایاننامههای دورهی دکتری عمومی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اراک با استانداردهای چکیدهنویسی (ISO 214) مدیریت اطلاعات سلامت، 8(3).
صدیق بهزادی، م. (1381). اصول چکیده نویسی براساس استاندارد ایزو 214 – 1976. تهران: کتابخانه ملی جمهوری اسلامی ایران.
فرقدان، س. (1386). بررسی میزان انطباق چکیده مقالات فصلنامه گنجینه اسناد با استاندارد بینالمللی ایزو 214. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشدرشته کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران.
لنکستر، ف.(1383). آیا نمایهسازی و چکیدهنویسی، آیندهای خواهند داشت؟. ترجمه الف اصنافی. مجله الکترونیکی مرکز اطلاعات و مدارک علمی ایران. 3(2).
مختاری، ح.(1382). انطباق چکیده مقالههای مجلات دانشگاههای علومپزشکی با دستورالعمل ونکوور و استاندارد ایزو 214. پایاننامه کارشناسیارشد رشته کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران.
Hans-V,D.L; Onwuegbuzie,A.J. (2010). Quality of abstract in articles submitted to a scholarly journal:A mixed methds case study of the journal research in the school.library and information. science research, 32, 53-61.
Hartley,J;Betts,L. (2009).Common weaknesses traditional abstract in the social science. journal of the American society for information science, 60, 2010-2018.
Hawkins, T.; Larson, S, E.; Caton, B. Q. (2003). Information Science abstracts: Tracking the literature of information science. Part 2: A new taxonomy for information scienc, Journal of The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(8), 771 – 781.
Jacsó, P. (2006). Open access to scholarly indexing/abstracting information. Online Information Review. 30(4), 461 – 468.
Sauperi,A.et al (2008). Compontents of abstract logical structure of scholarly abstract in pharmacology,society. journal of American society for information science and technology.9(9), 1420.
Tibbo.H.R. (1992). Abstracting across the 9 disclines: a content analysis of abstrscts from the natural sciences; the social sciences, and the humanities implication for abstracting. library and information science research, 14, 31-59.