تاثیر بازخورد بحث کلاسی بر عملکرد نوشتاری زبان آموزان برونگرا و درونگرا

Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation

Sahar Farrahi Avval ¹ (English Department, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran)
Hassan Asadollahfam ² (English Department, Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran)
Bahram Behin ³ (Department of English Language and Literature, Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran)

Received: 2022-08-15 Accepted : 2022-09-25 Published : 2023-04-01

Keywords: بازخورد اصلاحی, زبان آموزان, تیپ شخصیتی,

Abstract :

خلاصهدر پژوهش حاضر بر آن بود تا بررسی شود که آیا زبان آموزان ایرانی زبان انگلیسی با تیپ های شخصیتی متفاوت می توانند از بازخورد اصلاحی (CF) بهره مند شوند یا خیر. 317 زبان آموز زبان انگلیسی از 4 موسسه در تبریز در آزمون تافل شرکت کردند. 271 شرکت کننده بین 477 تا 510 امتیاز گرفتند. نمرات 164 نفر از آنها بین ± 1SD کاهش یافت. 34 نفر از آنها با شرکت در مطالعه موافقت کردند و از آنها خواسته شد تا یک ترکیب 200 کلمه ای ارائه دهند. ترکیبات آنها بر اساس CAF (پیچیدگی، دقت، و روان) تجزیه و تحلیل شد. سپس از آنها خواسته شد که به سوالات مربوط به بعد برونگرایی- درونگرایی پاسخ دهند تا میزان درونگرایی آنها بررسی شود. سپس انواع مختلف بازخورد اصلاحی از طریق 10 جلسه بحث کلاسی به شرکت کنندگان ارائه شد. پس از گذراندن این دوره، از آنها خواسته شد تا یک ترکیب 200 کلمه ای دیگر را تحویل دهند. این ترکیب نهایی دوباره بر اساس CAF تجزیه و تحلیل شد. نتایج نشان داد که کیفیت متن زبان آموزان درونگرا با کیفیت متن زبان آموزان برونگرا تفاوت معناداری ندارد.کلمات کلیدی: زبان آموزان ایرانی زبان انگلیسی، تیپ های شخصیتی، CF، بحث کلاسی

References:

Abalkheel, A., & Brandenburg, T. (2020). Effects of written corrective feedback: A synthesis of 10 quasi-experimental studies. English Language Teaching, 13(7), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p97

Ahmadi, A., Gowhary, H., Jamalinesari, A. & Azizifar, A. (2015). Investigating The Iranian EFL Teachers' Pronunciation Of Neutral And Non-Neutral Affixes in Derivative Words Based On Their Gender And Teaching Experience. Procedia, 192. pp. 748-757. 

Alibakhshi, G. (2011). On The Impacts Of Gender And Personality Types On Iranian Efl Teachers’ Teaching Efficacy And Teaching Activities Preferences.  IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS (IJAL), 1.

Aljaafreh, A. and J. P. Lantolf (1994). "Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development." The Modern Language Journal 78(4): 465-483. https://doi.org/10.2307/328585

Arnold, J. & H. D. Brown. (1999). A map of the terrain. In J. Arnold (ed.) Affect in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-24.

Banaruee, H. et al.  (2017). Corrective Feedback and Personality Type: A Case Study of Iranian L2 Learners. Global Journal of Educational Studies., 3(2).

Banaruee, H. and A. Askari (2016). Typology of corrective feedback and error analysis, Sana Gostar Publications Isfahan.

Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2004). Teachers’ stated belief about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Applied Linguistics, 25, 243-272. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.243

Boroujeni, A., Roohani, A. & Hasanimanesh, A. (2015). The Impact of Extroversion and Introversion Personality Types on EFL Learners’ Writing Ability. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(1), pp. 212-218.

Callahan, S. (2000). Responding to the invisible student. Elsevier, 7(1), pp. 57-77.

Carrell, P. (1995). The effect of writers' personalities and raters' personalities on the holistic evaluation of writing. Elsevier, 2(2). pp. 153-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/1075-2935(95)90011-X.

Chen, Y., Jiang, Y. & Mu, Z. (2015). A Survey Study: The Correlation between Introversion/Extroversion and Oral English Learning Outcome. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3), pp. 581-587.

Chen, M. (2012). Personality Type, Perceptual Style Preferences, and Strategies for Learning English as a Foreign Language. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(9), 1501-1510

Cheraghi Shehni, M. & Khezrab, T. (2020). Review of Literature on Learners' Personality in Language Learning: Focusing on Extrovert and Introvert Learners. Theory and Practice in Language Studies.10(11), pp. 1478-1483.

Chun, A. E., Day, R. R., Chenoweth, N. A., & Luppescu, S. (1982). Errors, interaction, and correction: A study of native‐ normative conversations. Tesol Quarterly, 16(4), 537-547.

Cumming, A. (2006). Teaching writing: Orienting activities to students' goals. In E. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of the Four Language Skills. Berlin: Mounton De Gruyter, 383–400.

Day, R. R., Chenoweth, N. A., Chun, A. E., & Luppescu, S. (1984). Corrective feedback

in native‐ nonnative discourse. Language learning, 34(2), 19-45.

Dewaele, J. M. & A. Furnham. (1999). Extraversion: the unloved variable in applied linguistic research. Language Learning 49: 509-544.

Ellis, R. (2006). Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431–463.

Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Eslami, Z. R., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Promoting advantageous ways of corrective feedback in EFL/ESL classroom. (Special Issue: In Honor of Andrew Cohen’s Contributions to L2 Teaching and Learning Research). Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 19, 48–65.

Esmaeeli M., & Sadeghi, K. (2020). The effect of direct versus indirect focused written corrective feedback on developing EFL learners’ written and oral skills. Language Related Research, 11(5), 89–124. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.11.5.124

Funder, D. C. (2007). The personality puzzle. NY: Norton

Griffiths, R. (1991). Personality and Second-Language Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. In: Sadtono, Eugenius, Ed. Language Acquisition and the Second/Foreign Language Classroom. Anthology Series 28; see FL 021 883.

Hyland, F. (2006). "Focusing on the form: Student engagement with teacher feedback." System 31(2): 217- 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6

Harmer, J. (1983). The practice of English language teaching. London: Longman.

Kiany, G. Reza. (1998). English proficiency and academic achievement in relation to extroversion: A preliminary study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8: 113-130.

Kubota, M. (2003). Factors affecting Japanese proficiency levels in native English speakers. ASAA E-journal of Asian Linguistics and Language Teaching, 5 [OL]. Http:// www.arts.unsw.edu.au/languages/asaa_ejournal.

Layeghi, F. (2011). Form and Content in the Argumentative Writing of Extroverted and Introverted Iranian EFL Learners. The Iranian EFL Journal, 7(3). pp.166-183.

 

Li, Sh. & Vuono, A. (2019). Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System. System (84).

Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37–66.

Milton, R., & Cranney, A. G. (1976). Personality correlates of college reading and study skills. Journal of Reading Behavior 8.3, 335–336.

Molinuevo, B. & Torrubia, R. (2013). Does personality predict medical students' attitudes to learning communication skills? IJME, 3(4). https://dx.doi.org/10.5116/ijme.51f4.f2de.

Moradi, A., Banitalebi, A. & Pazhuhesh, S. 92014). Predicting Computer Attitude Based on Psychological Hardiness, Self-Efficacy and Achievement Motivation. Information and Communication Tech

Naiman, N., M., Frohlich, H.H. Stern, & A. Todesco. (1978). The Good Language Learner. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

Nateghian, N. & Mohammadnia, Zh. (2022). Customized Oral Corrective Feedback: Learners’ Preferences and Personality Traits. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 14(29). 10.22034/ELT.2022.49503.2471.

Pornsakulvanich, V., Dumrongsiri, N. & Sajampun, P. (2012). An Analysis of Personality Traits and Learning Styles as Predictors of Academic Performance. ABAC Journal, 32(30).

Rezaei. Saeed. (2011). Corrective Feedback in Task-based Grammar Instruction: A Case of Recast vs. Metalinguistic Feedback. MA. Thesis.

Ruegg, R. (2017). Learner revision practices and perceptions of peer and teacher feedback. Writing & Pedagogy, 9(2). 214

Ruegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87-102.

Sadeghi, N., Zalina Mohd, K. Bee Hoon, T, & Faiz Sathi, A. 92012). Learning Styles, Personality Types and Reading Comprehension Performance. English Language Teaching, 5(4). pp. 116-123.

Samaee, L., Rassaei, E. & Bavali, M. (2021). Exploring Language Learners’ Perceptions of Explicit Corrections and Scaffolded Corrective Feedback in the Use of Articles in Oral Production. Journal of Language and Translation, 11(3). pp. 91-108.

Sharp, A. (2008). Personality and Second Language Learning. CCSE, 4(11).

Seyedebrahimi, S, Rahimi Esfahani, F & Sepehri, M. (2022). Impact of Metalinguistic vs. Clarification Request Feedback on the Speaking Anxiety of Iranian Students in IELTS Preparatory Classes. Journal of Language and Translation. 12(2). https://ttlt.stb.iau.ir/article_690692_04a825cd0da0c6ba43d301f192d2e1fc.pdf.

Salameh, M. & Khaled K, O. (2015). Let Them Toil to Learn: Implicit Feedback, Selfcorrection and Performance in EFL Writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies; London, 5(8).

Sinha, Sh. S. & Nassaji, S. (2021). ESL learners’ perception and its relationship with the efficacy of written corrective feedback. Wiley. 1(16). DOI: 10.1111/ijal.12378.

Skehan, P. (1989). Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. New York: Edward.

Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1993). Instruction and the development of questions in L2 classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 205–224.

Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.06.003

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14671770. 1996.tb01238.x

Varnosfadrani, A. & Basturkmen, H. (2009). The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners‟ performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 82-98.

Wafiqoh, H. (2019). Learning strategies based on students’ personality in speaking ability at the eighth grade on MTsN 1 Karanganyar (Undergraduate degree Thesis). Retrieved February 9, 2022, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/296480697.pdf. (15.32.2.1.031).

Wei, W., & Cao, Y. (2020). Written corrective feedback strategies employed by university English lecturers: A teacher cognition perspective. SAGE Open, 1(12). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020934886.

Wiboolyasarin, W. (2021). Written Corrective Feedback Beliefs and Practices in Thai as a Foreign Language Context: A Perspective from Experienced Teachers. Language Related Research. 12 (3). 81-119. https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.12.3.4

Yilmaz, Y. (2016). The role of exposure condition in the effectiveness of explicit correction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 65–96

Zhao, Y. & Ellis. R. (2020). The relative effects of implicit and explicit corrective feedback on the acquisition of 3rd person -s by Chinese university students: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research. 1(21). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168820903343.