Quantitative Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Used for Gastrointestinal Diseases in Bojnord, Iran
Mohabat Nadaf
1
(
Department of Biology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
)
Majid Halimi Khalil Abad
2
(
Department of Chemistry, Kosar University of Bojnord Iran, P.O.BOX 94156-15458
)
Reza Omidipour
3
(
Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran
)
Mohamad Ehsan Tghavizadeh Yazdi
4
(
Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
)
Keywords:
Abstract :
Quantitative Ethnobotanical Survey of Medicinal Plants Used for Gastrointestinal Diseases in Bojnord, Iran
Mohabat NadafA*, Majid Halimi Khalil AbadB, Reza OmidipourC, Mohammad Ehsan Taghavizadeh YazdiD
A Assistant Prof., Department of Biology, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran, *(Corresponding author), E-mail: m_nadaf@pnu.ac.ir
B Assistant Prof., Department of Chemistry, Kosar University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran
C Assistant Prof., Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam, Ilam University, Iran
D Applied Biomedical Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract. This study was aimed to ethnobotanical survey on important medicinal plants that are used for treatment of gastrointestinal disorders which are available in medicinal markets of Bojnord, Iran. The indigenous knowledge was collected through interviews (30 men and 4 women) of medicinal plants sellers for a period of 5 years from 2017 to 2022. Data were analyzed using ethnobotanical quantitative indices for Frequency of Citations (FC), Relative Frequency Citation (RFC), Use Report (UR), Cultural Importance Index (CII), Number of Uses (NU), Relative Importance Index (RII), Fidelity Level (FL), and Family Importance Value (FIV). In total, 90 plant species belonging to 35 plant families were reported for treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. The most FIV index was identified for Asteraceae (12 species with FIV = 35) followed by Apiaceae (10 species with FIV = 29). The most utilized plant parts were fruit (29%) followed by shoot (20%) and seed (18%). Based on the results, FC index ranged from 1 to 26. Some species such as Bunium persicum, Anethum graveolens, Descurainia sophia had minimum and Melissa officinalis had maximum citation. The NU index varied between 1 to 10 in which the highest used number was calculated for Trachyspermum copticum. In addition, the RFC ranged between 0.03 to 0.77, indicating the high native knowledge of people about medicinal plants and their usages. Result of this study indicated that although people in Bojnord County have access to modern medicinal preparations, a considerable population still use medicinal plants for therapeutic purposes. Regarding the rich traditional knowledge of these people, the represented data can potentially be a precious reference containing useful information for subsequent phytochemical, biological, and pharmacological investigations. The results clearly indicate that high number of used medicinal plants in the herbal markets of Bojnord is related to the diverse topographic-climatic of this region.
Keywords: Essential oils, Therapeutic potential, Herbal medicine, Relative Frequency Citation (RFC)
Introduction
Humans had consumed plants to treat diseases and maintain health since time ago (Toghranegar et al., 2020). Iran has one of the richest floras in the world. Since a high percentage of Iran's plant species constitutes medicinal plants, they have great abilities in this aspect. Rangelands have major roles in the supply of medicinal plants. Proper rangeland management is important for the purpose of sustainable use (Akbarlou and Nodehi, 2016). Nowadays, herbal medicines allocate a large proportion of pharmaceutical products, considered as diverse bioactive natural agents and suitable alternatives for chemical medicines (Ziaei et al., 2014). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 25% of conventional medications are originated from plants while recognizing therapeutic effects of most herbal medicines (74%) utilized in modern pharmaceutical technology has been traditionally documented a long time ago (Heshmati et al., 2016). Consumption of herbal medicine has a long and ancient history in Iran and like other parts of the world, it is expanding every day globally (Mosaddegh and Naghibi, 2002). Traditional and ethnobotanical medicines are two categories of interest in Iran and many countries. The science of ethnobotany is the survey of regional indigenous herbs and their applications through the traditional prescription from local culture and people (the word ethno means people and botany means plant). In fact, in an ethnobotanical study, the researcher refers to local people, old residents and experienced informants after visiting the area and the initial studies on familiarity with the area (Herbal medicine shop) and documents their oral information, traditional, and native knowledge of various plant applications including medicinal, food, dyeing, handicrafts, etc. (Vafadar and Toghranegar, 2020). Nowadays, due to the time situation, it seems necessary to conduct this research in parallel with laboratory research. Since the knowledge of elders of each region or local perfumers is recorded and passed on to the next generation. The use of plants for the treatment of diseases is increasing due to the fewer side effects of plants as a medicine.
In this regard, several studies have been directed by researchers in diverse regions of Iran, such as ethnobotanical investigation of herbal medicine in Mashhad Market (Amiri and Joharchi, 2016), ethnopharmacology study of effective herbal medicine in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases in Mahneshan, Zanjan province, Iran (Toghranegar et al., 2020), traditional use of some herbal drugs in the cure of gastrointestinal diseases in western part of Mazandaran province (Ahvazi and Akbarzadeh, 2017), ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants on gastrointestinal diseases in Lorestan province (Delfan et al., 2015). Besides, ethnobotanical study of some herbal medicine in Abadeh city has been situated in Fars province (Razmjoue et al., 2015). Among the studies that have been done in the northeastern part of Iran, the following researches can be mentioned: ethnobotanical study of common medicinal herbs in North Khorasan perfumeries for the treatment of neurological diseases (Nadaf et al., 2019), medicinal herbs in Farooj city (Eslami Farouji and Khodayari, 2016), and ethnobotany of medicinal plants of Razo and Jorglan county (North Khorasan) (Arvin and Firuzeh, 2022).
Gastrointestinal diseases are one of the challenges of cosmetic health system and one of the common causes of mortality (Lenti et al., 2019). Indigestion and reflux are the most common gastrointestinal diseases that reduce the quality of life and cause a heavy economic burden. Although the gastric ulcer prevalence is 6-15% globally, this rate is estimated by 41% in Iran (Toghranegar et al., 2020). According to studies, diarrhoea is another common infectious disease that affects between 19 and 83 people per 100 throughout a geographical area. In addition, nausea, parasitic diseases, infectious diseases, bloating, constipation, irritable bowel syndrome, intestinal inflammation, fatty liver and liver failures are the most common gastrointestinal disorders. The development of gastrointestinal diseases is usually dependent on dietary pattern, food restriction, fasting or overeating, and irregular meals (Thakur et al., 2020). The purpose of this survey was to identify and introduce important medicinal herbs used in perfumeries (Herbal medicine shop) of Bojnord city located in Northern Khorasan province, Iran, to help treat gastrointestinal diseases and prepare a record of valuable traditional medicinal plants which should not be forgotten as an indigenous knowledge of this region. The introduced plant species are pasture plants. Due to their importance, proper management of pastures can be effective in maintaining the diversity of pasture vegetation, and by informing people, the unprincipled collection of these valuable species can be prevented.
Materials and methods
Study area
Bojnord is situated in the north-eastern part of Iran, the capital city of North-Khorasan province, in a geographic location between 57°17' to 57°28' eastern longitude and 37°13' to 37°50' northern latitude (Fig. 1). The whole area of Bojnord County is 36 km2 with the population of about 230,000 people. Based on the de Martonne climatic classification, Bojnord has a semiarid and cold climate with 19.9°C maximum temperature to 6.8°C minimum temperature. The city is renowned for its multi-ethnic background. For this reason, different languages including Persian, Turkic, Kurdish, Tati, etc. are spoken (Nadaf et al., 2019).
Fig. 1. Map of the North Khorasan province.
Data collection and nomenclature
The present investigation was performed for a period of 5 years from 2017 to 2022 in the herbal markets of Bojnord. Thirty-four herbal medicine shop (ages 28-70 years, 30 men and 4 women) were interviewed. During the interview, the local name, uses, and used parts of each plant were recorded. These medicinal plants in herbal markets in Bojnord were identified using various Flora, especially Flora Iranica (Rechinger, 1963-2015), Flora of Iran (Asadi et al., 1989-2015) and Flora of Iraq (Townsed et al., 1960-1985). The list of scientific names of species and authors was standardized based on the database (IPNI = The International Plant Name Index) and the genera were standardized based on Angiosperm Phylogeny Groups (Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG-IV), Chase et al., 2016).
Data analysis
Frequency of Citation
The Frequency of Citations (FC) is the number of informants who have mentioned the species. In addition, Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC), Use Report (UR), Number of Uses (NU), Relative Importance index (RII), and Cultural Importance index (CII) indices for the species that had the most useful citations were calculated using software R.4.1.
Relative Frequency of Citation
The Relative Frequency of Citation (RFC) displays the local importance of each species, while it is attained by dividing the informant number who mention the use of the species (FC) by the informant number participating in the survey (N) (Equation 1).
(1)
This index varies from zero, when nobody refers to the herbs as valuable, to one; in case, every informant mentions it as valuable (Tardío and Pardo-de-Santayana, 2008).
Use Report
The function of Use Report (UR) calculates the number of use report for each species in the data set (Equation 2).
(2)
Where:
URs is the entire usage of a species by wholly informant (from i to N) in each use-category for that species. It is the number of the informant numeral who indicates each use-category NC for the species and addition of all uses in each use-category (from u1 to NC) (Prance et al., 1987).
Cultural Importance index
In the current research, the Cultural Importance Index (CII) is another index that was calculated. UR index is used to calculate this index (Tardío and Pardo-de-Santayana, 2008) for each species to allow the identity of the different herb species (Equation 3).
(3)
Where:
UR is the number of use report for each species and
N is total number of use report for all species in the data set.
Number of Uses
The function of Number of Uses (NU) calculates the number of uses per species. NU is the sum of entire use classes for which a species is considered beneficial (Prance et al., 1987).
The Relative Importance Index (RII) was calculated by the following equation (Tardío and Pardo-de-Santayana, 2008) (Equation 4).
(4)
Where:
RFC (max) = the relative frequency of citation over the maximum, i.e., it is achieved through dividing FC by the maximum value for whole species of the study
RFC (max)=FC/max (FC), and RNU (max) is the used number of use-categories over the maximum, gained by dividing the number of species uses utilizing the highest value in whole species of the survey (Equation 5).
(5)
The RII index differs theoretically from 0, when no one mentioned any use of the plant, to 1, when the plant was most often stated as beneficial in the highest number of used classes.
Fidelity Level
The Fidelity level (FL) index was assessed using the following formula (Equation 6) to define the most favored species employed in the handling of a specific ailment as more than one herb species is employed in the same class. The FL function estimates the FL per species in the study. It is a way of estimating the ratio of informants who use a herb for a similar goal as compared to the whole uses of all herbs.
(6)
Where:
N is the number of informants that exploits a specific herb for a particular goal, and
FC is the total number of uses for the species.
High FL value indicates high frequency of the herbal species application for handling a specific ailment class using the informants of the study region (Bibi et al., 2014).
Family Importance Value
The Family Importance Value (FIV) (Equation 7) provides the local importance of the families of species. It was assessed by taking the ratio of informant mentioning the family (Vitalini et al., 2013)
(7)
Where:
FC is the number of informants mentioning the family and
N is the whole number of people participating in the survey.
Chord diagram of ethnobotany uses and species
Radial plots were made for URs, FCs, NUs, CIs indices; the chord plot is made for ethnobotany uses and species (Gu et al., 2014). Flow diagram frequency distributions across uses, experts and use classes were drawn using ggplot2 package (Claus, 2020) in R ver. 4.2.1 software. In addition to the four medicinal species with the most citations, diagrams of the species with the highest number of usages were also drawn. Moreover, graphs of the part percentage used in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases were plotted. These diagrams were drawn through excel ver. 2016 software.
Phytochemical data
For this work, phytochemical information about four species with the highest FC was obtained based on a comprehensive survey of scientific databases.
Results
In this survey, 90 traditionally consumed herbs were identified that have effective medicinal values for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (Table 1). The scientific names, herbal families, local names, usages, the used plant parts, FC, UN, relative frequency citation (RFC) are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Medicinal plants and their uses in the treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. FC: frequency of citations; NU: number of uses; RFC: relative frequency of citation. Be sure to consult a doctor before using these herbs.
No | Family | Scientific name | Local name | Part used | Uses | FC | NU | RFC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Amaranthaceae | Dysphania botrys (L.) Mosyakin & Clemants | Dermaneh Torki | Shoot | Relieve stomach pain, Excretion of intestinal and gastric worms, Gastric lavage | 8 | 4 | 0.24 |
2 | Anacardiaceae | Rhus coriaria L. | Somagh | Fruit | Antidiarrhea | 22 | 1 | 0.65 |
3 | Apiaceae | Bunium persicum (Boiss.) B.Fedtsch | Zireh Siah | Fruit | Carminative, Laxatives, Stomach pain reliever | 26 | 3 | 0.77 |
4 | Apiaceae | Anethum graveolens L. | Shevid | Fruit | Stomach tonic, Stomach pain reliever, Carminative | 25 | 3 | 0.74 |
5 | Apiaceae | Foeniculum vulgare Mill. | Razianeh | Fruit | Stomach pain reliever, carminative, Anti-stomach acid | 22 | 3 | 0.65 |
6 | Apiaceae | Trachyspermum ammi (L.) Sprague | Zenian | Fruit | Stomach tonic, Carminative, Anti-parasite, Stomach ache, Stomach disinfectant, Anti-stomach acid, Stomach reflux remover, Ant diarrhea, Treatment of duodenal ulcers | 21 | 10 | 0.62 |
7 | Apiaceae | Cuminum cyminum L. | Zireh Sabz | Fruit | Treatment of stomach pain, Anti-flatulence | 19 | 2 | 0.56 |
8 | Apiaceae | Heracleum persicum Desf. | Golpar | Fruit | Stomach tonic | 18 | 1 | 0.53 |
9 | Apiaceae | Ferula gummosa Boiss. | Barijeh | Gum | Eliminates inflammation of the stomach, Duodenum and small intestine, eliminates gastrointestinal infections, Stomach tonic, Repel parasites, Stomach Tumor remover | 13 | 7 | 0.39 |
10 | Apiaceae | Petroselinum crispum (Mill.) Fuss | Jafari | Fruit | Stomach tonic, Treatment of indigestion | 10 | 2 | 0.29 |
11 | Apiaceae | Pimpinella anisum L. | Anison | Fruit | Carminative | 9 | 1 | 0.27 |
12 | Apiaceae | Dorema ammoniacum D.Don | Koma | Gum-Root | Antifungal gastric parasite, Stomach tonic | 5 | 2 | 0.15 |
13 | Arecaceae | Areca catechu L. | Fufel | Seed | Antidiarrhea | 8 | 1 | 0.24 |
14 | Asteraceae | Tripleurospermum disciforme (C.A.Mey.) Sch.Bip. | Babuneh Dashti | Flower | Laxatives, Control of symptoms of intestinal colitis, Stomach disinfectant, Fatty Liver | 22 | 5 | 0.65 |
15 | Asteraceae | Achillea santolinoides subsp. wilhelmsii (K.Koch) Greuter | Bumadaran | Shoot | Stomach tonic, Stomach pain reliever, Gastritis, Intestinal and gastric infections, Carminative, Laxatives, Liver tonic | 20 | 9 | 0.59 |
16 | Asteraceae | Cichorium intybus L. | Kasni | Shoot | Stomach tonic, Eliminates liver failure, Inflammation of the gallbladder, Fatty Liver | 12 | 4 | 0.36 |
17 | Asteraceae | Lactuca sativa L. | Kahu | Seed | Liver tonic, Laxatives | 12 | 2 | 0.35 |
18 | Asteraceae | Silybum marianum (L.) Gaertn. | Khare Maryam | Seed | Fatty liver remover, Gallbladder, Strong antibiotics for the liver, Jaundice treatment | 11 | 4 | 0.33 |
19 | Asteraceae | Calendula officinalis L. | Hamishe Bahar | Flower | Stomach tonic, Liver tonic | 10 | 2 | 0.23 |
20 | Asteraceae | Arctium lappa L. | Baba Adam | Leaf-Root | Stomach tonic, Liver purification | 9 | 2 | 0.27 |
21 | Asteraceae | Echinops cephalotes DC. | Shekar Tighal | Manna | Laxatives | 7 | 1 | 0.21 |
22 | Asteraceae | Centaurea depressa M.Bieb. | Gol Gandom | Shoot | Stomach disinfectant, Liver tonic | 6 | 2 | 0.18 |
23 | Asteraceae | Helichrysum graveolens (M.Bieb.) Sweet | Afsantin | Shoot | Anti-parasite، Laxatives | 6 | 2 | 0.18 |
24 | Asteraceae | Gundelia tournefortii L. | Kangar | Shoot | Stomach tonic ، Liver tonic | 3 | 2 | 0.09 |
25 | Asteraceae | Cynara scolymus L. | Kngar Farangi | Leaf-Fruit | Liver tonic | 2 | 1 | 0.06 |
26 | Berberidaceae | Berberis integerrima Bunge | Zereshk Kuhi | Fruit | Liver purifier, Carminative, Gastritis | 11 | 3 | 0.32 |
27 | Berberidaceae | Berberis vulgaris L. | Zereshk | Fruit | Regulation of liver enzymes | 9 | 1 | 0.26 |
28 | Brassicaceae | Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb ex Prantl | Khakshir | Seed | Laxatives, Fatty liver purifier | 25 | 2 | 0.74 |
29 | Brassicaceae | Brassica napus L. | Shalgham | Seed | Laxatives, Carminative | 9 | 2 | 0.27 |
30 | Brassicaceae | Eruca sativa (L.) Mill. | Mandab | Seed | Stomach tonic | 7 | 1 | 0.21 |
31 | Brassicaceae | Alyssum alyssoides (L.) L. | Ghodumeh | Seed | Laxatives, Liver tonic | 5 | 2 | 0.15 |
32 | Brassicaceae | Lepidium sativum L. | Shahi | Shoot | Food digester | 5 | 1 | 0.15 |
33 | Brassicaceae | Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. | Kiseh Keshish | Seed | Laxatives, Liver tonic | 3 | 2 | 0.09 |
34 | Burseraceae | Commiphora mukul | Maghal Azragh | Gum | Laxatives | 7 | 1 | 0.21 |
35 | Cannabinaceae | Cannabis sativa L. | Shahdaneh | Seed | Stomach tonic | 14 | 1 | 0.41 |
36 | Combretaceae | Terminalia chebula Retz. | Halileh Siah | Fruit | Laxatives | 13 | 1 | 0.38 |
37 | Combretaceae | Terminalia bellirica (Gaertn.) Roxb. | Halileh | Fruit | Laxatives, Carminative | 7 | 2 | 0.21 |
38 | Convolvulaceae | Cuscuta epithymum Murray | Aftimun | Shoot | Liver cleansing, Laxatives | 9 | 2 | 0.26 |
39 | Convolvulaceae | Operculina turpethum (L.) Silva Manso | Torbod | Root | Liver cleansing, Laxatives, Gallstone excretion | 8 | 3 | 0.24 |
40 | Cornaceae | Cornus mas L. | Zoghal Akhteh | Fruit | Liver cleansing | 5 | 1 | 0.15 |
41 | Eleagnaceae | Elaeagnus angustifolia L. | Senjed | Fruit | Diarrhea remover, Carminative, Eliminate stomach toxins | 18 | 4 | 0.53 |
42 | Euphorbiaceae | Ricinus communis L. | Karchak | Seed | Laxatives | 5 | 1 | 0.15 |
43 | Fabaceae | Glycyrrhiza glabra L. | Shirin Bayan | Root | Eliminates gastritis, Treatment of cancer and stomach ulcers, Stomach tonic, Anti-stomach acid, Duodenal wound healing | 19 | 7 | 0.56 |
44 | Fabaceae | Cassia obovate Collad. | Sena | Leaf | Laxatives | 19 | 1 | 0.56 |
45 | Fabaceae | Trigonella foenum-graecum L. | Shanbalileh | Seed | Carminative | 17 | 1 | 0.5 |
46 | Fabaceae | Alhagi graecorum Boiss. | Taranjabin | Manna | Jaundice treatment, Laxatives | 16 | 2 | 0.47 |
47 | Fabaceae | Astragalus spp. | Katira | Gum | Anti-bile، Laxatives | 14 | 2 | 0.41 |
48 | Fabaceae | Cassia fistula L. | Folus | Fruit | Laxatives ،Relieve stomach pain Jaundice treatment | 12 | 3 | 0.35 |
49 | Fabaceae | Tamarindus indica L. | Tamr Hendi | Fruit | Laxatives, Excretion of gallstones | 5 | 2 | 0.15 |
50 | Fabaceae | Astragalus adscendens Boiss. | Gazangabin | Manna | Relieve stomach pain, Laxatives | 2 | 2 | 0.06 |
51 | Juglandaceae | Juglans regia L. | Gerdu | Fruit-Leaf | Stomach tonic, Antidiarrhea | 9 | 2 | 0.26 |
52 | Lamiaceae | Melissa officinalis L. | Badranjbuyeh | Flower-Leaf | Eliminates gastric infection | 24 | 1 | 0.71 |
53 | Lamiaceae | Zataria multiflora Boiss. | Avishan Shirazi | Shoot | Antidiarrhea, Elimination of gastrointestinal parasites, Analgesia of the stomach | 23 | 4 | 0.68 |
54 | Lamiaceae | Mentha longifolia (L.) Hudson | Puneh | Shoot | Carminative, Antifungal and stomach infection, Antinausea, Food digester، Stomach tonic, Antidiarrhea | 21 | 6 | 0.62 |
55 | Lamiaceae | Mentha spicata L. | Naana | Shoot | Carminative, Analgesic gastrointestinal upset, Stomach tonic | 19 | 3 | 0.56 |
56 | Lamiaceae | Stachys lavandulifolia Vahl | Chai Kuhi | Flower | Relieve stomach pain, Stomach tonic, Intestine tonic | 16 | 3 | 0.47 |
57 | Lamiaceae | Satureja hortensis L. | Marzeh | Shoot | Carminative, Food digester | 16 | 2 | 0.47 |
58 | Lamiaceae | Ziziphora clinopodioides Lam. | Anokh (Avishan kohi) | Shoot | Stomach tonic, Relieve stomach pain, Carminative | 14 | 3 | 0.41 |
59 | Lamiaceae | Salvia officinalis L. | Maryam Goli | Shoot | Antidiarrhea, Ant nausea | 11 | 2 | 0.32 |
60 | Lamiaceae | Ziziphora tenuior L. | Kakuti | Shoot | Treatment of gastric colitis, Ulcers, Stomach and colon pain, Carminative | 9 | 5 | 0.26 |
61 | Lamiaceae | Perovskia abrotanoides Kar. | Gol Kabud | Flower- Leaf | Carminative | 1 | 2 | 0.03 |
62 | Lauraceae | Cinnamomum zeylanicum Nees | Darchin | Bark | Carminative, Food digester | 20 | 2 | 0.59 |
63 | Liliaceae | Aloe spp. | Sabr Zard | Latex | Laxatives, Ulcers | 11 | 2 | 0.32 |
64 | Linaceae | Linum usitatissimum L. | Katan | Seed | Laxatives, Intestinal tonic | 18 | 2 | 0.53 |
65 | Malvaceae | Alcea spp. | Khatmi | Flower | Laxatives، carminative | 20 | 2 | 0.59 |
66 | Nymphaeaceae | Nymphaea alba L. | Nilufar Abi | Flower | Laxatives | 2 | 1 | 0.06 |
67 | Pedaliaceae | Sesamum indicum L. | Konjed | Seed | Laxatives | 17 | 1 | 0.5 |
68 | Plantaginaceae | Plantago major L. | Barhang | Seed | Laxatives, Liver tonic, Cleansing the stomach and intestines | 17 | 4 | 0.5 |
69 | Plantaginaceae | Plantago ovata Forssk. | Esfarzeh | Seed | Laxatives | 12 | 1 | 0.35 |
70 | Portulacaceae | Portulaca oleracea L. | Khorfeh | Seed-Leaf | Food digester | 7 | 1 | 0.21 |
71 | Ranunculaceae | Nigella sativa L. | Siah Daneh | Seed | Food digester, Stomach antacids | 20 | 2 | 0.59 |
72 | Rhamnaceae | Ziziphus jujuba Miller | Anab | Fruit | Stomach antacids | 13 | 1 | 0.38 |
73 | Rosaceae | Rosa damasena Herm. | Gole Mohamadi | Flower | Carminative, Laxatives | 19 | 2 | 0.56 |
74 | Rosaceae | Cotoneaster nummularius Fisch. & C.A.Mey. | Shir Khesht | Manna | Jaundice treatment, Laxatives, Bile solvent | 12 | 3 | 0.35 |
75 | Rosaceae | Crataegus spp. | Sorkhe Valik | Fruit-Leaf | Relieve stomach pain | 4 | 1 | 0.12 |
76 | Rosaceae | Rosa foetida× Herrm. | Gol Zard | Flower | Stomach disinfectant | 2 | 1 | 0.06 |
77 | Salicaceae | Salix excelsa J.F.Gmel. | Bidkhesht | Manna | Laxatives, Jaundice treatment | 4 | 2 | 0.12 |
78 | Schisandraceae | Illicium verum Hook.f. | Badian Khotai | Fruit | Reduce gastric reflux | 7 | 1 | 0.21 |
79 | Scrophulariaceae | Scrophularia striata Boiss. | Mokhaleseh | Shoot | Laxatives | 3 | 1 | 0.09 |
80 | Scrophulariaceae | Verbascum cheiranthifolium Boiss. | Dom Gav | Shoot | Stomach tonic, Anti-stomach acid | 2 | 2 | 0.06 |
81 | Sterculiaceae | Helicteres isora L. | Bahman pich | Fruit | Carminative | 2 | 1 | 0.06 |
82 | Theaceae | Camellia sinensis (L.) Kunntze | Chai Sabz | Leaf | Ulcers and gastritis | 13 | 2 | 0.38 |
83 | Tiliacaea | Tilia cordata Mill. | Zirfun | Leaf-Fruit | Carminative | 6 | 1 | 0.18 |
84 | Verbenaceae | Aloysia citriodora Palau | Beh Limu | Leaf | Stomach tonic, Ccarminative | 17 | 2 | 0.5 |
85 | Zingiberaceae | Zingiber officinale Roscoe | Zanjafil | Root | Laxatives, Carminative, Antinausea | 23 | 3 | 0.68 |
86 | Zingiberaceae | Elettaria cardamomum Maton | Hel | Fruit | Carminative | 19 | 1 | 0.56 |
87 | Zingiberaceae | Amomum subulatum Roxb | Helbad | Fruit | Carminative, Food digester | 14 | 2 | 0.41 |
88 | Zingiberaceae | Curcuma longa L. | Zard Chubeh | Root | Food digester, Carminative | 2 | 2 | 0.06 |
89 | Zingiberaceae
| Alpinia galanga Willd. | Ghest Shirin | Root | Eliminates bloody diarrhea | 3 | 1 | 0.09 |
90 | Zingiberaceae | Curcuma zedoaria (Christm.) Roscoe | Zarambad | Root | Carminative, Stomach tonic, Liver tonic | 2 | 3 | 0.06 |
Family important value
These medicinal species belong to 35 plant families and the most common family of therapeutic herb species, upon the number of species and FIV index was identified as Asteraceae (12 species with FIV = 35) followed by Apiaceae (10 species with FIV = 29) (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2. Family important value (FIV) of medicinal plants used for treatment of gastrointestinal diseases.
Plant Part Used
The most applied herb parts were fruits (29%) followed by shoots (20%) and seeds (18%) (Fig. 3). In addition, the lowest plant part used were latex (2%), gum (3%) and manna (6%).
Fig. 3. Plant part used in preparation of ethnomedicine.
Ethnobotanical Quantitative Indices
Based on the results, species such as Bunium persicum, Anethum graveolens, Descurainia sophia and Melissa officinalis had the maximum citation in the study (Table 2).
RFCs, URs, NUs, RIs, and CIs indices for species with maximum citations calculated by R software are presented in Table 2. As the results showed, Bunium persicum (FC=26) demonstrated the maximum citation whereas A. graveolens (UR=44) had the highest use report; B. persicum and A. graveolens (NU=3 for both) followed by Descurainia sophia (NU=2) and M. officinalis (NU=1).
Table 2. Frequency of Citation (FC), Relative frequency citation (RFC), Use Report (UR), Number of Uses (NU), Relative Importance Index (RII), and Cultural Importance Index (CII) for species with maximum citations.
number | Species name | FC | RFC | UR | NU | RII | CII |
1 | Bunium persicum | 26 | 0.76 | 43 | 3 | 1 | 1.265 |
2 | Anethum graveolens | 25 | 0.73 | 44 | 3 | 0.981 | 1.294 |
3 | Descurainia sophia | 25 | 0.73 | 33 | 2 | 0.814 | 0.971 |
4 | Melissa officinalis | 24 | 0.70 | 24 | 1 | 0.628 | 0.706 |
Fidelity Level (FL) index
Based on the results, A. graveolens and B. persicum had the highest FL for Carminative (60 and 57.69 %, respectively). In addition, the highest FL for stomach analgesia (Use_3), fatty liver purifier (Use_5) and eliminates gastric infection (Use_6) was observed for B. persicum, D. Sophia and M. officinalis, respectively (Table 3 and Fig. 4).
Table 3. Fidelity Level (FL) index for species with maximum citations.
Number | Species name | Primary use | FL |
1 | Bunium persicum | Use_1 Carminative | 57.69 |
2 | Bunium persicum | Use_2 Laxatives | 61.54 |
3 | Bunium persicum | Use_3 Stomach analgesia | 46.15 |
4 | Anethum graveolens | Use_1 Carminative | 60.00 |
5 | Anethum graveolens | Use_2 Laxative | 64.00 |
6 | Anethum graveolens | Use_4 Stomach tonic | 52.00 |
7 | Descurainia sophia | Use_2 Laxative | 72.00 |
8 | Descurainia sophia | Use_5 Fatty liver purifier | 60.00 |
9 | Melissa officinalis | Use_6 Eliminates gastric infection | 100 |
Fig. 4. Chord diagram of ethnobotany uses and species with maximum citations. SP1: Bunium persicum, SP2: Anethum graveolens, SP3: Descurainia sophia, SP4: Melissa officinalis. Use 1 (carminative), Use 2 (Laxatives), Used 3 (Stomach pain reliever), Use 4 (Stomach tonic), Use 5 (Fatty liver purifier) and Use 6 (Eliminates gastric infection).
Phytochemical profile of species with most Frequency of Citation
Since four species had the most citations, their bioactive chemicals were presented by examining different sources. The predominant essential oils’ composition of D. sophia, B. persicum, A. graveolens and M. officinalis are listed in Table 4.
Table 4. The predominant essential oils’ composition of Descurainia Sophia, Bunium persicum, Anethum graveolens and Melissa officinalis and their amount in parenthesis (min-max).
N0 | Main Essential Oil compounds of plant species | |||
| Descurainia sophia | Bunium persicum | Anethum graveolens | Melissa officinalis |
1 | Ocimene (0.02-21.17%) | α- pinene (0.6-1.52%), | α- pinene (0.02 -6.4%), | Citronella (8.7-13.7%), |
2 | Menthol (10.7-11.27%), | ρ-cymene (5.3-25.8%), | Myrcene (0.01 -7.36%), | Limonene (0.11-2.2%), |
3 | Neoisomenthyl acetate (2.96-3.5%), | Limonen (0.16-6.4%), | Phellandrene (0.03-7.51%), | Neral (3.5-22.18%), |
4 | Longicyclene (1.69-2.25, %), | Cuminaldehyde (11.4-32.81%), | imonene (0.48-19.89%), | Geranial (0.0-1%), |
5 | Alloaromadendrene (2.28-2.18%), | γ-terpinene (10.9-46.1%), | ρ-cymene (0.2-33.42%), | Caryophyllene (3.3-8.2%), |
6 | Caryophyllene (3.87-4.59%), | Myrcene (0.56-1.1%), | Carvone (0.1575.92%), | Caryophyllene oxide (2.1-11%) |
7 | Ionone (6-6.2%), | β-pinene (0.1 - 11.27%) | Dihydrocarvone (0.06 -16%) |
|
8 | Cedrol (5.89, 4.18%), |
| Dill apiole (0.05-19.5%), |
|
9 | Hexahydrofarnesyl acetone (8.87-10.79%), |
| Dill ether (0.08-14.79%) |
|
10 | Phytol (5.52-7.2%) |
|
|
|
11 | Methyl linolenate (4.21-5.58%) |
|
|
|
Ref | Li et al, 2010;
| Keramat & Golmakani, 2016 Stappen et al., 2017
| Mohebodini & Farmanpour- Kalalagh, 2021 Ozliman et al., 2021 | Nurzyńska-Wierdaka et al., 2014; Jalal et al., 2015 |
Discussion
Iran has one of the richest plant floras in the world (Heydari et al., 2020), due to its diverse ecological conditions such as a wide range of climatic condition (Omidipour et al., 2021). Iran comprises 7300 vascular plant species (Akhani, 2006) in a 1.65 million km2 area and is the second richest country of plant diversity in Southwestern Asia after Turkey. Eighty percent of human population globally depends on medicinal plants as a primary healing option, including gastrointestinal ailments (Beyene et al., 2016). Gastrointestinal diseases are the most vulnerable system with respect to the number of human disorders. Such disorders affect people regardless of age, race, and gender. There is a vital demanding to support studies regarding the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases which cause a wide range of discomforts to patients (Thakur et al., 2020). In recent years, the occurrence of gastrointestinal diseases has increased in the world (Helsel et al., 2018). On the other hand, considering the high cost of chemotherapy for these patients (Vincent Rajkumar, 2020) and also the presence of adverse effects after chemical treatment, it has made researchers to focus on knowing more about medicinal plants and their capabilities. For this reason, Iran has a privileged position in this field due to its high medical plant biodiversity. Gastrointestinal cancer as a deathful type of cancer has a high incidence rate globally, and is considered as the most dangerous prevailing gastrointestinal disease. Anti-cancerous potencies of phytochemicals have been well-documented; among them, carotenoids (e.g., lutein, lycopene, β-carotene), flavonoids (e.g., quercetin), organosulfur compounds (e.g., allicin, allyl propyl disulfide, asparagusic acid), asides from pectin, curcumin, p-coumaric acid, and ferulic acid have been reported as the most bioactive dietary phytochemicals (Thakur et al., 2020).
In this study, 90 species of medicinal plants were used for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (Table 1). This result is in line with the wide climatic diversity in Iran (Asadi Oskouei et al., 2022) whereas the abundance of medicinal species has been reported in most of the similar research. Ahvazi and Akbarzadeh (2017) recorded 20 and 15 species in east Mazandaran and Lorestan province, Iran for treatment of stomach disorders (Delfan et al., 2015). Salarian et al. (2022) reported 61 medicinal species in Javaherdareh Rangelands of Ramsar in north of Iran. Mehrnia et al. (2021) studied medicinal plants in central Zagros. They reported herbs in the study area mostly used for treatment of gastrointestinal disorders. Therefore, as our investigation, the use of 90 species of medicinal plants suggested that the people of Northern Khorasan Province are among the other provinces suggesting the most medicinal plants for treatment of gastrointestinal diseases based on natural compounds and traditional ethnobotanical knowledge.
In a similar research on effective medicinal plants for digestive diseases, Toghranegar et al. (2020) reported the existence of 88 medicinal species in Mahneshan area of Zanjan. The Venn diagram between Mahneshan and Bojnord indicates that among all medicinal plants consumed for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, only 20 number shared common species. This result indicates that the type of medicinal plants and the amount of their use in each region depends a lot on the environmental conditions and the type of diseases prevalent in that region. In other words, in many regions of Iran, depending on the type of existing diseases, the local people discovered and identified the effects of different plants and this information was recorded as local knowledge of that region.
Based on the results, the Asteraceae family had the greatest therapeutic effect on gastrointestinal diseases (12 species with FIV=35). In line with this funding, Sharafatmandrad and Khosravi Mashizi (2020) reported that Asteraceae, Lamiaceae, Apiaceae, and Fabaceae were the most abundant families in terms of medicinal species in southeastern Iran. Similarly, other floristic scientists in Northern Khorasan reported similar findings (Nadaf, 2021; Asaadi, 2022). Thakur et al. (2020) investigated the medicinal plants used for gastrointestinal ailments in Kishtwar plateau in the Northwestern Himalaya. India. They showed that among the medicinal plants used, The Asteraceae was the dominant family (12.5%). This result is related to the diverse topographic-climatic zones in this region, such as warm low elevation plains in the south to snow-caped mountains and cold high elevation plains in the north. In addition, Asteraceae is one of the main medicinal families in Iran (Sharafatmandrad and Khosravi Mashizi, 2020). The high rate of seed production and dispersal, high tolerance to harsh condition and low palatability of species of Astraceae resulted in the dominance of this family in Northern Khorasan (Nadaf, 2021). In addition, the widespread distribution of Astraceae in Northern Khorasan led to diverse traditional medicinal uses for different groups of people, such as pastorals.
In the present survey, the fruit and shoots of medicinal plants were recorded as the most used parts for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (Fig. 3). Comparing to similar studies, aerial parts, leaves and fruit are reported as the most used plant parts in southeastern Iran (Sharafatmandrad and Khosravi Mashizi, 2020). Toghranegar et al. (2020) also showed the leaves of medicinal species had the most frequency. This finding is related to easy accessibility of aerial plant tissue for harvesting such as fruit while this approach could endanger sustainable use of medicinal plants.
Among the 90 species introduced in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, the species T. copticum, A. wilhelmsii, F. gummosa, G. glabra and M. pulegium had the highest number of uses, which are shown in Table 1. B. persicum and A. graveolens have the most NU index among four species with high FC. In the present study, RFC values ranged from 0.02-0.76. In addition, B. persicum, A. graveolens, D. sophia, and M. officinalis had the highest RFC (Table 1 and 2). The ethnomedicinal plant species having high RFC values indicate their abundant use and widespread knowledge among the medicinal markets in Bojnord. Amiri and Joharchi (2016) showed these four species are effective in treating gastrointestinal disease. D. sophia is recorded by Toghranegar et al. (2020) with the same effect (Laxatives، Fatty liver purifier) as the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. Arvin and Firozeh (2022) investigated the ethnobotany of medicinal plants in Razo Gargalan in Northern Khorasan, Iran, identifying three species, B. persicum, D. sophia and M. officinalis for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. As shown in Table 2, A. graveolens had the highest UR (UR=4). Whitney et al. (2018) also calculated this index for the valuation of plants in the home gardens of southwestern Uganda. The highest RII values were calculated for B. persicum (RI=1) (Table 2). This species had high FC and NU. Accordingly, formula RII index is the most for this species. Cultural importance index (CI) takes the spread of the use (number of informants) for each species along with its versatility, i.e. the diversity of its uses, into account (Mosaddegh and Naghibi, 2002). A. graveolens had the highest CI (1.294).
The analysis value of FL indicated M. officinalis accounts for maximum fidelity level (FL = 100%) for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases (Table 3). The value obtained indicates eliminating gastric infection was the most significant ailment treated using M. officinalis. The high value of FL (near 100%) represented the use of a particular species for all the use categories in the same way, whereas low value of FL represented the use of plants for many different purposes (Thakur et al., 2020). One of the most important species listed in Table 1, Ziziphora clinopodioides, is consumed as a drink with the local name (Anekh/Kakoti). This species is collected by the locals themselves and is considered as a vulnerable plant (Nadaf, 2021). F. gummosa (Gasni, Barijeh) is another species possessing an important role in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases and is collected by the local people. Barijeh (F. gumosa) is also one of the native Iranian plants, extensively consumed for medicinal and industrial purposes while it is being harvested every year due to its important applications. Due to inappropriate methods in extracting its leachate, the condition for the destruction of this plant has been provided and no action has been taken to protect it. The genus Ferula is known for its various chemical compounds including coumarin terpenoids, mixtures of aromatic esters, terpenic acids and alcohols, and terpene lactones. Traditional applications of Barijeh for the treatment of many diseases, in addition to its bioactive phytoconstituents, may unravel discovery of drugs by natural origin for optimistically production of therapeutic medicines (Ahmadi et al., 2020).
The results of the main essential oil indicate that in the case of D. sophia, ocimene has protective properties for the liver, as listed in Table 4. The major volatile chemicals of D. sophia (in China) were previously characterized as β-ocimene and menthol (Li et al., 2010). An in vitro study performed by Amin-Jalilzadeh et al. (2011) on its extract found that its seed extract was able to increase the movements of smooth muscles. In this way, it can be effective in the organs of the digestive system. Two bioactive volatile compounds of A. graveolens dihydrocarv one and limonene formerly indicated antioxidant effects and stabilizing liver cell membranes and reducing enzyme release into the bloodstream (Table 4). The A. graveolens seed extract exhibited a protective effect on gastric mucosa due to its flavonoid compounds. Moreover, the glucose-lowering effect of the extract is related to quercetin as the main plant’s flavonoid composition. The antioxidant compounds of A. graveolens reduce glucose uptake into the intestine (Aleebrahim-Dehkordy et al., 2017). M. officinalis was also studied as a medicinal plant in this report (Table 4). This plant is used to treat gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and neurological diseases and its ointment is consumed as anti-herpes. The geographical conditions can have impact on the essential oil content as well as the composition. Moreover, many studies proved abiotic and biotic effects on biosynthesis of plant volatile constituents (Nadaf et al., 2022).
Conclusion
In this study, based on an ethnobotanical survey, medicinal plants consumed for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases were identified from the herbal markets of Bojnord, Northern Khorasan Province, Iran. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first quantitative ethnomedicinal study. Data were statistically analyzed using R software using ethnobotanical quantitative indices of Frequency of Citations (FC), Relative Frequency Citation (RFC), Use Report (UR), Cultural Importance Index (CII), Number of Uses (NU), Relative Importance Index (RII), Fidelity Level (FL), and Family Importance Value (FIV). The existence of 90 plant species for the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases showed the high ethnobotanical knowledge of the people of the region. The results clearly indicate that the higher number of medical plants in the herbal markets of Bojnord is related to diverse topo-climatic in this region. It underlines the importance of documentation of traditional ethnomedicinal knowledge and to prevent its extinction in the study area. Also, phytochemical studies of all reported species, in addition to the most cited species, are vital for identifying the bioactive compounds of these medicinal plants which can be used in phytopharmaceutical industries for the development of novel herbal drugs. Complementary phytochemical investigations of D. sophia, B. persicum, A. graveolens, and M. officinalis, followed by preclinical experiments and clinical trials targeting assessment of gastrointestinal tract treatment can promisingly lead to introducing premier plant-base medications.
References
Ahmadi, K., Ghaderi, A., Rafiei, G. and Mirzadeh, E., 2020. A review of the properties of the medicinal plant Ferula gummosa from the perspective of traditional medicine. 3rd International Conference on Agricultural Sciences, Medicinal Plants and Traditional Medicine, 2020: 1-6.
Ahvazi, M. and Akbarzadeh, M., 2017. Traditional uses of some medicinal plants in Gastrointestinal tract treatment in east - Mazandaran (Iran). Journal of Medical Plants, 16:43–56.
Akbarlou, M. and Nodehi, N., 2016. Relationship between Some Environmental Factors with Distribution of Medicinal Plants in Ghorkhud Protected Region, Northern Khorasan Province. Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science, 6(1): 63-72.
Akhani, H., 2006. Flora Iranica: facts and figures and a list of publications by K. H. Rechinger on Iran and adjacent areas. Rostaniha, 7: 19-61.
Aleebrahim-Dehkordy, E., Tamadon, M. R., Nasri, H., Baradaran, A., Nasri, P. and Beigrezaei, S., 2017. Review of possible mechanisms of analgesic effect of herbs and herbal active ingredient. Journal of Young Pharmacists, 9(3): 303.
Amiri, M. S. and Joharchi, M. R., 2016. Ethnobotanical knowledge of Apiaceae family in Iran: A review. Avicenna journal of phytomedicine, 6(6): 621- 635.
Arvin, P. and Firuzeh, R., 2022. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants in Razo-Jargalan district in North Khorasan Province. Iranian Journal of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Research, 37:873–907. (In Persian).
Asaadi, A. M., 2022. A survey of floristic, life forms, and chorology of plants in Akhardaghe watershed (North Khorasan province, Iran). ECOPERSIA, 10(2): 133-151.
Asadi Oskouei, E., Delsouz Khaki, B., Kouzegaran, S., Navidi, M. N., Haghighatd, M., Davatgar, N. and Lopez-Baeza, E., 2022. Mapping Climate Zones of Iran Using Hybrid Interpolation Methods. Remote Sensing, 14(11): 2632.
Asadi, M. (1989-2012) Flora of Iran (ed.), Vols: 1-76, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Tehran, Iran (In Persian).
Beyene, B., Beyene, B. and Deribe, H., 2016. Review on application and management of medicinal plants for the livelihood of the local community. Journal of Resources Development and Management, 22(1): 33-39.
Bibi, T., Ahmad, M., Tareen, R. B., Tareen, N.M., Jabeen, R., Rehman, S. U., Sultana, S., Zafar, M. and Yaseen, G., 2014. Ethnobotany of medicinal plants in district Mastung of Balochistan province-Pakistan. Journal of ethnopharmacology, 157: 79-89.
Chase, M.W., Christenhusz, M.J., Fay, M.F., Byng, J.W., Judd, W.S., Soltis, D.E., Mabberley, D.J., Sennikov, A.N., Soltis, P.S. and Stevens, P.F., 2016. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical journal of the Linnean Society, 181(1): 1-20.
Delfan, B., Bahmani, M., Hassanzadazar, H., Saki, K., Rafieian-Kopaei, M., Rashidipour, M., Bagheri, F. and Sharifi, A., 2015. Ethnobotany study of effective medicinal plants on gastric problems in Lorestan province, West of Iran. J Chem Pharm Res, 7(2): 483-92.
Eslami Farouji, A. and Khodayari, H., 2016. Ethnomedicinal plants of Farouj district, North Khorasan province, Iran. Journal of Medicinal Herbs, 7: 21–36. (In Persian).
Helsel, B. C., Williams, J. E., Lawson, K., Liang, J. and Markowitz, J., 2018. Telemedicine and mobile health technology are effective in the management of digestive diseases: a systematic review. Digestive diseases and sciences, 63: 1392-1408.
Heshmati, G. A, Barani, H. and Mirdeylami, S. Z., 2016. Ethnobotanical and Ethnoecological Survey on Medicinal Species (Case Study Kechik Rangelands in the Northeast Golestan Province). Indigenous Knowledge, 1:129–54.
Heydari, M., Omidipour, R. and Greenlee, J., 2020. Biodiversity, a review of the concept, measurement, opportunities, and challenges. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity, 4(4): 26-39.
Jalal, Z., El., Atki, Y., Lyoussi, B. and Abdellaoui, A., 2015. Phytochemistry of the essential oil of Melissa officinalis L. growing wild in Morocco: Preventive approach against nosocomial infections. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, 5(6): 458-461.
Jalilzadeh-Amin, G., Maham, M., Dalir-Naghadeh, B. and Farshad, K., 2011. Effects of Bunium persicum (Boiss.) Essential Oil on the Contractile Responses of Smooth Muscle (An in vitro Study). Veterinary Res Forum, 2: 87–96.
Keramat, M. and Golmakani, M. T., 2016. Effect of Thymus vulgaris and Bunium persicum essential oils on the oxidative stability of virgin olive oil. Grasas y Aceites, 6: 67-162.
Lenti, M. V., Pasina, L., Cococcia, L., Cortesi, L., Miceli, E., Dominioni, C. C., Pisati, M., Mengoli, C. F., Perticone, F. and Nobili, A., 2019. Mortality rate and risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in elderly patients. European J Internal Med, 61: 54-61.
Li, J., Liu, X., Dong, F., Xu, J., Zheng, Y. and Shan, W., 2010. Determination of the Volatile Composition in Essential Oil of Descurainia sophia (L.) Webb ex Prantl (Flixweed) by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS). Molecules, 15: 233–240.
Mehrnia, M., Akaberi, M., Amiri, M. S., Nadaf, M. and Emami, S. A., 2021. Ethnopharmacological studies of medicinal plants in central Zagros, Lorestan Province, Iran. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 280: 1-56.
Mohebodini, M. and Farmanpour-Kalalagh, K., 2021. Comparative Chemical Composition of Essential Oils in Dill (Anethum graveolens L.) Ecotypes: Focus on Univariate and Factor Analysis. International Journal of Horticultural Science and Technology, 8: 81–90.
Mosaddegh, M. and Naghibi, F., 2002. Traditional medicine and materia medica, Tehran: Sara pulication, 166 p.
Nadaf, M., Joharchi, M. R. and Amiri, M.S., 2019. Ethnomedicinal uses of plants for the treatment of nervous disorders at the herbal markets of Bojnord, North Khorasan Province, Iran. Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine, 9: 153–63.
Nadaf, M., 2021. Floristic study and introduce medicinal plants of Babaaman region, North Khorasan. J Plant Res (Iran J Biology), 34(1): 43-53. (In Persian).
Nadaf, M., Halimi Khalil Abad, M., Gholami, A., Taghavizadeh Yazdi, M. E., Iriti, M. and Mottaghipisheh, J., 2022. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of different Iranian populations of Anabasis aphylla L. Natural Product Research, 1: 1-5.
Nurzyńska-Wierdaka, R., Bogucka-Kockab, A. and Szymczakc, G., 2014. Volatile Constituents of Melissa officinalis Leaves Determined by Plant Age. Natural Product Communications, 9: 703–706.
Omidipour, R., Erfanzadeh, R. and Faramarzi, M., 2021. Climatic condition effects on the components of plant diversity in the western Iran grasslands using multiplicative partitioning methods. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19(1): 1-10.
Ozliman, S., Yaldiz, G., Camlica, M. and Ozsoy, N., 2021. Chemical components of essential oils and biological activities of the aqueous extract of Anethum graveolens L. grown under inorganic and organic conditions. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agricultur, 8: 20-28.
Prance, G. T., Balee, W., Boom, B. M. and Carneiro, R. L., 1987. Quantitative Ethnobotany and the Case for Conservation in Ammonia. Conservation Biology, 1: 296–310.
Razmjoue, D., Zarei, Z. and Akbari, M., 2015. Ethnobotanical study of some medicinal plants of Abadeh city located in Fars province. Ecophysical and Phytochemistry of Medicinal and Aromatic plants, 7: 222–234.
Rechinger, K. H. (Ed.). 1963–2015. Flora Iranica, vol. 1–181, Akademische Druck- u. Verlagsanstalt, Graz; vol. 175. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Salzburg; vol. 176–181. Verlag des Naturhistorischen Museums, Wien.
Salarian, T., Arzani, H., Jouri, M. H. and Jafari, M., 2022. Use of Medicinal Species as an Ecological Indicator for Interpreting Changes in Rangeland Status (Case Study: Javaherdeh Rangelands of Ramsar). Journal of Rangeland Science, 12: 34–47.
Sharafatmandrad, M. and Khosravi Mashizi, A., 2020. Ethnopharmacological study of native medicinal plants and the impact of pastoralism on their loss in arid to semiarid ecosystems of southeastern Iran. Journal of Scientific Reports, 10(1): 1-18.
Stappen, I., Tabanca, N., Ali, A., Wedge, D., Wanner, J. and Gochev, V., 2017. Biological Activity of Bunium persicum Essential Oil from Western Himalaya. Planta Medica International Open, 4: 52–58.
Tardío, J. and Pardo-de-Santayana, M., 2008. Cultural Importance Indices: A Comparative Analysis Based on the Useful Wild Plants of Southern Cantabria (Northern Spain)1. Economic Botany, 62: 24–39.
Thakur, S., Tashi, N., Singh, B., Dutt, H.C. and Singh, B., 2020. Ethnobotanical plants used for gastrointestinal ailments by the inhabitants of Kishtwar plateau in Northwestern Himalaya, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 19(2): 288-298.
Toghranegar, Z., Vafadar, M. and Ghorbani Nohooji, M., 2020. Ethnopharmacological study of medicinal plants effective in the treatment of gastro-intestinal diseases in Mahneshan County. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 19(75): 266-290.
Townsed, C. C., Guest, E., Omar, S. A. and Al-kayat, A. H., 1960-1985. Flora of Iraq, Vols: 1-4. & 8-9, Ministry of Agriculture & Agrarian Reform Republic of Iraq.
Vafadar, M. and Toghranegar, Z., 2020. Ethnobotanical study of some medicinal plants of Abhar county, Zanjan province. Journal of Medicinal Plants, 19: 30–54. (In Persian).
Vincent Rajkumar, S., 2020. The high cost of prescription drugs: causes and solutions. Blood cancer journal, 10(6): 1-5.
Vitalini, S., Iriti, M., Puricelli, C., Ciuchi, D., Segale, A. and Fico, G., 2013. Traditional knowledge on medicinal and food plants used in Val San Giacomo (Sondrio, Italy). An alpine ethnobotanical study. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 145: 517–29.
Whitney, C. W., Bahati, J. and Gebauer, J., 2018. Ethnobotany and Agrobiodiversity: Valuation of Plants in the Homegardens of Southwestern Uganda. Ethnobiology Letters, 9(2): 90-100.
Ziaei, M., Sharifi, M., Naghdi Badi, H., Tahsili, J. and Ghorbani Nohooji, M., 2014. A Review on Ocimum basilicum L. Medicinal Plant with a Focus on the most Important Secondary Compounds and its Medicinal and Agronomic Properties. Journal of Medical Plants, 13: 26–40.
بررسی اتنوبوتانی کمی گیاهان دارویی مورد استفاده در طب سنتی در درمان بیماریهای گوارشی در بجنورد، ایران
محبت ندافالف*، مجید حلیمی خلیل آبادب، رضا امیدی پورج، محمد احسان تقویزاده یزدید
1الف استادیار گروه زیست شناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران، *(نگارنده مسئول)، پست الکترونیک: m_nadaf@pnu.ac.ir
ب استادیار گروه شیمی، دانشگاه کوثر بجنورد، بجنورد، ایران
ج استادیار گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران
د مرکز تحقیقات کاربردی زیست پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
چکیده. در این تحقیق، اطلاعات مهم اتنوبوتانیکی گیاهان دارویی مورد استفاده برای درمان بیماریهای گوارشی که در مغازههای عطاری در بجنورد وجود داشتند، جمعآوری و تحلیل شد. اطلاعات از طریق مصاحبه (30 مرد و 4 زن) با فروشندگان گیاهان دارویی (عطاران) در یک دوره 5 ساله (1401-1396) جمعآوری شدند. دادهها با استفاده از برخی از شاخصهای کمی مانند شاخصهای کمی مانند فراوانی نسبی ثبت (RFC)، گزارش استفاده (UR)، اهمیت فرهنگی (CI)، تعداد استفاده (NU)، اهمیت نسبی (RI)، سطح وفاداری (FL) و ارزش اهمیت خانواده (FIV) مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. در مجموع 90 گونه گیاهی متعلق به 35 تیره گیاهی برای درمان اختلالات گوارشی گزارش شدند. بیشترین میزان شاخص FIV در تیره Asteraceae با 12 گونه (FIV = 35) و Apiaceae با 9 گونه (FIV = 29) بدست آمد. قسمتهای میوه (29%) سپس اندام هوایی (20%) و بذر (18%) بیشترین استفاده دارویی را داشتند. بر اساس نتایج، شاخص FC بین 1 تا 26 متغیر بوده (میانگین=9/11) بطوریکه گونههایی مانند Bunium persicum، Anethum graveolens، Descurainia sophia و Melissa officinalis دارای بیشترین استناد در مطالعه بودند. شاخص NU بین 1 تا 10 متغیر بود که در آن بیشترین میزان استفاده برای (NU= 10) Trachyspermum copticum محاسبه شد. علاوه بر این، مقادیر شاخص RFC بین 03/0 تا 77/0 (میانگین = 35/0) متغیر بود که نشان دهنده دانش بومی بالای مردم در مورد گیاهان دارویی و کاربرد آنها است. این مطالعه نشان داد که اگرچه مردم بجنورد به داروهای شیمیایی مدرن دسترسی دارند، اما هنوز جمعیت قابل توجهی، از مردم از گیاهان دارویی برای اهداف درمانی استفاده میکنند. با توجه به دانش سنتی غنی این افراد، دادههای ارائه شده به طور بالقوه میتواند مرجع ارزشمندی باشند که حاوی اطلاعات مفیدی برای تحقیقات فیتوشیمیایی، بیولوژیکی و دارویی بعدی باشند. نتایج به وضوح نشان داد که تعداد بالای گیاهان دارویی مصرفی در بازارهای گیاهی بجنورد مربوط به تنوع توپواقلیمی در این منطقه است.
کلمات کلیدی: اسانس، پتانسیل درمانی، گیاهان دارویی، فراوانی نسبی ثبت