Estimation of Some Applied Important Parameters in Prediction of Wheat Growth

Subject Areas : Journal of Plant Ecophysiology

Ali Rahemi Karizaki ¹ , abbas bibani ² , Nabi khaliliaghdam ³

1 - Dept. of Agronomy Gonbade-Kavous University of Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources
2 - Assoiciate Professor, Department of plant production, Gonbad University
3 - Assistant professor Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University

Received: 2017-04-27 Accepted : 2018-04-26 Published : 2019-12-22

Keywords: Wheat, dry matter, leaf area, model,

Abstract :

For physiological importance of parameters of nonlinear regression in sigmoidal growth patterns, eight nonlinear regression models (Beta 1, Beta 2, Logistic, Richards, Gompertz, Symmetrical expolinear, Truncated expolinear, Weibull) used for describing of changing trend of accumulated dry matter and two models as: Logistic and Beta for qualification of changing trend of LAI in two cultivar of wheat in two level of N-fertilizer. Thus, an factorial experiment in RCB design with four replications performed which treatment were two level of N-fertilizer and two cultivar of wheat (0, 150 kg/h (cv. Kohdasht) + 0, 120 kg/h (cv. Durum)) during the seasons of 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 in the research field of Gonbad Kavous University, then analyzed in combination method. Results of plotting of LAI data in logistic and beta models showed that both of models described changing trend of LAI and in either cultivar or model, applying of fertilizer decreased RMSE and upgraded R2 slowly. LAImax of cv.kohdasht was more than it in cv.durum in each fertilizer level and models. Also, results revealed that all models could describe changing trend of accumulated dry matter in either fertilizer level, but Richards, symmetrical-expolinear, Truncated-expolinear, Weibull models were some better than others. Further estimated value of parameters in these models (maximum accumulated dry matter, RGR in linear phase, RGR in expolinear phase, missed time to beginning of expolinear phase, slope of dry matter and time of CGRmax) are very practical in simulation studies, cultivars comparings, growth analyses and simulation of growth and production of wheat.

References:

Arabameri, R. 2008. Predicting kernel number and biomass retranslocation inwheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Thesis of M.Sc, Gorgan Uni. Agric Sci. NaturResour. 89 p. (In Persian).

Ghadirian, R., Soltani, A., Zeinali, E. and Kalate-Arabi, M. 2011.The evaluation of non-linear regression models to use in wheat growth analysis. Electronic Journal of Crop Plant Production. 4(3):55-77.(In Persian).

Guadrian, J. and Monteith, J.L. 1990. A mathematical function for crop growth based on light interception and leaf area expansion. Ann. Bot. 66: 695-701.

Ishag, K.H.M. and Dennett, M.D. 1998. Use of the expolinear growth model to analyse the growth of faba bean, peas and lentils at three densities: fitting the model. Ann. Bot. 82: 497-505.

Karadavut, U., Palta, C., Kokten, K. and Bakoglu, A. 2010. Comparative study on some non-linear growth models for describing leaf growth of maize. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 12(2):227-230.

Khamis, A. and Z. Ismail, 2004. Comparative study on non-linear growth model to tobacco leaf growth data. J. Agron., 3: 147–153.

Khamis, A., I. Zuhaimy, H. Khalid and T.M. Ahmad, 2005. Non-linear growth models for modeling oil Palm yield growth. J. Math. Stat., 1:225–233.

Kiynaz, S., Karadavut, U. and Ertek A. 2016. Leaf area estimation of the sugar beet at different irrigation regimes. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Resources. 3(1):8-16.

Lei, Y.C. and S.Y. Zhang, 2004. Features and Partial Derivatives of Bertalanffy-Richards Growth Model in Forestry. Non-linear Analysis: Model. Cont., 9: 65–73.

Mahlooji, M. and Afiuni, D. 2004. Study of growth analysis and grain yield in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) gnotypes. Pajouhesh Sazandegi J. 63: 37-42.

Muller, J., Behrens, T. and Diepenbrock, W. 2006. Use of a new sigmoid growth equation to estimate organ area indices from canopy area index in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Res. 96: 279-295.

Prasad, T.V.R., K. Krishnamurthy and C. Kailasam, 2008. Functional crop and cob growth models of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 194: 208–212.

Rahemi-karizaki, A. 2005. Predicting interception and use of solar radiation in chickpea. Thesis of M.Sc. Thesis of M.Sc. Gorgan Uni. Agric Sci. Natur Resour. 89 p. (In Persian).

Richards, F.J. 1959. A flexible growth functions for empirical use. J. Exp. Bot. 10: 290-300.

Royo, C., Aparicio, N., Blanco, R. and Villegas, D. 2004. Leaf and green area development of durum wheat genotypes grown under Mediterranean conditions. Europ. J. Agron. 20: 419-430.

SAS Institute, 2009 — SAS Institute. The SAS System for Windows. Release 9.02. 1999. SAS Institute, Cary, NC (Ref Type: Computer Program).

Seidsharifi, R., Farzaneh, S. and Saednia, V. 2008. The effects of ZnSo4 on growth analysis, yield and the amount of protein and zinc in different wheat cultivars. Biol J. Iran. 21: 676-691.

Soltani, A. 2006. Re-consideration of Application of Statistical Methods in Agricultural Researches. Mashhad Jihad-e-Daneshgahi Press, 74 pp. (In Persian).

Timmermans, B. G.H., Vos, J., van Nieuwburg, J., Stomph, T.J. and van der Putten, P.E.L. 2007. Germination rates of Solanum sisymbriifolium: temperature response models, effects of temperature fluctuations and soil water potential. Seed Sci Res. 17: 221–231.

Tsialtas, J.T. and Maslaris, N. 2008. Leaf area prediction model for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars. Photosynthetica, 46: 291-293.

Villegas, D., Aparicio, N., Blanco, R. and Royo, C. 2001. Biomass accumulation and main stem elongation of durum wheat growth under Mediterranean condition. Ann. Bot. 88: 617-627.

Weibull, W. 1951. A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J. Appl Mechanics. 18: 293-297.

Yin, X., Gouadrian, J., Latinga, E.A., Vos, J. and Spiertz, J.H. 2003. A flexible sigmoid growth function of determinate growth. Ann. Bot. 91: 361-371.