The Study of Factors Affecting Income Inequality in Rural Areas of Iran (The Ahluwalia Approach)
Subject Areas : Bi-quarterly Journal of development economics and planning
1 - Assistant Professor of Economics, Islamic Azad University, Khoy Branch, Iran
Keywords: TFP, income inequality, Infrastructure investments, Ahluwalia hypothesis,
Abstract :
According to the Ahluwalia hypothesis (1995), the growth of total factor of productivity (TFP) in agricultural sectors along with the other government infrastructural investment in rural areas are the reason of income inequality decrease in these areas.The main objective of this study is to investigate the effects of public investments such as agricultural, road and education(R&E) and Irrigation on income inequality in rural areas of Iran. This research also attempts to study the direction of causality between the income inequality and total factor productivity (TFP) in Iran. Using ARDL methods in the period at 1980 to 2008, empirical results showed that there is a negative relationship between income inequality and agricultural TFP in rural areas of Iran. Hence, additional investments in rural education and agricultural R&E have significant impacts on income inequality. Findings showed also that the Ahluwali hypothesis of the relationship between income inequality and agricultural TFP in Iran's rural areas is not ejected
امینی، علی رضا، 1388، ارزیابی بهره وری کل عوامل تولید در اقتصاد ایران، مجله مدلسازی اقتصادی، جلد اول، شماره 8، ص12-30 .
باقرزاده، علی و کمیجانی، اکبر، 1389، تحلیل مساله نابرابری بر اساس فرضیه کوزنتس در ایران، فصلنامه مدلسازی اقتصاد، شماره 11، ص 43-57.
ترکمانی، جواد، 1387، اثرات مخارج عمرانی دولت بر فقر زدایی در مناطق روستایی ، فصلنامه پژوهش های اقتصادی ایران . دوره 5 ، شماره 25. ص 45- 67.
ذوالنور، بهروز، 1389، ارتباط فقر و نابرابری با سیاست های اقتصادی دولت، مجموعه مقالت فقر در ایران، دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی ایران ، تهران، ص 43- 54، ص 18-26.
صدر، سعید، 1386، کاهش فقر، کارایی و نا برابری در ایران ، پایان نامه دکتری دانشکده اقتصاد دانشگاه تهران،ص 189.
عظیمی، حسین،1387، مدارهای توسعه نیافتگی ، تهران ، نشر نی، چاپ دوم، ص 236.
کفایی ، محمد علی و نصیری ، حسین، 1387، شاخص های نابرابری در اقتصاد . فصلنامه اقتصاد اسلامی ، دوره 4، شماره 32. ص 121- 145.
نوفرستی ، محمد، 1389، ریشه واحد در اقتصادسنجی، تهران : نشر رسا ، چاپ اول.ص 267.
Ahluwalia M. 1995. Inequality and Poverty. Journal of Development Economics,6: 1-32
Alston S.1999.The Kuznets Process and the Inequality Relationship. Journal of Development Economics ,40 : 43- 67
Anderson L.2003. R&D and Inequality. Case of Developing Countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics , 12: 54- 69
Brut W.1998. Growth and Inequality . WashingtonDC. World Bank.
Denison B.2003.The Survey of Growth Models. Journal of Macroeconomics, 4:143-161
Fan S. 2007. Agricultural Research and Rural Poverty in India , International Food Policy Research Institute. Washington. 11: 132-154
Fan S Zhang L. 2007. Growth and Poverty in Rural China, The Role of Public Investment, International Food Policy Research Report 125:122-151.
Leyard M. 2003.The Role of Rural Education on Inequality. Studies in South Asia. Journal of Asian Economics . 2 : 320- 343
Pesaran B. 1999. Unit Rout and Econometric Methods . Journal of Econometrics ,4: 21- 41
Sadoullet G. 2006. Index of Inequality in Economics. Journal of Rural Economy ,13: 201-251
Park W. 1998. Impact of Public Investment on Rural Income Inequality. American-Euroasian , Agri & Environment , 20: 12- 34.
Pareto W. 1897. Innovation and Technological Spillovers, NBER Working Paper, 4 : 423-453.