Designing a smart city governance model based on urban justice with an electronic participation approach for the health of citizens
Subject Areas : Health information managementHoriya Abidpur 1 , احمدرضا کسرائی 2 , mohammadali keramati 3 , Hasan Mehrmanesh 4
1 - Department of Information Technology Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Industrial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Industrial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 - Department of Industrial Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Citizen participation, smart city, urban governance, urban justice, citizens' health,
Abstract :
Introduction: Citizens' health, as the most basic human asset, has long been considered one of the basic human concerns, and throughout history, it has attracted the attention of many experts and scientists in various scientific fields, including social experts. The aim of the research was to design a smart city governance model based on urban justice with an electronic participation approach in line with citizens' health.
Methods: The research was carried out in an exploratory and survey way. In the qualitative part of the Delphi method and in the quantitative part of the interpretive structural model method and structural equations, it was done. In the qualitative part as well as the interpretive structural model method of the community, managers and experts in urban planning were examined, and 18 people were selected from the available judgmental sampling method. Using the library technique, the components affecting the model were identified. First, using the Delphi technique, screening and evaluation of the identification components have been done. In the following, modeling has been done using the Delphi method and the interpretive structural method. The software used is EXCEL and MICMAC. The small community of citizens of Tehran was an unlimited number. Using Cochran's formula, 365 people were selected as samples. Based on the researcher's questionnaire based on qualitative analysis, data analysis was done using coding and path analysis. Data analysis was done using coding and path analysis. Based on the sampling, in order to fit the proposed model, the structural equation model technique was used in the SMARTPLS software.
Results: Based on the Delphi technique, 9 criteria for supporting smart innovation, smart economy, smart strategies, smart infrastructure, cooperation between the private and public sector, smart interaction, knowledge integration, smart sustainability and smart governance were confirmed and in a model 6 interpretive structural levels were identified. The criteria of smart infrastructure and smart strategies were identified as the most effective components. Finally, smart governance was identified. Meanwhile, other components were placed as intermediary criteria from the least effective to the most effective. In the model of smart city governance based on urban justice in line with the health of citizens, smart infrastructures play a key role in creating the necessary foundations for the development of urban services and facilities. These infrastructures include advanced communication networks, intelligent transportation systems, and information and communication technologies (ICTs) that enable extensive data collection and analysis.
Conclusion: By using these data, cities can more accurately identify the needs and problems of society for the health of citizens and provide solutions based on real data. This contributes to a more equitable distribution of resources and services, reducing urban inequalities, and improving the quality of life of all citizens.
1- Greif, M.J., & Dodoo F.N. How Community Physical, Structural, and Social Stressors Relate to Mental Health in the Urban Slums of Accra, Ghana. Health & Place, 2015; 33, 57-66.
2- Kim , T, F ; Gary, W, E. The Built Environment and Mental Health. Journal of Urban Health, 2018; 80(4):536 -55.
3- Yang, M., Dijst, M., Faber, J., & Helbich, M. Using structural equation modeling to examine pathways between perceived residential green space and mental health among internal migrants in China. Environmental Research, 2020; 109-121.
4- Wood, L; Hooper, P; Foster, S; Bull, F. Public green spaces and positive mental health – investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing. Health & Place, 2017; 48: 63 –71.
5- MacCay, L ; Bremer, I; Endale, T; Jannati, M; Yi,J, (2017). Urban Design and Mental Health. Mental Health and Illness in the City; 2017: 421 -444.
6- Willis, Katharine S, and Alessandro Aurigi. The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities. London: Routledge; 2020.
7- Chantry, W. Built from the internet up’: assessing citizen participation in smart city planning through the case study of Quayside, Toronto; 2022. GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10688-3
8- Malek, J.A.; Lim, S.B.; Yigitcanlar, T. Social inclusion indicators for building citizen-centric smart cities: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 2021; 13: 376
9- Bastos, D. Caballero, A. Pereira, A. Smart City Applications to Promote Citizen Participation in City Management and Governance: A Systematic Review; 2023.
10- Fraser, Nancy. Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World. New Left Review, 2005 36: 69–88.
11- Artyushina, Anna. “Is Civic Data Governance the key to Democratic Smart Cities? The Role of the Urban Data Trust in Sidewalk Toronto.” Telematics and Informatics, 2020; 55: 101456. Doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101456.
12- Köhler, Bettina. Smart City. In Wörterbuch Klimadebatte, edited by Sybille Bauriedl, 269–276. Bielefeld: transcript; 2016.
13- Morozov, Evgeny, and Francesca Bria. “Rethinking the Smart City. Democratizing Urban Technology.” In City Series #5. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, New York Office. Accessed April 25, 2022.
14- Ash, James, Rob Kitchin, and Agnieszka Leszczynski. Digital Turn, Digital Geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 2018; 42(1): 25–43. doi:10.1177/0309132516664800
15- Marvin, Simon, Andrés Luque-Ayala, and Colin McFarlane, eds. Smart Urbanism: Utopian Vision or False Dawn? London: Routledge; 2015.
16- Smith, Gavin JD. (2020). The Politics of Algorithmic Governance in the Black box City. Big Data & Society, 2020; 7(2): 2053951720933989.
17- Kitchin, R., Cardullo, P. and Di Feliciantonio, C. "Citizenship, Justice, and the Right to the Smart City", Cardullo, P., Di Feliciantonio, C. and Kitchin, R. (Ed.) The Right to the Smart City, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley; 2019: 1-24.
18- Alberto V. Playable Urban Citizenship: Social Justice and the Gamification of Civic Life" In The Right to the Smart City. Published online: 26 May 2019: 57-69.
19- Cardullo, Paolo, Cesare Di Feliciantonio, and Rob Kitchin. The Right to the Smart City. Emerald: Bingley; 2019.
20- Kitchin, Rob. Reframing, Reimagining and Remaking Smart Cities. Ireland: Maynooth Universit; 2016.
21- Leszczynski, A. Speculative Futures: Cities, Data, and Governance beyond Smart Urbanism.” Environment and Planning A, 2016; 48(9): 1691–1708.
22- Rose, Gillian. “Actually-existing Sociality in a Smart City. City, 2020; 24(3-4): 512–529. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2020.1781412
23- Vanolo, Alberto. Playable Urban Citizenship: Social Justice and the Gamification of Civic Life. In The Right to the Smart City, edited by Cardullo Paolo, Feliciantonio Cesare Di, and Kitchin Rob, 2019; 57–69. Emerald: Bingley.
24- Elwood, Sarah. Digital Geographies, Feminist Relationality, Black and Queer Code Studies: Thriving Otherwise. Progress in Human Geography, 2020; 0(0): 0309132519899733. doi:10.1177/0309132519899733.
25- Jokar, R. Compilation of a guide for creating urban spaces with the approach of reducing environmental stress generation (Study area: urban fabric around the old cargo terminal of Shiraz, master's thesis in urban design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz Universit; 2016..
26- Sasanpour F, Alizadeh S, Arabi Moghadam H. Measuring the livability of Urmia urban areas with the RALSPI model, Journal of Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 2017; 18(48): 241-258.
27- Pourahmad, A. Farhadi, I. Ghorbani, R. Darudinia, A. The impact of urban visions on the mental health of citizens, a case study of areas 2 and 9 of Tehran, Shahr Padayar Quarterly, 2017; 1: 17-33.
28- Dong, H., & Qin, B. Exploring the link between neighborhood environment and mental wellbeing: A case study in Beijing, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2017; 164: 71 -80.
29- Khomenko, S., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Ambros, A., Wegener, S., & Mueller, N. Is a liveable city a healthy city? Health affects of urban and transport planning in Vienna, Austria. Environmental research, 2020; 183: 109238.
30- Liu, Y., Wang, R., Lu, Y., Li, Z., Chen, H., Cao, M., & Song, Y. Natural outdoor environment, neighbourhood social cohesion and mental health: Using multilevel structural equation modelling, streetscape and remote -sensing metrics. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening; 2020: 126576.
31- Rosol, M. Gwendolyn, B. From the smart city to urban justice in a digital age, City; 2022. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2022.2079881
32- Albino, V., U. Berardi, R. M. Dangelico. “Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives.” Journal of Urban Technology, 2015; 22(1): 3–21.
33- Pierre, J., and B. Peters. Governance, Politics and the State. 2nd ed. London: Red Globe Press; 2019.
34- Lim, S.B.; Yigitcanlar, T. Participatory Governance of Smart Cities: Insights from e-Participation of Putrajaya and Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. Smart Cities, 2022; 5: 71–89. https://doi.org/10.3390/ smartcities5010005
35- Toots, M. Why e-participation systems fail: The case of Estonia’s Osale.ee. Gov. Inf. Q, 2019; 36: 546–559.
36- Bernardes, M.B. De Andrade, F.P.; Novais, P.; Lopes, N.V. Participatory governance of smart cities: A study upon Portuguese and Brazilian government portals. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV’18, Galway, Ireland, 2018; 4: 526–536.
37- Taqipour, A.A. Shahmiri, S M Parsa. Deharshid, A. Evaluation of the subjective indicators of a healthy city from the citizens' point of view (case study: Shahryar city). Sustainable Urban Development Quarterly, 2023; 4(12): 107-87.
38- Khanpour, S. Zabihi, H. Nouri, A. Citizen participation components in the smart city; A case study of Tehran metropolis. Quarterly Journal of Land Geography, 2022; 72: 1-17.
39- Gholami, H. Mirehee, M. Javed, A. Explaining the model of smart governance with the approach of public participation in urban decision-making (case example: Tehran). Planning and preparation of Tarbiat Modares University space, 2022; 26: 119-139.
40- Heydari, T. Zare, A A. Musk Sar, P. The role of citizens' participation in good urban governance (case example: district 2 of Shiraz city). Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Police Science, 2022; 37: 65-88.
41- Balochi, A. Behbodi, MR. Torabi, M. Designing a model for a smart city inspired by the assumptions of modern government services and evaluating its infrastructure components in Bandar Abbas municipality. Iranian Public Administration Quarterly, 2022; 2: 159-189.
42- Mousavi, H. Thabet, A. Philly, A. Investigating the impact of the smart city on urban vandalism with the mediating role of the happy city and social justice (case study: Shiraz city). Urban planning, 2022; 13: 150-266.
43- Naserifar, A. Bayat, B. Nikugoftar, M. Explaining the factors affecting the participation of women in the smartening of the city. National Security Scientific Quarterly; 2022:120-97.
44- Azimi, E. Sattarzadeh, D. Belilan, L Abdulzadeh Taraf, A, Faramarezi Main, M. Evaluation of the impact of environmental physical factors of public spaces on the mental health of citizens (case study: Ardabil city). Journal of applied research of geographic sciences, 2019;20(59): 319-307.
45- Przeybilovicz, E. Cucha, M. Tomor, Z. Citizen participation in the smart city: findings from an international comparative study. Local Government Studies, 2023; 48: 1-12.
