An explanation of the concept of tourism competitiveness in the direction of economic development (A case study: Iran)

Subject Areas : Regional Planning

Mohsen Panahande ¹ , Seyyed Mohammad Rashtian ² , Mahnaz Goodarzi, ³ , Saeed daei-karimzadeh ⁴ , Faezeh Taghipour ⁵

1 - Student of urban planning, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of International Relations and Political Science, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
4 - Associate Professor, Department of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Economic Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan Branch (Khorasgan), Isfahan, Iran.
5 - Assistant Professor, Department of Communication Sciences, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Ira

Received: 2023-12-04 Accepted : 2024-01-27 Published : 2024-02-20

Keywords: Iran, economic development, Tourism, Competitiveness,

Abstract :

Abstract
Tourism competitiveness holds significant importance in economic development. Enhancing competitiveness can lead to increased market share and economic growth in the tourism sector. Numerous studies have analyzed the determinants of tourism destination competitiveness. This research examines how tourism competitiveness in Iranian cities contributes to the country's economic development.The purpose of this research, on the one hand, is the link between the two concepts of competitiveness and the indicators used for measurement, and on the other hand, studies related to tourism competitiveness models and economic growth resulting from the presence of tourists. In terms of the nature of the research, the research method of the upcoming study is qualitative research, and in terms of the goal, it is developmental or applied in terms of methodology, it is analysis and copying tools, And the statistical population is used by experts and professors related to tourism competition and urban planning, and in the end, the analysis of information has been done by means of confirmatory factor analysis. The results obtained from these studies define a model in which the provision of heritage tourism resources with the provision of productive resources and the links between them are the elements that determine the capacity of an economy for production as a result of economic growth. The presented models have emphasized a set of related variables that indicate how they must be measured and evaluated. Even so, an increase in tourism activity contributes positively to economic growth, although how it does so, how much, as well as generalizing this contribution to the development of all countries or periods, are questions that remain.
 
Extended Abstract
 
Introduction
Based on this, the main problem of the research has been stated as follows: what are the concepts for creating competition between cities? Also, how can the government and the people solve the economic problems of society by using these competitions? On the other hand, how can actual and potential competition between cities lead to economic prosperity and solve other problems of cities and citizens? In this regard, Iran, as one of the countries whose economy is strongly dependent on oil, can move away from the oil economy by creating actual and potential competition between its cities, as well as changes in the texture of localities and the physicality of urban spaces to attract Tourists can promote  the economy caused by tourism.
 
Methodology
the research method of the upcoming study is qualitative research, and in terms of the goal, it is developmental or applied in terms of methodology, it is analysis and copying tools, And the statistical population is used by experts and professors related to tourism competition and urban planning, and in the end, the analysis of information has been done by means of confirmatory factor analysis.
 
Results and Discussion
In this research, a new concept of the relationship between competitiveness, tourism, and growth has been presented in which the provision of hereditary resources, together with the provision of production resources and the links between them, are the elements that determine the capacity of an economy for production and as a result growth. The new conceptual framework of tourism variables, including the model, does not depend on demand factors. Instead, it directly focuses on production factors such as physical and human capital. Unlike previous models that measured tourism by tourism income or the number of tourists, this new model aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of tourism. (Lejárraga, Walkenhorst, 2010)This variable refers to the conditions of the territory, which motivates the offer of tourism in a geographical area. As shown in previous studies on measuring tourism competitiveness, what should be included in the conception of intrinsic resources of tourism remains an undefined question.
 
Conclusion
In general, it seems that in certain lands there is a series of elements that make those places attractive for tourists, which is related to culture, environment and climate. These sources are numerous, and some of them have been protected from interest over the past century, indicating that they are known as attractive elements for the reasons already mentioned. Therefore, from the measurement of those elements, it is possible to produce an index that includes only the elements related to culture, environment and climatic condition, with the previously shown tourism competitiveness measurement techniques, such as those applied in TTCI or CM. Several aspects should be considered when analyzing these relationships. Firstly, The number of foreign economic variables like public capital, private capital, and human territory are indicators of the competitiveness of destination tourism.The influence of production factors on competitiveness indicators is a direct result of economic growth. The second measure of tourism is usually income or the number of tourists, which involves connecting a demand variable with economic growth. In addition, the relationship between tourism and economic growth is influenced by other variables such as physical and human capital, as well as infrastructure. The study will be biased if these variables are not taken into account to explain growth. This research proposes that the relationships between tourism and territory can be viewed from the standpoint of the territory having certain inherent qualities or resources that make it attractive to travelers, rather than the influence of production factors. These Innate resources are known as inherited resources. The provision of those resources in a territory, along with the provision of production resources, such as private or public capital and human capital and their connection with each other, means the complementary or alternative relationships that exist between them, elements that determine the capacity of an economy to produce and thus grow.

References:

References

1. Ali Akbari, E., Khodadad Kashi, F., & Komasi, H. (2018). Evaluating the competitiveness and economy of Iran's megacities. Regional Planning Quarterly, 8(29). https://jzpm.marvdasht.iau.ir/article_2769.html?lang=en [In Persian].


2. Aslan, A., Kula, F., & Kaplan, M. (2009). International tourism demand for Turkey: a dynamic panel data approach. Research Journal of International Studies, 9, 65-73.


3. Balaguer, J., & Cant Avella-Jorda, M. (2018). Tourism as a long-run economic growth factor: the Spanish case. Applied Economics, 34(7), 877-884.


4. Botti, L., Peypoch, N., Robinot, E., & Solonadrasana, B. (2009). Tourism destination competitiveness: the French regions case. European Journal of Tourism Research, 2(1), 5-24.


5. Brida, J. G., Cortés-Jiménez, I., & Pulina, M. (2014). Has the tourism-led growth hypothesis been validated? A literature reviews. Current Issues in Tourism. DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2013.868414, 1-37.


6. Cárdenas, P. J. (2011). La Competitividad turística en los países del Mediterráneo. Análisis de los factores determinantes. Análisis Turístico, 11(2), 11-22.


7. Castro-Nuño, M., Molina-Touched, J. A., & Pablo-Romero, M. D. P. (2016). Driving licenses based on points system: an efficient road safety strategy or a global fashion policy? A worldwide meta-analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 52(6), 745-758.


8. Cortés-Jiménez, I., & Pulina, M. (2010). Inbound tourism and long-run economic growth. Current Issues in Tourism, 13(1), 61-74.


9. Croes, R. (2011). Measuring and explaining competitiveness in the context of small island destinations. Journal of Travel Research, 50(4), 431-442.


10. Croes, R., & Kubickova, M. (2013). From potential to ability to compete: towards a performance-based tourism competitiveness index. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 23, 146-154.


11. Crouch, G. I., & Ritchie, J. B. (1999). Tourism, competitiveness, and societal prosperity. Journal of Business Research, 44, 137-152.


12. Dwyer, L., & Kim, C. (2013). Destination competitiveness. Determinants and indicators. Current Issues in Tourism, 6, 369-414.


13. Garau, J. (2007). Propuesta de dos índices para la medición de la competitividad de los destinos de sol y playa del Mediterráneo: avance de resultados desde el punto de vista de la demanda. Revista de Análisis Turístico, 4, 50-67.


14. Hong, W. (2009). Global competitiveness measurement for the tourism sector. Current Issues in Tourism, 12(2), 105-132.


15. Hye, Q. M., & Khan, R. E. (2013). Tourism-led growth hypothesis: a case study of Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 18(4), 303-313.


16. Ivanov, S. (2020). Problems in the measurement of tourism impact on the leakage of national income. Yearbook of International University College, 2, 176-182.


17. Jackman, M. (2012). Revisiting the tourism-led growth hypothesis for Barbados: a disaggregated market approach. Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, 12(2), 15-26.


18. Kim, C. H. (2020). Destination Competitiveness: Development of a Model with Application to Australia and the Republic of Korea. Korea Tourism Research Institute: Korea.


19. Kim, H. J., Chen, M. H., & Jang, S. C. S. (2006). Tourism expansion and economic development: the case of Taiwan. Tourism Management, 27(5), 925-33.


20. Kozak, M. (2002). Destination benchmarking. Annals of Tourism Research, 29, 497-519.


21. Krueger, A. (1980). Trade policy as an input to development. American Economic Review, 70, 188-292.


22. Kumar, R. R., & Kumar, R. (2012). Exploring the nexus between information and communications technology, tourism and growth in Fiji. Tourism Economics, 18(2), 359-371.


23. Lejárraga, I., & Walkenhorst, P. (2010). On linkages and leakages: measuring the secondary effects of tourism. Applied Economics Letters, 17(5), 417-421.


24. Massidda, C., & Mattana, P. (2013). A SVECM. Analysis of the Relationship between International Tourism Arrivals, GDP and Trade in Italy. Journal of Travel Research, 52(1), 93-105.


25. Max-Neef, M. (1995). Economic growth and quality of life: a threshold hypothesis. Ecological economics, 15(2), 115-118.


26. Navickas, V., & Malakauskaite, A. (2009). The possibilities for the identification and evaluation of tourism sector competitiveness factors. Engineering Economics, 1, 61-69.


27. Pablo-Romero, M. D. P., & Molina, J. A. (2013). Tourism and economic growth: a review of empirical literature. Tourism Management Perspectives, 8, 28-41.


28. Poon, M. (2014). Competitiveness in Tourism- Models of tourism competitiveness and their applicability: Case study Austria and Switzerland. European Journal of Tourism, Hospitality and Recreation, Special Issue, 73-94.


29. Porter, M. (2015). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press: New York.


30. Pulido, J. I., & Sánchez-Rivero, M. (2009). Measuring tourism sustainability: proposal for a composite index. Tourism Economics, 15(2), 277-296.


31. Pulido, J. I., Sánchez-Rivero, M., & López, Y. (2011). Comparative analysis of the sustainability of tourism in Spain’s regions. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 10(12), 1845-1855.


32. Ritchie, J. R. B., & Crouch, G. (2003). The Competitive Destination: A Sustainable Tourism Perspective. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK.


33. Ritchie, J. R. B., & Crouch, G. (2017). The competitive destination: a sustainability perspective. Tourism Management, 21(1), 1-7.


34. Sánchez-Cañizares, S. M., López-Guzmán, T. J., & Reis, H. (2011). Education of human capital as a source of competitiveness in tourist destinations. In, Matias A., Nijkamp P., Sarmento M. (Eds.) Tourism Economics. Springer: Berlin. 11-30.


35. Scott, B., & Lodge, G. (2020). U.S. Competitiveness in the World Economy. Business School Press. Harvard: Boston.


36. Seetanah, B. (2011). Assessing the dynamic economic impact of tourism for island economies. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(1), 291-308.


37. Sotoudeh, N., Fathollahi, J., & Mousavi, M. (2022). Explaining the Regional Competitiveness with a foresight approach (case studies: Kermanshah province). Regional Planning Quarterly, 11(44). https:// 20.1001.1. 22516735.1400. 11.44.3.2&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8 [In Persian].


38. Stabler, M. J., Papatheodorou, A., & Sinclair, M. T. (2010). The economics of tourism. Routledge: Oxon.


39. Tang, C. F., & Tan, E. C. (2013). How stable is the tourism-led growth hypothesis in Malaysia? Evidence from disaggregated tourism markets. Tourism Management, 37, 52-57.


40. Tribe, J. (2021). The Economics of Recreation, Leisure and Tourism. Tourism and GDP: A meta-analysis of panel data studies. Elsevier: Oxford.


41. United Nations World Tourism Organization. (2015). World Tourism Barometer. UNWTO: New York.


42. VanHove, N. (2018). The Economics of Tourism Destinations. Elsevier Butterworth- Heinemann, Burlington, MA.


43. Webster, C., & Ivanov, S. (2019). Transforming competitiveness into economic benefits: does tourism stimulate economic growth in more competitive destinations? Tourism Management, 40, 137-140.


44. World Travel and Tourism Council. (2014). Travel and Tourism Economic Impact 2014. European Union. WTTC: London.