Comparison of the effectiveness of motivational interviewing and matrix treatment with Cognitive-Behavioral Approach on depression and quality of life in marijuana users
Subject Areas : TectonostratigraphyAbdolRasoul Kaviani 1 , Hojjatullah Javid 2 , Hossein Baghooli 3 , Majid Barzegar 4
1 - Ph.D. Student in General Psychology, Department of Consulting, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
2 - Department of Consulting, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
3 - Department of Consulting, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
4 - Department of Consulting, Marvdasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran
Keywords: Quality of life, Depression, Motivational Interviewing, matrix treatment with Cognitive-Behavioral Approach, marijuana users,
Abstract :
The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of motivational interviewing and matrix treatment with Cognitive-Behavioral Approach on depression and quality of life in marijuana users. Experimental research method along with pretest-posttest design used with three groups (two experimental groups, a motivational interviewing group, a matrix treatment group and a control group). The statistical population was all marijuana addicts in Shiraz. Statistical samples were selected from marijuana addicts referred to Mehrari Hospital in Shiraz. Individuals were randomly assigned to three groups (15 people in each group). Weir Scherborn quality of life Scale and Beck Depression were used to collect data. The results showed that matrix treatment and motivational interviewing were significantly different from the control group, but matrix treatment with motivational interviewing were not different in effectiveness. Therefore, both therapies can be used as adjunctive therapies in marijuana addicts.
Keywords: motivational interviewing, matrix treatment with Cognitive-Behavioral Approach , depression, quality of life , marijuana users
ral Households of Shiraz Township . Journal of Rural Research. 2021;12(1): 62-79, http://dx.doi.org/ 10.22059/jrur.2020.304993.1523
7. Miller WR, Moyers TB. Motivational interviewing and the clinical science of Carl Rogers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017;85(8):757-766. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000179. PMID: 28726479.
9. Sara LD, Rosemarie A, Martin D, & Rohsenow J. Self-efficacy for cocaine abstinence: Pretreatment correlates and relationship to outcomes. Addictive Behaviors. 2008; 33:675-688. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.12.001
13. Shaul L, Blankers M, Koeter MWJ, Schippers GM, & Goudriaan AE. The Role of Motivation in Predicting Addiction Treatment Entry among Offenders With Substance Use Disorders Under Probation Supervision. International Journal of Of fender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, published online.2019. doi.org/10.1177/0306624X19849554
15. Dashti Dehkordi A, yousefi H, Maghsoudi J, Etemadifar M. The Effects of Motivational Interviewing on Depression of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis Disease. IJPN. 2017; 4 (5) :29-35. URL: http://ijpn.ir/article-1-756-en.html
16. Freira S, Lemos MS, Williams G, Ribeiro M, Pena F, Machado MD. Effect of Motivational Interviewing on depression scale scores of adolescents with obesity and overweight. Psychiatry research. 2012; 12(252):340-345. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.03.020
21. Kakakhani S. The effectiveness of addiction treatment matrix model on emotion regulation and quality of life of methamphetamine abusers, 4th International Conference on Recent Innovations in Psychology, Counseling and Behavioral Sciences, Tehran, Nikan University.2017.
URL: http://irj.uswr.ac.ir/article-1-768-en.html
25. Dakof GA, Cohen JB, Henderson CE, Durante E. A randomizedpilot study of the Engaging Moms Program for family drug court. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010; 38: 263–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.01.002
Lisa R, Fortuna MD. Motivational Interviewing in the Treatment of Psychological Problems.2008. doi.org/10.1176/ps.2008.59.9.1068a
_||_