Developing a model based on games theory for optimal allocation of water to stakeholders in shared water resources under water bankruptcy conditions: Application of chicken game

Subject Areas : Subjects

Mehdi Yazdian ¹ (Faculty Member of Civil Engineering Department, Science & Arts University, Yazd, Iran; Graduated of Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.)
Gholamreza Rakhshandehroo ² (Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.)
Mohammad Reza Nikoo ³ (Associate Professor, Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.)
Nasser Talebbeydokhti ⁴ (Professor, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.)

Received: 2020-11-30 Accepted : 2021-09-01 Published : 2022-04-21

Keywords: MODFLOW, Game Theory, Shared water resource, Optimal harvest, Chicken game,

Abstract :

The increase in consumption demand, competition between different stakeholders, decrease of water resources and being placed under water bankruptcy condition have caused many challenges for water resources management in recent years. The current study assesses the existing challenges between stakeholders who intend to extract from shared water resources. Chicken game has been applied to solve the problem, which is a practical method of games theory in order to eliminate the oppositions between two players. The main goal is to achieve a suitable behavioral pattern for two players by considering appropriate foresight. In this research, MODFLOW model has been used to simulate shared groundwater resource in the studied region. Then, the model is connected to a two-objective optimization model by minimize the drop in the aquifer’s water table and profit increase by using a neural network. The management period of this research was four years and its practicality has been evaluated one of the sub-basins of Golestan province located in northern Iran. In the study, different optimized cultivation areas in various modes of the game have been developed and then, based on the obtained results from the extracted groundwater, the exact amount of groundwater drawdown and obtained profit have been determined. The results show that different stakeholders in exploiting the common water source by using foresight can prevent their strategic losses in the future.

References:

1. Alizadeh MR, Nikoo MR, Rakhshandehroo GR. Developing a Multi-Objective Conflict-Resolution Model for Optimal Groundwater Management Based on Fallback Bargaining Models and Social Choice Rules: a Case Study. Water Resources Management. 2017 Mar 23;31(5):1457–72.


2. Farhadi S, Nikoo MR, Rakhshandehroo GR, Akhbari M, Alizadeh MR. An agent-based-nash modeling framework for sustainable groundwater management: A case study. Agricultural Water Management. 2016 Nov;177:348–58.


3. Avaz Yar, Mohammadreza, Mahmod Ahmadpour Borazjani, and Saman Zyaei. Determine optimal crop pattern with an emphasis on increasing the irrigation efficiency in lands of Mollasadra Dam in Fars province. 2018: 21-32. [In Persian].


4. Mian Abadi H, Mostert E, Zarghami M, van de Giesen N. Transboundary water resources allocation using bankruptcy theory; Case study of Euphrates and Tigris Rivers. The TWAM2013 International conference & workshops, Aveiro, Portugal. 2013;1–5.


5. Eleftheriadou E, Mylopoulos Y. Game Theoretical Approach to Conflict Resolution in Transboundary Water Resources Management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 2008 Sep;134(5):466–73.


6. Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Kinsara RA. Strategic Investigations of Water Conflicts in the Middle East. Group Decision and Negotiation. 2014 May 13;23(3):355–76.


7. Jamshidi S, Niksokhan MH. Waste load allocation in Sefidrud using water quality trading. Water and Irrigation Management. 2015 Sep 23;5(2):243-59. [In Persian].


8. Li B, Tan G, Chen G. Generalized Uncooperative Planar Game Theory Model for Water Distribution in Transboundary Rivers. Water Resources Management. 2016 Jan 23;30(1):225–41.


9. Başar T, Olsder GJ. Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 1999.


10. Madani K. Game theory and water resources. Journal of Hydrology. 2010 Feb;381(3–4):225–38.


11. Young HP, Okada N, Hashimoto T. Cost allocation in water resources development. Water Resources Research. 1982 Jun;18(3):463–75.


12. Ganji A, Khalili D, Karamouz M. Development of stochastic dynamic Nash game model for reservoir operation. I. The symmetric stochastic model with perfect information. Advances in Water Resources. 2007 Mar;30(3):528–42.


13. Mahjouri N, Ardestani M. A game theoretic approach for interbasin water resources allocation considering the water quality issues. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2010 Aug 22;167(1–4):527–44.


14. Liu Y, Tang W, He J, Liu Y, Ai T, Liu D. A land-use spatial optimization model based on genetic optimization and game theory. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2015 Jan;49:1–14.


15. Wang X, Zhang Y, Zeng Y, Liu C. Resolving Trans-jurisdictional Water Conflicts by the Nash Bargaining Method: A Case Study in Zhangweinan Canal Basin in North China. Water Resources Management. 2013 Mar 20;27(5):1235–47.


16. Aljefri YM, Fang L, Hipel KW, Madani K. Strategic Analyses of the Hydropolitical Conflicts Surrounding the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Group Decision and Negotiation. 2019 Apr 29;28(2):305–40.


17. Loáiciga HA. Analytic game—theoretic approach to ground-water extraction. Journal of Hydrology. 2004 Sep;297(1–4):22–33.


18. Raquel S, Ferenc S, Emery C, Abraham R. Application of game theory for a groundwater conflict in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management. 2007 Sep;84(4):560–71.


19. Nazari S, Ahmadi A. Non-cooperative stability assessments of groundwater resources management based on the tradeoff between the economy and the environment. Journal of Hydrology. 2019 Nov;578:124075.


20. Pourspehi Samiyan, H. and Kerachian, Reza., Water Allocation in Common Rivers: Application of Game Theory, 6th National Congress on Civil Engineering, Semnan, [In Persian].


21. Salehi F, Daneshvar M, Shahnoushi N, Jaleh Rajabi M. Application of game theory in determination of optimal groundwater extraction in Taybad Plain. Agricultural economics. 2010 Dec 1;4(3):65-89. [In Persian].


22. Carlsson B. Simulating How to Cooperate in Iterated Chicken and Prisoner’s Dilemma Games. In 2001. p. 175–200.


23. Kumar R. Chicken Game. 2018.


24. Madani K, AghaKouchak A, Mirchi A. Iran’s Socio-economic Drought: Challenges of a Water-Bankrupt Nation. Iranian Studies. 2016 Nov 1;49(6):997–1016.


25. Oftadeh E, Shourian M, Saghafian B. Evaluation of the Bankruptcy Approach for Water Resources Allocation Conflict Resolution at Basin Scale, Iran’s Lake Urmia Experience. Water Resources Management. 2016 Aug 25;30(10):3519–33.


26. Ristić B, Madani K. A Game Theory Warning to Blind Drivers Playing Chicken With Public Goods. Water Resources Research. 2019 Mar 12;55(3):2000–13.


27.     Barough AS, Shoubi MV, Skardi MJE. Application of Game Theory Approach in Solving the Construction Project Conflicts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012 Oct;58:1586–93.

                Jhawar S, Agarwaal S, Oberoi T, Sharma T, Thakkar A. Application of game theory in water resource management. International Journal of Advance Research and Development. 2018;3(10):63–8.