Experimental investigation of sulfur compounds removal from synthetic quaternary gas condensate system using ultrasound assisted oxidative desulfurization (UAOD) method
Subject Areas : OthersAmeneh Taghizadeh 1 , مریم آسمانی 2 , Fereidoon Esmaeilzadeh 3 , Abolhasan Ameri 4
1 - Department of Chemical Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
2 - Department of Chemical Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
3 - Department of Chemical Engineering; School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
4 - Department of Chemical Engineering, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
Keywords: Ultrasound, Gas condensate, Experimental design. ,
Abstract :
In addition to natural gas, gas condensates are also produced from gas reservoirs. The presence of any of the pollutants, such as sulfur compounds, can cause problems in downstream industries or damage the environment. In this research, the desulfurization of a synthetic quaternary gas-condensate system containing of normal heptane with different combinations of tert-butyl mercaptan (aliphatic thiol), dipropyl sulfide (aliphatic sulfide), and benzo thiophene (aromatic thiophene) in the range of 0-3000 ppm were treated using UAOD process. For this purpose, different operating variables including H2O2 (10- 70% v/v), CH2O2 (5- 70% v/v), H3P(W3O10)4 (1- 30% w/w), C4H10O (1- 30 % v/v) and sonication (5- 40 min) were examined upon the desulfurization efficiency. The design of the experiments was performed by the response surface method of the central composite design model. And then N, N-dimethylformamide solvent was used to extract oxidized sulfurous compounds from n-heptane. Residual sulfur was analyzed by ASTM D7039 standard method. Maximum desulfurization efficiency, 99.92%, for C4H10S= 1105.99 ppm, C6H14S= 2252.50 ppm, C8H6S= 2965.48 ppm in 20 mL n-heptane was obtained at H2O2= 23.57% v/v, CH2O2= 49.27% v/v, H3P(W3O10)4= 21.15% w/w, C4H10O= 24.56% v/v and sonication time= 21.17 min. Additionally, an empirical model was proposed to predict desulfurization efficiency with an error of less than 0.1%.
H. Topsøe, B.S. Clausen, F.E. Massoth, (1996) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61040-0
_1. 2. X . Ma, K. Sakanishi, I. Mochida, August 08, 1996, Volume 35, Issue 8Pages 2487-2816
3.
L. Vradman, M. Landau, M. Herskowitz, (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0920-5861(98)00356-3 4.
S. Mehran, B. Amarjeet, M. Argyrios. (2007).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.07.003. 5.
T. Chen, Y. Shen, W. Lee, C. Lin, M. Wan. (2013). Cleaner Production, Vol. 39, pp: 129-136. 6.
M.W. Wan, T.F. Yen. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2006.12.08 7.
M.F. Ali, A. Al-Malki, B. El-Ali, G. Martinie, M.N. Siddiqui. Fuel, 2006, 85, (10-11), pp. 1354-1363 8.
H. Mei, B.W. Mei, T.F. Yen. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(02)00318-6. 9.
T. C. Chen, Y. H. Shen, W. J. Lee, C.C. Lin, M. W. cleaner production, 2013, 39, pp. 129-136 10. S. Liu, Z. Liu, H. Zhu, Z. Wang, J. Guo, X. Zhang, H. Yu, X. Yue, P. Ning, B. Li. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.109770
11.
A. Taghizadeh, M. Asemani, F. Esmaeilzadeh, A. Ameri. (2023) https:// doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c05193