Linguistic Strategies in Post-Conflict Governance: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Iraqi Presidential Speeches

Subject Areas :

Inas Malik Mnaathar ¹ , Bahram Hadian ² , Hani Kamil Al-Ebadi ³ , Mehdi Vaez Dalili ⁴

1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -

Received: 2024-04-29 Accepted : 2024-05-25 Published : 2024-05-31

Keywords: Critical Discourse Analysis, Presidential Rhetoric, National Identity, Post-Conflict Governance, Iraq,

Abstract :

This study examines the evolution of Iraqi presidential rhetoric in response to shifting political landscapes, governance priorities, and societal expectations. Through a critical discourse analysis of presidential speeches, the research highlights how Iraqi leaders have transitioned from an exclusionary nationalist narrative to a more inclusive and pluralistic discourse, aligning with broader global trends in post-conflict state-building. The findings indicate a significant shift in the rhetorical strategies used to assert political legitimacy, moving from securitization and state rebuilding to democratic consolidation, governance reform, and anti-corruption discourse. Additionally, the role of religious references in presidential rhetoric has evolved from a tool for political unification to a cultural and ethical marker, reflecting Iraq’s efforts to balance its religious heritage with modern governance ideals. This study contributes to the understanding of the strategic use of discourse in post-conflict governance, illustrating the interplay between rhetoric, legitimacy, and national identity. The implications of these findings extend to political leaders, scholars, and media practitioners, offering insights into the role of language in shaping governance narratives. Future research should explore public reception of presidential rhetoric and its impact on national identity formation, as well as comparative analyses across different political institutions and regional contexts.