The Effects of Implementing Dynamic Assessment on Iranian Students’ Autonomy and Vocabulary Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective
Subject Areas : English Language Teaching
Seyyed Hossein Sanaeifar
1
,
Mehrshad Ahmadian
2
,
Amir Marzban
3
1 - English Department, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr Branch, Qaemshahr, Iran
2 - Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr Branch, Iran
3 -
Keywords: autonomous learning, dynamic assessment, learner autonomy, vocabulary development,
Abstract :
The current study represents one of the first systematic and scientific attempt to explore the effects of dynamic assessment (DA) on learning factors in Iranian scholastic context. This research was conducted to examine the impact of DA on the autonomy and vocabulary growth of Iranian high school students. For this purpose, 60 male Iranian students from two public vocational high schools participated in this mixed-methods quasi-experimental research. In order to collect the necessary quantitative data, two tools were utilized: a questionnaire on student autonomy and a vocabulary assessment. For this study, participants were split into an experimental group and a control group. Prior to the academic term, the pretests, namely autonomy and vocabulary, were conducted. During the academic term, the experimental group underwent the sandwich format of dynamic assessment comprising three phases: pretest, mediation, and posttest. The control group underwent traditional teaching methods. Following the conclusion of the academic term, the posttests, namely autonomy and vocabulary, were conducted once more. The data collected from the pretest and posttests of this study were analyzed using independent samples t-test and its non-parametric equivalent. Additionally, a semi-structured interview was conducted at the conclusion of the instructional phase to gather their reactions regarding the practice of DA. The findings of the research showed that applying DA had a statistically significant impact on the autonomy and vocabulary growth of Iranian high school students. Moreover, the qualitative aspect of the research indicated that the participants viewed DA as a beneficial method for enhancing their autonomy and vocabulary acquisition. Of course, some of the interviewees also raised comments about the weaknesses of this method, including the ambiguity of the implementation process, the loss of the boundary between teaching and evaluation, the subsequent loss of value of grading, and reduced motivation for participation. The findings of this study have pedagogical applications for EFL learners in public schools, EFL teachers, and policy-makers in the field of English language education in public schools to improve the quality and effectiveness of English language teaching.
Ahmadnejad, Z., & Aghajanzadeh Kiasi, G. (2024). Iranian EFL Teachers’ dynamic assessment literacy and their views of its practicality: A comparative study of public school and English language institute teachers. International Journal of Research in English Education, 9(2), 30-45.
Ahmadian, M., Sanaeifar, S. H., & Marzban, A. (2024). Augmenting Iranian students’ autonomy and reading comprehension through implementation of dynamic assessment. Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 70–89.
Alavi Moghaddam, S. B., Kheirabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Davari, H. (2016). Vision 1: English for senior high schools (Student book). Iran’s Textbook Publishing Company.
Alsaadi, H. M. A. (2021). Dynamic assessment in language learning: An overview and the impact of using social media. English Language Teaching, 14(8), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n8p73
Bachman, L., & Adrian, P. (2022). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Brown, A. G. (2020). Exploring the effects of teaching students’ dynamic assessment for appropriation in group learner-learner English discussion. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(1), 99-118.
Chen, C., & Yuan, Y. (2025). Effectiveness of virtual reality on Chinese as a second language vocabulary learning: Perceptions from international students. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 38(3), 397-425.
Chen, S., Jiang, Y., Qiu, S., Hu, J., Wang, L., Jiang, Y., & Wang, R. (2025). Distinct roles of parental autonomy support and psychological control in Chinese elementary school students’ intelligence mindsets and academic outcomes. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(1), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2192770
Chong, S. W., & Reinders, H. (2025). Autonomy of English language learners: A scoping review of research and practice. Language Teaching Research, 29(2), 607-632. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221075812
Çimen, S. S. (2022). Exploring EFL assessment in Turkey: Curriculum and teacher practices. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 9(1), 531-550.
Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., Kyle, K., & Monteiro, K. (2019). Absolute frequency effects in second language lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(4), 721-744. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263118000268
Daneshfar, S., & Moharami, M. (2018). Dynamic assessment in Vygotsky's sociocultural theory: Origins and main concepts. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 600-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0903.20
Davin, K. J., Herazo, J. D., & Sagre, A. (2017). Learning to mediate: Teacher appropriation of dynamic assessment. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 632-651. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362168816654309
Dixon, C., Oxley, E., Gellert, A. S., & Nash, H. (2023). Dynamic assessment as a predictor of reading development: A systematic review. Reading and Writing, 36(3), 673-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10312-3
García, P. N. (2019). Exploring the role of dynamic assessment in language education: An introduction to the special issue. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.38912
Ghaemi, H., & Houshangi, M. (2021). Group dynamic assessment of the listening skill: A ZPD-based study of Iranian TOEFL iBT candidates. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 56-67.
Grapin, S. E., & Llosa, L. (2022). Dynamic assessment of English learners in the content areas: An exploratory study in fifth‐grade science. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 201-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3059
Hao, T., Wang, Z., & Ardasheva, Y. (2021). Technology-assisted vocabulary learning for EFL learners: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 14(3), 645-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2021.1917028
Hoo, F. J., Noh, M. A. M., Harun, Z. A., Ibrahim, R., & Mohsin, N. A. (2025). Open the black box of autonomous learning: A sustainable approach to language learning. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 19(2), 98-114. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v19i2.9005
Huang, X., Kim, N., & Christianson, K. (2019). Gesture and vocabulary learning in a second language. Language Learning, 69(1), 177-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12326
Hui, X., Liu, Z., & Chi, Y. (2023). A review on learner autonomy with mobile-assisted language learning for EFL learners at the tertiary level. Open Access Library Journal, 10(9), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1110606
Infante, P., & Poehner, M. E. (Year). Realizing the ZPD in second language education. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.38916
Issa, B. I., Faretta–Stutenberg, M., & Bowden, H. W. (2020). Grammatical and lexical development during short‐term study abroad: Exploring L2 contact and initial proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 104(4), 860-879. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12677
Iwaizumi, E., & Webb, S. (2022). A guide to researching instructed second language vocabulary acquisition. In L. Gurzynski Weiss & Y. Kim (Eds.), Instructed second language acquisition research methods (pp. 181–206). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.3.08iwa
Izzati, R. F., Wardani, E., & Asriyama, W. F. (2024). The effect of dynamic assessment towards students' vocabulary mastery in podcast final project. Language, Education and Development, 3(1), 24-34.
Jia, L., Cai, J., & Wang, J. (2023). Promoting learning potential among students of L2 Chinese through dynamic assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(1), 66-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2156870
Kao, Y. T. (2022). Effects of group dynamic assessment on L2 Chinese learners’ literacy development: Learners’ responsiveness to interactive mediation. Applied Linguistics Review, 13(5), 843-871. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2019-0077
Kao, Y. T., & Kuo, H. C. (2023). Diagnosing L2 English learners’ listening difficulties and learning needs through computerized dynamic assessment. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2219-2243. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1876738
Kargar Behbahani, H., Namaziandost, E., & YarAhmadi, M. (2024). Dynamic assessment as the linchpin of academic buoyancy, reflective thinking, and academic resilience for intermediate Iranian EFL learners: a phenomenological study. International Journal of Language Testing, 14(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijlt.2024.449951.1334
Khan, R., Ali, A., & Alourani, A. (2022). Investigating learners’ experience of autonomous learning in e-learning context. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(8), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i08.29885
Khotimah, K., Widiati, U., Mustofa, M., & Ubaidillah, M. F. (2019). Autonomous English learning: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 371-381. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20234
Kosimov, A., & Latipov, S. (2022). The importance of language education policy and practice in state education systems. Involta Scientific Journal, 1(9), 23-27.
Lantolf, J. P., Xi, J., & Minakova, V. (2021). Sociocultural theory and concept-based language instruction. Language Teaching, 54(3), 327-342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000348
Legault, J., Fang, S. Y., Lan, Y. J., & Li, P. (2019). Structural brain changes as a function of second language vocabulary training: Effects of learning context. Brain and Cognition, 134, 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2018.09.004
Li, Y., & Hafner, C. A. (2022). Mobile-assisted vocabulary learning: Investigating receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge of Chinese EFL learners. ReCALL, 34(1), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000161
Little, D. (2022). Language learner autonomy: Rethinking language teaching. Language Teaching, 55(1), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000488
Liu, Y. T., Nassaji, H., & Tseng, W. T. (2024). Effects of internal and external attentional manipulations and working memory on second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 28(4), 1701-1741. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211030130
Luan, L., Hwang, G. J., Yi, Y., Lu, Z., & Jing, B. (2025). The effects of a self-developed virtual reality environment on college EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2024.2344056
Ludwig, C., & Tassinari, M. G. (2023). Foreign language learner autonomy in online learning environments: The teachers’ perspectives. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.2012476
Luković, S., Marinković, B., & Zotović-Kostić, M. (2022). The zone of actual and the zone of proximal development measured through preschool dynamic assessment as predictors of later school performance-a longitudinal study. Psihologija, 55(1), 89-105. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI200914004L
Ly, C. K. (2024). Teachers’ roles on English language teaching for promoting learner-centered language learning: A theoretical review. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 4(2), 78-98. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.24425
Malmir, A. (2020). The effect of interactionist vs. interventionist models of dynamic assessment on L2 learners’ pragmatic comprehension accuracy and speed. Issues in Language Teaching, 9(1), 279-320. https://doi.org/10.22054/ilt.2020.53398.515
Meng, Y., & Fu, H. (2023). Modeling mediation in the dynamic assessment of listening ability from the cognitive diagnostic perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 107(S1), 137-160. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12820
Mohammadkhah, E., Kiany, G. R., Tajeddin, Z., & Shayestefar, P. (2022). Teachers’ conceptions of language assessment: Affective and theoretical knowledge dimensions of language assessment literacy model. International Journal of Language Testing, 12(1), 82-102. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijlt.2022.146986
Orellana, C. I., Wada, R., & Gillam, R. B. (2019). The use of dynamic assessment for the diagnosis of language disorders in bilingual children: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1298-1317. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_ajslp-18-0202
Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2023). Advancing L2 dynamic assessment: Innovations in Chinese contexts. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2158465
Poehner, M. E., & Wang, Z. (2021). Dynamic assessment and second language development. Language Teaching, 54(4), 472-490. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000555
Rassaei, E. (2023). Implementing mobile-mediated dynamic assessment for teaching request forms to EFL learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(3), 257-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1912105
Rezai, A., Naserpour, A., & Rahimi, S. (2024). Online peer-dynamic assessment: an approach to boosting Iranian high school students’ writing skills: a mixed-methods study. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(1), 306-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2086575
Ritonga, M., Farhangi, F., Ajanil, B., & Farid Khafaga, A. (2022). Interventionist vs. interactionist models of dynamic assessment (DA) in the EFL classroom: Impacts on speaking accuracy and fluency (SAF), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language learning motivation (FLLM). Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1-21.
Sanaeifar, S. H., & Divcolaii, M. S. (2019). Actualizing language learners’ potentials through mediation: Cumulative vs concurrent group dynamic assessment and students’ self-management of learning tasks. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(7), 802-809. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00195-0
Sanaeifar, S. H., & Farsi, L. (2020). The effect of static and dynamic assessment on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ autonomy. Language Education Studies, 6(4), 1-15.
Sagre, A., Herazo, J. D., & Davin, K. J. (2022). Contradictions in teachers’ classroom dynamic assessment implementation: An activity system analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 56(1), 154-177. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3046
Silseth, K., & Gilje, Ø. (2019). Multimodal composition and assessment: A sociocultural perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(1), 26-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1297292
Sun, H., & Yin, B. (2022). Vocabulary development in early language education. In Schwartz, M. (eds.), Handbook of early language education (pp. 57-82). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91662-6_3
Sun, Z., Xu, P., & Wang, J. (2023). Dynamic assessment of the learning potential of Chinese as a second language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(1), 127- 142. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2151911
Tai, K. W. (2024). Documenting students’ conceptual understanding of second language vocabulary knowledge: A translanguaging analysis of classroom interactions in a primary English as a second language classroom for linguistically and culturally diverse students. Applied Linguistics Review, 15(6), 2775-2822. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0181
Tang, Y., & Ma, X. (2023). An interventionist dynamic assessment approach to college English writing in China. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(1), 44-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2155165
Teng, M. F. (2024). The roles of second-language proficiency level and working memory on vocabulary learning from word-focused exercises. RELC Journal, 55(2), 296-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221102228
Teng, M. F. (2025). Exploring self-regulated vocabulary learning strategies, proficiency, working memory and vocabulary learning through word-focused exercises. The Language Learning Journal, 53(1), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2023.2267575
Tiing, C. W. H., Phui, C. P., Sieng, L. H., Niek, M., Wen, Y., Devi, S., & Hashim, H. (2021). Identifying young learners’ language learning strategies in learning English vocabulary. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(2), 727-753. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i2/10029
Uchihara, T., & Clenton, J. (2023). The role of spoken vocabulary knowledge in second language speaking proficiency. The Language Learning Journal, 51(3), 376-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2080856
Wang, Z., & Zhang, J. (2023). Mediation and learner reciprocity: Applying dynamic assessment to the oral proficiency interview framework. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 10(1), 82-105. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.22181
Yang, C. T. Y., Lai, S. L., & Chen, H. H. J. (2024). The impact of intelligent personal assistants on learners’ autonomous learning of second language listening and speaking. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(5), 2175-2195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2141266
Yildiz, Y., & Yucedal, H. M. (2020). Learner autonomy: A central theme in language learning. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 7(3), 208-212. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v7i3p208
Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2019). Measuring and supporting second language development using computerized dynamic assessment. Language and sociocultural theory, 6(1), 92-115. https://doi.org/10.1558/lst.31710
Zhang, Y., & Xi, J. (2023). Fostering self-regulated young writers: Dynamic assessment of metacognitive competence in secondary school EFL class. Language Assessment Quarterly, 20(1), 88-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2022.2103702
Zhang, Y., Ridchenko, M., Hayashi, A., & Hamrick, P. (2021). Episodic memory contributions to second language lexical development persist at higher proficiencies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(5), 1356-1361. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3865
Zhu, H. (2021). The implications of semantic prosody and synonym for second language vocabulary teaching and learning. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 4(10), 340-347. https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202110_4(10).0055
