Examining the effect of cultural values on enhancing the performance of the space in rural homes by relying on the role of behavioral patterns
Subject Areas : architecture
Ali Akbar Heidari
1
(Faculty member, School of Engineering, Yasooj University, Yasooj, Iran.)
Maryam Kiaee
2
(Ph.D. in Architecture at the Institute of Architecture, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Qazvin, Iran.)
Keywords: Behavioral Patterns, performance efficiency, rural home, Culture,
Abstract :
Culture is a set of values that exists in a community or a nation and reflects the approach, think, believe, behaviors, and lifestyle of people. The notion of public culture refers to the common values that are common in society. These values are in the domain of thinking, belief, views, and structural aspects, as well as practical aspects such as the behavior and lifestyle of human beings, and are characterized by being collective and transformative. The views of some theoreticians in the field of housing and culture, especially traditional and rural housing, reflect the significant impact of culture on the physical aspects of space and current behavior patterns. On the one hand, Rapoport believes that from a far past, home for man has been more than shelter, and spiritual and religious aspects are fully evident throughout the construction process of the houses until it is established and used. On the other hand, the influence of cultural factors along with factors such as climate, building techniques, indigenous materials and etc., on the formation of the physical-spatial structure of the house is undeniable, and in some of its traditional types, the arrangement of various organs it significantly affects. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of cultural values on the formation of behavioral patterns in the home environment. Behavioral patterns are also dependent on the function and form of the house, which its proper shape has led to enhance the performance of the space function. The process of this research is defined in four stages. In the first stage, several cultural indicators were extracted as a sample of related literature and the behavioral dimensions associated with them were explained in the home environment. In the next step, the components of functional performance were investigated. These components were extracted through "space syntax" indicators and the collected data was evaluated and analyzed by "Depthmap" software used in the space layout method. The third stage consists of extracting the theoretical framework of research in which the relationship between elements of architecture affecting the functional efficiency and cultural values prevailing on the way of life is explained and, finally, in the fourth stage in order to demonstrate the hypothesis that the impact of the cultural values governing the lives of people on enhancing the performance of space in the home, the above are tested in two examples of rural - traditional homes. The results showed that the existence of cultural and spiritual values, in addition to the impacts on behavioral patterns and the arrangement of spaces in the internal environment, is also effective on improving the optimum functional performance of space in traditional homes and specifically rural settlements. Therefore, the goal of this study is to answer this question, “How can one affect the use of cultural values of inhabitants in the architecture of houses on formation of some behavioral and structural-physical forms in homes?”, In other words, can these behaviors lead to proper functioning of homes by adjusting the relationships of individuals in space?
اشرفی، اکبر. (1380). هویت فرهنگی در عصر مشروطه، تحقیقات فرهنگی،22 و 23، 8-32.
حیدری، علی اکبر؛ پیوستهگر، یعقوب؛ و کیایی، مریم. (1396 الف). ارزیابی نقش حیاط در ارتقاء راندمان عملکردی خانه، صفه، 73، 40-60.
حیدری، علی اکبر؛ پیوستهگر، یعقوب؛ و کیایی، مریم. (1396ب). جایگاه پایهای ایوان در ارتقاء راندمان عملکردی مسجد، پژوهشهای معماری اسلامی، (5)14، 68-85.
راپوپورت، آموس. (1392). انسان شناسی مسکن، (خسرو افضلیان، مترجم)، تهران: کتابکدهی کسری (نشر اثر اصلی 1969).
کریمی، فریبرز. (1383). ضوابط و مقررات اجرایی روستاهای واقع در حریم شهر قزوین: مطالعهی موردی: روستای شفیع آباد، قزوین: شهرداری؛ معاونت معماری و شهرسازی.
مظفر، فرهنگ؛ حسینی، باقر؛ و عبدمجیری، باقر. (1391).فرهنگ در پژوهشهای معماری، مسکن و محیط روستا، 138، 38-29.
یزدانفر، عباس؛ حسینی، باقر؛ و زرودی، مصطفی. (1392). فرهنگ و شکل خانه مطالعهی موردی: خانههای سنتی شهرستان تنکابن و رامسر، مسکن و محیط روستا، 144، 32-17.
Bahammam, A, S. (1987). Architectural Patterns of Privacy in Saudi Arabian Housing., Master of Architecture Thesis, McGill University, Montreal.
Campos, M., Lemlij, M., & Manning, S. (2007). The Role of the Building Layout in the Delivery of Social Work Services In Space Syntax sixth International Symposium,Jun, Istanbul: Istanbul University (pp. 42:1–42:14).
Desai, M., & Desai, M. (2016). The Bungalow in Twentieth-Century India: The Cultural Expression of Changing Ways of Life and Aspirations in the Domestic Architecture of Colonial and Post-colonial Society. Routledge.
Deshpande, R. (2015). ‘Dwellings’ then and now: A topological approach for privacy analysis of ‘Wada’ and modern houses, In Space Syntax tenth international Symposium, July,(pp. 2:1-2:17). London: UCL.
Dezuari, E. (2010). Social change and transformation in housing, ISSJ, UNESCO, 197-198:10.
Erpi, F. (1991). Community Culture and Its Reflection on Vernacular Architecture-Three Case Studies: Turkish, Greek and Levantine Housing in Anatolia. Architecture & Behavior, 7(3), 205-222.
Haq, S. U. (1999). Can space syntax predict environmental cognition? In Space Syntax second international symposium, March- April, (pp. 44:1-44:14). Brasilia: Brasilia University.
Hillier, B., Leaman, A., Stansall, P., & Bedford, M. (1976). Space syntax. Environment and planning B: Planning and design, 3(2), 147-185.
Hillier, B. (1985). The nature of the artificial: the contingent and the necessary in spatial form in architecture. Geoforum, 16(2), 163-178.
Hillier, B. (1988). Against enclosure, London: Butterworths.
Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J., & Penn, A. )1987(. Creating Life: Or does Architecture Determine Anything. In Architecture and Behavior, 3 (3), 233-50.
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1988).The Social Logic of Space, London: Cambridge University Press.
Hillier, B., Hanson. J, Graham, H. (1986).Ideas are in things: the application of the space syntax method to discovering house genotypes, Environment and planning B: planning and design, 14 (4) 363 – 385.
Hillier, B. (2007). SpaceistheMachine: AConfigurational TheoryofArchitecture, London: Space Syntax Laboratory.
Hofmann, H. (2005). Culture of memory and Maya architecture: architectural documentation and interpretation of structure 1 of Chunchimai. Anthropological notebooks 11:11.
Khan, N. (2012). Analyzing patient flow: reviewing literature to understand the contribution of space syntax to improve operational efficiency in healthcare settings. Space Syntax eighth international Symposium, June, (pp. 8183:1- 8183:11). Lincoln: Santiago University.
Klarqvist, B. (1993). A space syntax glossary, nordisk arkitektur for skning, 11-12, Retrieved March 18, 2016. from http://www. http://arkitekturforskning.net/na/article/download/778/722.
Minor, H.(2002). Reforming Rome: architecture and culture, the department of art and archaeology the faculty of Princeton University.
Mostafa, F., & Hassan, A. (2013). Mosque layout design: An analytical study of mosque layouts in the early Ottoman period, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 2, 445-456.
Mustafa, F., Sanusi, A., & Hassan, A. (2010).Spatial-Functional Analysis of Kurdish Courtyard Houses in Erbil City, American J. of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 3(3), 560-568.
Oliver, P. (1969). Shelter and society.London: Barrie And Rockliff /Cresset press.
Penn, A. (2003). Space syntax and spatial configuration or why the axial line, environment and behavior, 35(1), 30-65.
Peponis, J. (1985). The spatial culture of factories.HumanRelations, 38(4), 357-390.
Peponis, J., Wineman. J., Rashid. M., Hong, K., & Bafna. S. (1997). On the description of shape and spatial configuration inside building Partition and their local properties, environment and planning B: planning and design, 24 (5), 761-781.
Peponis, J., Zimring, C., & Choi, Y.K. (1990). Finding the building in Way finding, Environment and Behavior, 22(5), 555-590.
Said, I. (2001). Culture-Ethnic Landscape of terrace housing community in peninsular Malaysia, Journal Technology B, 35, 41-53.
Young, O., Chung, H., Kong, E., & Heo, J. (2015). A study on the design methodologies for activating large- scale underground commercial complexes, In Space Syntax tenth International Symposium, July, (pp. 16:2-16:19). London: UCL.
