Effect of CEO Entrenchment on Stakeholders' Social Pressure: Critique of Power Transition (Hegemonic) Theory

Subject Areas : Management Accounting

parviz miri ¹ , Ghodratolah Talebnia ² , faegh ahmadi ³ , Hamidreza Vakili fard ⁴

1 - Department of Accounting, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran
4 - Associate Professor of Accounting, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2021-06-05 Accepted : 2021-06-05 Published : 2021-05-22

Keywords: Power Transition (Hegemonic) T, Stakeholders' Social Pressure, CEO Entrenchment,

Abstract :

Stability in office systems helps companies achieve more goals and goals by developing coherent programs and strategies. One of the theories related to this field is the theory of hegemonic stability, which is rooted in the economic layers of larger administrative systems. Expanding this theory to administrative systems, such as market-based corporate-based companies, can be effective in balancing the relationship with stakeholders and controlling potential social pressures. This research tried to be based on Power Transition (Hegemonic) Theory, examine the effect of the CEO's entrenchment on stakeholders' social pressures. On this basis, two analyzes were used to measure social pressures Meta-synthesis and Delphi Finally, with the participation of research experts, questionnaires were developed in the form of 5-choice Likert scale. Also, in order to measure the CEO's entrenchment, three criteria of tenure, managerial ownership and duty duality were used based on the definition of indicators 0 and 1. The statistical population studied in this study included all companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange in 2019. A total of 109 questionnaires were examined with the participation of CEOs of capital market companies through the analysis of Partial Least Squares (PLS). The test results of the research hypothesis showed that CEO entrenchment has a positive and significant effect on stakeholders' social pressure. This result is in fact a critique of power transition (Hegemonic) theory at the level of theories of representation in capital market companies And it shows that the existence of a stronghold for CEO entrenchment at the head of the government and the decision of the company in line with transition (hegemonic) theory, cannot be a factor to control the social pressures of stakeholders. Because the presence of opportunistic motivations of managers will disrupt the effective and efficient functions of the company's development path, and stakeholders will put a lot of pressure on the company to protect their interests in various ways.

References:

*      ابوالحسن‌خان‌ایلچی، محسن. (۱۳۹۶). سوگیری رسانه‌ای در بازارهای مالی (با تأکید بر علل فردی و سازمانی)، فصلنامه رسانه، ۲۷(۱): ۱۴۹-۱۷۲.

*      انوشیروانی، فرزانه.، ساعدی، رحمان. (1397). بررسی رابطه بین قدرت مدیرعامل و ارزش شرکت با نقش تعاملی رقابت بازار و حاکمیت شرکتی، پژوهشنامه مدیریت اجرایی، 10(20): 147-173

*      تقی‌زاده خانقاه، وحید.، زینالی، مهدی. (1396). تاثیر ویژگی‌های هیأت مدیره و جبهه‌گیری مدیریت بر استراتژی متنوع‌سازی شرکت، راهبرد مدیریت مالی، ۵(۱): ۱۳۵-۱۵۷.

*      حسینی، سیدعلی.، خوئینی، مهین. (1396). شبکه‌های اجتماعی، بازار سرمایه و گزارشگری مالی، پژوهش حسابداری، 7(4): 23-38.

*      خانقاه، وحید.، زینالی، مهدی. (۱۳۹۶). تأثیر ویژگی های هیئت مدیره و جبهه‌گیری مدیریت بر استراتژی متنوع سازی شرکت، راهبرد مدیریت مالی، ۵(۱): ۱۵۷-۱۳۵.

*      دیانتی‌دیلمی، زهرا.، مرادزاده فرد، مهدی.، مظاهری، علی. (1392). اثر دوره تصدی مدیریت بر ارزش شرکت، هزینه‌های نمایندگی و ریسک اطلاعاتی، پژوهش‌های تجربی حسابداری، 3(1): 21-39. https://doi.org/10.22051/jera.2013.587

*      محمدی ملقرنی، عطا‌اله.، خدابنده لو، نسرین. (1398). تأثیر تعدیلات نگهداشت وجه نقد و جبهه‌گیری‌های مدیریتی (شرکت‌های پذیرفته شده در بورس اوراق بهادار تهران)، حسابداری مدیریت، 12(41): 185-196.

*      مرادی، مجید. (۱۳۹۵). نقش تئوری مشروعیت و تئوری ذینفعان در مسئولیت اجتماعی شرکت‌ها، فصلنامه مطالعات اقتصادی، مدیریت مالی، حسابداری، ۲(۴): ۱۷۴-۱۸۶.

*      مهربان‌پور، محمدرضا.، جندقی‌قمی، محمد. (۱۳۹۸). جایگاه مالی و سرمایه اجتماعی، مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی، ۶(۲): ۳۲۷-۳۴۹.

*      یعقوبی‌صالح‌آبادی، رسول.، بنی‌مهد، بهمن.، شکری، اعظم. (1393). مدت تصدی مدیرعامل و کیفیت سود: آزمون فرضیه مشکل افق، دانش حسابداری و حسابرسی مدیریت، 4(14): 33-42.

*      Awaysheh, A., & Klassen, R. D. (2010). The impact of supply chain structure on the use of supplier socially responsible practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30, 1246–1268. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443571011094253

*      Baron, D, P. (2012). Credence attributes, voluntary organizations, and social pressure, Journal of Public Economics, 95(11–12): 1331-1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.07.005

*      Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., Ferrell, A., 2009. What matters in corporate governance? Rev. Finan. Stud. 22 (2), 783–827.

*      Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., M’Zali, B., 2013. The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk Journal of Bank Finance, 37(4): 1258–1273, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.004

*      Brink, A, G., Tang, F., Yang, L. (2016). The Impact of Estimate Source and Social Pressure on Auditors' Fair Value Estimate Choices. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 2(28): 29-40.

*      Chiou, Ch, L., Shu, P, G. (2019). How does foreign pressure affect a firm's corporate social performance? Evidence from listed firms in Taiwan, Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 51(2): 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2019.04.006

*      Damert, M., & Baumgartner, R. J. (2017). External pressures or internal governance: What determines the extent of corporate responses to climate change? Corporate social responsibility and environmental management.

*      Dawson, P., Dobson, S. (2010). The influence of social pressure and nationality on individual decisions: Evidence from the behaviour of referees, Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(2): 181-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.06.001

*      De Miguel, A., Pindado, J., De La Torre, C., 2004. Ownership structure and firm value: new evidence from Spain. Strat. Manag. J. 25 (12), 1199–1207.

*      Di Meo, F., García Lara, J, M., Surroca, J, A. (2017). Managerial entrenchment and earnings management, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 36 (2017) 399–414.

*      Foot, R. (2017). Power transitions and great power management: three decades of China–Japan–US relations, The Pacific Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1303535

*      Fredrickson, J.W., Hambrick, D.C., Baumrin, S., 1988. A model of CEO dismissal. Acad. Manage. Rev. 13 (2), 255–270.

*      Freeman, R. E. (1983). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Advances in Strategic Management, 1, 31–60.

*      Fu, L., Boehe, D., Orlitxky, M., Swanson, D, L. (2018). Managing stakeholder pressures: Toward a typology of corporate social performance profiles, Long Range Planning, 52(6):101-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.08.002

*      Gennari, L. (2017). Power Transitions and International Institutions: China's Creation of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, Honors Theses, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/

*      Gompers, P., Ishii, J., Metrick, A., 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Q. J. Econ. 118 (1), 107–156.

*      Graafland, J., Smid, H. (2017). Reconsidering the relevance of social license pressure and government regulation for environmental performance of European SMEs, Journal of Cleaner Production, 141(10): 967-977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.171

*      Hawn, O., & Ioannou, I. (2016). Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility, Strategic Management Journal, 37, 2569–2588. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2464

*      Hill, C. W., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder‐agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14676486.1992.tb00657.x

*      Ji, Sh., Mauer, D, C., Zhang, Y. (2019). Managerial entrenchment and capital structure: The effect of diversification, Journal of Corporate Finance, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.101505

*      Jiraporn, P., Chintrakarm, P., Kim, Y, S. (2014). Analyst following, staggered boards, and managerial entrenchment, Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6): 3091-3100.

*      Larcker, D.F., Richardson, S.A., Tuna, I.  2007. Corporate governance, accounting outcomes, and organizational performance. Account. Rev. 82 (4), 963–1008.

*      Malmendier, U., Tate, G. (2015). Behavioral CEOs: The Role of Managerial Overconfidence, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(4): 37-60.

*      Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., Ricceri, F., & Roberts, R. W. (2016). Behind camouflaging: traditional and innovative theoretical perspectives in social and environmental accounting research. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(3): 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ‐12‐2015‐0121

*      Moratis, L., Egmond, M, V. (2018). Concealing social responsibility? Investigating the relationship between CSR, earnings management and the effect of industry through quantitative analysis, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(8): 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0030-7

*      Morse, A., Wang, W., and Wu, S. (2016). Executive Lawyers: Gatekeepers or Strategic Officers?. The Journal of Law and Economics 59(4): 847-888.

*      Name-Correa, A., Yildirim, H. (2019). Social pressure, transparency, and voting in committees, Journal of Economic Theory, 184(4):104-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2019.104943

*      Pålsson, H., & Kovács, G. (2014). Reducing transportation emissions: A reaction to stakeholder pressure or a strategy to increase competitive advantage. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 44, 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPDLM‐09‐2012‐0293

*      Pham, M, H. (2020). In law we trust: lawyer CEOs and stock liquidity, Journal of Financial Markets, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2020.100548.

*      Shen, W., 2003. The dynamics of the CEO-board relationship: an evolutionary perspective. Acad. Manage. Rev. 28 (3), 466–476

*      Stead, J. G., & Stead, W. E. (2013). Sustainable strategic management. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.

*      Tao, Q., Zhao, Zh., Zhang, M., Xiang, X. (2018). Managerial Placement and Entrenchment, Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 54(14): 3366-3383. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2018.1474739

*      Theriault, J, E., Young, L., Feldman Barrett, L. (2020). The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure, Physics of Life Reviews, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2020.01.004

*      Wang, P., Yuan, L., Wu, J. (2017). The joint effects of social identity and institutional pressures on audit quality: The case of the Chinese Audit Industry, International Business Review, 26(4): 666-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.12.007

*      Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sense making. Organization Science, 16, 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133