Determining the Amount of Water Use and Evapotranspiration of Bean Using Tafteh, Pasquale and Raes Methods under the Conditions of Drip and Furrow Irrigation
Subject Areas : Farm water management with the aim of improving irrigation management indicatorsAli Abdzad Gohari 1 , Fatemeh Keykhaei 2 , Niazali Ebrahimipak 3
1 - Instructor, On-Farm Water Management Department, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
2 - Researcher, On Farm Water Management Department, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
3 - Associated professor, On Farm Water Management Department, Soil and Water Research Institute, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Keywords: numerical inverse solution, Water requirement, Irrigation methods, Niazab system, Native Cultivar,
Abstract :
Background and Aim: Due to the limitation of water resources, proper use of water is necessary, and the use of appropriate irrigation methods in fields is an appropriate strategies to use water. Water stress can affect crop yield in the field. Therefore, the correct method of irrigation and management of water consumption is one of the basic issues in farms. The deficit irrigation strategy with the water requirement supply approach can be considered as a practical and efficient technique to ensure more crop yield, without compromising the physiological processes and yield. Therefore, the scope of this research is to estimate the amount of water consumed and the amount of evapotranspiration of the bean plant with the aim of evaluating the field conditions and comparing it with Tafteh, Pasquale and Raes methods. Method: The present study aims to determine the amount of water use and evapotranspiration of bean using Tafteh, Pasquale and Raes methods and based on the inverse solution of the yield production function in Markazi Province and at the Khomin Bean National Research Station at an altitude of 1930 meters above sea level with a length of 49 degrees and 57 minutes of latitude and 33 degrees and 39 minutes of latitude were implemented in 2016 and 2017. In this experiment, the irrigation treatment including furrow and drip-tape as the main factor and, the values of water requirement including 100, 75 and 55% of water requirement as a sub-factor and in the form of split plots in the form of randomized complete blocks design were done in three replications. Cultivated variety was of native type and its planting time was on the 10th and 9th of June respectively in the first and second year. Drip irrigation tapes were placed on the stacks and irrigation was carried out in the same way until the seedling was fully established in the stage of emergence of the third three leaves. Results: The highest seed yield with an average of 2683 kg/ha was obtained in the furrow irrigation method and by providing 100% of the water requirement. In evaluating evapotranspiration, the root mean square error (RMSE) in Tafteh, Pasquale and Raes methods were 0.160, 117.8 and 0.185 mm respectively and the root mean square normal error (RMSEn) were 0.448, 0.330 and 0.518 percent respectively. The index of agreement or compatibility (d) in Tafteh, Pasquale and Raes methods were 0.295, 0.600 and 0.081% respectively. In the investigation of irrigation water amounts, the root mean square error (RMSE) in Tafteh, Pasquale and Raes methods was 156.7, 117.5, and 181.3 mm, respectively, and the root mean square normal error (RMSEn) was 0.446, 0.335 and 0.516 percent respectively. The index of agreement or compatibility (d) in Tafteh, Pasquale and Raes methods were 0.324, 0.602 and 0.118% respectively. Conclusion: In general and according to the statistical results, Tafteh, Pasquale and Raes methods had an acceptable estimate of the amount of irrigation water and the amount of evapotranspiration in the furrow and drip conditions under different amounts of water requirement. Therefore, they can be used as appropriate tool in the estimation of water use in the studied area.
Abdzad Gohari, A. & Sadeghipour, O. (2019). Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Humic Acid on Yield and Water Use Efficiency in Common Bean. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 33 (3), 383-395. (in Persian)
Abdzad Gohari, A., Nikakhtar, A., Tafteh, A., & Ebrahimipak, N. (2023). Using NIAZAB System to Determine Soybean Water Use Based on the Inverse Solution of the Production Functions under Different Irrigation Conditions. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 37(2), 159-169.
Abdzad Gohari, A., Tafteh, A., & Ebrahimipak, N. (2022). Investigation of Water Requirement System in Determining the Actual Amount of Irrigation Water of Peanut Plant Based on Inverse Solution of Yield Function under Water Stress Conditions. Iranian Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 3(16), 460-471. (in Persian)
Babazadeh, H., Abdzad Gohari, A., & Khonok, A. (2015). Effect of Irrigation Management and Different Levels of Straw Mulch on Yield and Yield Components of Bean (phaseolus Vulgaris) . Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 29 (2), 129-140. (in Persian)
Darabi, F., Sharifipour, M., & Nasrolahi, A. (2022). Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Yield Components and Water Productivity of Pinto Beans Using Drip Tape Irrigation in Khorramabad Climatic. Journal of Irrigation Sciences and Engineering (JISE), 44 (4), 1-14. (in Persian)
Dashadi, M., Rasaei, A., & Ranjbar, F. (2022). Investigation of different irrigation times and nitrogen starter fertilizer on yield and water use efficiency of bean. Crop Physiology Journal, 13 (52), 79-93. (in Persian)
Ebrahimipak, N., Tafteh, A., Egdarnejad, A., & Kapourchal, S. (2018a). Determination of monthly evapotranspiration coefficients of winter wheat by different methods of estimating evapotranspiration and evaporation pan in Qazvin plain. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 8 (4), 107-121. (in Persian)
Ebrahimipak, N.A., Egder Nejad, A., Tafteh, A., & Khodadadi Dehkordid, D. (2018b). Evaluation of AquaCrop Model to Simulate Canola (Brassica napus) Yield under Deficit Irrigation Scenarios in Gazvin Plain. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 49 (5). 1003-1015. (in Persian)
Ebrahimipak, N.A., Tafteh, A., Abbasi, F., & Baghani, G. (2022a). Estimation of the actual amount of wheat irrigation water using the NIAZAB system and comparing with the farm measurement, Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 53 (9), 2075-2092. (in Persian)
Ebrahimipak, N.A., Tafteh, A., Abbasi, F., & Baghani, G. (2022b). Comparing the amount of sugar beet irrigation water using the NIAZAB system and field measurement. Water and Soil Management and Modeling, Articles in Press, (in Persian)
Ebrahimipak, N.A., Tafteh, A., Hoseini, N. & Kikhaei, F. (2022c). NIAZAB system. Soil and Water Research Institute. (http://niwr.ir) (in Persian)
Ehsani, A., Arzani, H., Farahpur, M., & Jafari, M. (2012). Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Climatic Data, Plant Characteristics and Cropwat 8.0 Software (Case Study: Steppic Region of Markazi Province, Roodshore Station). Iranian journal of Range and Desert Research, 19 (1), 1-16.
Emdad, M., Tafteh, A., & Ebrahimipak, N. (2022). Efficiency of Aquacrop Model in Simulating Yield of Quinoa in Different Deficit Irrigation Managements. Journal of Water and Soil, 36 (3), 319-331. (in Persian)
Farid, M., Hugh, J. E. & Navabi, A. (2016). Yield stability of dry bean genotypes across nitrogen-fixation-dependent and fertilizer-dependent management systems. Crop Science. 56: 1-10.
Jafari najafabadi, M., Tafteh, A., & Ebrahimipak, N. (2022). Determining the water requirement and Applied water of bell pepper in the greenhouse and comparing it with the results of the water requirement system. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 53(8), 1831-1848. (in Persian)
Jamieson, P.D., Porter, J.R., & Wilson, D.R. (1991). A test of the computer simulation model ARCWHEAT on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Research, 27: 337-350.
Kamel, M., Shabiri, S., & Mohammadi, B. (2016). Technical instructions for planting, keeping and harvesting beans and introduction of cultivars. Agricultural and natural resources research and training center of Zanjan province, 27p. (in Persian)
Raes, D. (2004). Budjet: A soil water and salt balance model. Reference Manual. Version 6.0 (http://www.iupware.be and select downloads and next software. last updated June 2004).
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., & Fereres, E. (2017). Reference manual AquaCrop. FAO. Land and Water Division, Rome, Italy. 25p.
Roodbarani, J., Mozaffari, J., & Mohseni Movahed, S. (2021). Comparison of bean yield in Furrow, Tape and Rain flat irrigation systems. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation. 28 (2), 195-210.
Roshdi, M., Boyaghchi, D., & Rezadoust, S. (2012). Effect of Micronutrients on Growth and Yield of Pinto Bean under Irrigation cutback Treatments. Journal of Crop Production and Processing, 2 (5), 131-142.
Tafteh, A., Ebrahimipak. N.A., Babazadeh, H, & Kaveh, F. (2014). Determine yield response factors of important crops by different production functions in Qazvin plain. Ecology, Environment and Conservation, 20 (2), 415-422.
Willmott, C.J. (1982). Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bulletin of American Meteorology Society, 63: 1309-1313.
_||_