Analysis of Iran’s northern forests structure using the nearest neighbor indices (Case study: Dashtenaz forest protected area in Mazandaran province)

Subject Areas : natural resorces

Peyman Farhadi ¹ (Ph.D. Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Lorestan, Lorestan. Iran)
Javad Soosani ² (Assistant Prof., Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Lorestan. Lorestan. Iran. *(Corresponding author))
Rohollah Esmaili ³ (Ph.D. Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Lorestan, Lorestan. Iran)
Asghar Fallah ⁴ (Associate Prof., Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Sari, Sari. Iran.)

Received: 1970-01-01 Accepted : 1970-01-01 Published : 1970-01-01

Keywords: DBH dimension, Structure, Index, Nearest neighbor,

Abstract :

Background and Objective: The first step in proper management of forests is having enough information about growth, development and how the forest stands structure are influenced by environmental factors. Considering the importance of forest stands in the north country and environmental values of the study area, structure of the existing species in Dashtenaz forest protected area in Mazandaran province has been investigated using the nearest neighbor indices. Method: To investigate the structure of the study area, 56 hectare of the forest stands were statistically analyzed, and Clark and Evanes, Uniform angles, Shannon-Wiener, Mingling, DBH dominance and DBH differentiation indices were used to investigate the structure. Findings: The results showed that the mean Clark and Evans and uniform angles indices were 0.70 and 0.55 respectively, indicating a distribution between random and cluster patterns. Mean indices of Shannon-Weiner and Mingling were 0.40 and 0.06 respectively. Knowing that the study area is mostly composed of oak, the Mingling index value was calculated to be low​​. The mean DBH dominance index was calculated as 0.50, indicating the dominance of DBH of Quercus Castaneifolia and recessivity ofUlmus Glabra. Zelkova Carpinifolia was medium in terms of DBH dimension. Also average DBH differentiation index was calculated as 0.32, representing a medium difference between the trees next to each other in terms of DBH dimension. Discussion and Conclusion: The indices used in this study can be used to describe the structure and ecological property of different species of trees.

References:

1. Memarian, F., M, Tabari., S, M, Hosseini., A, Banch Shafiee. 2007. Comparison of biodiversity of Needle leaf stand with Broad Leaf Blend stand in Kelardasht Region. Journal Of Environment Studies. 42: 103-108. (In Persian)


2. Ghomi Avili, A., S, M, Hosseini., A, A, Mataji., S, Gh, A, Galali. 2007. Biodiversity of Woody Species in Different Soils of Two Plant Associations. Journal of Plant Biology. 20(2):200-206. (In Persian)


3. Pommerening, A., 2006. Evaluating structural indices by reversing forest structural analysis. Forest Ecology and Management. 224: 266-277.


4. Kint, V,. N, Lust,. R, Ferris,. A.F.M, Olsthoorn. 2000. Quantification of forest stand structure applied to Scote Pine (Pinus Sylvestris L.) Forests. Invest. Agr.: Sist. Recur. For.: Fuera de. 1: 147-163


5. Amiri, M., D, Darghahi., H, Habashi., D, Azadfar., N, Solaymani. 2009. Comparision of regeneration density and species diversity in managed and natural stands of Loveh Oak Forest. J. Agric. Sci. Natur. Resour., Vol. 15(6). (In Persian)


6. Graz, P.F. 2004. The behavior of the species mingling index M_sp in relation to species dominance and dispersion.  Eur J Forest Res. 123: 87-92.


7. Kint, V,. D, Wulf Robert,. L, Noel. 2004. Evaluation of sampling methods for the estimation of structural indices in forest stands. Ecological Modeling. 180: 461-476.


8. Aguirre, O., G, Hui., K.V, Gadow., J, Jimenez. 2003. An analysis of forest structure using neighborhood-based variables. Forest Ecology and Management. 183: 137-145.


9. Motz, K., Sterba, H. and Pommerening, A. 2010. Sampling measures of tree diversity. Forest Ecology and Management, 260: 1985-1996.


10. Gadow, K.V. 2012. Forsteinrichtung, Adaptive Steuerung und Mehrpfadprinzip. University of Gottingen, 163.


11. Kint, V., 2005. Structural development in ageing temperate Scots pine stands. Forest Ecology and Management. 214, 237-250.


12. Ruprecht, H., Dhar, A., Aigner, B., Oitzinger, G., Raphael, K., Vacik, H., 2010. Structural diversity of English yew (Taxus bacata L.) populations. European Journal of Forest Research. 129, 189-198.


13. Alijani, V., J, Feghhi., M, Zobeiri., M, R, Marvi Mohadjer. 2012. Quantifying the Spatial Structure in Hyrcanian Submountain Forest (Case Study: Gorazbon District of Kheirud Forest-Noushahr-Iran). Journal of Natural Environmental. 65(1): 111-125. (In Persian)


14. Farhadi, P., Soosani, J., Adeli, K., and Alijani, V. 2014. Analysis of zagros forest structure using neighborhood-based indices (Case study: Ghalehgol forest, Khorramabad). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 22: 2. 294-306. (In Persian)


15. Farhadi, P., Soosani, J., Adeli, K. and Alijani, V., 2014a. Investigation of positioning and species diversity changes caused by local communities in Zagros forests (Case study: Ghalehgol forest, Zagros, Iran). Journal of Wood and Forest Science and Technology, 20(4): 61-80 (In Persian).


16. Szmyt, J. 2014. Spatial statistics in ecological analysis: from indices to functions.Silva Fennica.38:1-31.


17. Marvi Mohadjer, M.R. 2005. Silviculture. University of Tehran Press. 387p .(In Persian)


18. Pommerening, A,. 2002. Approaches to quantifying forest structures. Forestry. 3: 305-324.


19. Pommerening, A., D, Stoyan. 2006. Edge-correction needs in estimating indices of spatial forest structure. Can. J. For. Res. 36:1723-1739.


20. Bakus, G.J. 2004. Quantitative analysis of mapping biological communities. John Wiley press. 435 p.


21. Mattaji, A., M, Namiranian. 2003. Investigating the structure and evolution process of Beech forests natural stands in North of Iran (case study : Kheyrood-kenar, Noushahr). J. Natural Res. 55(4) :531-541. (In Persian)