A New-Historicist Reading Of Contemporary Arabic Poetic Play; "Case Study in Shawqis's the Death of Cleopatra

Subject Areas : Literary criticism

Ebrahim Hassani ¹ (Graduate of English Language and Literature, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran)
Javad Yaghoobi Derabi ² (Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran)

Received: 2020-02-16 Accepted : 2022-03-07 Published : 2022-03-01

Keywords: Power, New Historicism, Michel Foucault, Ahmad shawqi, Resistance,

Abstract :

New Historicists believe that a literary work should be evaluated in its historical context. It means that a work of art is written under the impacts of social conditions, formed in a particular context, impressed by various discourses, and it impacts on them mutually. On this ground, power as a set of relations (and discourses) is available at all times and has an intimate relationship with the dominant discourse and other narratives. So through written workes belong to a given era, critics will be able to find out power relations in that era and this helps them to achieve its meaning. Ahmad Shawqi in his verse play, under influences of social conditioning, embodied power relations. And his picture of power meets Foucault's terms regarding power. Foucault, as a new historicist, pursues power everywhere. As he says "Where there is power, there is resistance, and yet, or rather consequently, this resistance is never in a position of exteriority in relation to power", he crystallizes a binary operation between power and resistance. Furthermore, by evaluating this work, I show power relations among characters e.g. Cleopatra and Romans, Cleopatra and Caesar, Egypt and Rome. In the following, I illustrate the ways characters resist in the chain of power relations. Attendance of Eastern women in power positions is another matter which will be shown respectively.

References:

اشرف نظری، علی. (1390ش). «تصور فوکویی و پسافوکویی از قدرت" (المفهوم الفوكوي وما بعد الفوكوي للسلطة)». سیاست. دوره چهل و یکم. العدد 3. ص 351.

بهیان، شاپور. (1389ش). «روش شناسی میشل فوکو (منهجية ميشيل فوكو)». علوم اجتماعی. س 4، العدد 8. ص 15

شوقي، أحمد. لاتا. "مصرع کلئوباترا". لامک: لانا.

• Barry, Peter. Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory. Manchester University Press, 1995. Page 175


• Belsey Catherine, Critical Practice, (London: Metheum, 1980), Page 144.


• Breytenbach, M. M. A Queen for All Seasons: Zenobia of Palmyra1 (Stellenbosch University). Page 55


• Dean, Mitchell, 1999. Governmentality power and rule in modern society. London: Sage. Page 105 - 106


• Foucault, Michel, 1978. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. vol I. New York: Pantheon Books. Page 83-85


• Foucault, Michel. The Subject and Power. The University of Chicago., 2011. Page 871.


• Karim, M. M. Shariful. Interrogating Foucauldian Concept of Power/Knowledge in Shakespeare's the Tempest. Page 33.


• Lilja Mona & Vinthagena Stellan. Sovereign Power, Disciplinary Power and Biopower: Resisting what Power with What Resistance? a School of Global Studies, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden Published online: 24 Mar 2014. Page 109-111-112-113


• Nisbet, H.B et al., ed. the Cambridge History of Literary Criticism, Volume 9. Page 21


• Rapoport, Yossef. Women and Gender in Mamluk Society: An Overview, University of Oxford. Page 43-44


• Said, Edward (1994). 'Michel Foucault', Barry Smart (ed.), in: Michel Foucault, Vol. 2, London: Routledge.


• Smart, Barry (1994). 'Rationality, Power, and Subjectivity', in Michel Foucault, Vol. 4, London: Routledge. Page 9.


• Williams, Mukesh. New Historicism and Literary Studies. Page 153.