A Study of the Research Article Discussion Section Written by Native Authors: Hyland’s (2005) Metadiscourse Model in Focus
Subject Areas : Research in English Language PedagogyJafar Asadi 1 , Seyed Hesamuddin Aliasin 2 , Rasool Morad-Joz 3
1 - English Language Department, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran
2 - English Language Department, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
3 - English Language Department, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
Keywords:
Abstract :
Abdulaal, M.A. A. (2020). A cross-linguistic analysis of formulaic language and metadiscourse in linguistics research articles by natives and Arabs: Modeling Saudis and Egyptians. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 193-211.
Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.35360/njes.218
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang.
Duruk, E. (2017). Analysis of metadiscourse markers in academic written discourse produced by Turkish researchers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 13(1), 01-09.
Ezeifeka, C. R. (2014). Grammatical metaphor in SFL: A rhetorical resource for academic writing. Unizik Journal of Arts and Humanities,12(1), 207-221.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan. R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman Group Ltd.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Hashemi, A., Mahdavirad, F., Mazdayasna, G. (2021). Appraisal resources in book reviews: A study of cross-gender variations. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 13(28), 127146. Doi: 10.22034/ELT.2021.46516.2404
Herriman, J. (2022). Metadiscourse in English instruction manuals. English for Specific Purposes, 65, 120-132.
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 3(1),437-455. Doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: exploring writing in interaction. London: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2009). Writing in the disciplines: Research evidence for specificity. Taiwan International ESP Journal,1(1), 5-22.
Hyland, K. (2010) Metadiscourse: mapping interactions in academic writing. English Stud, 9(2), 125-143.
Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113(1), 16–29. Doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
Hyland, K. (2019). Metadiscourse: exploring interaction in writing (2nd edition). Continuum
Khedri, M., Ebrahimi, S. J., & Heng, C. S. (2013). Interactional metadiscourse markers in academic research article result and discussion sections. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 19(1), 65–74.
Kuhi, D., & Behnam, B. (2011). Generic variations and metadiscourse use in the writing of applied linguists: A comparative study and preliminary framework. Written Communication, 28 (1), 97-141.
Marandi, S. (2003). Metadiscourse in Persian/English master’s theses: A contrastive study. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 23-42.
Salahshoor, F. & Afsari, P. (2017). An investigation of interactional metadiscourse in discussion and conclusion sections of social and natural science master theses. The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 5(2),7-14.
Taymaz, N. (2021). A corpus-based comparison of use of hedges and boosters by Turkish ELT MA and PhD students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 33-49.
Vande Kopple, W. (2002). Metadiscourse, discourse and issues in composition and rhetoric. In E. Barton, & G. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition (pp. 91e113). Hampton Press.
Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2(1), 321-331.