Validation markers in introduction and results and discussion sections of research articles from four disciplines

Subject Areas : Journal of Teaching English Language Studies

Seyed Foad Ebrahimi ¹ (Department of English, Shadegan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shadegan, Iran.)
Aziz Eshmidian Nejad ² (English Department, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran)

Received: 2018-07-18 Accepted : 2018-08-20 Published : 2018-09-01

Keywords:

References:

Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters
dissertations in Language Teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8 (4),
241-251.
Basturkmen, H. (2012). A genre-based investigation of discussion sections of research articles in
dentistry and disciplinary variation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 11(2),
134-144.
Berkenkotter, C. & Huckin, T. N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication:
Cognition/culture/power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific
Purposes 13(1), 47-59.
Davies, F. (1988). Reading between the lines: Thematic choices as a device for presenting
writers viewpoint in academic discourse. The Especialist 9 (2), 173-200.
Ebrahimi, S. F., Chan, S. H. & Ain, N. A. (2014). Discourse functions of grammatical subject in
result and discussion section of research article across four disciplines. Journal of Writing
Research 6 (2), 125-140.
Fries, P. H. (1994). Theme, method of development, and texts . World Englishes 21(2), 317- 359.
Fries, P. H. & Francis, G. (1992). Exploring theme: Problems for research. Occasional Papers in
Systemic Linguistics 6, 45-60.
Gillaerts, P. & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts.
Journal of English for Academic purposes 9(2), 128-139.
Gosden, H. (1992). Discourse functions of marked theme in scientific research articles. Journal
of English for Specific Purposes 11, 207-224.
Gosden, H. (1993). Discourse functions of subject in scientific research articles. Applied
Linguistics 14(1), 56-75.
Halliday, M.A.k. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Britain: Edward
Arnold.
Harwood, N. (2005). ‘Nowhere has anyone attempted… In this article I aim to do just that’: A
corpus-based study of self-promotional I and we in academic writing across four
disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 37(8), 1207-1231.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of
research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes
16(4), 321-337.
Hunston, S. (1994). Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse.
Advances in written text analysis, 191-218.
Hu, G. & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A
comparative study of English-and Chinese-medium journals. Journal of pragmatics 43
(11), 2795-2809.
Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied
linguistics 17(4), 433-454.
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University
of Michigan Press.
Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for
specific purposes 27(1), 4-21.
Jalilifar, A. R. (2009). Research article in Applied Linguistics: A gender-based writing guide.
Ahwaz: Shahid Chamran University Press.
Jalilifar, A. (2010). The status of theme in applied linguistics articles. The Asian ESP Journal 6
(2), 7-39.
Johns, A. & Swales, J. (2002). Literacy and disciplinary practices: Opening and closing
perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 1(1), 13-28.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for
specific purposes 24 (3), 269-292.
Kashiha, H. & Chan, S.H. (2014). Discourse functions of formulaic sequences in academic
speech across two disciplines. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies 14(2), 15-27.
Khedri, M., Ebrahimi, S. J. & Chan, S. H. (2013). Interactional metadiscourse markers in
academic research article result and discussion sections. The Southeast Asian Journal of
English Language Studies 19(1), 65-74.
Lores, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. Journal of
English for Specific Purposes 23, 280-302.
Martinez, I.A. (2003). Aspects of theme in the method and discussion sections of biology journal
article in English. Journal of English for Academic Purpose 2, 103-123.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System
30(4), 479-497.
Ruiying, Y. & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to
conclusion. Journal of English for Specific Purposes 22 (4), 103-123.
Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research setting. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Williams, I.A. (1999). Results Sections of Medical Research Articles: Analysis of Rhetorical
Categories for Pedagogical Purposes. English for Specific Purposes 18(4), 347-366.