Assessment of Maize Yield (S.C. 704) Responses to Appropriate Planting Date and Deficit Irrigation Using Multivariate Analysis

Subject Areas : Journal of Crop Ecophysiology

Babak Mirshekarnezhad ¹ , Farzad Paknejad ² , Mohammad Nabi Ilkaee ³

1 - Ph.D. Graduated in Agronomy, Agrometeorology and Synoptic Office of Karaj, Meteorological Organization, Tehran, Iran
2 - Professor, Department of Agronomy, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
3 - Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran

Received: 2019-11-18 Accepted : 2022-03-30 Published : 2022-07-23

Keywords: Path analysis, harvest index, water productivity, Agronomic traits, Ear weight,

Abstract :

Arid and semiarid climate in many parts of Iran dictates the employment of agronomic practices. With this approach, a statistical experiment was set up in split-plot based on randomized complete block design with three replicates during 2015 and 2016 cropping seasons. The experiment took place in College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran. Experimental treatments scheduled on three planting dates: (21st April, 11th May and 31th May) and four irrigation regimes: I100: 100%ETc, I80: 80%ETc, I60: 60%ETc and I40: 40%ETc, based on plant water need. The highest value of water productivity of economical yield (1.19 kg.m-3) and the greatest value of water productivity of biological yield (1.03 kg.m-3) obtained in early-planting date in both years, respectively. Path analysis showed that ear weight with direct effect (1.27) and water productivity of biological yield (0.973), positively contributed to the final yield determination under irrigation regimes I100 and I60, respectively. According to principal component analysis (PCA), the variables such as grain yield, ear weight, biological yield, total number of grain, kernel weight and harvest index as agronomic traits in PC1 and water productivity of economical yield and biological yield as physiological traits in PC2 were accounted for 70% of the final yield variations in total. Due to interactions of planting date and irrigation level on the grain yield (p ≤ 0.01), early planting of grain maize and deficit irrigation management as early season strategies will have great potential to achieve optimal yield and higher water productivity by mitigating early abiotic factors.

References:

• Abasi Sadr, S., S. Sharafi, and A. Hassanzadeh Ghorttapeh. 2018. Effect of drought stress and seed priming on some traits of vegetative and reproductive of castor bean (Ricinus Communis) plant. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 12(1): 75-88. (In Persian).


• Abedinpour, M. 2015. Evaluation of growth-stage-specific crop coefficients of maize using weighing lysimeter. Soil and Water Research. 10: 99-104.


• Abrokwah, O.A., A. Antwi-Boasiako, and Z. Zechariah Effah. 2017. Effects of drought stress on maize genotypes (Zea mays) using some plant parameters. Journal of Science Research in Allied Science. 6(3): 481-490.


• Afshari, M., A. Naderi, M. Mojadam, Sh. Lak, and M. Alavifazel. 2021. Response of physiological and iochemical arameters of maize (Zea mays) to the application of zinc and iron at irrigation cutoff conditions. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology. 15 (4):515-534. (In Persian).


• Akinnuoye-Adelabu, D.B., and A.T. Modi. 2017. Planting dates and harvesting stages influence on maize yield under rain-fed conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science. 9: 43-55.


• Bekele, S., and K. Tilahun. 2007. Regulated deficit irrigation scheduling of onion in a semiarid region of Ethiopia. Agricultural Water Management. 89: 148-152.


• Berzsenyi, Z., and D.Q. Lap. 2005. Responses of maize (Zea mays) hybrids to sowing date, N fertilizer and plant density in different years. Journal of Acta Agronomica Hungarica. 53: 119-131.


• Cakir, R. 2004. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Research. 89: 1-16.


• Di Paolo, E., and M. Rinaldi. 2008. Yield response of corn to irrigation and nitrogen fertilization in a Mediterranean environment. Field Crops Research. 105: 202-210.


• Fanaei, H.R., A. Azmal, and I. Piri. 2017. Effect of biological and chemical fertilizers on oil, seed yield and some agronomic traits of safflower under different irrigation regimes. Journal of Agroecology. 8(4): 551-566. (In Persian).


• Fereres, E., and M.A. Soriano. 2006. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. Journal of Experimental Biology. 58(2): 147-159.


• Golbashy, M., M. Ebrahimi, S.K. Khorasani, and R. Choukan. 2010. Evaluation of drought tolerance of some corn (Zea mays) hybrids in Iran. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 5: 2714-2719.


• Howell, T.A. 2003. Irrigation efficiency. In: Encyclopedia of water science Stewart, B.A., and T.A. Howell (Eds.). Marcel Dekker, New York. 467- 472p.


• Kiziloglu, F.M., U. Sahin, Y. Kuslu, and T. Tunc. 2009. Determining water–yield relationship, water use efficiency, crop and pan coefficients for silage maize in a semiarid region. Irrigation Science. 27: 129-137.


• Lisar, S.Y.S., R. Motafakkerazad, M.M. Hossain, and I.M.M. Rahman. 2012. Water stress in plants: Causes, Effects and Responses. DOI: 10.5772/39363.


• Lizaso, J. 2017. Modeling the response of maize phenology, kernel set, and yield components to heat stress and heat shock with CSM-IXIM. Field Crops Research. 214: 239-252.


• Morison, J.I.L., N.R. Baker, P.M. Mullineaux, and W.J. Davies. 2008. Improving water use in crop production. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B. 363: 639-658.


• Nielson, R.L., P.R. Thomison, G.A. Brown, A.L. Halter, J. Wells, and K.L. Wuethrich. 2002. Delayed planting effects on flowering and grain maturation of dent corn. Journal of Agronomy. 94: 549-558.


• Payero, J.O., D.D. Tarkalson, S. Irmak, D. Davison, and J.L. Petersen. 2009. Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass. Agricultural Water Management. 96: 1387-1397.


• Praba, M.L., J.E. Cairns, R.C. Babu, and HR. Lafitte. 2009. Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. Journal of Agronomy. 195: 30-46.


• Soler, C.M.T., P.C. Sentelhas, and G. Hoogenboom. 2007. Application of the CSM-CERES-Maize model for planting date evaluation and yield forecasting for maize grown off-season in a subtropical environment. European Journal of Agronomy. 27: 165-177.


• Strzepek, K., and B. Boehlert. 2010. Competition for water for the food system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. 365: 2927-2940.


• Tsimba, R., G.O. Edmeades, J.P. Millner, and P.D. Kemp. 2013. The effect of planting date on maize: Phenology, thermal time durations and growth rates in a cool temperate climate. Field Crops Research. 150: 145-155.


• Yang, J.C., J.H. Zhang, L.J. Liu, Z.Q. Wang, and Q.S. Zhu. 2002. Carbon remobilization and grain filling in Japonica/ Indica hybrid rice subjected to post-anthesis water deficit. Agronomy Journal. 94: 102–109.