تاثیر نوع فعالیت کلاسی وشرایط طرح ریزی قبل از فعالیت بر میزان صحت نوشتاردانشجویان سطح متوسط زبان انگلیسی
Subject Areas : آموزش زبان انگلیسی
سید محمد علوی
1
(Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literature,
Universtiy of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.)
نرجس اشعری تبار
2
(Department of English, Science and Research Branch, Islamic
Azad University, Tehran, Iran.)
Abstract :
روش تدریس مبتنی بر فعالیت کلاسی که از فراگیران زبان میخواهد که فعالیتهای کلاسی را انجام دهند که مشابه نیازهای زبانی در دنیای واقعی آنهاست٬ فراگیران را ملزم به طرح ریزی در مراحل مختلف یادگیری می کند. از آنجائی که در آموزش فعالیت-محورمی توان انواع مختلف فعالیت کلاسی را بکار گرفت٬ تحقیق حاضر٬ تأثیر نوع فعالیتها وساختار متفاوت مشارکت ضمن طرح ریزی پیش از فعالیت را بر میزان صحت نوشتار فراگیران مورد بررسی قرار داده است. جهت نیل به این هدف٬ محقق 120 نفرازدانشجویان سطح متوسط زبان انگلیسی را بطور اتفاقی در سه گروه آزمایشی و یک گروه کنترل قرار داد. در حالیکه گروههای آزمایشی تحت شرایط متفاوت طرح ریزی قبل از فعالیت (یعنی: طرح ریزی فردی٬ دونفره وگروهی) قرار گرفتند٬ گروه کنترل بدون زمانی برای طرح ریزی٬ فعالیتهای کلاسی را انجام دادند. طی دوره آموزش٬ فراگیران مدل انجام شده فعالیت مشابه را دریافت کردند٬ دو نوع فعالیت کلاسی (یعنی: فعالیت ازنوع توصیفی ونوع تصمیم گیری) به آنها ارائه شد وتوسط دانشجویان تکمیل گردید. تحلیل داده های جمع آوری شده ازطریق روش آماری ANOVA نشان داد که نوع فعالیت کلاسی وشرایط طرح ریزی پیش از فعالیت بر میزان صحت نوشتارشرکت کنندگان درتحقیق به گونه ای تأثیر گذاشت که درهمه گروههای آزمایشی٬ میزان صحت بالاتری درحین انجام فعالیت تصمیم گیری مشاهده شد. این امر تضمین کننده کارآیی این شیوه آموزشی در کاهش مشکل ریشه دار فراگیران زبان انگلیسی در دست یابی به میزان صحت گرامری بالاترحین پرداختن به یک فعالیت خاص می باشد.
Crookes, G., & Gass, S. M. (1993). Tasks in a pedagogic context: Integrating theory and practice. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 3-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V. Publication.
Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 36-53.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299-323.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of source of planning and focus of planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3(3), 215-247.
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2000). SPSS for windows step by step (2nd edition). New York: Pearson Education Company.
Guerrero, R. G. (2005). Task complexity and L2 narrative oral production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved on May 14, 2011, from http://www. tesisenxaraxa.net
Heaton, J. B. (1975). Beginning composition through pictures. London: Longman.
Jafari, S. (2006). The effects of planning condition, task structure, and gender on different aspects of Iranian intermediate EFL learners' performance (fluency, accuracy, complexity, and lexical density) in written tasks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Johnson, K. & Johnson, H. (1999). Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
Keating, G. D. (2008). Task effectiveness and word learning in a second language: The involvement load hypothesis on trial. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 365-386.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2007). Cognitive task complexity and linguistic performance in French L2 writing. In M. P. G. Mayo (Ed.),Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 117-135). Clevedon: Multilingual matters Ltd.
Laufer, B. & Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1-26.
Malmir, A. (2008). The effect of task-based approach on the Iranian advanced EFL learners vs. expository writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Allame Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.
Mofidi, A. (2005). The relationship between instrumental and integrative motivation of students and their performance on planned and unplanned speaking tasks. Unpublished master's thesis, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Ojima, M. (2006). Concept-mapping as pre-task planning: A case study of three Japanese ESL writers. System, 34, 566-585.
Philp, J., Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2006). The impact of planning time on children's task-based interactions. System, 34, 547-565.
Rahmanian, M. (2004).The relationship between pre-task and on-line planning and fluency, accuracy and complexity of Iranian EFL students production in written narrative and descriptive tasks. Unpublished master's thesis, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Rezazadeh, M., Tavakoli, M., & Eslami Rasekh, A. (2011). The role of task type in foreign language written production: focusing on fluency, complexity, and accuracy [Electronic version]. International Education Studies, 4(2), 169-176.
Richards, J. C., &Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, Th. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roohi, A. (2006). Striking an effective balance between accuracy and fluency in task-based teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Samuda, V., & Bygate, M. (2008). Tasks in second language learning. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Seifoori, Z. (2009). The impact of metacognitive strategies-based training and levels of planning on accuracy, complexity, and fluency of focused task-based oral Performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Campus, Tehran, Iran.
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38-62.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185- 211.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120.
Tavakoli, P. (2009). Assessing L2 task performance: Understanding effects of task design. System, 37, 482-495.
Tuan, T. A., & Neomy, S. (2007). Investigating group planning in preparation for oral presentations in an EFL class in Vietnam. RELC, 38(1), 104-124.
Van Avermaet, P. and Gysen, S. (2006). From needs to tasks: Language learning needs in a task-based approach. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 17-46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language teaching in a nutshell. In K. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp. 1-16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445-466.
Willis, J. (1996). A flexible framework for task-based learning. In J. Willis and D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 52-62). Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.
Yuan, F. & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and online planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1-27.
