Examining the claim of entering and attracting a third party in Iranian and American law (federal)

Subject Areas : Private law

Alireza Sotudeh ¹ , ali pourjavaheri ² , Ali Jamadi ³ , Darush Babae ⁴

1 - PhD student in private law, Yasouj Branch, Yasouj Islamic Azad University, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Yasouj Branch, Yasouj Islamic Azad University, Iran.
3 - Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Yasouj Branch, Yasouj Islamic Azad University, Iran.
4 - Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Yasouj Branch, Yasouj Islamic Azad University, Iran.

Received: 2020-06-22 Accepted : 2021-12-12 Published : 2023-05-22

Keywords: Iranian Law, Third-party entry, third-party capture, US Federal Civil Procedure Code, criminal lawsuit,

Abstract :

Every lawsuit has two parties, the plaintiff and the main defendant; Maybe some people like the lawyer, executor, guardian, heirs, or deputy are also involved in the lawsuit, but they actually enter the lawsuit as the main plaintiff and defendant. If other than the plaintiff and the main defendant (their dependents), another person is also a beneficiary in the lawsuit, he should enter the lawsuit under the title of "third party"; "Third-party entry" or "Third-party acquisition" will have special provisions. The results of this research showed that in Iranian law, the conditions for filing the said lawsuit are not mentioned in the legal articles related to the third-party claim. But there are two related conditions or the same origin. In order to file these lawsuits, the American legislator has provided three conditions of a common action or legal event, a common judicial or subject matter, and having an interest in the main issue to file these three lawsuits. These conditions of the American federal law are similar to the Iranian procedural law. . Regarding the third entry, the situation is slightly different. The third party cannot always be considered as a defendant, which has been proven both in Iran's civil procedure and in the American federal law.

References:

- احمدی، خلیل (1397)، تاملی در دعوای جلب شخص ثالث در حقوق ایران و قواعد آیین دادرسی مدنی فدرال آمریکا، مجله پژوهش های حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 22، شماره 3.

- اسدزاده طالعی، سیمین؛ داور، منوچهر (1395)، مطالعه تطبیقی دعوای متقابل در حقوق ایران و ایالات متحده آمریکا، فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوق خصوصی و کیفری، شماره 30.

- بهرامی، بهرام (1389)، بایسته های ادله اثبات، دعاوی حقوقی و کیفری، علمی، تطبیقی و کاربردی منطبق با سر فصل ادله اثبات دعوی، تهران: نگاه بینه.

- جعفری مجد، محمد (1391)، احکام دعوی جلب ثالث در دیوان عدالت اداری، دو فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشی دانش حقوق مدنی، شماره دوم.

- حسن زاده، مهدی (1390)، مهلت اقامه دعوای اضافی؛ حقوق اسلامی، سال هشتم، شماره 29.

- حسن زاده، مهدی؛ رمضانی، سارا (1394)، تحلیل جلب ثالث تقویتی و مقایسه آن با شهادت، پژوهش های حقوق خصوصی و کیفری، شماره 26.

- سخی، مرضیه (1389)، طواری ناشی از دخالت اشخاص ثالث در دادرسی، پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی.

- صابر، محمود؛ خلیق آذر، سمیه (1396)، مداخله شخص ثالث در دادرسی کیفری؛ جلوه ها و موانع، مطالعات حقوق کیفری و جرم شناسی، دوره 4، شماره 2، پیاپی 9، ص 227-248.

- عزیزی، علیرضا (1388)، پیشینه و مبانی حمایت از بزه دیده و متهم در فرایند دادرسی کیفری، فصلنامه حقوقی گواه، شماره 14.

- غمامی، مجید (1383)، دعوای متقابل، مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، شماره 66، ص 225.

- مرادخانی، احمد (1395)، شرایط گواهان در فقه فریقین (باتوجه به قانون)، فصلنامه پژوهش­های فقه و حقوق اسلامی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بابل، دوره 12، شماره 43، بهار 1395، ص 145-164.

- هرمزی، خیرالله (1395)، دعوای ورود ثالث تبعی در حقوق ایران و فرانسه، دو فصلنامه علمی و پژوهشب دانش حقوق مدنی، سال پنجم، شماره دوم، پیاپی 10.

- Gunter, Justin P (2013), "Dual standards for third-party intervener’s: distinguishing between public-law and private-law intervention." Vend. L. Rev. 66.

- Potthast, Catherine (1982), "Criminal Law —Constitutional Law— Intervention — Media May Intervene in Criminal Cases to Contest Orders Restricting Publicity". News American v. State, 294 Md. 30, 447A.2d 1264.

- Robin Effron, the Shadow Rules of Joinder, 100 Geo. L. J. 759, 2011-2012.

-  Shreve, Gene R (1979), "Questioning Intervention of Right--Toward a New Methodology of Decision-making." Nw. UL Rev. 74.

- Ahmadi, Khalil (2017), a reflection on the third party litigation in Iranian law and the American federal civil procedure rules, Journal of Comparative Law Research, Volume 22, Number 3.
- Asadzadeh Talei, Simin; Davar, Manouchehr (2015), Comparative study of counterclaims in the laws of Iran and the United States of America, Private and Criminal Law Research Quarterly, No. 30.
- Bahrami, Bahram (1389), the requirements of proof evidence, legal and criminal lawsuits, scientific, comparative and practical in accordance with the title of the proof proof chapter, Tehran: Negah Bineh.
- Jafari Majed, Mohammad (2013), rulings on third-party claims in the Court of Administrative Justice, two scientific and research quarterly journals of civil law knowledge, number two.
- Hassanzadeh, Mehdi (2013), deadline for filing an additional lawsuit; Islamic Law, Year 8, Number 29.
- Hassanzadeh, Mehdi; Ramezani, Sara (2014), Analysis of third-party evidence and its comparison with testimony, Private and Criminal Law Research, No. 26.
- Sakhi, Marzieh (2009), The influence of third parties in the proceedings, Master's thesis, University of Tehran, Faculty of Law and Political Sciences.
- Saber, Mahmoud; Khaliq Azar, Samia (2016), third party intervention in criminal proceedings; Effects and obstacles, criminal law and criminology studies, volume 4, number 2, series 9, pp. 227-248.
- Azizi, Alireza (2008), background and basics of protecting the victim and the accused in the criminal proceedings, Gawah Legal Quarterly, No. 14.
- Ghamami, Majid (2013), Counterclaim, Faculty of Law and Political Science Journal, No. 66, p. 225.
- Muradkhani, Ahmad (2016), Conditions of witnesses in foreign jurisprudence (according to the law), Islamic Jurisprudence and Law Research Quarterly, Islamic Azad University, Babol Branch, Volume 12, Number 43, Spring 2015, pp. 145-164.
- Hormozi, Khairollah (2015), the third-party entry lawsuit in Iranian and French law, two academic and research quarterly journals of civil law, fifth year, second issue, 10 in a row.
- Gunter, Justin P (2013), "Dual standards for third-party interveners: distinguishing between public-law and private-law intervention." Vend. L.Rev. 66.
- Potthast, Catherine (1982), "Criminal Law —Constitutional Law— Intervention — Media May Intervene in Criminal Cases to Contest Orders Restricting Publicity". News American v. State, 294 Md. 30, 447A.2d 1264.
- Robin Effron, the Shadow Rules of Joinder, 100 Geo. L. J. 759, 2011-2012.
- Shreve, Gene R (1979), "Questioning Right's Intervention--Toward a New Methodology of Decision-Making." Nw. UL Rev. 74.