Indicators assessing the quality of urban life In ten areas of metropolitan Shiraz
Subject Areas :mojtaba rafiiyan 1 , ebrahim zahmatkesh 2 , پروین ده ده زاده سیلابی 3
1 - univercity aff tarbiyat modarres
2 - univercity aff sistan baluchestan
3 - دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
Keywords: TOPSIS, VIKOR, AHP, quality of life, Shiraz,
Abstract :
In the context of the human environment in urban areas, providing standards require that at a glance it can be called quality of life standards. As the most important and most fundamental purpose of urban planning to meet the needs and improve the quality of life of peopleis living in cities The quality of life distribution service institutions including housing quality, environmental quality, employment, education, health, etc. in the city managers and urban planners are. Accordingly, the aim of this study and analysis of the quality of urban life in the city of Shiraz. The research was descriptive - analytical studies and questionnaires were collected and analyzed using SPSS software And then use single-sample T-test first citizen's satisfaction was measured quality of life in the city. And then use the models topsis, AHP and vikor urban areas of Shiraz in the enjoyment of life quality indicators were prioritized.The results show that the index of entertainment, education and the environment is higher than average sense of satisfaction. As well as facilities and equipment, civil society and services in terms of medium are satisfied. Health indicators, employment and housing are lower than average satisfaction with quality of life. The results of the ranking of the districts indicates significant differences in the quality of life in ten districts of the city and inequality between the old and new areas are areas.
22. AZIZI, M. RAMEZANZADEH, (2013), Determining effective criteria for the selection of MDF industry locations in Mazandaran Province: Application of AHP, For. Sci. Pract., 2013, 15(3):PP 222–230
23. Burinskiene marija , Rudzkiene vitalija , Dovilelazauskaite(2013) ”The assessment of quality of life in peripheral urban areas in Lithuania”,pp 22-230.
24. Enrique carreras romero , ana carreras franco (2013) “effects of ldeology on citizen evaluation and satisfaction with local administration” metodoloqia do encuestas ,PP 27-55
25. Eziyi, O. I., & Amole, D., (2014), Subjective life satisfaction in public housing in urban areas of Ogun State, Nigeria. Journal of CITIES, 35(1),PP 51-61.
26. Foo Tuan Seik (2000): Subjective assessment of urban quality of life in Singapore, Habitat Internatonal, 24, pp
27. Ghulam ZAKRIA, Zailin GUAN, Yasser RIAZ, Mirza JAHANZAIB, Anwar KHAN,(2010), Selecting and prioritizing key factors for CAD/CAM software in small- and medium-sized enterprises using AHP, Front. Mech. Eng. China, 5(2):PP 157–164
28. Huang,J,J. Tzeng, G,H& His Liu,Hsiang, (2009), “ A Revised VIKOR Model for Multiple Criteria Decision Making - The Perspective of Regret Theory” Graduate Institute of international Business, NationalTaipei University, Sansia, Taiwan
29. Lee, Y. J. (2008). Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and Environment, 43(7), PP 1205-1215.
30. Marans, R. W. (2015). Quality of urban life & environmental sustainability studies: Future
31. Nigeria Eziyio .Iben ,DolapoAmoie.(2013).”Subjestive life satis faction in public housing in urban areas of ogunstst
32. Olajuyigbe, A.E ,Osakpolor, S, and, Adegboyega, S, A. (2013) “Assessment of Quality of Life Using Geographical InformationSystem
33. Olajuyigbe, A.E., Osakpolor, S., Adegboyega, S. A., (2013)., System Approach for Assessment of Quality of Life Using Geographical Information Poverty Alleviation Decision-Making. International Journal of Sustainable Land Use and Urban Planning, 1(1), PP 1-20
34. Opricovic,S and Tzeng, G-H (2004), “Compromise Solution by MCDM Methods: A Comparative Analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS”, European Journal of Operational Research, 445.
35. Pacione, Michael , (2003), Urban environmental quality and human wellbeing – a social geographical perspective, Landscape and Urban Planning ,PP 65-89
36. Pal, A.K, Kumar,U.C,(2005),Quality of life concept for the evaluation of societal development of rural community in west bangal, india, Rural Devolopment, vol. xv,n
37. Smith, C., Levermore,G.,(2008), Designing urban spaces and building to improve sustainability and quality of life in a warmer word, Social Indicators Research , PP 40-55
_||_