The Spatial proportionality assessment and optimal pattern Presentation the Locating of urban parks with using Gis (case study: Dezful city)
Subject Areas :
Saeed Maleki
1
(Associate Professor of Geography and Urban Planning in University of Shahid Chamran in ahvaz)
Naeem Ekrami
2
(Master student of Geography and Urban Planning in University of Shahid Chamran in ahvaz)
Ahmad Rashedi
3
(Master student of Geography and Urban Planning in University of Shahid Chamran in ahvaz)
Keywords: FAHP, GIS, Location, Dezful, park, Space suitability,
Abstract :
the Purpose of this study: Spatial proportionality assessment and optimal pattern Presentation the Locating of urban parks in the city of Dezful .based on library studies and documents have been conducted. This research has purpose and is descriptive-analytical method. The variables of the study include: Residential, educational, cultural, sports, arterial roads, commercial, military, health - care, municipal utilities, industrial and office. In order to weigh and assess the effect of the studied variables ultimate goal FAHP model is used. For the final layer using the Raster Calculator and the use of the plural layers are overlapped With each other combined methods and final map optimize the location of parks in the city of Dezful of this action has been made. The results of FAHP in connection with the extraction of value-weighted index of assessing urban parks has shown The index of residential and educational Each version of 0/154 and 0/122 as the most important indicators of locating urban parks were the highest weight have been. The end result layers show that a total of 19 parks the city of Dezful in terms of proximity and compatibility with other users nearby; 6 Park on the whole poor, 6 parks in the moderate range, 5 Parks on the whole good And 2 parks in the whole are quite good.
35. Balram Shivanand, Dragicevic Suzana, (2005), Attitudes toward urban green space: Integrating questionnaire survey and collaborative GIS techniques to improve attitude measurements", Landscape and Urban Planning.
36. Bunruamkaew, Khwanruthai & Yuji Murayama(2011), Site Suitability Evaluation for Ecotourism Using GIS & AHP: A Case Study of Surat Thani Province, Thailand, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 21, PP: 269–278.
37. Caspersen, O., Cecil C., and Anton S. 2006. Green Sopace Planning and Land Use: An assessment of urban regional and green structure planning in Greater Colenhagen Geografisk Tidsskrift, Danish Journal of Geography, 106(2).
38. Chiesura, A. (2004). The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landscape Urban Plan, 68: 129-138.
39. Jarosław Banaszek1, Małgorzata Gajos, Dominik Karkosz1, Oimahmad Rahmonov, Tomasz Parusel (2014), Using GIS Methods to Investigate Urban Parks within Industrial Regions, Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 23, No. 2 (2014), 609-617.
40. Kioshikoh, Seughyungeong (2006), “Landscape and Planning” 82, p25-32.
41. Kong, F., N. Nakagoshi (2005). Spatialtemporal gradient analysis of urban green spaces in Jinan, China. Landscape Urban Plan, (in press). Konijnendijk, Cecil C; Matilda, Annerstedt; Anders Busse, Nielsen and Sreetheran.
42. Kyushik Oh, Seunghyun Jeong (2007), Assessing the spatial distribution of urban parks using GIS, Vol. 82, Issues 1–2, 15 August 2007.
43. Maruthaveeran (2013). Benefits of Urban Parks, Copenhagen & Alnarp, ifpra.
44. Matisen. M. (2000), Urban land use and its evolution, urban policy. Vol. 51: 203-217.
45. Williams, C., Thwaites, E( 2011), Managing Urban Parks. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 12(2). 11-24.
46. Zhou Y, Shi TM, Hu YM, Gao C, Liu M, Song LQ(2011), Location selection for Shenyang urban parks based on GIS and multi-objective location allocation model, Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Dec; 22(12):3307-14. [Article in Chinese].
_||_