Evaluation of the effect of Azospirillum spp. inoculation, alone and in combination with phosphate solubilizing bacteria Bacillus megaterium , on alleviation of the effects of salinity stress on Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.)
Subject Areas : Genetic
Nosratollah Abasi
1
(Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Urmia, Iran)
Jalal Jalilian
2
(Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Urmia, Iran)
Mohhamad Javad Zare
3
(Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Ilam, Iran)
Keywords: Yield, Salinity, biofertilizer, Mung bean, Nutrient absorption,
Abstract :
Increasing salinity of soil and water is the most important concern for agriculture in dry lands. In this research the effect of Azospirillum inoculation alone and in co-inoculation with phosphate solubilizing bacteria was investigated in alleviating the adverse effect of salinity on mung bean Vigna radiata L. cv Gohar) for 2-year under field condition. The study was a factorial experiment based on a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The main factors were application of various serovars of Azospirillum, phosphate solubilizing bacteria Bacillus megaterium, co-inoculation of both bacteria, non-inoculated treatment as control and two levels of salinity irrigation (0.2 and 12 dS m-1). Analysis of variance indicated significant effect of salinity and microbial inoculation on mung bean seed yield. Salinity resulted in reduction of seed yield by 88%. Under salinity and non-salinity conditions, the highest amount of grain yield, seed weight, and seed number was observed in plants with seeds inoculated with Azospirillum. The minimum Na and K and maximum P contents of seeds were observed in Azospirillum inoculated plants. Co-inoculation with Azospirillum and Bacillus megaterium resulted in no further beneficial effect under saline and non-saline conditions. Overall, Azospirillum appeared to be effective in mitigation of the adverse effect of NaCl and its co-inoculation with phosphate solubilizing bacteria gained no more additives benefit.
Amor, F.M. and Cuadra-Crespo, P. (2011). Plant growth-promoting bacteria as a tool to improve salinity tolerance in sweet pepper. Functional Plant Biology. 39: 82-90.
Argaw, A. (2012). Evaluation of Co-inoculation of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and phosphate solubilizing Pseudomonas spp. on Soybean (Glycine max L. (Merr.)) in Assossa Area. Journal ofAgricultural Science and Technology. 14: 213–224.
Ashraf, M., Hasnain, S., Berge, O. and Mahmood, T. (2004). Inoculating wheat seedlings with exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria restricts sodium uptake and stimulates plant growth under salt stress. Biology Fertility of Soils. 40: 157–162.
Barea, J.M., Bonis, A.F. and Olivares, A. (1983). Interactions between Azospirillum and VA mycorrhiza and their effects on growth and nutrition of maize and ryegrass. Soil Biology Biochemistry. 15: 705–709.
Bashan, Y. and Holguin, G. (1997). Azospirillum -plant relationships: environmental and physiological advances (1990–1996). Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 43: 103–121.
Bashan, Y. and Levanony, H. (1990).Current status of Azospirillum inoculation technology: Azospirillum as a challenge for agriculture. Canadianan Journal of Microbiology. 30: 591–608.
Bashan, Y., Holguin, G. and de-Bashan. L.E. (2004). Azospirillum-plant relationships: physiological, molecular, agricultural, and environmental advances (1997–2003). Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 50: 521–577.
Bates, L.S., Waldren, R.O. and Teare, I.D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-tress studies. Plant and Soil. 39: 205–207.
Blaha, C.A.G. and Shrank, I.S. (2003). An Azospirillum brasilense tn5 mutant with modified stress response and impaired in flocculation. Antonie Leeuweenhook. 83: 35–43.
Çakmakçi, R., Kantar, F. and Algur, Ö.F. (1999). Sugar beet and barley yields in relation to Bacillus polymyxa and Bacillus megaterium var. phosphaticum inoculation. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 162: 437–442.
Casanovas, E.M., Barassi, C.A., Andrade, F.H. and Sueldo, R.J. (2003). Azospirillum-inoculated maize plant responses to irrigation restraints imposed during flowering. Cereal Research Communication. 31: 395 – 402.
Cherif-Silini, H., Silini, A., Ghoul, M., Yahiaoui, B. and Arif, F. (2013). Solubilization of phosphate by the Bacillus under salt stress and in the presence of osmoprotectant compounds. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 7: 4562-4571.
Creus, C.M., Sueldo, R.J. and Barassi, C.A. (1997). Shoot growth and water status in Azospirillum-inoculated wheat seedlings grown under osmotic and salt stresses. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 35: 939–944.
Grattan, S.R. and Grieve, C.M. (1992). Mineral element acquisition and growth response of plants grown in saline environments. Agricultural Ecosystem Environment. 38: 275–300
Grattan, S.R. and Grieve, C.M. (1999). Salinity-mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Scientia Horticulturae. 78: 127–157.
Hamaoui, B., Abbadi, J.M., Burdman, S., Rashid, A., Sarig, S. and Okon, Y. (2001). Effects of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on chickpeas (Cicer arietinum) and faba beans (Vicia faba) under different growth conditions. Agronomie. 21:553–560.
Hamdia, M.A. and El-Komy. H.M. (1997). Effect of salinity, gibberellic acid and Azospirillum inoculationon growth and nitrogen uptake of Zea mays. Biological Plant. 40:109–120.
Isaac, R.A. and Kerber, J.D. (1971). Atomic absorption and flame photometry: Techniques and uses in soil, plant and water analysis. In: Instrumental Methods for Analysis of Soil and Plant Tissue, (Eds.): Walsh, L.M. Madison, Wis. PP. 17-37.
Karimi, N. (2012). Isolation and identification of plant symbiosis (Azospirillum) of saline area and investigate the interference of wheat-weed in response to endophytic fungus P. indica under salinity stress. Thesis. Ilam University.
Kucey, R.M.N. (1983). Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and fungi in various cultivated and virgin alberta soils. Canadian Journal Soil Science. 63: 671-678.
Kumar, V. and Narula, N. (1999). Solubilization of inorganic phosphates and growth emergence of wheat as affected by Azotobacter chroococcum mutants. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 28:301-305.
Kundu B.S. and Gaur, A.C. (1980). Effect of phosphobacteria on the yield and phosphate uptake of potato crop. Current Science. 49: 159.
Okon, Y. and Laberandera-Gonzalez, C.A. (1994). Agronomic application of Azospirillum: An evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biology Biochemistry. 26: 1591–601.
Pardossi, A., Bagnoli, G., Malorgio, F., Campiotti, C.A. and Tognoni, F. (1999). NaCl effects on celery (Apium graveolens L.) grown in NFT. Scientia Horticulturae. 81: 229–242.
Sambrook J., Fritisch, E.F. and Manialis, T. (1989). Molecular cloning; a laboratory manual. 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp. 73–9.
Siahmargue, A., Raci Saray, M.R. and Naseri, M.Y (2014).Effect of biofertilizer on some quality traits of Pennisetum glaucum. Environmental plant physiology. 9: 72-81.
Somers, E. (2004). Vanderleyden J., Srinivasan M. Rhizosphere bacterial signalling: a love arade beneath our feet. Critical Review Microbiology. 30: 205–40.
Son, T.T.N., Diep, C.N. and Giang, T.T.M. (2006). Effect of bradyrhizobia and phosphate solubilizing bacteria application on soybean in rotational system in the mekong delta. Omonrice. 14: 48–57.
Souchie, E.L., Azcón, R. Barea, J.M., Saggin-Júnior, O.J. and da Silva. E.M.R. (2007). Indolacetic acid production by P-solubilizing microorganisms and interaction with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences. 29: 315-320.
Stewart, C.K. and Lee, J.A. (1974). The role of proline accumulation in halophytes. Planta, 120: 1279-289.
Strain, H.H. and Svec, W.A. (1966). Extraction, separation, estimation and isolation of chlorophylls. In: Vernon L. P., Seely G. R. (Eds The chlorophylls) 21-66. Academic Press, New York.
Tarakcioglu, C. and Inal, A. (2002). Changes induced by salinity, demarcating specific ion ratio (Na/Cl) and osmolality on ion and proline accumulation, nitrate reductase activity and growth performance of lettuce. Plant Nutrition, 25: 27–41.
Tilak K.V.B.R., Ranganayki, N., Pal, K.K., De, R., Saxena, A.K., Shekhar Nautiyal, C., Shilpi, M., Tripathi, A.K. and Johri, B.N. (2005). Diversity of plant growth and soil health supporting bacteria. Current Science. 89(1): 136–50.
Tiwari, V.N., Lehri L.K. and Pathak, A.N. (1989). Effect of inoculation crops with phospho-microbes. Experimental Agriculture. 25: 47–50
Wang, X., Pan, Q., Chen, F., Yan, X. and Liao, H. (2011). Effects of co-inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia on soybean growth as related to root architecture and availability of N and P. Mycorrhiza. 21: 173–81.
Wasule, D.L., Wadyalkar, S.R. and Buldeo, A.N.(2007). Effect of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on role of Rhizobium on nodulation by soybean. In: "First International Meeting on Microbial Phosphate Solubilization", (Eds.):Velazquez, E. and Rodriguez-Barrueco, C. PP.139–142.
Zarea, M.J. and Karimi, N. (2014). Plant physiological mechanisms of salt tolerance induced by mycorrhizal Fungi and Piriformospora Indica. Springer Science Business Media New York.
Zarea, M.J., Chordia, P. and Varma, A. (2013a). Piriformospora indica Versus Salt Stress. In: Varma A, Kost G, Oelmüller R (Eds.). Piriformospora indica, Soil Biology. 33 263–284.
Zarea, M.J., Hajinia, S., Karimi, N., Mohammadi Goltapeh, E., Rejali, F. and Varma, A. (2012). Effect of Piriformospora indica and Azospirillum strains from saline or non-saline soil on mitigation of the effects of NaCl. Soil Biology Biochemistry. 45: 139–146.
Zarea, M.J., Mohammadi Gol Tapeh, E., Alikhani, H.A. and Ghalavand, A. (2015).Mycorrhizal fungi for sustainable farming in saline arid and semi arid area. Jahad-e-Daneshgahi of Tehran Universit. PP. 1-50.
Zarea, M.J., Mohammadi Goltapeh, E., Karimi, N. and Varma, A. (2013b). Sustainable agriculture in saline-arid and semiarid by use potential of am fungi on mitigates NaCl effects. In: E.M. Mohammadi Goltapeh, Y. Rezaidanesh and A. Varama (Eds.). Fungi as Bioremediators. Soil Biology. 32: 340–370.
