Monitoring compatibility with land use planning of industries in Geospatial Information System (Case Stady: Citi of sari)
Subject Areas :
Reza Lahmian
1
(عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه علمی پیام نور _ رئیس دانشگاه دولتی گرمسار)
Keywords: GIS, Land use planning, city of Surrey, monitoring compliance,
Abstract :
Planning to predict the future and the future will help to some extent imaginable. In fact, the plan looks to the future and a bridge between where we are and where we want to go. Rshdsry and unbridled human population, uninterrupted operation of mining, logging and deforestation, destruction of natural vegetation and pasture land, water and air pollution caused by industrial activities from the past to the present, the life cycle home common to all living creatures, the earth is in danger. One of the problems is increased abnormalities in industry and industrial activities Due to lack of effective factors in determining industrial capabilities, especially planning and Taking the necessary measures before the activities associated with it is. The present study also aims to plan and finding optimal locations for industrial activities carried out in the city of Sari. For this purpose, the powerful multi-criteria decision system and its integration with GIS is used. First, criteria and data layers with expert guidance as well as investigations were made in the past. The most important factor in environmental decision-making criteria were identified, weighing 0.7. Afterassigning weights to the criteria by AHP and its integration software environment Arc GIS10.3 final map was obtained. At the end of about 169 780 hectares of land, 17% of the entire city was identified with the interpretation fit perfectly
1- امان پور،سعید و حسن پور، سحر. 1395 . سطوح برخورداری از خدمات بهداشت و درمان در شهرستانهای استان خوزستان با بهره گیری از تکنیک فرایند سلسله مراتبی فازی (Fuzzy AHP). فصلنامۀ آمایش محیط، 10 (37): 64-37.
2- ایمانی، بهرام و فیروزی مجنده، ابراهیم و کانونی، رضا. 1395. پراکنش مکانی فضاهای سبز و اولویتبندی تناسب اراضی با هدف مکانیابی بهینه ی پارک (مطالعه موردی: شهر اردبیل). فصلنامۀ آمایش محیط، 10 (37): 98-65.
3- تقدیسی، ا.، پیری،س.، بهاری،ع. 1391 .تحلیل فضایی و سطح بندی شاخص های توسعۀ خدمات بهداشتی- درمانی با استفاده از تحلیل عاملی و تکنیک خوشه ای (مطالعۀ موردی: شهرستانهای استان گیلان). فصلنامۀ آمایش محیط، 5 (18): 176-145.
4-Piatkowski P, D., & Marshall E, W. (2015). Not all prospective bicyclists are created equal: The role of attitudes, socio-demographics, and the built environment in bicycle commuting. Travel Behaviour and Society, 2(3), pp 166–173. Retrieved from http:// doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2015.02.201
5- Saneinejad, S., Roorda, M. J., & Kennedy, C. (2012). Modelling the impact of weather conditions on active transportation travel behaviour. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(2), 129–137.
6- Singleton, P. A., & Clifton, K. J. (2013). Pedestrians in Regional Travel Demand Forecasting Models: State-of-the-Practice. In 93nd Annual Meeting of th Transportation Research Board
7- Luo Lingjun, He Zong, Hu yan (2006). “STUDY ON LAND USE SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT OF URBAN-RURAL PLANNING BASED ON REMOTE SENSING—A CASE STUDY OF LIANGPING IN CHONGQING Progress in Planning, Volume 62, Issue 1,Pages 3-65
8- Rodríguez, D. A., Merlin, L., Prato, C. G., Conway, T. L., Cohen, D., Elder, J. P., … Veblen-Mortenson, S. (2015). Influence of the Built Environment on Pedestrian Route Choices of Adolescent Girls. Environment and Behavior (Vol. 47).
9- Satish Kumar, V.K. Bansal (2016) A GIS-based methodology for safe site selection of a building in a hilly regionOriginal Research Article Frontiers of Architectural Research, Volume 5, Issue 1, March 2016, Pages 39-51
10- Ye Duan, Hailin Mu, Nan Li, Linlin Li, Zhaoquan Xue (2016). “Research on Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Carbon Economy Development Level Based on AHP-Entropy Method: A Case Study of Dalian “Original Research Article Energy Procedia, Volume 104, December 2016, Pages 468-474
11- Lawson, C. T., Chen, C., & Gong, H. (2010). Advanced Applications of Person-based GPS in an Urban Environment.1003-1017
12- Jiuping Xu, Xiaoling Song, Yimin Wu, Ziqiang Zeng (2015), GIS-modelling based coal-fired power plant site identification and selectionOriginal Research Article Applied Energy, Volume 159, 1 December 2015, Pages 520-539
13- Ljubomir Gigović, Dragan Pamučar, Darko Lukić, Slobodanka Marković (2016) GIS-Fuzzy DEMATEL MCDA model for the evaluation of the sites for ecotourism development: A case study of “Dunavski ključ” region, SerbiaOriginal Research Article Land Use Policy, Volume 58, 15 December 2016, Pages 348-365
14- Annet Kempenaar, Judith Westerink, Marjo van Lierop, Marlies Brinkhuijsen, Adri van den Brink (2016). “Design makes you understand”—Mapping the contributions of designing to regional planning and development” Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 149, May 2016, Pages 20-30
15-Wei Gu*, Jian Guo, Ke Fan, Edwin H.W. Chan (2016). “Dynamic Land Use Change and Sustainable Urban Development in a Third-tier City within Yangtze Delta” Procedia Environmental Sciences 36 ( 2016 ) 98 – 105. www.sciencedirect.com
16- Mulliner E, Smallbone K, Maliene V (2013). "An assessment of sustainable housing affordability using a multiple criteria decision making method". Omega. 41 (2): 270–79.
17- Fosgerau, M., Frejinger, E., & Karlstrom, A. (2013). A link based network route choice model with unrestricted choice set. Transportation Research Part B:Methodological, 56, 70–80. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.07.012
18- Aly MH, Giardino JR, Klein AG. 2005. Suitability assessment for New Minia City, Egypt: a GIS approach to engineering geology. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 11(3): 259-269.
19- Bojorquez-Tapia LA, Diaz-Mondragon S, Ezcurra E. 2001. GIS-based approach for participatory decision making and land suitability assessment. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(2): 129-151.
20- Ishizaka and Labib A. 2009. Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and Limitations, ORInsight, 22(4): 201-220.
21- Janardhana Raju NT, Reddy VK and Munirathnam P. 2006. Subsurface dams to harvest rainwater- a case study of the Swarnamukhi River basin. Southern India. Hydrology Journal, 14:
22- Malczewski J. 2006. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 20(7): 703-726.
23- Oswald M. 2004. Implementation of the analytical hierarchy process with VBA in ArcGIS. Computers and Geosciences, 30: 637-646.
24- Saaty TL. 1980. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York. 350 pp.
25- Saaty TL. 2000. Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory. 2nd ed. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications, p.11.
26- Saaty TL. 2002. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145: 85-91.
27- Svoray T, Bar P, Bannet T. 2005. Urban land-use allocation in a Mediterranean ecotone: Habitat Heterogeneity Model incorporated in a GIS using a multi-criteria mechanism. Landscape and Urban Planning, 72(4): 337-351.
28- Ying X, Zeng GM, Chen GQ, Tang L,Wang KL, Huang DY. 2007. Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of ecoenvironment quality-A case study of Hunan Province, China. Ecol Model, 209 (2-4): 97-109.
_||_